The World Wide Web and the U.S. political news market

American Journal of Political Science

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 428-439

  Nie, Norman H ^a   Miller, Darwin W ^b   Golde, Saar ^a   Butler, Daniel M ^c   Winneg, Kenneth ^d  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954292471     PISSN: 00925853     EISSN: 15405907     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00439.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Baum Matthew A. Soft News Goes to War: Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy in the New Media Age 2003, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press
2. Bimber Bruce. The Internet and Political Fragmentation. 2005, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
3. Bimber Bruce, Davis Richard. Campaigning Online: The Internet in U.S. Elections 2003, New York, Oxford University Press
4. Chaffee Steven H, Saphir Melissa N, Graf Joseph, Sandvig Christian, Hahn Kyu S. Attention to Counter-attitudinal Messages in a State Election Campaign. Political Communication 2001, 18(3):247-72.
5. D'Alessio Dave, Allen Mike. Selective Exposure and Dissonance after Decisions. Psychological Reports 2002, 91(2):527-32.
6. Davis Richard, Owen Diana. New Media and American Politics 1998, New York, Oxford University Press
7. DellaVigna Stefano, Kaplan Ethan. The Fox Effect: Media Bias and Voting. Quarterly Journal of Economics 2007, 122(3):1187-1234.
8. Dimmick John, Chen Yan, Zhan Li. Competition between the Internet and Traditional News Media: The Gratification-opportunities Niche Dimension. Journal of Media Economics 2004, 17(1):19-33.
9. Eaton B Curtis, Lipsey Richard G. Product Differentiation. Handbook of Industrial Organization, ed. Richard Schmalensee and Robert Willig 1989, 723-70. In, Amsterdam, North-Holland
10. Festinger Leon. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance 1957, Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press
11. Gentzkow Matthew, Shapiro Jesse M. Media Bias and Reputation. Journal of Political Economy 2006, 114(2):280-316.
12. Groseclose Tim, Milyo Jeffrey. A Measure of Media Bias. Quarterly Journal of Economics 2005, 120(4):1191-1237.
13. Hamilton James T. All the News That's Fit to Sell: How the Market Transforms Information into News 2004, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press
14. Hotelling Harold. Stability in Competition. Economic Journal 1929, 39(1):41-57.
15. Iyengar Shanto. Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Polarization in Media Use. 2007, San Francisco
16. Jones David A. The Polarizing Effect of New Media Messages. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 2001, 14(2):158-74.
17. Mardenfeld Sandra, Christie Erin, Taylor Art, Kirkyla Andrius, Anderson Dwight. Choosing Media Based on Political Stance. 2006
18. Morris Jonathan S. The Fox News Factor. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 2005, 10(3):56-79.
19. Morris Jonathan S. Slanted Objectivity? Perceived Media Bias, Cable News Exposure, and Political Attitudes. Social Science Quarterly 2007, 88(3):707-28.
20. News Audiences Increasingly Politicized Online News Audience Larger, More Diverse. 2004, http://www.pewinternet.org, Pew Research Center, Research report, Retrieved December 5, 2007, from
21. Internet's Broader Role in Campaign 2008. 2008, http://www.pewinternet.org, Pew Research Center, Research report, Retrieved January 17, 2009, from
22. Posner Richard A. Bad News. 2005, 1. 2005, July 31, Section 7, p.
23. Prior Markus. Post-broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections 2007, New York, Cambridge University Press
24. Stroud Natalie J. Media Effects, Selective Exposure, and Fahrenheit 9/11. Political Communication 2007, 24(4):415-32.
25. Stroud Natalie J. Media Use and Political Predispositions: Revisiting the Concept of Selective Exposure. Political Behavior 2008, 30(3):341-66.
26. Sunstein Cass R. Republic.com 2001, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press
27. Taber Charles S, Lodge Milton. Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs. American Journal of Political Science 2006, 50(3):755-69.
28. http://www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/ipoll.html, Retrieved August 5, 2008 from the iPOLL Databank, The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut
29. Tewksbury David. Exposure to Newer Media in a Presidential Primary. Political Communication 2006, 23(3):313-32.