Librarians as part of cross-disciplinary, multi-institutional team projects: Experiences from the VIVO collaboration

Science and Technology Libraries

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 160-175

  García Milian, Rolando ^a   Norton, Hannah F ^a   Auten, Beth ^a   Davis, Valrie I ^b   Holmes, Kristi L ^c   Johnson, Margeaux ^b   Tennant, Michele R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

collaboration; interdisciplinary; team science

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATION; COLLABORATION PLATFORMS; CROSS-DISCIPLINARY; CROSS-DISCIPLINARY TEAMS; INTERDISCIPLINARY; LESSONS LEARNED; RESEARCH QUESTIONS; TEAM SCIENCE;

INFORMATION SCIENCE; TECHNOLOGY;

LIBRARIES;

EID: 84879678535     PISSN: 0194262X     EISSN: 15411109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0194262X.2013.791183     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aitken, E., S. E. Powelson, R. D. Reaume, and W.A. Ghali. 2011. Involving clinical librarians at the point of care: Results of a controlled intervention. Academic Medicine 86 (12): 1508-1512. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ 22030761 (accessed September 27, 2012)
2. Bandy, M., J. Condon, and E. Graves. 2008. Participating in communities of practice. Medical Reference Services Quarterly 27 (4): 441-419
3. Bennett, M. L., H. Gadlin, and S. Levine-Findley. 2010. Team science and collaboration: A field guide. Bethesda, MD: Department of Health and Human Services. https://ccrod.cancer.gov/confluence/download/attachments/47284665/Team Science-FieldGuide.pdf (accessed September 27, 2012)
4. Börner, K., N. Contractor, H. J. Falk-Krzesinski, S. M. Fiore, K. L. Hall, J. Keyton, B. Spring, D. Stokols, W. Trochim, and B. Uzzi. 2010. A multi-level systems perspective for the science of team science. Science Translational Medicine 15 (2): 49cm24. http://stm.sciencemag.org/content/2/49/ 49cm24.full.pdf (accessed September 27, 2012)
5. Burke C. S., K. C. Stagl, E. Salas, L. Pierce, and D. Kendall. 2006. Understanding team adaptation: A conceptual analysis and model. Journal of Applied Psychology 91 (6): 1189-1207. http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/apl/91/6/ 1189.pdf (accessed May 9, 2012)
6. Cummings, J. N., and S. Kiesler. 2008. Who collaborates successfully? Prior experience reduces collaboration barriers in distributed interdisciplinary research. Proceedings of the ACM 2008 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, November 8-12, San Diego, CA, 437-446. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/? kiesler/publications/2008pdfs/2008Cummings-Kiesler.pdf (accessed May 7, 2012)
7. Davis, V., M. Devare, S. Russell González, and M. R. Tennant. 2009. Implementation of a new research discovery tool by the university libraries at Cornell University and the University of Florida. Paper presented at theBiomedical and Life Sciences Division, Special Libraries Association Annual Conference, Washington DC
8. Disis, M. L., and J. T. Slattery. 2010. The road we must take: Multidisciplinary team science. Science Translational Medicine 2 (22): 22cm9. http://stm.sciencemag. org/content/2/22/22cm9.full (accessed August 14, 2012)
9. Dudden, R. F., and S. L. Protzko. 2011. The systematic review team: Contributions of the health sciences librarian. Medical Reference Services Quarterly 30 (3): 301-315
10. Fiore, S. M. 2008. Interdisciplinarity as teamwork: How the science of teams can inform team science. Small Group Research 39 (3): 251-277. http://sgr.sagepub. com/content/39/3/251.full.pdf (accessed May 2, 2012)
11. Glenn, E., and B. Rolland. 2010. Librarians in biomedical research: New roles and opportunities. Information Outlook 14 (7): 26-29 http://students. washington. edu/brolland/Research/SLA%20Outlook%20Final%20Article.pdf (accessed May 6, 2012)
12. Gold, A. 2007. Cyberinfrastructure, data, and libraries, part 2. Libraries and the data challenge: Roles and actions for libraries. D-Lib Magazine 13 (9/10). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september07/gold/09gold-pt2.html (accessed May 30, 2012)
13. Holmes, K. L., and E. K. Dubinsky. 2009. Integration of Web 2.0 technologies in the translational research environment. Medical Reference Services Quarterly 28 (4): 309-335
14. Holmes, K. L., M. R. Tennant, G. Hack, V. Davis, M. H. Devare, S. Russell-González, M. Conlon, and VIVO Collaboration. 2010. VIVO: A national resource discovery tool for the biomedical community. Paper presented at the Biomedical and Life Sciences Division, Special Libraries Association Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA
15. Huerta, D., and V. McMillan. 2004. Reflections on collaborative teaching of science information literacy and science writing. Resource Sharing & Information Networks 17 (1-2): 19-28. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10. 1300/J121 v17n0103 (accessed September 27, 2012)
16. Krafft, D. B., N. A. Cappadona, B. Caruso, J. Corson-Rikert, M. Devare, B. J. Lowe, and VIVO Collaboration. 2010. VIVO: Enabling national networking of scientists. Proceedings of the WebSci10: Extending the Frontiers of Society On-Line, April 26-27. Raleigh, NC. http://journal.webscience.org/316/2/websci10 submission82.pdf (accessed May 2, 2012)
17. Kraut, R. E., S. R. Fussell, S. E. Brennan, and J. Siegel. 2002. Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. In Distributed work, ed. P. Hinds and S. Kiesler, 137-162. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. from http://www.psychology.sunysb.edu/sbrennan-/papers/kraut.pdf (accessed May 30, 2012)
18. Lounsbury, J. W., N. Foster, H. Patel, P. Carmody, L. W. Gibson, and D. R. Stairs. 2012. An investigation of the personality traits of scientists versus nonscientists and their relationship with career satisfaction. R&D Management 42 (1): 47-59
19. Lynch, R. P. 2011. Collaborative innovation: Essential foundation of scientific discovery. In Collaborative computational technologies for biomedical research, ed. M. A. Z. Ekins, A. Hupcey, and A. J. Williams, 19-37. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley
20. Martin, E. R. 2006. Team effectiveness in academic medical libraries: A multiple case study. Journal of the Medical Library Association 94 (3): 271-278. http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1525325/(accessed September 27, 2012)
21. Moore, M. 2011. Teaching physicians to make informed decisions in the face of uncertainty: Librarians and informaticians on the health care team. Academic Medicine 86 (11): 1345-1345
22. Moustakas, C. 1994. Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
23. Nash, J. M., B. N. Collins, S. E. Loughlin, M. Solbrig, R. Harvey, S. Krishnan-Sarin, J. Unger, et al. 2003. Training the transdisciplinary scientist: A general framework applied to tobacco use behavior. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 5 (Supplement 1): S41-S53. http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/content/5/ Suppl-1/S41.full.pdf (accessed May 7, 2012)
24. Norton, H. F., R. García-Milian, M. R. Tennant, S. Henning, M. Conlon, and VIVO Collaboration. 2010. VIVO: Researcher networking and discovery across disciplines. Poster presented at Florida Genetics 2010: The Sixth Annual Symposium of the UF Genetics Institute, Gainesville, FL. http://ufdc.ufl.edu/ IR00000367/00001 (accessed August 14, 2012)
25. Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
26. Pritchard, P. A. 2010. The embedded science librarian: Partner in curriculum design and delivery. Journal of Library Administration 50 (4): 373-396. http://www. tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01930821003667054 (accessed September 27, 2012)
27. Rambo, N. 2009. E-science and biomedical libraries. Journal of the Medical Library Association 97 (3): 159-161. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ articles/PMC2706433/(accessed May 30, 2012)
28. Rosenfield, P. L. 1992. The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Social Science and Medicine 35 (11): 1343-1357
29. Russell-González, S., V. Davis, M. R. Tennant, K. L. Holmes, M. Conlon, and VIVO Collaboration. 2010. Letting the good times roll through alignment: Meeting institutional missions and goals with VIVO, a web-based research discovery tool. Paper presented at the Biomedical and Life Sciences Division, Special Libraries Association Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA
30. Sarli, C. C., and K. L. Holmes. 2011. Assessing the impact of research: A Bernard Becker Medical Library project. https://becker.wustl.edu/impact- assessment (accessed August 14, 2012)
31. Stokols, D., K. L. Hall, B. D. Taylor, and R. P. Moser. 2008a. The science of team science: Overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 35 (2S): S77-S89
32. Stokols, D., S. Mistra, R. P. Moser, K. L. Hall, and B. K. Taylor. 2008b. The ecology of team science: Understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 35 (2S): S96-S115
33. Urquhart, C., J. Turner, J. Durbin, and J. Ryan. 2007. Changes in information behavior in clinical teams after introduction of a clinical librarian service. Journal of the Medical Library Association (95) 1: 14-22. VIVO. n.d. An interdisciplinary network. http://www.vivoweb.org