Quantitative risk assessment for collisions involving double hull oil tankers

Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects Part A: International Journal of Maritime Engineering

Volumn 156, Issue PART A2, 2014, Pages 157-174

  Voussef, S A M ^a,b   Ince, S T ^a,c   Kim, V S ^a   Paik, J K ^a   Chang, F ^d   Kim, M S ^e  

^a Pusan National University   (South Korea)

^b Egypt Mansoura University   (Egypt)

^c YILDIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^d LLOYD'S REGISTER   (United Kingdom)

^e LLOYD'S REGISTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; ACCIDENTS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; HULLS (SHIP); OIL SPILLS; RISK ASSESSMENT; VIRTUAL REALITY;

DOUBLE HULL OIL TANKERS; ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES; ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES; FORMAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT; NONLINEAR FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; PROBABILISTIC APPROACHES; QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT; REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE;

OIL TANKERS;

EID: 84905256488     PISSN: 14798751     EISSN: 17400716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3940/rina.ijme.2014.a2.288     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. International Tanker Owner's Pollution Federation, Effects of Oil Spills, ITOPF, 2012, (http://www.itopf.comlinformationservices/data-and-statistics/statistics!).
2. http://www.counterspill.org/disasters/atlanticempress-oil-spill, 2013.
3. HOOKE, N.: "Maritime Casualties, 1963-1996", second edition, LLP Limited, London, 1997.
4. IMO: "Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO Rulemaking Process", International Maritime Organization, MSC'/C'ircl. 1023. 2002.
5. YOUSSEF, S.A.M., KIM, Y.S., PAIK, J.K., CHANG, F. and KIM M.S.: "Hazard Identification and Probabilistic Scenario Selection for Ship-ship Collision Accidents", International Journal of Maritime Engineering, Vol. 156, PartAJ,pp.61-80,2014.
6. HALLQUTST, JO.: "LS-DYNA3D Theory Manual", Livermore Software Technology Corporation, CA., 2010.
7. ROSQVIST, T. and TUOMINEN, R.: "Qualification of Formal Safety Assessment: An Exploratory Study", Safety Science, Vol. 42, No. .?pp. 99-120, 2004.
8. RTNA: "Formal Safety Assessment", Conference proceedings, Royal Instilution of Naval Architects, London, 2002.
9. DNV: "Marine Shipping Quantitative Risk Analysis", Technical Data Report, Det Norske Veritas, Oslo, 2010.
10. OGP: "Risk Assessment Data Directory-Ship! installation Collisions", International Association of Oil and Gas Producers, Report No. 434-16, 2010.
11. PAIK, J.K., CZUJKO, J., KIM, B. J., SEO, J.K., RYU, H.S., HA, Y.C., JANISZEWSKI, P. and MUSIAL, B.: "Quantitative Assessment of Hydrocarbon Explosion and Fire Risks in Offshore Installations", .Journal of Marine Structures, Vol. 24, pp. 73-96, 2011.
12. IMO: "Formal Safety Assessment: FSAContainer Vessels", international Maritime Organization. MSC 83/21/2, 2007.
13. IMO: "Formal Safety Assessment: FSA-Cruise ships", International Maritime Organization, MSC85/17/1, 2008.
14. IMO: "Formal Safety Assessment: FSA-Crude Oil Tankers", international Maritime Organization, MEPC 58/INF.2., 2008.
15. IMO: "Formal Safety Assessment: FSALiquefied Natural Gas (LNG) carriers", International Maritime Organization, MSC 83/21/1, 2007.
16. LOTS, P., WANG, J., WALL, A. and RUXTON, T.: "Formal Safety Assessment of Cruise Ships", Tourism Management. Vol. 25, pp. 93-109, 2004.
17. CROSS, R.B. and BALLESIO, J.E.: "A Quantitative Risk Assessment Model for Oil Tankers", American Bureau of Shipping. 2003.
18. PAIK, J.K., ClUNG, J.Y., THAYAMBALLI, AK.. PEDERSEN. PT. and WANG. G.: "On the Rational Design of Double Hull Tanker Structures against Collision", SNAME Transactions. Vol. 107, pp.323-363, 1999.
19. SERVIS. D. P., SAMUELIDES, M., LOUKA, T., and VOUDOURS, G.: "The Implementation of Finite Element Codes for the Simulation of Ship-ship Collisions", Journal of Ship Research, Vol. 46, pp. 239-24 7, 2002.
20. TSSC: "Collision and Grounding", Report of committee Vol. 3, Proceedings of the 15th international Ship and Offshore Structures C'ongress, San Diego, CA., 2003.
21. SAJDAK, J.A.W. and BROWN, A.J.: "Modelling Longitudinal Damage in Ship Collisions", SSC-437, Ship Structural Committee, Washington DC., 2005.
22. JONES, N.: "Some Recent Developments in the Dynamic Inelastic Behaviour of Structures", Ships and Offshore Structures, Vol. 1. No. 1, pp. 3 7-44, 2006.
23. PAIK, J.K., PARK, J.H. and SAMUELTDES, M.: "Collision Accidental Limit States Performance of Double-Hull Oil Tanker Structures: Pre-CSR versus CSR Designs", Journal of Marine Technology, Vol. 46, No. 4 pp. 183-191, 2009.
24. DNV.: "Rules for Ships", Det Norske Veritas. Pg.5, Ch. 15, Sec.3, Oslo, 2004.
25. HARTS, S. and AMDAHL, J.: "An Analytical Model to Assess a Ship Side during a Collision", Ships and UjJshore Structures, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 431-448, 2012.
26. OZGUC, O.: "A Comparative Study on the Structural Integrity of Single and Double Side Skin Bulk Carriers under Collision Damage", Journal of Marine Structures, Vol. 18, pp. 511-547, 2005.
27. TORNQVTST, R.: "The Design of Crashworthy ship structures", Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Lvngby, 2003.
28. FERRY, M., LE SOURNE, H. and BESNIER F.: "MCOL-Theoretical Manual", Technical Report 01-52, French Shipbuilding Research Institute, 2002.
29. LUTZEN, M.: "Ship Collision Damage", Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, 2001.
30. FUJII, Y. and TANAKA, K.: "Traffic Capacity", Journal of Navigation, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 543-552. 1971.
31. MACDUFF, T.: "Probability of Vessel Collisions", Ocean Industiy, Vol. 9. No. 9, pp. 144-148, 1974.
32. PEDERSEN, PT.: "Collision and Grounding Mechanics", Proceedings of WEGEMT'95, PP. 125-157, 1995.
33. ROELEVEN, D., KOK, M., STIPDONK, H.L. and DEVRIES, W.A.: "Inland Waterway Transport: Modelling the Probability of Accidents", Safety Science, Vol. 19, pp. 19 1-202. 2002.
34. KANEKO, F.: "Methods for Probabilistic Safety Assessments of Ships", Journal of Marine Science and Technology. Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 1-16, 2002.
35. FRIIS-HANSEN, P., RAVN, E. and ENGBERG, P.: "The Bassy Toolbox Baltic Sea Safety-Basic Modelling Principles for Prediction of Collision and Grounding Frequencies", Technical University of Denmark, Lyngbv. 2009.
36. ROSQVIST, T., NYMAN, T., SONNINEN, S. and TUOMINEN, R.: "The Implementation of the VTMIS System for the Gulf of Finland-A FSA Study", Proceedings of RI1'JA International Conference Formal Sa/Cty Assessment, London, 2002.
37. OTTO, S., PEDERSEN, P.T., SAMUELIDES, M. and SAMES, P.C. "Elements of Risk Analysis for Collision and Grounding of a RoRo Passenger Ferry", Journal of Marine Structures, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 461-4 74, 2002.
38. PEDERSEN, PT., and ZHANG, S.: "Collision Analysis for MS Dextra", SAFER EURORO Spring Meeting, Nantes, France, Paper No. 2. pp. 1-33, 1999.
39. FUJIT, Y. and MIZUKT, N.: "Design of VTS Systems fur Water with Bridges", Proceedings of the International Svmposiuni on Advances in Ship Collision Analysis. Copenhagen, 1998.
40. FUWLER, T.i. and SØR1ARD, E.: "Modelling Ship Transportation Risk", Risk Analysis. Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 225-244. 2000.
41. KARLSSON, M., RASMUSSEN, F. M. and FRISK, L.: "Verification of Ship Collision Frequency Model", Proceedings of the International Symposium on Advances in Ship collision Analysis, Rotterdam, 1998.
42. HANNINEN, S. and RYTKANEN, J.: "Oil Transportation and Terminal Development in the Gulf of Finland", VTT publications: 547. Helsinki, 2004.
43. SORMUNEN, O.E.: "Spill Estimation of Chemical Tanker Collisions in the Gulf of Finland", M'S. Thesis, Aalto University, Finland, 2012.
44. Shipping Intelligence Network, SINC, Clarksons, 2010, (http://www.clarksons.net/sin20l0/register/Defa ult.aspx)
45. IMO: "Maritime Knowledge Centre: International Shipping Facts and Figures - Information Resources on Trade, Safety, Security, Environment", International Maritime Organization, 2012.
46. PEDERSEN, P.T.: "Review and Application of Ship Collision and Grounding Analysis Procedures", Journal of Marine Structures, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 241-262, 2010.
47. KUJALA. P., HANNTNEN. M., AROLA, T. and YL.ITALO, J.: "Analysis of the Marine Traffic Safety in the Gulf of Finland", Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 94,pp. 1349-1357, 2009.
48. FUJIT, Y., YAMANOUCHT, H. and MATUI, T.: "Survey on Vessel Traffic Management Systems and Brief Tntroduction to Marine Trat'tic Studies", Electronic Navigation Research In.stitute Papers No. 45, 1983.
49. HANNINEN, M. and KUJALA P.: "The Effects of Causation Probability on the Ship Collision Statistics in the Gulf of Finland", International navigational symposium, Gdansk, Poland, 2009.
50. MONTE WKA, J., GOERLANDT, F. and KUJALA, P.: "Determination of Collision Criteria and Causation Factors Appropriate to a Model for Estimating the Probability of Maritime Accidents", Ocean Engineering, Vol. 'IO,pp. 50-6, 2012.
51. YLTTALO, J.: "Ship-Ship Collision Probability of the Crossing Area between Helsinki and Taunt", Mat-2.4108 Independent research projects in applied mathematics, Systems Analysis Laboratory & Ship Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology, Finland, 2009.
52. ELTOPOULOU, F. and PAPANTKOLAOU, A.:, "Casually Analysis of Large Tankers", Journal of Marine Science and Technology, Vol. 12, No, 4, pp. 240-250, 2007.
53. LOER, K. and HAMANN, R.: "Hazid of Tanker Operations", SAFEDOR Deliverable D4. 7.1., 2007.
54. KITAMURA, 0.: "FEM Approach to the Simulation of Collision and Grounding Damage", Journal of Marine Structures, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 406-428, 2002.
55. HARTS, S. and AMDAHL, J.: "Analysis of Ship-ship Collision Damage Accounting for Bow and Side Deformation Interaction", Journal of Marine Structures. Vol. 32, pp. 18-48. 2013.
56. PAIK, J.K., CHUNG, J.Y., CHOE, I.H., THAYAMBALLJ, A.K., PEDERSEN, PT, and WANG, G.: "On the Rational Design of Double Hull Tanker Structures against Collision", SNAME Transactions, Vol. 107, pp. 323-363, 1999.
57. MINORSKY, VU.: "An Analysis of Ship Collision with Reference to Protection of Nuclear Power Ships", Journal of Ship Research, Vol. 3, pp. 1-4, 1959.
58. IMO: "Revised Interim Guidelines for the Approval of Alternative Methods of Design and Construction of Oil Tankers", Marine environment Protection Committee of the Organisation by Resolution MEPC 110(49), international Maritime Organization. 2003.
59. YAMADA, Y.: "The Cost of Oil Spills from Tankers in Relation to Weight of Spilled Oil", Journal of Marine Technology, Vol. 46, pp. 219-228, 2009.
60. GUARIN, L., KONOVESSIS, D. and VASSALOS D.: "Safety level of Damaged RoPax Ships: Risk Modelling and Cost-effectiveness Analysis", Ocean Engineering, Vol. 36, pp. 941-951, 2009.
61. NET: "Study on Competitiveness of the European Shipbuilding Industry", Netherlands Economic institute, final report ENTR/06/054, Rotte, dam, 2009.
62. KONTOVAS, C.A. and PSARAFTIS, H.N.: "Marine Environment Risk Assessment: A Survey on the Disutility Cost of Oil Spills", 2nd international Symposium on Ship Operations, Management and Economics, SNAME Greek Section. Athens. 2008.
63. PSARROS, G., SKJONG, R. and VANEM, E.: "Risk Acceptance Criterion for Tanker Oil Spill Risk Reduction Measures", Marine Pollution Bulletin, 62:I,pp. 116-127, 2011.
64. PATK, J.K. and CZUJKO, J.: "Assessment of Hydrocarbon Explosion and Fire Risks in Otishore Installations: Recent Advances and Future Trends", The IES Journal Part A: Civil & Structural Engineering, Vol. 4, pp. 16 7-1 79, 2011.
65. VINNEM, J,E.: "Offshore Risk Assessment: Principles, Modelling and Applications of QRA Studies", Second edition, Springer, London, 2007.
66. LEHMANN, M.P. and SORGARD, E.: "Consequence Model for Ship Accidents", SARS und SRA-Europe Annual C'onfe,ence, Edinburgh, 2000.
67. SAMES, P.C. and HAMANN R.: "Towards Environmental Risk Acceptance Criteria", ASME International ('onference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (OMA), Estoril, 2008.