Analysis of ship-ship collision damage accounting for bow and side deformation interaction

Marine Structures

Volumn 32, Issue , 2013, Pages 18-48

  Haris, Sabril ^a   Amdahl, Jorgen ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Damage interaction; Non linear FEM; Relative resistance; Ship collision; Simplified analytical method; Type of collision

Indexed keywords

DAMAGE INTERACTION; NONLINEAR FEM; RELATIVE RESISTANCE; SHIP COLLISION; SIMPLIFIED ANALYTICAL METHODS; TYPE OF COLLISION;

DEFORMATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; NUMERICAL METHODS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

SHIPS;

COLLISION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DAMAGE; DEFORMATION; SHIP DESIGN; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84875798505     PISSN: 09518339     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2013.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Minorsky V.U. An analysis of ship collisions with reference to nuclear power plants. J Ship Res 1959, 3(2):1-4.
2. Hong L. Simplified analysis and design of ships subjected to collision and grounding. Doctoral thesis. Department of Marine Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; 2009.
3. Carlebur A.F.C. Full-scale collision tests. Saf Sci 1995, 19(2, 3):171-178.
4. Ito H., Kondo K., Yoshimura N., Kawashima M., Yamamoto S. A simplified method to analyse the strength of double hulled structures in collision. J Soc Naval Architects Jpn 1984, 156:283-296.
5. Haris S., Amdahl J. An analytical model to assess a ship side during a collision. Ships Offshore Struct 2012, 7(4):431-448.
6. Amdahl J. Energy absorption in ship-platform impacts. Doctoral thesis. Department of Marine Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; 1983.
7. Hagiwara K., Takanabe H., Kawano H. A proposed method of predicting ship collision damage. Int J Impact Eng 1983, 1(3):257-279.
8. Endo H., Yamada Y., Kitamura O., Suzuki K. Model test on the collapse strength of the buffer bow structures. Marine Struct 2002, 15(4, 5):365-381.
9. Yamada Y., Endo H. Collapse mechanism of the buffer bow structure on axial crushing. Int J Offshore Polar Eng 2005, 15(2):147-154.
10. Yang P.D.C., Caldwell J.B. Collision energy absorption of ships' bow structures. Int J Impact Eng 1988, 7(2):181-196.
11. Kierkegaard H. Ship bow response in high energy collisions. Marine Structures 1993, 6(4):359-376.
12. Kitamura O. Buffer bow design for the improved safety of ships. Ship structure symposium on ship structures for the new millennium 2000, Supporting Quality in Shipbuilding, Arlington, VA.
13. Yasuda A, Imakita A. Numerical study on structural arrangement effects on collision resistance of hull girders. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on collision and grounding of ships, Hamburg, Germany; 2007. p. 117-122.
14. Lutzen M., Simonsen B.C., Pedersen P.T. Rapid prediction of damage to struck and striking vessels in a collision event. Ship structure symposium on ship structures for the new millennium 2000, Supporting Quality in Shipbuilding, Arlington, VA.
15. Hallquist J.O. LS-DYNA theory manual 2006, Technical report, Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore, CA.
16. Hallquist J.O. LS-DYNA keyword user's manual 2007, Technical report, Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore, CA.
17. Kitamura O. FEM approach to the simulation of collision and grounding damage. Marine Struct 2002, 15(4, 5):403-428.
18. Wierzbicki T., Abramowicz W. On the crushing mechanics of thin-walled structures. J Appl Mech 1983, 50:727-734.
19. Hong L., Amdahl J. Crushing resistance of web girders in ship collision and grounding. Marine Struct 2008, 21(4):374-401.
20. Simonsen B.C., Ocakli H. Experiments and theory on deck and girder crushing. Thin-walled Struct 1999, 34(3):195-216.
21. Wang G, Ohtsubo H. Deformation of ship plate subjected to very large load. In: Proceedings of sixteenth international conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering, Yokohama, Japan, vol. II; 1997. p. 173-80.
22. Zhang S. The mechanics of ship collisions. Doctoral thesis. Department of Naval Architecture and Offshore Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark; 1999.
23. Wang G., Ohtsubo H., Arita K. Large deflection of a rigid-plastic circular plate pressed by a sphere. J Appl Mech 1998, 65(2):533-535.
24. Simonsen B.C., Lauridsen L.P. Energy absorption and ductile failure in metal sheets under lateral indentation by a sphere. Int J Impact Eng 2000, 24(10):1017-1039.
25. Lee Y.W., Woertz J.C., Wierzbicki T. Fracture prediction of thin plates under hemi-spherical punch with calibration and experimental verification. Int J Mech Sci 2004, 46(5):751-781.
26. Hayduk R.J., Wierzbicki T. Extensional collapse modes of structural members. Comput Struct 1984, 18(3):447-458.
27. Haris S., Amdahl J. Crushing resistance of a cruciform and its application to ship collision and grounding. Ships Offshore Struct 2012, 7(2):185-195.
28. Yamada Y., Pedersen P. A benchmark study of procedures for analysis of axial crushing of bulbous bows. Mar Struct 2008, 21(2, 3):257-293.
29. Wang G, Katsuyuki S, Ohtsubo H. Predicting collision strength of bow structure. In: International conference on technologies for marine environment preservation, Tokyo, Japan; 1995. p. 40-43.
30. Belytschko T., Liu W.K., Moran B. Nonlinear finite elements for continua and structures 2006, JohnWiley & Sons, Chichester (England).
31. Alsos H.S., Amdahl J. On the resistance of tanker bottom structures during stranding. Mar Struct 2007, 20(4):218-237.
32. Tornqvist R, Simonsen BC. Safety and structural crashworthiness of ship structures; Modelling tools and application in design. In: the third international conference on collision and grounding of ships, Izu, Japan; 2004. p. 285-294.
33. Alsos H.S., Amdahl J., Hopperstad O.S. On the resistance to penetration of stiffened plates, part II: numerical analysis. Int J Impact Eng 2009, 36(7):875-887.
34. NORSOK N-004 Design of steel structures, appendix A 2004, Design Against Accidental Actions.