From service providers to content producers: New opportunities for libraries in collaborative open access book publishing

New Review of Academic Librarianship

Volumn 16, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2010, Pages 28-43

  Adema, Janneke ^a   Schmidt, Birgit ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Humanities; Library publishing; Monographs; Open access publishing; Social sciences

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952432607     PISSN: 13614533     EISSN: 17407834     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2010.509542     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Adema, Janneke. Overview of Open Access models for ebooks in the Humanities and Social Sciences. OAPEN, 2010. Web. 24 March 2010.
2. Adema, Janneke, and Paul Rutten. Digital Monographs in the Humanities and Social Sciences: Report on User Needs. OAPEN, 2010. Web. 24 March 2010.
3. Allen, Katie. "Amazon e-book Sales Overtake Print for First Time." Guardian 28 December 2009. Web. 24 March 2010.
4. Bailey, Charles W. "Open Access and Libraries." Collection Management 32.3 (2008): 351-383. Web. 24 March 2010.
5. Bargheer, Margo, and Birgit Schmidt. "Göttingen University Press: Publishing services in an Open Access environment." Information Services & Use 28.2 (2008): 133-139. Web. 24 March 2010.
6. Borgman, Christine. Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure and the Internet. Cambridge MA: MIT, 2007. Print.
7. Brown, Laura et al. "Ithaka Report. University Publishing in a Digital Age." The Journal of Electronic Publishing 10.3. (2007). Web. 24 March 2010.
8. Cerruti, Laura, and Catherine Mitchell, "Library-press partnerships in action: The new University of California Publishing Services." SPARC Webcast. 17 February 2010: n. pag. Web.
9. Crow, Raym. Campus-based publishing partnerships: A guide to critical issues. 2009. Web. 24 March 2010, SPARC.
10. Greco, Albert N., and Robert Michael Wharton. "Should University Presses Adopt an Open Access [electronic publishing] Business Model for All of Their Scholarly Books?" ELPUB. Open Scholarship: Authority, Community, and Sustainability in the Age of Web 2.0-Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Electronic Publishing. Toronto: 2008. Web. 24 March 2010.
11. Hahn, Karla L. Research Library Publishing Services. New Options for University Publishing. ARL Report 258, 2008. Web. 24 March 2010.
12. Harboe-Ree, Cathrine. Just Advanced Librarianship: The Role of Academic Libraries as Publishers. Australian Academic and Research Libraries (AARL), 2007. Web.
13. Harnad, Stevan et al. "The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access." Serials Review 30.4 (2004): 310-314. Web. 24 March 2010.
14. Hawkins, Kevin S. "Libraries as Publishers: Increasing Access to Scholarly Literature." St. Petersburg, Russia, 2005. Web. 24 March 2010.
15. Heath, Malcolm Michael, and David Robey. "E-Publication and Open Access in the Arts and Humanities in the UK." Ariadne 54 (2008): n. pag. Web. 24March 2010.
16. Johnson, Richard K. "The Future of Scholarly Communication in the Humanities: Adaptation or Transformation?" 2004. Web. 24 March 2010.
17. Jöttkandt, Sigi, Shana Kimball, and John Willinsky. "The Role of Libraries in Emerging Models of Scholarly Communications." 13 October 2009: n. pag. Web. 24 March 2010.
18. King, C. Judson. Scholarly Communication: Academic Values and Sustainable Models. Center for Studies in Higher Education. University of California Berkeley, 2006. Web. 24 March 2010.
19. Lynch, Clifford A. Institutional Repositories: Essential Infrastructure for Scholarship in the Digital Age. ARL: A Bimonthly Report, 2003. Web. 24 March 2010.
20. Mitchell, Catherine A., and Laura Cerruti. "Local, Sustainable, and Organic Publishing: A Library-Press Collaboration at the University of California." Against the Grain January 2008: 22-24. Web. 24 March 2010.
21. Morrison, Heather. "The Imaginary Journal of Poetic Economics." 16 June 2010. Web.
22. "Newfound Press Business Plan 2008-2011." 1 July 2008: n. pag. Web. 24 March 2010.
23. Oppenheim, Charles, and Fytton Rowland. "Scoping Study on Issues Relating to Quality-Control Measures within the Scholarly Communication Process." 2009. Web. 24 March 2010.
24. Pinter, Frances. "Rethinking the Role and Funding of Academic Book Publishing." 2010: n. pag. Tools of Change for Publishing Conference. Web. 24 March 2010.
25. Ranganathan, Shiyali Ramamrita. The five laws of library science. Madras: Madras Library Association Publication Series 23, 1957 (2nd edition). Print.
26. Rowlands, Ian, and Maggie Fieldhouse. Information behaviour of the researcher of the future. Trends in scholarly information behaviour. A British Library/JISC Study, 2007. Web. 24 March 2010.
27. Steele, Colin. "Phoenix rising: new models for the research monograph?" Learned Publishing 16 (2003): 111-122. Web. 24 March 2010.
28. Steele, Colin. "Scholarly Monograph Publishing in the 21st Century: The Future More Than Ever Should Be an Open Book." Journal of Electronic Publishing 11.2 (2008): n. pag. Web. 24 March 2010.
29. Thompson, Jennifer Wolfe. "The Death of the Scholarly Monograph in the Humanities?" Libri 52 (2002): n. pag. Web. 24 March 2010.
30. Thompson, John B. Books in the Digital Age: The Transformation of Academic and Higher Education Publishing in Britain and the United States. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005. Print.
31. Tonkin, Emma. "eBooks: Tipping or Vanishing Point?" Ariadne 62 (2010): n. pag. Web. 24 March 2010.
32. Waaijers, Leo Bas, and Michel Wesseling. "Copyright Angst, Lust for Prestige and Cost Control: What Institutions Can Do to Ease Open Access." Ariadne 57 (2008): n. pag. Web. 24 March 2010.
33. Webster, Duane. "Emerging Responses to the Science Journal Crisis." IFLA Journal 26.2. (2000): 97-102. Print, Web. 24 March 2010.
34. Willinsky, John. "Toward the Design of an Open Monograph Press (DRAFT)." 28 September 2008: n. pag. Web. 24 March 2010.