Nucleosomes Shape DNA Polymorphism and Divergence

PLoS Genetics

Volumn 10, Issue 7, 2014, Pages

  Langley, Sasha A ^a   Karpen, Gary H ^a,b   Langley, Charles H ^c  

^a LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DINUCLEOTIDE; DNA; HISTONE; CHROMATIN; NUCLEOSOME;

ALLELE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA HISTONE INTERACTION; DNA ISOLATION; DNA POLYMORPHISM; DNA SEQUENCE; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EMBRYO; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HETEROZYGOSITY; INTRON; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NATURAL SELECTION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOSOME; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; ANIMAL; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANIMALS; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; DNA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; INTRONS; NUCLEOSOMES; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84905474695     PISSN: 15537390     EISSN: 15537404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004457     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Lee W, Tillo D, Bray N, Morse RH, Davis RW, et al. (2007) A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast. Nat Genet 39: 1235-1244.
2. Pham CD, He X, Schnitzler GR, (2010) Divergent human remodeling complexes remove nucleosomes from strong positioning sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 400-413.
3. Moshkin YM, Chalkley GE, Kan TW, Reddy BA, Ozgur Z, et al. (2012) Remodelers organize cellular chromatin by counteracting intrinsic histone-DNA sequence preferences in a class-specific manner. Mol Cell Biol 32: 675-688.
4. Lowary PT, Widom J, (1998) New DNA sequence rules for high affinity binding to histone octamer and sequence-directed nucleosome positioning. J Mol Biol 276: 19-42.
5. Thastrom A, Lowary PT, Widlund HR, Cao H, Kubista M, et al. (1999) Sequence motifs and free energies of selected natural and non-natural nucleosome positioning DNA sequences. J Mol Biol 288: 213-229.
6. Kaplan N, Moore I, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Gossett AJ, Tillo D, et al. (2010) Nucleosome sequence preferences influence in vivo nucleosome organization. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17: 918-920 author reply 920-912.
7. Kaplan N, Moore IK, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Gossett AJ, Tillo D, et al. (2009) The DNA-encoded nucleosome organization of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 458: 362-366.
8. Radman-Livaja M, Rando OJ, (2010) Nucleosome positioning: how is it established, and why does it matter? Dev Biol 339: 258-266.
9. Widom J, (2001) Role of DNA sequence in nucleosome stability and dynamics. Q Rev Biophys 34: 269-324.
10. Segal E, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Chen L, Thastrom A, Field Y, et al. (2006) A genomic code for nucleosome positioning. Nature 442: 772-778.
11. Mavrich TN, Jiang C, Ioshikhes IP, Li X, Venters BJ, et al. (2008) Nucleosome organization in the Drosophila genome. Nature 453: 358-362.
12. Ioshikhes IP, Albert I, Zanton SJ, Pugh BF, (2006) Nucleosome positions predicted through comparative genomics. Nat Genet 38: 1210-1215.
13. Gaffney DJ, McVicker G, Pai AA, Fondufe-Mittendorf YN, Lewellen N, et al. (2012) Controls of nucleosome positioning in the human genome. PLoS Genet 8: e1003036.
14. Satchwell SC, Drew HR, Travers AA, (1986) Sequence periodicities in chicken nucleosome core DNA. J Mol Biol 191: 659-675.
15. Anselmi C, Bocchinfuso G, De Santis P, Savino M, Scipioni A, (1999) Dual role of DNA intrinsic curvature and flexibility in determining nucleosome stability. J Mol Biol 286: 1293-1301.
16. Drew HR, Travers AA, (1985) DNA bending and its relation to nucleosome positioning. J Mol Biol 186: 773-790.
17. Shrader TE, Crothers DM, (1989) Artificial nucleosome positioning sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86: 7418-7422.
18. Rohs R, West SM, Sosinsky A, Liu P, Mann RS, et al. (2009) The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature 461: 1248-1253.
19. West SM, Rohs R, Mann RS, Honig B, (2010) Electrostatic interactions between arginines and the minor groove in the nucleosome. J Biomol Struct Dyn 27: 861-866.
20. Jiang C, Pugh BF, (2009) Nucleosome positioning and gene regulation: advances through genomics. Nat Rev Genet 10: 161-172.
21. Zhang Y, Moqtaderi Z, Rattner BP, Euskirchen G, Snyder M, et al. (2009) Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions are not the major determinant of nucleosome positions in vivo. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16: 847-852.
22. Valouev A, Johnson SM, Boyd SD, Smith CL, Fire AZ, et al. (2011) Determinants of nucleosome organization in primary human cells. Nature 474: 516-520.
23. Brogaard K, Xi L, Wang JP, Widom J, (2012) A map of nucleosome positions in yeast at base-pair resolution. Nature 486: 496-501.
24. Zhang Z, Wippo CJ, Wal M, Ward E, Korber P, et al. (2011) A packing mechanism for nucleosome organization reconstituted across a eukaryotic genome. Science 332: 977-980.
25. Field Y, Kaplan N, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Moore IK, Sharon E, et al. (2008) Distinct modes of regulation by chromatin encoded through nucleosome positioning signals. PLoS Comput Biol 4: e1000216.
26. Tillo D, Hughes TR, (2009) G+C content dominates intrinsic nucleosome occupancy. BMC Bioinformatics 10: 442.
27. Sekinger EA, Moqtaderi Z, Struhl K, (2005) Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions and low nucleosome density are important for preferential accessibility of promoter regions in yeast. Mol Cell 18: 735-748.
28. Albert I, Mavrich TN, Tomsho LP, Qi J, Zanton SJ, et al. (2007) Translational and rotational settings of H2A.Z nucleosomes across the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 446: 572-576.
29. Cui F, Cole HA, Clark DJ, Zhurkin VB, (2012) Transcriptional activation of yeast genes disrupts intragenic nucleosome phasing. Nucleic Acids Res 40: 10753-10764.
30. Bowman GD, (2010) Mechanisms of ATP-dependent nucleosome sliding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 20: 73-81.
31. Wright S, (1931) Evolution in Mendelian Populations. Genetics 16: 97-159.
32. Bulmer M, (1991) The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage. Genetics 129: 897-907.
33. Hartl DL, Moriyama EN, Sawyer SA, (1994) Selection intensity for codon bias. Genetics 138: 227-234.
34. Akashi H, (1994) Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy. Genetics 136: 927-935.
35. Akashi H, (1996) Molecular evolution between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: reduced codon bias, faster rates of amino acid substitution, and larger proteins in D. melanogaster. Genetics 144: 1297-1307.
36. Sasaki S, Mello CC, Shimada A, Nakatani Y, Hashimoto S-I, et al. (2009) Chromatin-associated periodicity in genetic variation downstream of transcriptional start sites. Science (New York, NY) 323: 401-404.
37. Tolstorukov MY, Volfovsky N, Stephens RM, Park PJ, (2011) Impact of chromatin structure on sequence variability in the human genome. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 18: 510-515.
38. Prendergast J, Semple C, (2011) Widespread signatures of recent selection linked to nucleosome positioning in the human lineage. Genome Research 21: 1777-1877.
39. Washietl S, Machne R, Goldman N, (2008) Evolutionary footprints of nucleosome positions in yeast. Trends Genet 24: 583-587.
40. Babbitt GA, Cotter CR, (2011) Functional conservation of nucleosome formation selectively biases presumably neutral molecular variation in yeast genomes. Genome Biol Evol 3: 15-22.
41. Babbitt GA, Kim Y, (2008) Inferring Natural Selection on Fine-Scale Chromatin Organization in Yeast. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25: 1714-1727.
42. Babbitt GA, Tolstorukov MY, Kim Y, (2010) The molecular evolution of nucleosome positioning through sequence-dependent deformation of the DNA polymer. J Biomol Struct Dyn 27: 765-780.
43. Warnecke T, Batada NN, Hurst LD, (2008) The impact of the nucleosome code on protein-coding sequence evolution in yeast. PLoS Genet 4: e1000250.
44. Chen X, Chen Z, Chen H, Su Z, Yang J, et al. (2012) Nucleosomes suppress spontaneous mutations base-specifically in eukaryotes. Science 335: 1235-1238.
45. Javaid S, Manohar M, Punja N, Mooney A, Ottesen JJ, et al. (2009) Nucleosome remodeling by hMSH2-hMSH6. Mol Cell 36: 1086-1094.
46. Li F, Tian L, Gu L, Li GM, (2009) Evidence that nucleosomes inhibit mismatch repair in eukaryotic cells. J Biol Chem 284: 33056-33061.
47. Hinz JM, Rodriguez Y, Smerdon MJ, (2010) Rotational dynamics of DNA on the nucleosome surface markedly impact accessibility to a DNA repair enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 4646-4651.
48. Rodriguez Y, Smerdon MJ, (2013) The structural location of DNA lesions in nucleosome core particles determines accessibility by base excision repair enzymes. J Biol Chem 288: 13863-13875.
49. Wang J, Zhuang J, Iyer S, Lin X, Whitfield TW, et al. (2012) Sequence features and chromatin structure around the genomic regions bound by 119 human transcription factors. Genome Res 22: 1798-1812.
50. Peckham HE, Thurman RE, Fu Y, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Noble WS, et al. (2007) Nucleosome positioning signals in genomic DNA. Genome Res 17: 1170-1177.
51. Allan J, Fraser RM, Owen-Hughes T, Keszenman-Pereyra D, (2012) Micrococcal nuclease does not substantially bias nucleosome mapping. J Mol Biol 417: 152-164.
52. Poh YP, Ting CT, Fu HW, Langley CH, Begun DJ, (2012) Population Genomic Analysis of Base Composition Evolution in Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Biol Evol 4: 1245-1255.
53. Moriyama EN, Powell JR, (1996) Intraspecific nuclear DNA variation in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol 13: 261-277.
54. Keightley PD, Trivedi U, Thomson M, Oliver F, Kumar S, et al. (2009) Analysis of the genome sequences of three Drosophila melanogaster spontaneous mutation accumulation lines. Genome Res 19: 1195-1201.
55. Davey CA, Sargent DF, Luger K, Maeder AW, Richmond TJ, (2002) Solvent Mediated Interactions in the Structure of the Nucleosome Core Particle at 1.9 a Resolution. Journal of Molecular Biology 319: 1097-1113.
56. Chua EY, Vasudevan D, Davey GE, Wu B, Davey CA, (2012) The mechanics behind DNA sequence-dependent properties of the nucleosome. Nucleic Acids Res 40: 6338-6352.
57. Ikemura T, (1982) Correlation between the abundance of yeast transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in protein genes. Differences in synonymous codon choice patterns of yeast and Escherichia coli with reference to the abundance of isoaccepting transfer RNAs. J Mol Biol 158: 573-597.
58. Duret L, (2002) Evolution of synonymous codon usage in metazoans. Curr Opin Genet Dev 12: 640-649.
59. Tajima F, (1989) Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123: 585-595.
60. Waterson GA, (1974) The Sampling Theory of Selectively Neutral Alleles. Advances in Applied Probability 6: 463-488.
61. McVean GAT, Charlesworth B, (1999) A Population Genetic Model for the Evolution of Synonymous Codon Usage: Patterns and Predictions. Genetics Research 74: 145-158.
62. Sawyer SA, Hartl DL, (1992) Population genetics of polymorphism and divergence. Genetics 132: 1161-1176.
63. Wright S, (1938) The Distribution of Gene Frequencies Under Irreversible Mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 24: 253-259.
64. Wall JD, Przeworski M, (2000) When did the human population size start increasing? Genetics 155: 1865-1874.
65. Langley CH, Stevens K, Cardeno C, Lee YC, Schrider DR, et al. (2012) Genomic Variation in Natural Populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 192: 533-598.
66. Hernandez RD, Williamson SH, Bustamante CD, (2007) Context dependence, ancestral misidentification, and spurious signatures of natural selection. Mol Biol Evol 24: 1792-1800.
67. Halligan DL, Keightley PD, (2006) Ubiquitous selective constraints in the Drosophila genome revealed by a genome-wide interspecies comparison. Genome Res 16: 875-884.
68. Casillas S, Barbadilla A, Bergman CM, (2007) Purifying selection maintains highly conserved noncoding sequences in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol 24: 2222-2234.
69. Charlesworth B, (2012) The effects of deleterious mutations on evolution at linked sites. Genetics 190: 5-22.
70. Braverman JM, Hudson RR, Kaplan NL, Langley CH, Stephan W, (1995) The hitchhiking effect on the site frequency spectrum of DNA polymorphisms. Genetics 140: 783-796.
71. Pool JE, Corbett-Detig RB, Sugino RP, Stevens KA, Cardeno CM, et al. (2012) Population Genomics of Sub-Saharan Drosophila melanogaster: African Diversity and Non-African Admixture. PLoS Genet 8: e1003080.
72. Begun DJ, Whitley P, (2002) Molecular population genetics of Xdh and the evolution of base composition in Drosophila. Genetics 162: 1725-1735.
73. Schopf B, Bregenhorn S, Quivy JP, Kadyrov FA, Almouzni G, et al. (2012) Interplay between mismatch repair and chromatin assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 1895-1900.
74. Gaillard H, Fitzgerald DJ, Smith CL, Peterson CL, Richmond TJ, et al. (2003) Chromatin remodeling activities act on UV-damaged nucleosomes and modulate DNA damage accessibility to photolyase. J Biol Chem 278: 17655-17663.
75. Jagannathan I, Pepenella S, Hayes JJ, (2011) Activity of FEN1 endonuclease on nucleosome substrates is dependent upon DNA sequence but not flap orientation. J Biol Chem 286: 17521-17529.
76. Ye Y, Stahley MR, Xu J, Friedman JI, Sun Y, et al. (2012) Enzymatic excision of uracil residues in nucleosomes depends on the local DNA structure and dynamics. Biochemistry 51: 6028-6038.
77. Lyko F, Ramsahoye BH, Jaenisch R, (2000) DNA methylation in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 408: 538-540.
78. Hwang DG, Green P, (2004) Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sequence analysis reveals varying neutral substitution patterns in mammalian evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 13994-14001.
79. Nagylaki T, (1983) Evolution of a large population under gene conversion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 80: 5941-5945.
80. Birdsell JA, (2002) Integrating genomics, bioinformatics, and classical genetics to study the effects of recombination on genome evolution. Mol Biol Evol 19: 1181-1197.
81. Galtier N, Bazin E, Bierne N, (2006) GC-biased segregation of noncoding polymorphisms in Drosophila. Genetics 172: 221-228.
82. Li Q, Wrange O, (1995) Accessibility of a glucocorticoid response element in a nucleosome depends on its rotational positioning. Mol Cell Biol 15: 4375-4384.
83. Tilgner H, Nikolaou C, Althammer S, Sammeth M, Beato M, et al. (2009) Nucleosome positioning as a determinant of exon recognition. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16: 996-1001.
84. Kwak H, Fuda NJ, Core LJ, Lis JT, (2013) Precise maps of RNA polymerase reveal how promoters direct initiation and pausing. Science 339: 950-953.
85. Li XY, MacArthur S, Bourgon R, Nix D, Pollard DA, et al. (2008) Transcription factors bind thousands of active and inactive regions in the Drosophila blastoderm. PLoS Biol 6: e27.
86. Celniker SE, Wheeler DA, Kronmiller B, Carlson JW, Halpern A, et al. (2002) Finishing a whole-genome shotgun: release 3 of the Drosophila melanogaster euchromatic genome sequence. Genome Biol 3: RESEARCH0079.
87. Riddle NC, Minoda A, Kharchenko PV, Alekseyenko AA, Schwartz YB, et al. (2011) Plasticity in patterns of histone modifications and chromosomal proteins in Drosophila heterochromatin. Genome Research 21: 147-163.
88. R Development Core Team (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
89. Schrödinger L The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.5.0.4.