Sensory-motor transformations for speech occur bilaterally

Nature

Volumn 507, Issue 7490, 2014, Pages 94-98

  Cogan, Gregory B ^a   Thesen, Thomas ^b   Carlson, Chad ^b   Doyle, Werner ^b   Devinsky, Orrin ^b,c   Pesaran, Bijan ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY CUE; BIOTRANSFORMATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; NEUROLOGY; NUMERICAL MODEL; PERCEPTION; SENSORY SYSTEM;

ARTICLE; ELECTROCORTICOGRAPHY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EPILEPSY; HUMAN; INFERIOR FRONTAL GYRUS; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MIDDLE TEMPORAL GYRUS; MOTONEURON; PREMOTOR CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SUPERIOR TEMPORAL GYRUS; SUPRAMARGINAL GYRUS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HEARING; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TEMPORAL LOBE;

EID: 84895898295     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature12935     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P. & Studdert-Kennedy, M. Perception of the Speech Code. Psychol. Rev. 74, 431-461 (1967).
2. Liberman, A. M. & Mattingly, I. G. The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 21, 1-36 (1985).
3. Halle, M.&Stevens, K. N. Speech recognition: amodel and a programfor research. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 8, 155-159 (1962).
4. Halle, M.&Stevens, K. N.Analysis by synthesis In (edsWathen-Dunne, W.&Woods, L. E.) Proceedings of seminar on speech compression and processing Vol. 2, D7 1959).
5. Berwick, R. C., Friederici, A. D., Chomsky, N.& Bolhuis, J. J. Evolution, brain, and the nature of language. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17, 89-98 (2013).
6. Chomsky, N. The Minimalist Program (MIT Press, 1995).
7. Jakobson, R. Child Language, Aphasia and Phonological Universals (Mouton, 1968).
8. Lichtheim, L. On aphasia. Brain 7, 433-484 (1885).
9. Wernicke, C. The aphasic symptom-complex: a psychological study on an anatomical basis. Arch. Neurol. 22, 280-282 (1970).
10. Geschwind, N. Disconnexion syndromes in animals andman. I. Brain 88, 237-294 (1965).
11. Hickok, G. & Poeppel, D. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 8, 393-402 (2007).
12. Price, C. J. The anatomy of language: a review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1191, 62-88 (2010).
13. Obleser, J., Eisner, F. & Kotz, S. A. Bilateral speech comprehension reflects differential sensitivity to spectral and temporal features. J. Neurosci. 28, 8116-8123 (2008).
14. Rauschecker, J. P. & Scott, S. K. Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: nonhuman primates illuminate human speech processing. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 12, 718-724 (2009).
15. Hickok, G., Houde, J. & Rong, F. Sensorimotor integration in speech processing: computational basis and neural organization. Neuron 69, 407-422 (2011).
16. Hickok, G., Okada, K. & Serences, J. T. Area Spt in the human planum temporale supports sensory-motor integration for speech processing. J. Neurophysiol. 101, 2725-2732 (2009).
17. Guenther, F. H. Cortical interactions underlying the production of speech sounds. J. Commun. Disord. 39, 350-365 (2006).
18. Wise, R. J. S. et al. Separate neural subsystems within 'Wernicke's area'. Brain 124, 83-95 (2001).
19. Caramazza, A., Basili, A. G., Koller, J. J. & Berndt, R. S. An investigation of repetition andlanguage processingin a case of conductionaphasia. Brain Lang. 14,235-271 (1981).
20. Crone, N. E., Sinai, A. & Korzeniewska, A. Event-related dynamics of brain oscillations. Prog. Brain Res. 159, 275-295 (2006).
21. Markowitz, D. A., Wong, Y. T., Gray, C. M. & Pesaran, B. Optimizing the decoding of movement goals from local field potentials in macaque cortex. J. Neurosci. 31, 18412-18422 (2011).
22. Zhang, M. & Barash, S. Neuronal switching of sensorimotor transformations for antisaccades. Nature 408, 971-975 (2000).
23. Gail, A. & Andersen, R. Neural dynamics in monkey parietal reach region reflect context-specific sensorimotor transformations. J. Neurosci. 26, 9376-9384 (2006).
24. Chang, E. F., Niziolek, C. A., Knight, R. T., Nagarajan, S. S. & Houde, J. F. Human cortical sensorimotor network underlying feedback control of vocal pitch. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 2653-2658 (2013).
25. Oller, D. K., Eilers, R. E.&Oiler, D. K. The role of audition in infant babbling the role of audition in infant babbling. Child Dev. 59, 441-449 (1988).
26. Agnew, Z. K., McGettigan, C., Banks, B. & Scott, S. K. Articulatory movements modulate auditory responses to speech. Neuroimage 73, 191-199 (2013).
27. Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E. & Barresi, B. Assessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000).
28. Damasio, H. & Damasio, A. R. The anatomical basis of conduction aphasia. Brain 103, 337-350 (1980).
29. Benson, D. F. et al. Conduction aphasia: a clinicopathic study. Arch. Neurol. 28, 339-346 (1973).
30. Murphy, K. et al. Cerebral areas associated withmotor control of speech inhumans cerebral areas associated with motor control of speech in humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 83, 1438-1447 (1997).
31. Yang, A. I. et al. Localization of dense intracranial electrode arrays usingmagnetic resonance imaging. NeuroImage 63, 157-165 (2012).
32. Kovalev, D. et al. Rapid and fully automated visualization of subdural electrodes in the presurgical evaluation of epilepsy patients. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 26, 1078-1083 (2005).
33. Dale, A. M., Fischl, B. & Sereno, M. I. Cortical surface-based analysis. I: segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 9, 179-194 (1999).
34. Mitra, P. P. & Pesaran, B. Analysis of dynamic brain imaging data. Biophys. J. 76, 691-708 (1999).
35. Maris, E., Schoffelen, J.-M. & Fries, P. Nonparametric statistical testing of coherence differences. J. Neurosci. Methods 163, 161-175 (2007).
36. Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 57, 289-300 (1995).