A comprehensive review of sensors and instrumentation methods in devices for musical expression

Sensors (Switzerland)

Volumn 14, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 13556-13591

  Medeiros, Carolina Brum ^a   Wanderley, Marcelo M ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Accelerometers; Digital musical instruments; Do It yourself; FSR; NIME conference; Sensor fusion; Strain gages

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETERS; DESIGN; ELECTRONIC MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; MILITARY APPLICATIONS; MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; STRAIN GAGES;

DO-IT-YOURSELF; ELECTRONIC INSTRUMENTATION DESIGN; FSR; NEW INTERFACES FOR MUSICAL EXPRESSIONS; NIME CONFERENCE; SENSOR FUSION; SENSORS AND INSTRUMENTATIONS; SIGNAL PROCESSING TECHNIQUE;

SIGNAL PROCESSING;

EID: 84904962615     PISSN: 14248220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/s140813556     Document Type: Article

References (120)

1. International Bureau of Weights and Measures. In Vocabulary of Basic and General Terms in Metrology (VIM), 3rd ed.; Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM): Paris, France, 2012.
2. Stein, P. The Unified Approach to the Engineering of Measurement Systems for Test and Evaluation-A Brief Survey. In Proceedings of the Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (IMTC 96), Brussels, Belgium, 4-6 June 1996.
3. Stein, P.K. The Unified Approach to the Engineering of Measurement Systems-Basic Concepts; Stein Engineering Services Inc: Phoenix, AZ, USA, 1992.
4. Buxton, B. Artists and the Art of the Luthier. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 1997, 31, 10-11.
5. Dobrian, C.; Koppelman, D. The 'E' in NIME: Musical Expression with New Computer Interfaces. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME 2006), Paris, France, 4-8 June 2006.
6. Cook, P. Principles for Designing Computer Music Controllers. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME 2001), Seatle, WA, USA, 1-2 April 2001.
7. Kushner, D. The Making of Arduino. Available online: http://spectrum.ieee.org/geek-life/hands-on/the-making-of-arduino/ (accessed on 22 July 2014).
8. Buechley, L.; Perner-Wilson, H. Crafting Technology: Reimagining the Processes, Materials, and Cultures of Electronics. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. (TOCHI 2012) 2012, 19, 21:1-21:21.
9. Marshall, M.T.; Hartshorn, M.; Wanderley, M.M.; Levitin, D.J. Sensor Choice for Parameter Modulations in Digital Musical Instruments: Empirical Evidence from Pitch Modulation. J. New Music Res. 2009, 38, 241-253.
10. Marshall, M.T. Physical Interface Design for Digital Musical Instruments. Ph.D. Thesis, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada, 2009.
11. Bongers, B. Physical Interfaces in the Electronic Arts. In Trends in Gestural Control; Wanderley, M.M., Battier, M., Eds.; IRCAM: Centre Pompidou: Paris, France, 2000.
12. Wanderley, M.M.; Orio, N. Evaluation of Input Devices for Musical Expression: Borrowing Tools from HCI. Comput. Music J. 2002, 26, 62-76.
13. Trends in Gestural Control of Music; Wanderley, M.M., Battier, M., Eds.; IRCAM: Centre Pompidou: Paris, France, 2000.
14. Miranda, E.R.; Wanderley, M.M. New Digital Musical Instruments: Control and Interaction Beyond the Keyboard; A-R Editions: Middleton, USA, 2006.
15. Begg, R.; Palaniswami, M. Computational Intelligence for Movement Sciences: Neural Networks and Other Emerging Techniques; Idea Group Publishing: Hershey, PA, USA, 2010.
16. Page, A.F.; Rosario, H.D.; Mata, V.; Besa, A. Rules of propagation of artifact to kinematic variables in human movement analysis: Effect of the angular displacement representation. J. Biomech. Eng. 2013, 36, 034502.
17. Naveda, L.; Leman, M. The spatiotemporal representation of dance and music gestures using Topological Gesture Analysis (TGA). Music Percept. 2010, 28, 93-111.
18. Lai, D.; Begg, R.; Palaniswami, M. Computational Intelligence in Gait Research: A Perspective on Current Applications and Future Challenges. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 2009, 13, 687-702.
19. Cloete, T.; Scheffer, C. Benchmarking of a full-body inertial motion capture system for clinical gait analysis. In Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS 2008), Vancouver, Canada, 21-24 August 2008.
20. Pallás-Areny, R.; Webster, J.G. Sensors and Signal Conditioning; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2001.
21. Fraden, J. Handbook of Modern Sensors: Physics, Design and Applications, 3rd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2004.
22. Hoffmann, K. An Introduction to Measurements Using Strain Gages; HBM: Pfungstadt, Germany, 2012.
23. Omega. Transactions in Measurement and Control-Volume 2: Data Acquisition. Available online: http://www.omega.com/literature/transactions/volume2/trantocvol2.html (accessed on 22 July 2014).
24. Kitchin, C.; Counts, L. Analog Devices. In A Designer's Guide to Instrumentation Amplifiers, 3rd ed.; Available online: http://www.analog.com/en/content/CU_dh_designers_guide_to_ instrumentation_amps/fca.html (accessed on 22 July 2014).
25. Kugelstadt, T. Texas Instruments. Getting the Most out of Your Instrumentation Amplifier Design. Available online: http://www.ti.com/lit/an/slyt226/slyt226.pdf (accessed on 22 July 2014).
26. International Bureau of Weights and Measures. In Evaluation of Measurement Data-Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM); Standard; Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM): Paris, France, 2008.
27. Welch, G.; Bishop, G. An Introduction to the Kalman Filter. In Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH Conference, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 12-17 August 2001.
28. Brown, R.; Hwang, P. Introduction to Random Signals and Applied Kalman Filtering; JohnWiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1997.
29. Hall, D.; Llinas, J. Handbook of Multisensor Data Fusion; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2001.
30. Haykin, S. Chapter Kalman Filters. In Kalman Filtering and Neural Networks; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2001; pp. 1-22.
31. Zarchan, P.; Musoff, H. Fundamentals of Kalman Filtering: A Practical Approach; Volume 208; American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics: Reston, VA, USA, 2005.
32. Hall, D.L.; McMullen, S.A.H. Mathematical Techniques in Multisensor Data Fusion, 2nd ed.; Artech House: London, UK, 2004.
33. Sabatini, A.M. Estimating Three-Dimensional Orientation of Human Body Parts by Inertial/Magnetic Sensing. Sensors 2011, 11, 1489-1525.
34. Yun, X.; Bachmann, E.; McGhee, R. A Simplified Quaternion-Based Algorithm for Orientation Estimation from Earth Gravity and Magnetic Field Measurements. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2008, 57, 638-650.
35. Yun, X.; Bachmann, E. Design, Implementation, and Experimental Results of a Quaternion-Based Kalman Filter for Human Body Motion Tracking. IEEE Trans. Robot. 2006, 22, 1216-1227.
36. Music, J.; Kamnik, R.; Munih, M. Model based inertial sensing of human body motion kinematics in sit-to-stand movement. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 2008, 16, 933-944.
37. Fohanno, V.; Colloud, F.; Begon, M.; Lacouture, P. Estimation of the 3D kinematics in kayak using an extended Kalman filter algorithm: A pilot study. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 2010, 13, 55-56.
38. Tao, Y.; Hu, H. A Novel Sensing and Data Fusion System for 3-D Arm Motion Tracking in Telerehabilitation. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2008, 57, 1029-1040.
39. Zhu, R.; Zhou, Z. A real-time articulated human motion tracking using tri-axis inertial/magnetic sensors package. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2004, 12, 295-302.
40. Marins, J.; Yun, X.; Bachmann, E.; Mcghee, R.; Zyda, M. An Extended Kalman Filter for Quaternion-based Orientation Estimation Using MARG Sensors. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (RSJ 2001), Maui, HI, USA, 29 October-3 November 2001; Volume 4, pp. 2003-2011.
41. Farrell, J. Aided Navigation: GPS with High Rate Sensors; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA,2008.
42. Medeiros, C.; Wanderley, M.M. Multiple-Model Linear Kalman Filter Framework for Unpredictable Signals. IEEE Sens. J. 2014, 14, 979-991.
43. Drolet, L.; Michaud, F.; Cote, J. Adaptable Sensor Fusion Using Multiple Kalman Filters. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2000), Takamatsu, Japan, 31 October-5 December 2000; Volume 2, pp. 1434-1439.
44. Lapinski, M. A Platform for High-Speed Biomechanical Data Analysis using Wearable Wireless Sensors. Ph.D. Thesis, MIT: Boston, MA, USA, 2013.
45. Roetenberg, D.; Luinge, H.; Baten, C.; Veltink, P. Compensation of Magnetic Disturbances Improves Inertial and Magnetic Sensing of Human Body Segment orientation. IEEE Trans. Neural Systems Rehabil. Eng. 2005, 13, 395-405.
46. Madgwick, S.; Harrison, A.J.L.; Vaidyanathan, R. Estimation of IMU and MARG Orientation Using a Gradient Descent Algorithm. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR 2011), Zurich, Switzerland, 29 June-1 July 2011; pp. 1-7.
47. Vigliensoni, G.; Wanderley, M.M. A Quantitative Comparison of Position Trackers for the Development of a Touch-less Musical Interface. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression Proceedings (NIME 2012). Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 21-23 May 2012.
48. Nymoen, K.; Voldsund, A.; Skogstad, S.A.; Jensenius, A.R.; Torresen, J. Comparing Motion Data from an iPod Touch to an Optical Infrared Marker-Based Motion Capture System. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interface for Musical Expression (NIME 2012), Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 21-23 May 2012.
49. Skogstad, S.A.; Nymoen, K.; de Quay, Y.; Jensenius, A.R. OSC Implementation and Evaluation of the Xsens MVN Suit. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME 2011), Oslo, Norway, 30 May-1 June 2011.
50. Caramiaux, B.; Tanaka, A. Machine Learning of Musical Gestures. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interface for Musical Expression (NIME 2013), Seoul, Korea, 27-30 May 2013.
51. Tanaka, A.; Parkinson, A.; Settel, Z.; Tahiroglu, K. A Survey and Thematic Analysis Approach as Input to the Design of Mobile Music GUIs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME 2012), Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 21-23 May 2012.
52. Thibodeau, J.; Wanderley, M.M. Trumpet Augmentation and Technological Symbiosis. Comput. Music J. 2013, 37, 12-25.
53. Guaus, E.; Bonada, J.; Maestre, E.; Perez, A.; Blaauw, M. Calibration Method to Accurately Measure Bow Force in Real Violin Performances. In Proceeding of the International Computer Music Conference (ICMC 2009), Montreal, Canada, 16-21 August 2009.
54. Gong, N.W.; Steimle, J.; Olberding, S.; Hodges, S.; Gillian, N.; Kawahara, Y.; Paradiso, J.A. PrintSense: A Versatile Sensing Technique to Support Multimodal Flexible Surface Interaction. In Proceeding of the ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2014), Toronto, Canada, 26 April-1 May 2014.
55. Koehly, R.; Wanderley, M.M.; van de Ven, T.; Curtil, D. In-House Development of Paper Force Sensors for Musical Applications. Comput. Music J. 2014, 28, 22-35.
56. Hollinger, A.; Thibodeau, J.; Wanderley, M.M. An Embedded Hardware Platform for Fungible Interfaces. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (ICMC 2010), New York, NY, USA, 1-3 June 2010; pp. 56-59.
57. Mitchell, T.; Madgwick, S.; Heap, I. Musical Interaction with Hand Posture and Orientation: A Toolbox of Gestural Control Mechanisms. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME 2012), Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 21-23 May 2012.
58. Hollinger, A.; Wanderley, M.M. Evaluation of Commercial Force-Sensing Resistors. Internal Report IDMIL Laboratory, McGill University. Available online: http://idmil.org/_media/publications/hollinger_wanderley_fsrevaluation.pdf?id=publications (accessed on 22 July 2014).
59. Szekely, G.J.; Rizzo, M.L. Hierarchical Clustering via Joint Between-Within Distances: Extending Ward's Minimum Variance Method J. Classif. 2005, 22, 151-183.
60. Arduino Playground. Available online: http://playground.arduino.cc/Main/InterfacingWithHardware#InputTOC (accessed on 22 July 2014).
61. Threads on Sensors in Instructables Portal. Available online: http://www.instructables.com/tag/type-id/category-technology/channel-sensors/ (accessed on 22 July 2014).
62. Sensor Wiki. Available online: http://www.sensorwiki.org (accessed on 22 July 2014).
63. Kamada, T.; Kawai, S. An Algorithm for Drawing General Undirected Graphs. Inf. Process. Lett. 1989, 31, 7-15.
64. Hanneman, R.A.; Riddle, M. Introduction to Social Network Methods; University of California: Oakland, CA, USA, 2005.
65. Schacher, J.C.; Stoecklin, A. Traces-Body, Montion and Sound. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME 2011), Oslo, Norway, 30 May-1 June 2011.
66. Ahola, T.; Tahiroglu, K.; AAAhmaniemi, T.; Belloni, F.; Ranki, V. Raja-A Multidisciplinary Artistic Performance. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME 2011), Oslo, Norway, 30 May-1 June 2011.
67. Jessop, E.; Torpey, P.A.; Bloomberg, B. Music and Technology in Death and the Powers. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME 2011), Oslo, Norway, 30 May-1 June 2011.
68. Todoroff, T. Wireless Digital/Analog Sensors for Music and Dance Performances. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME 2011), Oslo, Norway, 30 May-1 June 2011.
69. Gillian, N. Gesture Recognition for Musician Computer Interaction. Ph.D. Thesis, School of Music and Sonic Arts, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK, 2011.
70. Analog Devices. The Five Motion Senses: Using MEMS Inertial Sensing to Transform Applications. Available online: http://www.analog.com/static/imported-files/overviews/The_Five_Motion_Senses.pdf (accessed on 22 July 2014).
71. Fisher, C.J. Analog Devices Application Note on Using an Accelerometer for Inclination Sensing. Available online: http://www.analog.com/static/imported-files/application_notes/AN-1057.pdf (accessed on 22 July 2014).
72. Heaston, R.J. Why did Einstein put so Much Emphasis on the Equivalence Principal. In Proceeding of the 15th Annual Conference of the Natural Philosophy Alliance, Albuquerque, NW, USA, 21-25 May 2008.
73. Park, M. Error Analysis and Stochastic Modeling of MEMS based Inertial Sensors for Land Vehicle Navigation Applications. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 2004.
74. Colibrys. Accelerometer for AHRS Application. Available online: http://www.colibrys.com/files/pdf/products/30N-AHRS.B.05.11.pdf (accessed on 22 July 2014).
75. Dorobantu, R.; Gerlach, C. Investigation of a Navigation Grade RLG SIMU type iNAV RQH. Ph.D. Thesis, IInstitut fur Astronomische und Physikalische Geodasie Technische Universitat Munchen, Munich, Germany, 2004.
76. Allen, J.J.; Kinney, R.D.; Sarsfield, J.; Daily, M.; Ellis, J.R.; Smith, J.; Montague, S.; Howe, R.; Boser, B.; Horowitz, R.; et al. Integrated micro-electro-mechanical sensor development for inertial applications. IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag. 1998, 13, 36-40.
77. Kionix. AN012 Accelerometer Errors. Available oneline: http://www.kionix.com/sites/default/files/AN012%20Accelerometer%20Errors.pdf (accessed on 22 July 2014).
78. Grigorie, T.L.; Lungu, M.; Edu, I.R.; Obreja, R. Concepts for Error Modeling of Miniature Accelerometers Used in Inertial Navigation Systems; Annals of the University of Craiova, Electrical Engineering Series; Craiova, Romania, 2010; p. 34.
79. Park, M.; Gao, Y. Error and Performance Analysis of MEMS-based Inertial Sensors with a Low-cost GSP Receiver. Sensors 2008, 8, 2240-2261.
80. Ang, W.T.; Khosla, P.K.; Riviere, C.N. Nonlinear Regression Model of a Low-g MEMS Accelerometer. IEEE Sens. J. 2007, 7, 81-88.
81. Baba, T.; Hashida, M.; Katayose, H. VirtualPhilharmony": A Conducting SySystem with Heuristics of Conducting an Orchestra. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME 2010), Sydney, Australia, 15-18 June 2010.
82. Groux, S.L.; Manzoli, J.; Verschure, P.F. Embodied and Collaborative Musical Interaction in the Multimodal Brain Orchestra. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME 2010), Sydney, Australia, 15-18 June 2010.
83. Yaremchuk, V.; Wanderley, M.M. Artificial Neural Networks for Movement Analysis of Musical Performance. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Movement and Computing (MOCO 2014), Paris, France, 16-17 June 2014.
84. Interlink. Interlink Electronics FSR © Force Sensing Resistors. Available online: http://akizukidenshi.com/download/ds/interlinkelec/9400004_Rev_B%20FSR%20Integration%20Guide.pdf (accessed on 22 July 2014).
85. Pardue, L.S.; Boch, A.; Boch, M.; Southworth, C.; Rigopulos, A. Gamelan Elektrika: An Electronic Balinese Gamelan. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME 2011), Oslo, Norway, 30 May-1 June 2011.
86. Medeiros, C.B.; Wanderley, M.M. Conditioning Circuits and Data Fusion for Low Performance Sensors. In forthcoming conference paper.
87. Young, D. The Hyperbow Controller: Real-Time Dynamics Measurement of Violin Performance In Proceeding of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME 2002), Dublin, Ireland, 24-26 May 2002.
88. Strain Gauge Technology, 2nd ed.; Window, A., Ed.; Elsevier Applied Science: Newnes, Australia, 1993.
89. Springer Handbook of Experimental Solid Mechanics; Sharpe, W.N., Jr., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2008.
90. Medeiros, C.B.; Wanderley, M.M. Evaluation of Sensor Technologies for The Rulers: A Kalimba-like Digital Musical Instrument. In Proceedings of the Sound and Music Computing Conference (SMC 2011), Padova, Italy, 6-9 July 2011.
91. Leeuw, H. The Electrumpet, a Hybrid Electro-Acoustic Instrument. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME 2009), Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 4-6 June 2009.
92. Jenkins, L.; Page, W.; Trail, S.; Tzanetakis, G.; Driessen, P. An Easily Removable, Wireless Optical Sensing System (EROSS) for the Trumpet. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME 2013), Seoul, Korea, 27-30 May 2013.
93. Semiconductors, V. Fully Integrated Proximity and Ambient Light Sensor with Infrared Emitter and I2C Interface. Available online: http://www.vishay.com/docs/83798/vcnl4000.pdf (accessed on 13 May 2014).
94. McPherson, A. Portable Measurement and Mapping of Continuous Piano Gesture. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME 2013), Seoul, Korea, 27-30 May 2013.
95. Shear, G.; Wright, M. Further Developments in the Electromagnetically Sustained Rhodes Piano. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME 2012), Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 21-23 May 2012.
96. Buschert, J.R. Musician Marker: Play Expressive Music WitWith Practice. In Proceedings of the Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME 2012), Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 21-23 May 2012.
97. Grosshauser, T.; Tröster, G. Finger Position and Pressure Sensing Techniques for Strings and Keyboard Instruments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME 2013), Seoul, Korea, 27-30 May 2013.
98. Shear, G.; Wright, M. The Electromagnetically Sustained Rhodes Piano. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME 2011), Oslo, Norway, 30 May-1 June 2011.
99. Pardue, L.S.; McPherson, A.P. Near-Field Optical Reflective Sensing for Bow Tracking. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME 2013), Seoul, Korea, 27-30 May 2013.
100. Marchini, M.; Papiotis, P.; Pérez, A.; Maestre, E. A Hair Ribbon Deflection Model for Low-Intrusiveness Measurement of Bow Force in Violin Performance. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME 2011), Oslo, Norway, 30 May-1 June 2011.
101. Demoucron, M.; Askenfelt, A.; Caussé, R. Measuring Bow Force in Bowed String Performance: Theory and Implementation of a Bow Force Sensor. Acta Acust. United Acust., 2009, 95, 718-732.
102. Wang, J.; d'Alessandro, N.; Fels, S.; Pritchard, B. Squeezy: Extending a Multi-touch Screen with Force Sensing Objects for ContControl Articulatory Synthesis. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME 2011), Oslo, Norway, 30 May-1 June 2011.
103. Hollinger, A. Optical Sensing, Embedded Systems, and Musical Interfaces for Functional Neuroimaging. Ph.D. Thesis, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada, 2014.
104. Hollinger, A.; Wanderley. MRI-Compatible Optically-Sensed Cello In Proceedings of the IEEE Sensors Conference, Baltimore, MD, USA, 4-6 November 2013.
105. Hollinger, A.; Wanderley, M.M. Optoelectronic Acquisition and Control Board for Musical Applications. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME 2012), Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 21-23 May 2012.
106. Paradiso, J.A.; Gershenfeld, N. Musical applications of electric field sensing. Comput. Music J. 1997, 21, 69-89.
107. Gong, N.W.; Zhao, N.; Paradiso, J.A. A Customizable Sensate Surface for Music Control. In Proceeding of the Internation Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME 2011), Oslo, Norway, 30 May-1 June 2011.
108. Elmenreich, W. Sensor Fusion in Time-Triggered Systems. Ph.D. Thesis, Institut für Technische Informatik, Lübeck, Germany, 2002.
109. Raol, J. Multi-Sensor Data Fusion With MATLAB; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010.
110. Llinas, J.; Hall, D. An Introduction to Multi-sensor Data Fusion. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS 1998), Monterey, CA, USA, 31 May-3 June 1998; Volume 6, pp. 537-540.
111. Klein, L. Sensor and Data Fusion: A Tool for Information Assessment and Decision Making; SPIE Press: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2004.
112. Fowler, C. Comments on the Cost and Performance of Military Systems. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 1979, AES-15, 2-10.
113. Waltz, E.L.; Llinas, J. Multisensor Data Fusion; Artech House, Inc.: Norwood, MA, USA, 1990.
114. Maybeck, P. Stochastic Models, Estimation and Control; Academic Press: Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 1979.
115. Welch, G.; Bishop, G. An Introduction to Kalman filter. Available online: http://www.cs.unc.edu/welch/media/pdf/kalman_intro.pdf (accessed on 22 July 2014
116. Cook, G. Mobile Robots: Navigation, Control and Remote Sensing, 1st ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011.
117. Grewal, M.; Andrews, A. Kalman Filtering: Theory and Practice Using MATLAB; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2001.
118. Arnaud, E.; Memin, E. An efficient Rao-Blackwellized particle filter for object tracking. In Proceeding of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Genova, Italy, 11-14 September 2005.
119. Doucet, A.; Johansen, A.M. A Tutorial on Partical Filtering and Smoothing: Fifteen years Later. In Handbook of Nonlinear Filtering; Crisan, D., Rozovsky, B., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2011.
120. Comotti, D.; Ermidoro, M.; Galizzi, M.; Vitali, A. Development of a Wireless Low-power Multi-sensor Network for Motion Tracking Applications. In Proceeding of the IEEE International Conference on Body Sensor Networks (BSN 2013), Boston, MA, USA, 6-9 May 2013.