Bibliometrics and research data management services: Emerging trends in library support for research

Library Trends

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 636-674

  Corrall, Sheila ^a   Kennan, Mary Anne ^b   Afzal, Waseem ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878452777     PISSN: 00242594     EISSN: 15590682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/lib.2013.0005     Document Type: Article

References (115)

1. Adams, J. (2007). Bibliometrics, assessment and UK research. Serials, 20, 188-191. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://uksg.metapress.com/content/10yj8m7h3e4ljcmw/fulltext.pdf
2. Aldrich, A. W. (2007). Following the phosphorous trail of research library mission statements into present and future harbors. In Sailing into the Future: Charting Our Destiny, ACRL 13th National Conference (pp. 304-316). Chicago, IL: American Library Association, Association of College and Research Libraries. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.ala.org/acrl/conferences/confsandpreconfs/national/baltimore/baltimore
3. Amos, K., Mower, A., James, M. A., Weber, A., Yaffe, J., & Youngkin, M. (2012). Exploring publishing patterns at a large research university: Implications for library practice. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 7(3), 32-50. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/17122/14266
4. Arizona State University. (2012). Citation research: How to find citation counts for your publications and how to find journal rankings such as impact factors. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://libguides.asu.edu/citation
5. Auckland, M. (2012). Re-skilling for research: An investigation into the roles and skills of subject and liaison librarians required to effectively support the evolving information needs of researchers. London: RLUK Research Libraries UK. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.rluk.ac.uk/content/re-skilling-research
6. Ball, R., & Tunger, D. (2006). Bibliometric analysis - a new business area for information professionals in libraries? Support for scientific research by perception and trend analysis. Scientometrics, 66, 561-577.
7. Barrett, J. (2012). UCD data management checklist. Dublin, Ireland: University College Dublin, The Library: Retrieved November 21, 2012, from https://www.ucd.ie/t4cms/Guide121.pdf
8. Baughman, J. C. (1977). Towards a structural approach to collection development. College & Research Libraries, 38, 241-248.
9. Beck, S. E., & Manuel, K. (2008). Practical research methods for librarians and information professionals. New York: Neal-Schuman.
10. Bennett, D. B., Leonard, M., & Wrublewski, D. (2012). Comparing engineering departments across institutions: Gathering publication impact data in a short timeframe. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 68. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.istl.org/12-winter/refereed2.html
11. Bent, M., Gannon-Leary, P., & Webb, J. (2007). Information literacy in a researcher's learning life: Seven ages of research. New Review of Information Networking, 13, 81-99.
12. Bourg, C., Coleman, R., & Erway, R. (2009). Support for the research process: An academic library manifesto. Dublin, OH: OCLC Research. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/library/2009/2009-07.pdf
13. Broadus, R. N. (1977). The applications of citation analyses to library collection building. Advances in Librarianship, 7, 299-355.
14. Brownlee, R. (2009). Research data and repository metadata: Policy and technical issues at the University of Sydney Library. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47, 370-379.
15. Burke, L. (2008). Models of reference services in Australian academic libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 40, 269-286.
16. Carlson, J., & Kneale, R. (2011). Embedded librarianship in the research context: Navigating new waters. College & Research Libraries News, 72, 167-170. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://crln.acrl.org/content/72/3/167.full
17. Carlson, J. R., & Garritano, J. R. (2010). E-science, cyberinfrastructure, and the changing face of scholarship: Organizing for new models of research support at the Purdue University Libraries. In S. Walter & K. Williams (Eds.), Staffing, sustaining, and advancing the academic library in the 21st century (pp. 234-269). Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries.
18. Case, D. (2012). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs and behaviour (3rd ed.). Bingley, England: Emerald.
19. Choudhury, G. S. (2008). Case study in data curation at Johns Hopkins University. Library Trends, 57, 211-220.
20. Connaway, L. S., & Powell, R. R. (2010). Basic research methods for librarians (5th ed.). Westport. CT: Libraries Unlimited.
21. Corrall, S. (2012). Roles and responsibilities: Libraries, librarians and data. In G. Pryor (Ed.), Managing research data (pp. 105-133). London: Facet.
22. Cotta-Schønberg, M. (2007). The changing role of the subject specialist. Liber Quarterly, 17 (3/4). Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://liber.library.uu.nl/index.php/lq/article/view/7890/8111
23. Davis, M., Wilson, C. S., & Horn, H. (2005). Informing decision-making in libraries: Informetric research as input to LIS education and practice. Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 36, 195-213. Retrieved October 22, 2102, from http://www.alia.org.au/publishing/aarl/36.4/davis.pdf
24. De Bellis, N. (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: From the Science Citation Index to cybermetrics. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
25. Delasalle, J. (2012). Research evaluation: Bibliometrics and the librarian. SCONUL Focus, 53, 15-19. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.sconul.ac.uk/publications/newsletter/53/5.pdf
26. Delserone, L. M. (2008). At the watershed: Preparing for research data management and stewardship at the University of Minnesota Libraries. Library Trends, 57, 202-210.
27. Drott, M. C., Mancall, J., & Griffith, B. C. (1979). Bradford's Law and libraries: Present applications-potential promise. ASLIB Proceedings, 31, 296-304.
28. Drummond, R., & Wartho, R. (2009). RIMS: The Research Impact Measurement Service at the University of New South Wales. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 40, 76-87. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.alia.org.au/publishing/aarl/40/ARRL.Vol40.No2.2009.pdf
29. Duranceau, E. F. (2008). The "Wealth of Networks" and institutional repositories: MIT, DSpace, and the future of the scholarly commons. Library Trends, 57, 244-261.
30. Florance, P. (2006). GIS collection development within an academic library. Library Trends, 55, 222-234. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/3680
31. Fonseca, A. J., & Viator, V. P. (2009). Escaping the island of lost faculty: Collaboration as a means of visibility. Collaborative Librarianship, 1, 81-90. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://collaborativelibrarianship.org/index.php/jocl/article/view/23/14
32. Freiburger, G., & Kramer, S. (2009). Embedded librarians: One library's model for decentralized service. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 97, 139-142. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2670204/
33. Friedlander, A., & Adler, P. (2006) To stand the test of time: Long-term stewardship of digital data sets in science and engineering, a report to the National Science Foundation from the ARL Workshop on New Collaborative Relationships: The Role of Academic Libraries in the Digital Data Universe. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/digdatarpt.pdf
34. Fulton, B., Botticelli, P., & Bradley, J. (2011). DigIn: A hands-on approach to a digital curation curriculum for professional development. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 52, 95-109.
35. Gabridge, T. (2009). The last mile: Liaison roles in curating science and engineering research data. Research Library Issues, 265, 15-21. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/rli-265-gabridge.pdf
36. Garritano, J. R., & Carlson, J. R. (2009). A subject librarian's guide to collaborating on e-science projects. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 57. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.istl.org/09-spring/refereed2.html#15
37. Gibbs, C., & Sergeant, K. (2009, January). Opportunity, not hard work: Scripted solutions to solving our bibliometric nightmare. Paper presented at Information Online 2009: ALIA 14th Exhibition and Conference, Sydney. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://conferences.alia.org.au/online2009/docs/PresentationB6.pdf
38. Gold, A. (2007). Cyberinfrastructure, data, and libraries, part 2. Libraries and the data challenge: Roles and actions for libraries. D-Lib Magazine, 13(9/10). Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september07/gold/09gold-pt2.html
39. Gumpenberger, C., Wieland, M., & Gorraiz, J. (2012). Bibliometric practices and activities at the University of Vienna. Library Management, 33, 174-183.
40. Harris-Pierce, R. L., & Liu, Y. Q. (2012). Is data curation education at library and information science schools in North America adequate? New Library World, 113(11/12), 598-613.
41. Harvey, R. (2010). Digital curation: A how-to-do-It manual. New York: Neal-Schuman.
42. Heath, F. (2011). Library assessment: The way we have grown. Library Quarterly, 81, 7-25.
43. HEFCE (2009). Report on the pilot exercise to develop bibliometric indicators for the Research Excellence Framework. Bristol, England: Higher Education Funding Council for England. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce1/pubs/hefce/2009/0939/09_39.pdf
44. HEFCE (2011). Analysis of data from the pilot exercise to develop bibliometric indicators for the REF: The effect of using normalised citation scores for particular staff characteristics. Bristol, England: Higher Education Funding Council for England. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce1/pubs/hefce/2011/1103/11_03.pdf
45. Hendrix, D. (2010). Tenure metrics: Bibliometric education and services for academic faculty. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 29, 183-189.
46. Henty, M. (2008). Developing the capability and skills to support e-research. Ariadne, 55. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue55/henty
47. Herther, N. (2009). Research evaluation and citation analysis: Key issues and implications. The Electronic Library, 27, 361-375.
48. Hey, T., & Hey J. (2006). E-science and its implications for the library community. Library Hi Tech, 24, 515-528.
49. HLG (2010) High Level Expert Group on Scientific Data. Riding the wave: How Europe can gain from the rising tide of scientific data. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/e-infrastructure/docs/hlg-sdi-report.pdf
50. Holland, M. (2006). Serving different constituencies: Researchers. In P. Dale., M. Holland, & M. Matthews (Eds.), Subject librarians: Engaging with the learning and teaching environment (pp. 131-147). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
51. Houser, R. (2006). Building a library GIS service from the ground up. Library Trends, 55, 315-326. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from https://www.ideals.uiuc.edu/handle/2142/3681
52. Hswe, P., & Holt, A. (2011). Joining in the enterprise of response in the wake of the NSF data management planning requirement. Research Library Issues, 274, 11-17. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://publications.arl.org/17gcns.pdf
53. Joint, N. (2008). Bemused by bibliometrics: Using citation analysis to evaluate research quality. Library Review, 57, 346-357.
54. Jones-Evans, A. (2005). Bangor university library service: An update. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 37, 115-117.
55. Kear, R., & Colbert-Lewis, D. (2011). Citation searching and bibliometric measures. College & Research Libraries News, 72, 470-474. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://crln.acrl.org/content/72/8/470.long
56. Keralis, S. D. C. (2012). Data curation education: A snapshot. In L. Jahnke, A. Asher, & S. D. C. Keralis. The problem of data (pp. 32-43). Washington, D.C.: Council on Library and Information Resources. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub154/pub154.pdf
57. Lage, K., Losoff, B., & Maness, J. (2012). Receptivity to library involvement in scientific data curation: A case study at the University of Colorado Boulder. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 11, 915-937.
58. Lewis, M. (2010). Libraries and the management of research data. In S. McKnight (Ed.), Envisioning future academic library services: Initiatives, ideas and challenges (pp. 145-168). London: Facet.
59. Line, M. B. (1978). Rank lists based on citations and library use as indicators of journal usage in individual libraries. Collection Management, 2, 313-316.
60. Lyon, L. (2007). Dealing with data: Roles, rights, responsibilities and relationships. Bath, England: UKOLN. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ukoln/staff/e.j.lyon/reports/dealing_with_data_report-final.pdf
61. Lyon, L. (2012). The informatics transform: Re-engineering libraries for the data decade. International Journal of Digital Curation, 7(1), 126-138. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view/210/279
62. MacColl, J. (2010). Library roles in university research assessment. Liber Quarterly, 20, 152-168. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://liber.library.uu.nl/index.php/lq/article/view/7984/8299
63. MacColl, J., & Jubb, M. (2011). Supporting research: Environments, administration and libraries. Dublin, OH: OCLC Research. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.oclc.org/resources/research/publications/library/2011/2011-10.pdf
64. Macdonald, S., & Martinez, L. (2005). Supporting local data users in the UK academic community. Ariadne, 44. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue44/martinez
65. Macdonald, S., & Uribe, L. M. (2008). Libraries in the converging world of open data, e-research, and Web 2.0. Online, 32(2), 36-40. Retrieved March 18, 2013, from http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/227/1/Online_mar08.pdf
66. Macquarie University. (2012). Research metrics: Research metrics allows you to measure the impact of your research and publications. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://libguides.mq.edu.au/Research-Metrics
67. Marcum, D. B., & George, G. (Eds.), (2010). The data deluge: Can libraries cope with e-science? Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
68. Mays, R., Tenopir, C., & Kaufman, P. (2010). Lib-Value: Measuring value and return on investment of academic libraries. Research Library Issues, 271, 36-40. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/rli271-libvalue.pdf
69. McNeill, P., & Chapman, S. (2005). Research methods (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
70. Nicholas, D., Rowlands, I., Jubb, M., & Jamali, H. R. (2010). The impact of the economic downturn on libraries: With special reference to university libraries. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36, 376-382.
71. NSF (2007). Cyberinfrastructure vision for 21st century discovery. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, Cyberinfrastructure Council. Retrieved March 18, 2013, from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2007/nsf0728/nsf0728.pdf
72. Oakleaf, M. (2010). The value of academic libraries: A comprehensive research review and report. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/issues/value/val_report.pdf
73. Pan, R., & Breen, E. (2011, April). MyRI: An open access bibliometrics toolkit - collaboration in research skills support. Paper presented at LILAC 2011: Librarians' Information Literacy Annual Conference, London. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.slideshare.net/infolit_group/pan-breen
74. Pendlebury, D. (2008). Using bibliometrics in evaluating research. White Paper. Philadelphia, PA: Thomson Reuters. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://thomsonreuters.com/content/science/pdf/ssr/training/UsingBibliometricsinEval_WP.pdf
75. Peters, C., & Dryden, A. R. (2011). Assessing the academic library's role in campus-wide research data management: A first step at the University of Houston. Science & Technology Libraries, 30, 387-403
76. Pickard, A. J. (2007). Research methods in information. London: Facet.
77. Pryor, G. (Ed.), (2012). Managing research data. London: Facet.
78. Pryor, G., & Donnelly, M. (2009). Skilling up to do data: Whose role, whose responsibility, whose career? International Journal of Digital Curation, 4(2), 158-170. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view/126
79. Qin, J., D'Ignazio, J., Oakleaf, M., Crowston, K., Wiggins, A., & Kuehn, A. (2010, December). Educating escience librarians. Poster presented at Participation and Practice: Growing the Curation Community through the Data Decade, 6th International Digital Curation Conference, Chicago, IL. Retrieved October 22, 2102, from http://www.dcc.ac.uk/events/conferences/6th-international-digital-curation-conference/posters
80. Rambo, N. (2010). Changes in research libraries as a result of e-science initiatives: A snapshot. In D. B. Marcum & G. George (Eds.), The data deluge: Can libraries cope with e-science? (pp. 43-60). Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
81. Ray, J. (2009). Sharks, digital curation, and the education of information professionals. Museum Management and Curatorship, 24, 357-368.
82. Renear, A. H., Dolan, M., Trainor, K., & Muñox, T. (2010, February). Extending an LIS data curation curriculum to the humanities: Selected activities and observations. Poster presented at iConference 2010, Champaign, IL. Abstract retrieved October 22, 2012, from https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/15061
83. Rice, R., & Haywood, J. (2011). Research data management initiatives at University of Edinburgh. International Journal of Digital Curation, 6(2), 232-244. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view/194/259
84. RIN. (2007). Research Information Network & Consortium of Research Libraries. Researchers' use of academic libraries and their services: A report commissioned by the Research Information Network and the Consortium of Research Libraries. London: Research Information Network. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.rin.ac.uk/system/files/attachments/Researchers-libraries-services-report.pdf
85. RIN. (2011). Research Information Network & Research Libraries UK. The value of libraries for research and researchers: A RIN and RLUK report. London: Research Information Network. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.rluk.ac.uk/content/value-libraries-research-and-researchers
86. Roemer, R. C., & Borchadt, R. (2012). From bibliometrics to altmetrics: A changing scholarly landscape. College & Research Libraries News, 73, 596-600. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://crln.acrl.org/content/73/10/596.full
87. Schonfield, R. C., & Housewright, R. (2010). Faculty survey 2009: Key strategic insights for libraries, publishers, and societies. New York: Ithaka Strategic Consulting and Research. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.sr.ithaka.org/research-publications/faculty-survey-2009
88. Schottlaender, B. E. C. (2010). An idiosyncratic perspective on the history and development at the University of California, San Diego, of support for Cyberinfrastructure-enabled e-science (99-112). In D. B. Marcum & G. George (Eds.), The data deluge: Can libraries cope with e-science? (pp. 43-60). Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
89. Schrader, A. M. (1981). Teaching bibliometrics. Library Trends, 30, 151-172. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/7192
90. Shumaker, D. (2012). The embedded librarian: Innovative strategies for taking knowledge where it's needed. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
91. Soehner, C., Steeves, C., & Ward, J. (2010). e-Science and data support services: A study of ARL member institutions. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/escience_report2010.pdf
92. Stanton, J. M., Kim, Y., Oakleaf, M., Lankes, R. D., Gandel, P., Cogburn, D., & Liddy, E. D. (2011). Education for eScience professionals: Job analysis, curriculum guidance, and program considerations. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 52, 79-94.
93. Steinhart, G. (2006). Libraries as distributors of geospatial data: Data management policies as tools for managing partnerships. Library Trends, 55, 264-284. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from https://www.ideals.uiuc.edu/handle/2142/3689
94. Swan, A. (2011). Institutional repositories - Now and next. In P. Dale, J. Beard., & M. Holland (Eds.), University libraries and digital learning environments (pp. 119-133). Farnham, England: Ashgate.
95. Swan, A., & Brown, S. (2008). The skills, role and career structure of data scientists and curators: An assessment of current practice and future needs. Truro, England: Key Perspectives. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/documents/dataskillscareersfinalreport.aspx
96. Thomas, J. (2011). Future-proofing: The academic library's role in e-research support. Library Management, 32, 37-47.
97. Town, J. S. (2011). Value, impact, and the transcendent library: Progress and pressures in performance measurement and evaluation. Library Quarterly, 81, 111-125.
98. Treloar, A. (2009). Design and implementation of the Australian National Data Service. International Journal of Digital Curation, 4(1), 125-137. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view/107/83
99. University of Pittsburgh. (2012). Citation searching and bibliometric measures: A discussion on topics such as the h-index, Eigenfactor, impact factor, Journal Citation Reports, and other tools. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://pitt.libguides.com/bibliometrics
100. University of North Texas. (2011). UNT receives more than $800,000 to investigate needs in archiving research data. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://untsystem.edu/news/2011/August/11-08-09-arch-res-data.htm
101. Varvel, V. E., Bammerlin, E., & Palmer, C. L. (2012). Education for data professionals: A study of current courses and programs. Poster presented at the iConference 2012: Proceedings of the 2012 iConference (pp. 527-529). NewYork: Association for Computing Machinery.
102. von Ungern-Sternberg, S. (1998). Teaching bibliometrics. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 39, 76-80.
103. Wallace, D. P., & Van Fleet, C. (2012). Knowledge in action: Research and evaluation in library and information science. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
104. Walters, T. O. (2009). Data curation program development in U.S. universities: The Georgia Institute of Technology example. International Journal of Digital Curation, 3(4), 83-92. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/viewFile/136/153
105. Warr, R. B. (1983). Bibliometrics: A model for judging quality. Collection Building, 5(2), 29-34.
106. Webb, J., Gannon-Leary, P., & Bent, M. (2007). Providing effective library services for research. London: Facet.
107. Westra, B. (2010). Data services for the sciences: A needs assessment. Ariadne, 64. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue64/westra/
108. Witt, M. (2008). Institutional repositories and research data curation in a distributed environment. Library Trends, 57, 191-201.
109. Whitten, J., & Bentley, L. (2007). Systems analysis and design methods (7th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
110. Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
111. Wong, G. K. W. (2009). Exploring research data hosting at the HKUST institutional repository. Serials Review, 35, 125-132.
112. Wood, E. J., Miller, R., & Knapp, A. (2007). Beyond survival: Managing academic libraries in transition. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
113. Yakel, E., Conway, P., Hedstrom, M., & Wallace, D. (2011). Digital curation for digital natives. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 52, 23-31.
114. Young, H., & Lund, P. (2008) Reflections on a benchmarking survey of research support provided by 1994 Group libraries. SCONUL Focus, 43, 51-56. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.sconul.ac.uk/publications/newsletter/43/14.pdf
115. Zhao, D. (2011). Bibliometrics and LIS education: How do they fit together? [Panel proposal]. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology: ASIST 2011, 48, 1-4.