Looking the other way: Selective exposure to attitude-consistent and counterattitudinal political information

Communication Research

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 426-448

  Knobloch Westerwick, Silvia ^a   Meng, Jingbo ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Accessibility; Attitude strength; Attitudes; Cognitive dissonance; Selective exposure

Indexed keywords

EID: 65449147552     PISSN: 00936502     EISSN: 15523810     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093650209333030     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Albarracn, D., & Mitchell, A.L. (2004). The role of defensive confidence in preference for proattitudinal information: How believing that one is strong can sometimes be a defensive weakness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1565-1584. (Pubitemid 39604620)
2. American National Election Studies. (n.d.). Questions asked in ANES surveys. Retrieved February 23, 2009, from www.electionstudies.org/resources/ questions/questions.htm
3. Atkin, C.K. (1971). How imbalanced campaign coverage affects audience exposure patterns. Journalism Quarterly, 48, 235-244.
4. Bagby, R.M., Parker, J.D.A., & Bury, A.S. (1990). A comparative citation analysis of attribution theory and the theory of cognitive dissonance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 274-283.
5. Barlett, D.L., Drew, P.B., Fahle, E.G., & Watts, W.A. (1974). Selective exposure to a presidential campaign appeal. Public Opinion Quarterly, 28, 264-270.
6. Bennett, W.L. (2001). News: The politics of illusion (4 th ed.). New York: Longman.
7. Bizer, G.Y., & Krosnick, J.A. (2001). Exploring the structure of strength-related attitude features: The relation between attitude importance and attitude accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 566-586. (Pubitemid 33597802)
8. Brannon, L.A., Tagler, M.J., & Eagly, A.E. (2007). The moderating role of attitude strength on selective exposure to information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 611-617.
9. Chaffee, S., Nichols, S., Graf, J., Sandvig, C., & Hahn, K.S. (2001). Attention to counter-attitudinal messages in a state election campaign. Political Communication, 18, 247-272. (Pubitemid 33333685)
10. Cotton, J.L. (1985). Cognitive dissonance in selective exposure. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Selective exposure to communication (pp. 11-33). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. D'Alessio, D., & Allen, M. (2007). Meta-analysis of television's impact on special populations. In R. W. Preiss (Ed.), Mass media effects research: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 119-136). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Donsbach, W. (1989). Selektive Zuwendung zu Medieninhalten. Einflussfaktoren auf die Auswahlentscheidungen der Rezipienten [Selective exposure to media messages: Impacts on media users' choices]. In M. Kaase & W. Schulz (Eds.), Massenkommunikation: Theorien, Methoden, Befunde (Special Issue 30, pp. 237-252). Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
13. Donsbach, W. (1991). Medienwirkung trotz Selektion: Einflussfaktoren auf die Zuwendung zu Zeitungsinhalten [Media effects despite selectivity: Impacts on selective exposure to newspaper content]. Cologne, Germany: Bahlau.
14. Fabrigar, L.R., Priester, J.R., Petty, R.E., & Wegener, D.T. (1998). The impact of attitude accessibility on elaboration of persuasive messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 339-352. (Pubitemid 128054829)
15. Fazio, R.H. (1989). On the power and functionality of attitudes: The role of attitude accessibility. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 153-179). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Fazio, R.H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior-The mode model as an integrative framework. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 75-109.
17. Fazio, R.H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.)., Attitude strength-Antecedents and consequences: The fourth Ohio State University volume on attitudes and persuasion (pp. 247-282). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
19. Freedman, J.L., & Sears, D.W. (1965). Effects of expected familiarity with arguments upon opinion change and selective exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 420-426.
20. Garrett, R.K. (2006, November). Avoiding political difference: Characteristics associated with reduced exposure to opinion-contrary information. Paper presented at the National Communication Association conference, San Antonio, TX.
21. Holbrook, A.L., Berent, M.K., Krosnick, J.A., Visser, P.S., & Boninger, D. (2005). Attitude importance and the accumulation of attitude-relevant knowledge in memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 749-769. (Pubitemid 40735500)
22. Irle, M., & Mantmann, V. (1978). Die Theorie der kognitiven Dissonanz. Ein Resmee ihrer theoretischen Entwicklung und empirischen Ergebnisse 1957-1976 [The theory of cognitive dissonance: A summary of its theoretical development and empirical findings 1957-1976]. In M. Irle & V. Mantmann (Eds.), L. Festinger: Theorie der kognitiven Dissonanz (pp. 247-363). Bern, Switzerland: Hans Huber.
23. Iyengar, S., Hahn, K.S., Krosnick, J.A., & Walker, J. (2008). Selective exposure to campaign communication: The role of anticipated agreement and issue public membership. Journal of Politics, 70 (1). 186-200.
24. Jonas, E., Graupmann, V., Fischer, P., Greitemeyer, T., & Frey, D. (2003). Schwarze Kassen, weie Westen? Konfirmatorische Informationssuche und -bewertung im Kontext der ParteispendenaffCurrency signre der CDU [Money laundering and clean slates? Confirmatory information seeking and evaluation in the context of the campaign financing scandal of the CDU]. Zeitschrift fr Sozialpsychologie, 34, 47-61.
25. Jost, J.T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A.W., & Sulloway, F.J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129 (3). 339-375. (Pubitemid 37206643)
26. Klapper, J.T. (1960). The effects of mass communication. New York: Free Press.
27. Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2008). Informational utility. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), International encyclopedia of communication (pp. 2273-2276). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
28. Krosnick, J.A., & Abelson, R.P. (1992). The case for measuring attitude strength in surveys. In J. Tanur (Ed.), Questions about survey questions (pp. 177-203). New York: Russell Sage.
29. tLazarsfeld, P.F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people's choice. How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York: William Morrow.
30. Mutz, D.C. (2002). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46 (4). 838-855.
31. Mutz, D.C., & Martin, P.S. (2001). Facilitating communication across lines of political difference: The role of mass media. American Political Science Review, 95, 97-114. (Pubitemid 33251362)
32. Oliver, M.B., & Fonash, D. (2002). Race and crime in the news. Whites' identification and misidentification of violent and nonviolent criminal suspects. Media Psychology, 4, 137-156. (Pubitemid 36630294)
33. Patterson, T.E. (2002). The vanishing voter. Public involvement in an age of uncertainty. New York: Vintage.
34. Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35. Rhine, R.J. (1967). The 1964 presidential election and curves of information seeking and avoiding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 416-423.
36. Sears, D.O., & Freedman, J.L. (1967). Selective exposure to information: A critical review. Public Opinion Quarterly, 31, 194-213.
37. Stroud, N.J. (2008). Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior 30 (3). 341-366.
38. Sunstein, C.R. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39. Sweeney, P.D., & Gruber, K.L. (1984). Selective exposure: Voter information preferences and the Watergate affair. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1208-1221.
40. Zillmann, D. (1985). The experimental exploration of gratifications from media entertainment. In K. E. Rosengren, L. A. Wenner, & P. Palmgren (Eds.), Media gratification research: Current perspectives (pp. 225-239). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
41. Zillmann, D. (1988). Mood management through communication choices. American Behavioral Scientist, 31, 327-340.
42. Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (Eds.). (1985). Selective exposure to communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.