Designing libraries for research collaboration in the network world: An exploratory study

LIBER Quarterly

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 17-48

  Corrall, Sheila ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Management structures; Organization design; Research support; University libraries

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905461713     PISSN: 14355205     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.18352/lq.9525     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Adema, J., & Schmidt, B. (2010). From service providers to content producers: New opportunities for libraries in collaborative open access book publishing. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 16(sup. 1), 28-43. doi: 10.1080/13614533.2010.509542. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/1361 4533.2010.509542.
2. Aldrich, A.W. (2007). Following the phosphorous trail of research library mission statements into present and future harbors. ACRL 13th National Conference, March 29-April 1, 2007, Baltimore, MD (pp. 304-316). Chicago, IL: Association of College & Research Libraries. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/national/baltimore/ papers/304.pdf.
3. Andrade, R., & Zaghloul, R. (2010). Restructuring liaison librarian teams at the University of Arizona Libraries, 2007-2009. New Library World, 111(7/8), 273-286. doi: 10.1108/03074801011059911.
4. Auckland, M. (2012). Re-skilling for research: An investigation into the role and skills of subject and liaison librarians required to effectively support the evolving information needs of researchers. London: RLUK Research Libraries UK. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www.rluk.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/RLUK-Re-skilling.pdf.
5. Bourg, C., Coleman, R., & Erway, R. (2009). Support for the research process: An academic library manifesto. Dublin, OH: OCLC Research. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http:// www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/library/2009/2009-07.pdf.
6. Bradbury, K., & Weightman, A. (2010). Research support at Cardiff University Library. SCONUL Focus, 50, 65-70. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www. sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/19_2.pdf.
7. Brunner, M.L. (2010). PhD holders in the academic library: The CLIR Postdoctoral Fellowship Program. In K. Williams & S. Walter (Eds.), The expert library: Staffing, sustaining, and advancing the academic library in the 21st century (pp. 158-189). Chicago, IL: Association of College & Research Libraries. Retrieved June 23, 2014, from http:// escholarship.org/uc/item/05j228r4.
8. Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods. (2nd. ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Bryson, T., Posner, M., St. Pierre, A., & Varner, S. (2011). Digital humanities: SPEC Kit 326. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.
10. Bulpitt, G. (Ed.) (2012). Leading the student experience: Super-convergence of organisation, structure and business processes. London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www.lfhe.ac.uk/en/components/publication. cfm/S3%20-%2005.
11. Carlson, J., & Kneale, R. (2011). Embedded librarianship in the research context: Navigating new waters. College & Research Libraries News, 72(3), 167-170. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://crln.acrl.org/content/72/3/167.full.
12. Carroll, D.L. (2011a). Fostering a community of scholars at the University of Warwick: The Wolfson Research Exchange. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 17(1), 78-95. doi: 10.1080/13614533.2011.547820. Retrieved June 23, 2014, from http://wrap. warwick.ac.uk/4540.
13. Carroll, D. (2011b). What researchers want: A personal case study. SCONUL Focus, 51, 52-56. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/ documents/16_3.pdf.
14. Chan, D.L.H., & Soong, S.C. (2011). Strategic repositioning in a dynamic environment. Library Management, 32(1/2), 22-36. doi: 10.1108/01435121111102557.
15. Child, J. (1988). Organization: A guide to problems and practice (2nd ed.). London: Paul Chapman.
16. Corrall, S. (2007). Benchmarking strategic engagement with information literacy in higher education: Towards a working model. Information Research, 12(4), paper 328. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www.informationr.net/ir/12-4/paper328.html.
17. Corrall, S. (2008). Information literacy strategy development in higher education: An exploratory study. International Journal of Information Management, 28(1), 26-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2007.07.002.
18. Corrall, S., & Lester, R. (2013). The researcher's view: Context is critical. In L. Watson (Ed.), Better library and learning spaces: Projects, trends and ideas (pp. 183-192). London: Facet.
19. Corrall, S., Kennan, M.A., & Afzal, W. (2013). Bibliometrics and research data management services: Emerging trends in library support for research. Library Trends, 61(3), 636-674. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/18948/. doi: 10.1353/lib.2013.0005.
20. Cotta-Schønberg, M. (2007). The changing role of the subject specialist. Liber Quarterly, 17(3/4). Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://liber.library.uu.nl/index. php/lq/article/view/7890/8111.
21. Covert-Vail, L., & Collard, S. (2012). New roles for new times: Research library services for graduate students. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www.arl.org/storage/documents/publications/nrnt-gradroles-20dec12.pdf.
22. Cox, A., Verbaan, E., & Sen, B. (2012). Upskilling liaison librarians for research data management. Ariadne, 70. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/ issue70/cox-et-al.
23. Creamer, A.T., Morales, M.E., Kafel, D., Crespo, J., & Martin, E.R. (2012). A sample of research data curation and management courses. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 1(2), 88-96. doi: 10.7191/jeslib.2012.1016. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http:// escholarship.umassmed.edu/jeslib/vol1/iss2/4/.
24. Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
25. Crow, R., Ivins, O., Mower, A., Nesdill, D, Newton, M., Speer, J., & Watkinson, C. (2012). Library publishing services: Strategies for success. Washington, DC: SPARC. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://wp.sparc.arl.org/lps/.
26. Daniels, W., Darch, C., & de Jager, K. (2010). The research commons: a new creature in the library. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 11(2), 116-130. doi: 10.1108/14678041011064043.
27. Delserone, L.M., Kelly, J.A., & Kempf, J.L. (2010). Connecting researchers with funding opportunities: A joint effort of the Libraries and the University Research Office. Collaborative Librarianship, 2(1), 33-37. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http:// collaborativelibrarianship.org/index.php/jocl/article/view/59/39.
28. Drummond, R., & Wartho, R. (2009). RIMS: The Research Impact Measurement Service at the University of New South Wales. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 40(2), 76-87. doi: 10.1080/00048623.2009.10721387. Retrieved June 23, 2014, from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00048623.2009.10721387.
29. Duncan, R. (1979). What is the right organization structure? Decision tree analysis provides the answer. Organizational Dynamics, 7(3), 59-80.
30. Duranceau, E.F. (2008). The "Wealth of Networks" and institutional repositories: MIT, DSpace, and the future of the scholarly commons. Library Trends, 57(2), 244-261. doi: 10.1353/lib.0.0030. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/ handle/2142/10671.
31. EPSRC (2011). EPSRC policy framework on research data. Swindon: Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www. epsrc.ac.uk/about/standards/researchdata/Pages/policyframework.aspx.
32. Eustis, J.D., & Kenney, D.J. (1996). Library reorganization & restructuring: A SPEC kit. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.
33. Fearon, D., Gunia, B., Pralle, B.E., Lake, S., & Sallans, A.L. (2013). Research data management services: SPEC Kit 334. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.
34. Federer, L. (2013). The librarian as research informationist: A case study. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 101(4), 298-302. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.101.4.011. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/ PMC3794685/.
35. Field, C.D. (2001). Theory and practice: Reflections on convergence in United Kingdom universities. LIBER Quarterly, 11(3), 267-289. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://liber.library.uu.nl/index.php/lq/article/view/7646/7682.
36. Franklin, B. (2009). Aligning library strategy and structure with the campus academic plan: A case study. Journal of Library Administration, 49(5), 495-505. doi: 10.1080/01930820903090862.
37. Fonseca, A.J., & Viator, V.P. (2009). Escaping the island of lost faculty: Collaboration as a means of visibility. Collaborative Librarianship, 1(3), 81-90. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://collaborativelibrarianship.org/index.php/jocl/article/ view/23/14.
38. Furlough, M.J. (2010). The publisher in the library. In S. Walter & K. Williams (Eds.). The expert library: Staffing, sustaining, and advancing the academic library in the 21st century (pp. 190-233). Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries. Retrieved June 23, 2014, from http://www.personal.psu.edu/mjf25/blogs/on_ furlough/2010/11/18/Furlough-Publisher_in_Library-ExpertLibrary_Chapter08-preprint.pdf.
39. García-Milian, R., Norton, H.F., Auten, B., Davis, V.I., Holmes, K.L., Johnson, M., & Tennant, M.R. (2013). Librarians as part of cross-disciplinary, multi-institutional team projects: Experiences from the VIVO collaboration. Science & Technology Libraries, 32(2), 160-175. doi: 10.1080/0194262X.2013.791183. Retrieved June 23, 2014, from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3700548/.
40. Giesecke, J. (2010). Finding the right metaphor: Restructuring, realigning, and repackaging today's research libraries. Journal of Library Administration, 51(1), 54-65. doi: 10.1080/01930826.2011.531641. Retrieved June 23, 2014, from http:// digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1264&context=libraryscience.
41. Gold, A. (2007). Cyberinfrastructure, data, and libraries, Part 2. Libraries and the data challenge: Roles and actions for libraries. D-Lib Magazine, 13(9/10). Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september07/gold/09gold-pt2.html.
42. Greyson, D., & Surette, S. (2013). "You're just one of the group when you're embedded": report from a mixed-method investigation of the research-embedded health librarian experience. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 101(4), 287-297. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.101.4.010. Retrieved April 30. 2014, from http://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3794684/.
43. Hanson, T. (Ed.) (2005). Managing academic support services in university: The convergence experience. London: Facet.
44. Harris-Pierce, R.L., & Liu, Y.Q. (2012). Is data curation education at library and information science schools in North America adequate? New Library World, 113(11/12), 598-613. doi: 10.1108/03074801211282957. Retrieved June 23, 2014, from http://50.17.193.184/omeka/files/original/27c3005ce52904ea1375f42f6671e5a4.pdf.
45. Healy, A.M. (2010). Increasing the visibility of the library within the academic research enterprise. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 63. doi: 10.5062/ F43N21B7. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www.istl.org/10-fall/refereed1. html.
46. Herther, N.K. (2009). Research evaluation and citation analysis: key issues and implications. The Electronic Library, 27(3), 361-375. doi: 10.1108/02640470910966835.
47. Housewright, R., Schonfeld, R.C., & Wulfson, K. (2013a). Ithaka S+R US faculty survey 2012. New York: Ithaka S+R. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www.sr.ithaka. org/research-publications/us-faculty-survey-2012.
48. Housewright, R., Schonfeld, R.C., & Wulfson, K. (2013b). Ithaka S+R/JISC/RLUK US survey of academics 2012. New York: Ithaka S+R. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http:// sr.ithaka.org/research-publications/ithaka-sr-jisc-rluk-uk-survey-academics-2012.
49. Jahnke, L.M., & Asher, A. (2012). The problem of data: Data management and curation practices among university researchers. In L. Jahnke, A. Asher & S.D.C. Keralis, The problem of data (pp. 3-31). Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www.clir.org/pubs/ reports/pub154.
50. Jaguszewski, J.M., & Williams, K. (2013). New roles for new times: Transforming liaison roles in research libraries. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www.arl.org/storage/documents/publications/NRNTLiaison-Roles-final.pdf.
51. Larsen, S. & Riis, C. (2012). Aarhus University Library: Restructuring a university's library organisation. Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis, 36(2), 235-240. doi: 10.1515/ bfp-2012-0030. Retrieved June 23, 2014, from http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/ bfup.2012.36.issue-2/bfp-2012-0030/bfp-2012-0030.pdf.
52. Lee, C.A., & Tibbo, H. (2011). Where's the archivist in digital curation: Exploring the possibilities through a matrix of knowledge and skills. Archivaria, 72, 123-168. Retrieved June 23, 2014, from http://www.ils.unc.edu/callee/p123-lee.pdf.
53. Long, M.P., & Schonfeld, R.C. (2014). Ithaka S+R Library Survey 2013. New York: Ithaka. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://sr.ithaka.org/sites/default/files/ reports/SR_LibraryReport_20140310_0.pdf.
54. Lynch, C. (2008). The institutional challenges of cyberinfrastructure and e-research. EDUCAUSE Review, 43(6), 74-88. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from https://net. educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0867.pdf.
55. Lyon, L. (2012). The informatics transform: Re-engineering libraries for the data decade. International Journal of Digital Curation, 7(1), 126-138. doi: 10.2218/ijdc. v7i1.220. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www.ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/ article/view/210/279.
56. MacColl, J., & Jubb, M. (2011). Supporting research: Environments, administration and libraries. Dublin, OH: OCLC Research. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www. oclc.org/resources/research/publications/library/2011/2011-10.pdf.
57. Manchester University Library (2012). News from member libraries. SCONUL Focus, 56, 61-62. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www.sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/ files/documents/20_6.pdf.
58. McBain, I., Culshaw, H., & Walkley Hall, L. (2013). Establishing a culture of research practice in an academic library: an Australian case study. Library Management, 34(6/7), 448-461. doi: 10.1108/LM-08-2012-0053.
59. McGuigan, G.S. (2012). Addressing change in academic libraries: A review of classical organizational theory and implications for academic libraries. Library Philosophy and Practice, Paper 755. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ libphilprac/755/.
60. McNicol, S. (2005). The challenges of strategic planning in academic libraries. New Library World, 106(11/12), 496-509. doi: 10.1108/03074800510634982.
61. Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (2nd. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
62. Miles, R.E., Snow, C.C., Fjeldstad, O.D., Miles, G., & Lettl, C. (2010). Designing organizations to meet 21st-century opportunities and challenges. Organizational Dynamics, 39(2), 93-103. doi: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2010.01.009.
63. Nadin, S. & Cassell, C. (2004). Using data matrices. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research. (pp. 271-287). London: SAGE. Retrieved June 23, 2014, from http://smpncilebak2011.files.wordpress. com/2011/11/essential-guide-to-qualitative-in-organizational-research.pdf.
64. Nesdill, D., Love, A., & Hunt, M. (2010). From subject selectors to college and interdisciplinary teams. Science & Technology Libraries, 29(4), 307-314. doi: 10.1080/0194262X.2010.523308.
65. Nowviskie, B. (2013). Skunks in the library: A path to production for scholarly R&D. Journal of Library Administration, 53(1), 53-66. doi: 10.1080/01930826.2013.756698. Retrieved June 23, 2014, from http://libra.virginia.edu/catalog/libra-oa:2745.
66. Nutefall, J.E., & Chadwell, F.A. (2012). Preparing for the 21st century: Academic library realignment. New Library World, 113(3/4), 162-173. doi: 10.1108/03074801211218543. Retrieved June 23, 2014, from https:// ir.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1957/28798/NutefallJenniferOSULibrariesPreparing21stCentury.pdf?sequence=1.
67. Ohio State University Libraries (2012). Overview of research commons in academic libraries: A white paper. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Libraries. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://library.osu.edu/staff/administration-reports/ ResearchandEducation/ResearchCommonsVision.pdf.
68. Pacios, A.R. (2004). Strategic plans and long-range plans: Is there a difference? Library Management, 25(6/7), 259-269. doi: 10.1108/01435120410547913. Retrieved June 23, 2014, from http://e-archivo.uc3m.es/bitstream/handle/10016/4610/ strategic_pacios_LM_2004_ps.pdf?sequence=1.
69. Posner, M. (2013). No half measures: Overcoming common challenges to doing digital humanities in the library. Journal of Library Administration, 53(1), 43-52. doi: 10.1080/01930826.2013.756694. Retrieved June 23, 2014, from http://miriamposner. com/PosnerJLA.pdf.
70. Pugh, L. (1997a). Convergence in academic support services. London: British Library Research and Innovation Centre.
71. Pugh, L. (1997b). Some theoretical bases of convergence. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 3(1), 49-66. doi: 10.1080/13614539709516753.
72. Pugh, L. (2005). The management of hybrid libraries. Library and Information Research, 29(92), 13-31. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www.lirgjournal.org.uk/lir/ojs/ index.php/lir/article/view/194/239.
73. Pugh, L. (2007). Change management in information services (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Ashgate.
74. Quinlan, C., & McHarg, H. (2012). The emerging library: Structure, culture, and lessons learned from the dissolution of a combined libraries-IT organization. Journal of Library Administration, 52(2), 147-161. doi: 10.1080/01930826.2012.656483.
75. Radom, R., Feltner-Reichert, M., & Stringer-Stanback, K. (2012). Organization of scholarly communication services: SPEC Kit 332. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.
76. RCUK (2013). RCUK policy on open access and supporting guidance. Swindon: Research Councils UK. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/RCUK-prod/ assets/documents/documents/RCUKOpenAccessPolicy.pdf.
77. Renfro, P., & Neal, J.G. (2012). The integration of libraries and academic computing at Columbia: New opportunities for internal and external collaboration. Journal of Library Administration, 52(2), 162-171. doi: 10.1080/01930826.2012.655594. Retrieved June 23, 2014, from https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/download/fedora_ content/download/ac:145755/CONTENT/01930826.2012.655594.pdf.
78. Schrader, A., Shiri, A., & Williamson, V. (2012). Assessment of the research learning needs of the University of Saskatchewan librarians: A case study. College & Research Libraries, 73(2), 147-163. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://crl.acrl.org/ content/73/2/147.full.pdf.
79. Shore, E. (2012). Embracing hybridity: The merged organization, Alt/ac and higher education. Journal of Library Administration, 52(2), 189-202. doi: 10.1080/01930826.2012.655602.
80. Stanford, N. (2013). Organization design: Engaging with change(2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
81. Stanton, J.M., Kim, Y., Oakleaf, M., Lankes, R.D., Gandel, P., Cogburn, D., & Liddy, E.D. (2011). Education for eScience professionals: Job analysis, curriculum guidance, and program considerations. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 52(2), 79-94.
82. Vandegrift, M., & Varner, S. (2013). Evolving in common: Creating mutually supportive relationships between libraries and the digital humanities. Journal of Library Administration, 53(1), 67-78. doi: 10.1080/01930826.2013.756699. Retrieved June 23, 2014, from http://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&co ntext=library_faculty_publications.
83. Vaughan, K.T.L., Hayes, B.E., Lerner, R.C., McElfresh, K.R., Pavlech, L., Romito, D. Morris, E.N. (2013). Development of the research lifecycle model for library services. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 101(4), 310-314. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.101.4.013. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ articles/PMC3794687/.
84. Vinopal, J., & McCormick, M. (2013). Supporting digital scholarship in research libraries: Scalability and sustainability. Journal of Library Administration, 53(1), 27-42. Retrieved June 23, 2014, from https://archive.nyu.edu/bitstream/2451/31698/2/ Vinopal_McCormick_Final.pdf.
85. Warren, V. (2011). Using workforce structures to enable staff retention and development: An academic library case study. New Library World, 112(1-2), 8-18. doi: 10.1108/03074801111100427.
86. Yakel, E., Conway, P., Hedstrom, M., & Wallace, D. (2011). Digital curation for digital natives. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 52(1),23-31. Retrieved June 23, 2014, from http://www.virtualarchiveslab.org/sites/virtualarchiveslab.org/ files/Digitial%20Curation%20for%20Digital%20Natives.pdf.
87. Young, H., & Lund, P. (2008). Reflections on a benchmarking survey of research support provided by 1994 Group libraries. SCONUL Focus, 43,51-56. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/dspace-jspui/bitstream/2134/4172/1/ Young_Lund_SCONUL_Focus_2008.pdf.