The neuroanatomic and neurophysiological infrastructure for speech and language

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volumn 28, Issue , 2014, Pages 142-149

  Poeppel, David ^a,b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR EMPIRICAL AESTHETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN REGION; COGNITION; EMOTION; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEMISPHERE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LINGUISTICS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MIDDLE TEMPORAL GYRUS; NERVE CELL MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; NERVE EXCITABILITY; NEUROANATOMY; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; OSCILLATION; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SEMANTICS; SPEECH; SYNTAX SCORE; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; BRAIN FUNCTION; FUNCTIONAL ANATOMY; NERVE CELL; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NEUROBIOLOGY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; BRAIN; CYTOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; NEURONS; SPEECH;

EID: 84904763587     PISSN: 09594388     EISSN: 18736882     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2014.07.005     Document Type: Review

References (72)

1. Hickok G., Poeppel D. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nat Rev Neurosci 2007, 8:393-402.
2. Friederici A.D. The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function. Physiol Rev 2011, 91:1357-1392.
3. Pulvermüller F., Fadiga L. Active perception: sensorimotor circuits as a cortical basis for language. Nat Rev Neurosci 2010, 11:351-360.
4. Poeppel D., Embick D. Defining the relation between linguistics and neuroscience. Twenty-first Century Psycholinguistics: Four Cornerstones 2005, 103-120. Lawrence Erlbaum. A. Cutler (Ed.).
5. Scharinger M., Merickel J., Riley J., Idsardi W.J. Neuromagnetic evidence for a featural distinction of English consonants: sensor- and source-space data. Brain Lang 2011, 116:71-82.
6. Mesgarani N., Cheung C., Johnson K., Chang E.F. Phonetic feature encoding in human superior temporal gyrus. Science 2014, 343:1006-1010.
7. Fiorentino R., Naito-Billen Y., Bost J., Fund-Reznicek E. Electrophysiological evidence for the morpheme-based combinatoric processing of English compounds. Cogn Neuropsychol 2013, PMID: 24279696.
8. Almeida D., Poeppel D. Word-specific repetition effects revealed by MEG and the implications for lexical access. Brain Lang 2013, 127:497-509.
9. Bozic M., Tyler L.K., Su L., Wingfield C., Marslen-Wilson W.D. Neurobiological systems for lexical representation and analysis in English. J Cogn Neurosci 2013, 25:1678-1691.
10. Ettinger A., Linzen T., Marantz A. The role of morphology in phoneme prediction: evidence from MEG. Brain Lang 2014, 129:14-23.
11. Crepaldi D., Berlingeri M., Cattinelli I., Borghese N.A., Luzzatti C., Paulesu E. Clustering the lexicon in the brain: a meta-analysis of the neurofunctional evidence on noun and verb processing. Front Hum Neurosci 2013, 7:303.
12. Fedorenko E., Nieto-Castañón A., Kanwisher N. Syntactic processing in the human brain: what we know, what we don't know, and a suggestion for how to proceed. Brain Lang 2012, 120:187-207.
13. Moro A. On the similarity between syntax and actions. Trends Cogn Sci 2014, 18:109-110.
14. Bemis D.K., Pylkkänen L. Basic linguistic composition recruits the left anterior temporal lobe and left angular gyrus during both listening and reading. Cereb Cortex 2013, 23:1859-1873.
15. Westerlund M., Pylkkänen L. The role of the left anterior temporal lobe in semantic composition vs. semantic memory. Neuropsychologia 2014, 57:59-70.
16. Hagoort P., van Berkum J. Beyond the sentence given. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2007, 362:801-811.
17. Xu J., Kemeny S., Park G., Frattali C., Braun A. Language in context: emergent features of word, sentence, and narrative comprehension. Neuroimage 2005, 25:1002-1015.
18. Zion Golumbic E.M., Poeppel D., Schroeder C.E. Temporal context in speech processing and attentional stream selection: a behavioral and neural perspective. Brain Lang 2012, 122:151-161.
19. Li X., Yang Y. How long-term memory and accentuation interact during spoken language comprehension. Neuropsychologia 2013, 51:967-978.
20. Kotz S.A., Paulmann S. When emotional prosody and semantics dance cheek to cheek: ERP evidence. Brain Res 2007, 1151:107-118.
21. January D., Trueswell J.C., Thompson-Schill S.L. Co-localization of stroop and syntactic ambiguity resolution in Broca's area: Implications for the neural basis of sentence processing. J Cogn Neurosci 2009, 21:2434-2444.
22. Poeppel D., Idsardi W.J., Van Wassenhove V. Speech perception at the interface of neurobiology and linguistics. Philos Trans Roy Soc B: Biol Sci 2008, 363:1071.
23. Beeman M.J., Bowden E.M., Gernsbacher M.A. Right and left hemisphere cooperation for drawing predictive and coherence inferences during normal story comprehension. Brain Lang 2000, 71:310-336.
24. Federmeier K.D. Thinking ahead: the role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. Psychophysiology 2007, 44:491-505.
25. Obermeier C., Menninghaus W., von Koppenfels M., Raettig T., Schmidt-Kassow M., Otterbein S., Kotz S.A. Aesthetic and emotional effects of meter and rhyme in poetry. Front Psychol 2013, 4:10.
26. Poeppel D. The maps problem and the mapping problem: two challenges for a cognitive neuroscience of speech and language. Cogn Neuropsychol 2012, 29:34-55.
27. Price C.J. A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fmri studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading. Neuroimage 2012, 62:816-847.
28. Vigneau M., Beaucousin V., Hervé P.Y., Duffau H., Crivello F., Houdé O., et al. Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: phonology, semantics, and sentence processing. Neuroimage 2006, 30:1414-1432.
29. Vigneau M., Beaucousin V., Hervé P.Y., Jobard G., Petit L., Crivello F., et al. What is right-hemisphere contribution to phonological, lexico-semantic, and sentence processing? Insights from a meta-analysis. Neuroimage 2011, 54:577-593.
30. Poeppel D. Pure word deafness and the bilateral processing of the speech code. Cogn Sci 2001, 25:679-693.
31. Hickok G., Poeppel D. Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception. Trends Cogn Sci 2000, 4:131-138.
32. Bozic M., Tyler L.K., Ives D.T., Randall B., Marslen-Wilson W.D. Bihemispheric foundations for human speech comprehension. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:17439-17444.
33. Turkeltaub P.E., Coslett H.B. Localization of sublexical speech perception components. Brain Lang 2010, 114:1-15.
34. Binder J.R., Frost J.A., Hammeke T.A., Bellgowan P.S., Springer J.A., Kaufman J.N., Possing E.T. Human temporal lobe activation by speech and nonspeech sounds. Cereb Cortex 2000, 10:512-528.
35. Morillon B., Lehongre K., Frackowiak R.S., Ducorps A., Kleinschmidt A., Poeppel D., Giraud A.L. Neurophysiological origin of human brain asymmetry for speech and language. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:18688-18693.
36. Morillon B., Liégeois-Chauvel C., Arnal L.H., Bénar C.G., Giraud A.L. Asymmetric function of theta and gamma activity in syllable processing: an intra-cortical study. Front Psychol 2012, 3:248.
37. Cogan G.B., Thesen T., Carlson C., Doyle W., Devinsky O., Pesaran B. Sensory-motor transformations for speech occur bilaterally. Nature 2014, 507:94-98.
38. Wlotko E.W., Federmeier K.D. Two sides of meaning: the scalp-recorded n400 reflects distinct contributions from the cerebral hemispheres. Front Psychol 2013, 4:181.
39. Poeppel D. The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: cerebral lateralization as 'asymmetric sampling in time'. Speech Commun 2003, 41:245-255.
40. McGettigan C., Scott S.K. Cortical asymmetries in speech perception: what's wrong, what's right and what's left?. Trends Cogn Sci 2012, 16:269-276.
41. Scott S.K., McGettigan C. Do temporal processes underlie left hemisphere dominance in speech perception?. Brain Lang 2013, 127:36-45.
42. Giraud A.L., Kleinschmidt A., Poeppel D., Lund T.E., Frackowiak R.S., Laufs H. Endogenous cortical rhythms determine cerebral specialization for speech perception and production. Neuron 2007, 56:1127-1134.
43. Hickok G., Poeppel D. Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition 2004, 92:67-99.
44. Rauschecker J.P., Scott S.K. Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: nonhuman primates illuminate human speech processing. Nat Neurosci 2009, 12:718-724.
45. Gow D.W. The cortical organization of lexical knowledge: a dual lexicon model of spoken language processing. Brain Lang 2012, 121:273-288.
46. Lau E.F., Phillips C., Poeppel D. A cortical network for semantics: (De)constructing the N400. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008, 9:920-933.
47. Anwander A., Tittgemeyer M., von Cramon D.Y., Friederici A.D., Knösche T.R. Connectivity-based parcellation of Broca's area. Cereb Cortex 2007, 17:816-825.
48. Amunts K., Lenzen M., Friederici A.D., Schleicher A., Morosan P., Palomero-Gallagher N., Zilles K. Broca's region: novel organizational principles and multiple receptor mapping. PLoS Biol 2010, 8.
49. Fedorenko E., Duncan J., Kanwisher N. Language-selective and domain-general regions lie side by side within Broca's area. Curr Biol 2012, 22:2059-2062.
50. Turken A.U., Dronkers N.F. The neural architecture of the language comprehension network: converging evidence from lesion and connectivity analyses. Front Syst Neurosci 2011, 5:1.
51. Dronkers N.F., Wilkins D.P., Van Valin R.D., Redfern B.B., Jaeger J.J. Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension. Cognition 2004, 92:145-177.
52. Lewis G., Poeppel D. The role of visual representations during the lexical access of spoken words. Brain Lang 2014, 134:1-10:. 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.03.008.
53. Pallier C., Devauchelle A.D., Dehaene S. Cortical representation of the constituent structure of sentences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:2522-2527.
54. Tyler L.K., Cheung T.P., Devereux B.J., Clarke A. Syntactic computations in the language network: characterizing dynamic network properties using representational similarity analysis. Front Psychol 2013, 4:271.
55. Obleser J., Lahiri A., Eulitz C. Magnetic brain response mirrors extraction of phonological features from spoken vowels. J Cogn Neurosci 2004, 16:31-39.
56. Phillips C., Pellathy T., Marantz A., Yellin E., Wexler K., Poeppel D., et al. Auditory cortex accesses phonological categories: an MEG mismatch study. J Cogn Neurosci 2000, 12:1038-1055.
57. DeWitt I., Rauschecker J.P. Phoneme and word recognition in the auditory ventral stream. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:505-514.
58. Giraud A.L., Poeppel D. Cortical oscillations and speech processing: emerging computational principles and operations. Nat Neurosci 2012, 15:511-517.
59. Luo H., Poeppel D. Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex. Neuron 2007, 54:1001-1010.
60. Luo H., Liu Z., Poeppel D. Auditory cortex tracks both auditory and visual stimulus dynamics using low-frequency neuronal phase modulation. PLoS Biol 2010, 8(8):e1000445.
61. Luo H., Poeppel D. Cortical oscillations in auditory perception and speech: evidence for two temporal windows in human auditory cortex. Front Psychol 2012, 3:170.
62. Luo H., Tian X., Song K., Zhou K., Poeppel D. Neural response phase tracks how listeners learn new acoustic representations. Curr Biol 2013, 23:968-974.
63. Peelle J.E., Gross J., Davis M.H. Phase-locked responses to speech in human auditory cortex are enhanced during comprehension. Cereb Cortex 2013, 23:1378-1387.
64. Ghitza O. Linking speech perception and neurophysiology: speech decoding guided by cascaded oscillators locked to the input rhythm. Front Psychol 2011, 2:130.
65. Doelling K.B., Arnal L.H., Ghitza O., Poeppel D. Acoustic landmarks drive delta-theta oscillations to enable speech comprehension by facilitating perceptual parsing. Neuroimage 2014, 85:761-768.
66. Ding N., Simon J.Z. Emergence of neural encoding of auditory objects while listening to competing speakers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:11854-11859.
67. Mesgarani N., Chang E.F. Selective cortical representation of attended speaker in multi-talker speech perception. Nature 2012, 485:233-236.
68. Zion Golumbic E., Cogan G.B., Schroeder C.E., Poeppel D. Visual input enhances selective speech envelope tracking in auditory cortex at a "cocktail party". J Neurosci 2013, 33:1417-1426.
69. Zion Golumbic E.M., Ding N., Bickel S., Lakatos P., Schevon C.A., McKhann G.M., et al. Mechanisms underlying selective neuronal tracking of attended speech at a "cocktail party". Neuron 2013, 77:980-991.
70. Hickok G. Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nat Rev Neurosci 2012, 13:135-145.
71. Gagnepain P., Henson R.N., Davis M.H. Temporal predictive codes for spoken words in auditory cortex. Curr Biol 2012, 22:615-621.
72. Santoro R., Moerel M., De Martino F., Goebel R., Ugurbil K., Yacoub E., Formisano E. Encoding of natural sounds at multiple spectral and temporal resolutions in the human auditory cortex. PLoS Comput Biol 2014, 10(1):e1003412. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003412.