Heuristics and criterion setting during selective encoding in visual decision making: Evidence from eye movements

Visual Cognition

Volumn 20, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1110-1129

  Schotter, Elizabeth R ^a   Gerety, Cainen ^a   Rayner, Keith ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision making; Eye movements; Gaze bias; Heuristics; Selective encoding

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; EYE MOVEMENT; GAZE; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; RETINA IMAGE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DECISION MAKING; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

EID: 84869409691     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2012.735719     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Baayen, R., Davidson, D. and Bates, D. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59: 390-412.
2. Busemeyer, J. R. and Townsend, J. T. 1993. Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review, 100: 432-459.
3. Glaholt, M. G. and Reingold, E. M. 2009a. Stimulus exposure and gaze bias: A further test of the gaze cascade model. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 71: 445-450.
4. Glaholt, M. G. and Reingold, E. M. 2009b. The time course of gaze bias in visual decision tasks. Visual Cognition, 17: 1228-1243.
5. Glaholt, M. G. and Reingold, E. M. 2011. Eye movement monitoring as a process tracing methodology in decision making research. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 4: 125-146.
6. Glaholt, M. G., Wu, M. and Reingold, E. M. 2009. Predicting preference from fixations. PsychNology Journal, 7: 141-158.
7. Jaeger, T. F. 2008. Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and toward logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59: 434-446.
8. Johnson, J. G. and Busemeyer, J. R. 2005. A dynamic, stochastic, computational model of preference reversal phenomena. Psychological Review, 112: 841-861.
9. Pieters, R. and Warlop, L. 1999. Visual attention during brand choice: The impact of time pressure and task motivation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 16: 1-16.
10. Rayner, K. 1998. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124: 372-442.
11. Rayner, K. 2009. The thirty-fifth Sir Frederick Bartlett lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62: 1457-1506.
12. Schotter, E. R., Berry, R., McKenzie, C. and Rayner, K. 2010. Gaze bias: Selective encoding and liking effects. Visual Cognition, 18: 1113-1132.
13. Shimojo, S., Simion, C., Shimojo, E. and Scheier, C. 2003. Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference. Nature Neuroscience, 6: 1317-1322.
14. Simion, C. and Shimojo, S. 2006. Early interactions between orienting, visual sampling and decision making in facial preference. Vision Research, 46: 3331-3335.