Predicting preference from fixations

PsychNology Journal

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 141-158

  Glaholt, Mackenzie G ^a   Wu, Mei Chun ^b   Reingold, Eyal M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b NATIONAL SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Decision making; Eye movements; Gaze bias; Preference

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955162697     PISSN: 17207525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. nd Annual Conference on Communication by Gaze Interaction, COGAIN 2006, Turin, Italy.
2. Duchowski, A. T. (2002). A breadth-first survey of eye-tracking applications. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 34(4), 455-470.
3. Ford, J. K., Schmitt, N., Schechtman, S. L., Hults, B. M., & Doherty, M. L. (1989). Process tracing methods: Contributions, problems, and neglected research questions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 75-117.
4. Glaholt, M. G., & Reingold, E. M. (in press). The time course of gaze bias in visual decision tasks. Visual Cognition.
5. Glaholt, M. G., & Reingold, E. M. (2009). Stimulus exposure and gaze bias: a further test of the gaze cascade model. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 71, 445-450.
6. Isaacowitz, D. M., Wadlinger, H. A., Goren, D., & Wilson, H. R. (2006). Selective preference in visual fixation away from negative images in old age? An eye-tracking study. Psychology and Aging, 21(1), 40-48.
7. Lohse, G. L., & Johnson, E. J. (1996). A comparison of two process tracing methods for choice tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68, 28-43.
8. Murphy, N. A., & Isaacowitz, D. M. (2008). Preferences for emotional information in older and younger adults: A meta-analysis of memory and attention tasks. Psychology and Aging, 23(2), 263-286.
9. Pannasch, S., Dornhoefer, S. M., Unema, P. J. A., & Velichkovsky, B. M. (2001). The omnipresent prolongation of visual fixations: saccades are inhibited by changes in situation and in subject's activity. Vision Research, 41, 3345-3351.
10. Pieters, R., & Warlop, L. (1999). Visual attention during brand choice: The impact of time pressure and task motivation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 16, 1-16.
11. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 21-38.
12. Reingold, E. M., & Stampe, D. M. (2002). Saccadic inhibition in voluntary and reflexive saccades. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(3), 371-388.
13. Reingold, E. M., & Stampe, D. M. (2004). Saccadic inhibition in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(1), 194-211.
14. Rosen, L. D., & Rosenkoetter, P. (1976). An eye fixation analysis of choice and judgment with multiattribute stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 4(6), 747-752.
15. Russo, J. E. (1978). Eye fixations can save the world: A critical evaluation and a comparison between eye fixations and other information processing methodologies. Advances in Consumer Research, 5(1), 561-570.
16. Russo, J. E., & Dosher, B. A. (1983). Strategies for multiattribute binary choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9(4), 676-696.
17. Russo, J. E., & Leclerc, F. (1994). An eye-fixation analysis of choice processes for consumer nondurables. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 274-290.
18. Russo, J. E., & Rosen, L. D. (1975). An eye fixation analysis of multialternative choice. Memory & Cognition, 3(3), 267-276.
19. Simion, C., & Shimojo, S. (2007). Interrupting the cascade: Orienting contributes to decision making even in the absence of visual stimulation. Perception & Psychophysics, 69(4), 591-595.
20. Simion, C., & Shimojo, S. (2006). Early interactions between orienting, visual sampling and decision making in facial preference. Vision Research, 46, 3331-3335.
21. Shimojo, S., Simion, C., Shimojo, E., & Scheier, C. (2003). Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference. Nature Neuroscience, 6(12), 1317-1322.