Domestication and the mitochondrial genome: Comparing patterns and rates of molecular evolution in domesticated mammals and birds and their wild relatives

Genome Biology and Evolution

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 161-169

  Moray, Camile ^a   Lanfear, Robert ^a,b   Bromham, Lindell ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b NATIONAL EVOLUTIONARY SYNTHESIS CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Artificial selection; Comparative analysis; DN dS; Effective population size; Mitochondria; Relaxed selection

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL SELECTION; CAT; CATTLE; CHICKEN; COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; DN/DS; DOG; DOMESTIC ANIMAL; EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; HORSE; MITOCHONDRIAL GENOME; MITOCHONDRION; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PEDIGREE; RELAXED SELECTION; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

ARTIFICIAL SELECTION; COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; DN/DS; EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE; MITOCHONDRIA; RELAXED SELECTION;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, DOMESTIC; CATS; CATTLE; CHICKENS; DOGS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENOME, MITOCHONDRIAL; HORSES; PEDIGREE; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EID: 84905390543     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17596653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evu005     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Akey JM, et al 2010. Tracking footprints of artificial selection in the dog genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107:1160-1165.
2. Allaby RG, Fuller DQ, Brown TA 2008. The genetic expectations of a protracted model for the origins of domesticated crops. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 105:13982-13986.
3. Amaral AJ, et al 2011. Genome-wide footprints of pig domestication and selection revealed through massive parallel sequencing of pooled DNA. PLoS One 6:e14782.
4. Ballard JWO, Whitlock MC 2004. The incomplete natural history of mitochondria. Mol Ecol. 13:729-744.
5. Bazin E, Glémin S, Galtier N. 2006. Population size does not influence mitochondrial genetic diversity in animals. Science 312:570-572.
6. Björnerfeldt S, Webster MT, Vilà C. 2006. Relaxation of selective constraint on dog mitochondrial DNA following domestication. Genome Res. 16: 990-994.
7. Blumler MA, et al 1991. The ecological genetics of domestication and the origins of agriculture. Curr Anthropol. 32:23-54.
8. Bollongino R, et al 2012. Modern Taurine cattle descended from small number of Near-Eastern founders. Mol Biol Evol. 29:2101-2104.
9. Bromham L. 2009. Why do species vary in their rate of molecular evolution? Biol Lett. 5:401-404.
10. Burt A, Bell G. 1987. Mammalian chiasma frequencies as a test of two theories of recombination. Nature 326:803-805.
11. Clutton-Brock J. 1999. A natural history of domesticated mammals, 2nd ed. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
12. Cruz F, Vilà C, Webster MT. 2008. The legacy of domestication: accumulation of deleterious mutations in the dog genome. Mol Biol Evol. 25: 2331-2336.
13. Cui P, et al 2007. A complete mitochondrial genome sequence of the wild two-humped camel (Camelus bactrianus ferus): an evolutionary history of Camelidae. BMC Genomics 8:241.
14. Denamur E, Matic I. 2006. Evolution of mutation rates in bacteria. Mol Microbiol. 60:820-827.
15. Diamond J. 2002. Evolution, consequences and future of plant and animal domestication. Nature 418:700-707.
16. Dobney K, Larson G. 2006. Genetics and animal domestication: new windows on an elusive process. J Zool. 269:261-271.
17. Driscoll CA, Macdonald DW, O'Brien SJ. 2009. From wild animals to domestic pets, an evolutionary view of domestication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 106:9971-9978.
18. Driscoll CA, et al 2007. The Near Eastern origin of cat domestication. Science 317:519-523.
19. Drummond A, et al 2011. Geneious v5.4. [cited 2013 Jun 1]. Available from: http://www.geneious.com/.
20. Fang M, Larson G, Soares Ribeiro H, Li N, Andersson L. 2009. Contrasting mode of evolution at a coat color locus in wild and domestic pigs. PLoS Genet. 5:e1000341.
21. Gibbons JG, et al 2012. The evolutionary imprint of domestication on genome variation and function of the filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae. Curr Biol. 22:1403-1409.
22. Gu Z, et al 2005. Elevated evolutionary rates in the laboratory strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 102:1092-1097.
23. Hare J. 1997. The wild Bactrian camel Camelus bactrianus ferus in China: the need for urgent action. Oryx 31:45-48.
24. Harrison RG. 1989. Animal mitochondrial DNA as a genetic marker in population and evolutionary biology. Trends Ecol Evol. 4:6-11.
25. Hasegawa M, Cao Y, Yang Z. 1998. Preponderance of slightly deleterious polymorphism in mitochondrial DNA: nonsynonymous/synonymous rate ratio is much higher within species than between species. Mol Biol Evol. 15:1499-1505.
26. Ho SYW, Phillips MJ, Cooper A, Drummond AJ 2005. Time dependency of molecular rate estimates and systematic overestimation of recent divergence times. Mol Biol Evol. 22:1561-1568.
27. Hugall AF, Lee MSY. 2007. The likelihood node density effect and consequences for evolutionary studies of molecular rates. Evolution 61: 2293-2307.
28. Hughes AL. 2013. Accumulation of slightly deleterious mutations in the mitochondrial genome: a hallmark of animal domestication. Gene 515:28-33.
29. Hurvich CM, Tsai CL 1989. Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 76:297-307.
30. Innan H, Kim Y. 2004. Pattern of polymorphism after strong artificial selection in a domestication event. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 101: 10667-10672.
31. Kadwell M, et al 2001. Genetic analysis reveals the wild ancestors of the llama and the alpaca. Proc Biol Sci. 268:2575-2584.
32. Kijas JW, et al 2009. A genome wide survey of SNP variation reveals the genetic structure of sheep breeds. PLoS One 4:e4668.
33. Kijas JW, et al 2012. Genome-wide analysis of the world's sheep breeds reveals high levels of historic mixture and strong recent selection. PLoS Biol. 10:e1001258.
34. Kim Y, Nielsen R. 2004. Linkage disequilibrium as a signature of selective sweeps. Genetics 167:1513-1524.
35. Kimura M, Ohta T. 1971. Theoretical aspects of population genetics. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
36. King DG, Kashi Y. 2007. Indirect selection for mutability. Heredity 99: 123-124.
37. Lanfear R, Calcott B, Ho SYW, Guindon S. 2012. PartitionFinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Mol Biol Evol. 29:1695-1701.
38. Lu J, et al 2006. The accumulation of deleterious mutations in rice genomes: a hypothesis on the cost of domestication. Trends Genet. 22: 126-131.
39. Lynch M. 2010. Evolution of the mutation rate. Trends Genet. 26: 345-352.
40. Lynch M. 2011. The lower bound to the evolution of mutation rates. Genome Biol Evol. 3:1107-1118.
41. MacEachern S, et al 2009. Molecular evolution of the Bovini tribe (Bovidae, Bovinae): is there evidence of rapid evolution or reduced selective constraint in domestic cattle? BMC Genomics 10:179.
42. Medugorac I, et al 2009. Genetic diversity of European cattle breeds highlights the conservation value of traditional unselected breeds. Mol Ecol. 18:3394-3410.
43. Meyer RS, Purugganan MD 2013. Evolution of crop species: genetics of domestication and diversification. Nat Rev Genet. 14:840-852.
44. Moehlman PD. 2002. Status and action plan for the African wild ass. In: Moehlman PD, editor. Equids: zebras, asses and horses, status survey and conservation action plan. Gland (Switzerland): IUCN. p. 2-9.
45. Moore WS. 1995. Inferring phylogenies from mtDNA variation: mitochon-drial-gene trees versus nuclear-gene trees. Evolution 49:718-726.
46. Nabholz B, Uwimana N, Lartillot N. 2013. Reconstructing the phylogenetic history of long-term effective population size and life-history traits using patterns of amino acid replacement in mitochondrial genomes of mammals and birds. Genome Biol Evol. 5:1273-1290.
47. Nikolaev SI, et al 2007. Life-history traits drive the evolutionary rates of mammalian coding and noncoding genomic elements. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 104:20443-20448.
48. Ohta T. 1992. The nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 23:263-286.
49. Otto SP, Barton NH 2001. Selection for recombination in small populations. Evolution 55:1921-1931.
50. Popadin K, Polishchuk LV, Mamirova L, Knorre D, Gunbin K. 2007. Accumulation of slightly deleterious mutations in mitochondrial protein-coding genes of large versus small mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 104:13390-13395.
51. Rand DM. 1994. Thermal habit, metabolic rate and the evolution of mitochondrial DNA. Trends Ecol Evol. 9:125-131.
52. Rand DM, Kann LM 1996. Excess amino acid polymorphism in mitochondrial DNA: contrasts among genes from Drosophila, mice, and humans. Mol Biol Evol. 13:735-748.
53. Rand DM, Kann LM 1998. Mutation and selection at silent and replacement sites in the evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA. Genetica 102-103:393-407.
54. S are time dependent for closely related bacterial genomes. J Theor Biol. 239:226-235.
55. Rokas A. 2009. The effect of domestication on the fungal proteome. Trends Genet. 25:60-63.
56. Rokas A, Ladoukakis E, Zouros E. 2003. Animal mitochondrial DNA recombination revisited. Trends Ecol Evol. 18:411-417.
57. Rubin CJ, et al 2010. Whole-genome resequencing reveals loci under selection during chicken domestication. Nature 464:587-591.
58. Scandura M, et al 2008. Ancient vs. recent processes as factors shaping the genetic variation of the European wild boar: are the effects of the last glaciation still detectable? Mol Ecol. 17: 1745-1762.
59. Silbermayr K, et al 2010. High mitochondrial differentiation levels between wild and domestic Bactrian camels: a basis for rapid detection of maternal hybridization. Anim Genet. 41:315-318.
60. Sniegowski PD, Gerrish PJ, Lenski RE 1997. Evolution of high mutation rates in experimental populations of E. coli. Nature 387: 703-705.
61. Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. 2008. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web servers. Syst Biol. 57:758.
62. Vilà C. 2001. Widespread origins of domestic horse lineages. Science 291: 474-477.
63. Vilà C, Seddon J, Ellegren H. 2005. Genes of domestic mammals augmented by backcrossing with wild ancestors. Trends Genet. 21: 214-218.
64. Vilà C, et al. 1997. Multiple and ancient origins of the domestic dog. Science 276:1687-1689.
65. Wang Z, et al 2011. Domestication relaxed selective constraints on the yak mitochondrial genome. Mol Biol Evol. 28:1553-1556.
66. Wayne RK, Ostrander EA 2007. Lessons learned from the dog genome. Trends Genet. 23:557-567.
67. Weinreich DM, Rand DM 2000. Contrasting patterns of nonneutral evolution in proteins encoded in nuclear and mitochondrial genomes. Genetics 156:385-399.
68. Wilcoxon F. 1946. Individual comparisons of grouped data by ranking methods. J Econ Entomol. 39:269.
69. Woolfit M, Bromham L. 2005. Population size and molecular evolution on islands. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 272:2277-2282.
70. Wu GS, et al 2007. Population phylogenomic analysis of mitochondrial DNA in wild boars and domestic pigs revealed multiple domestication events in East Asia. Genome Biol. 8:R245.
71. Xia Q, et al 2009. Complete resequencing of 40 genomes reveals domestication events and genes in silkworm (Bombyx). Science 326: 433-436.
72. Yang Z. 2007. PAML 4: Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood. Mol Biol Evol. 24:1586-1591.
73. Zeder MA. 2006. Central questions in the domestication of plants and animals. Evol Anthropol. 15:105-117.