"Call for papers": Analysis of the schematic structure and lexico-grammar of CFPs for academic conferences

English for Specific Purposes

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 39-51

  Yang, Wenhsien ^a  

^a NATIONAL KAOHSIUNG UNIVERSITY OF HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Call for papers (CFP); Evaluative genre; Generic structures; Lexico grammatical analysis; Promotional genre

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904382744     PISSN: 08894906     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.006     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Afros E., Schryer C. Promotional (meta)discourse in research articles in language and literary studies. English for Specific Purposes 2009, 28(1):58-68.
2. Archer D., Culpeper J., Rayson P. Love - 'a familiar or a devil'? An exploration of key domains in Shakespeare's comedies and tragedies. What's in a word-list? Investigating word frequency and keyword extraction 2009, 137-157. Ashgate, Surrey, England. D. Archer (Ed.).
3. Askehave I. The impact of marketisation on higher education genres: The international students prospectus as a case in point. Discourse Studies 2007, 9(6):723-742.
4. Askehave I., Nielsen A. Digital genres: A challenge to traditional genre theory. Information Technology and People 2005, 18(2):120-141.
5. Bawarshi A.S., Reiff M. Genre: An introduction to history, theory, research, and pedagogy 2010, Parlor, West Lafayette, IN.
6. Bhatia V.K. Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings 1993, Longman, London.
7. Bhatia V.K. Interdiscursivity in professional communication. Discourse & Communication 1997, 4(1):32-50.
8. Bhatia V.K. Genre analysis today. Revue Belge de Philologie et D'Histoire 1997, 75(3):629-652.
9. Bhatia V.K. Genres in conflict. Analysing professional genres 2000, 147-162. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. A. Trosborg (Ed.).
10. Bhatia V.K. Generic patterns in promotional discourse. Persuasive across genres: A linguistic approach 2004, 213-225. John Benjamins, Philadelphia, PA. H. Halmari, T. Virtanen (Eds.).
11. Bhatia V.K. Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view 2004, Continuum, London.
12. Caiazzo L. The hybridisation of academic discourse: The 'About us' section of British and Indian university websites 2009, Retrieved from. http://www.genresonthemove2009.unina.it/abstracts/Caizzo%20Luisa.pdf.
13. Carter-Thomas S., Rowley-Jolivet E. Analyzing the scientific conference presentation (CP): A methodological overview of a multimodal genre. ASP: La Revue du GERAS 2003, 39-40:59-72.
14. Cheung M. 'Click here': The impact of new media on the encoding of persuasive messages in direct marketing. Discourse Studies 2008, 10(2):161-189.
15. Connor U., Mauranen A. Linguistic analysis of grant proposals: European Union research grants. English for Specific Purposes 1999, 18(1):47-62.
16. D'Angelo L. Creating a framework for the analysis of academic posters. Language Studies Working Paper 2010, 2:38-50.
17. Ding H. Genre analysis of personal statements: Analysis of moves in application essays to medical and dental schools. English for Specific Purposes 2007, 26(3):368-392.
18. Djuwari D. Genre analysis of international conference paper abstracts 2009, (Master's thesis), Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia.
19. Dressen-Hammouda D. From novice to disciplinary expert: Disciplinary identity and genre mastery. English for Specific Purposes 2008, 27(2):233-252.
20. Fairclough N. Critical discourse analysis and the marketisation of public discourse: The universities. Discourse & Society 1993, 4(2):133-168.
21. Flowerdew J., Dudley-Evans T. Genre analysis of editorial letters to international journal contributors. Applied Linguistics 2002, 23(4):463-489.
22. Glaser B., Strauss A. The discovery of ground theory 1967, Aldine, Chicago, IL.
23. Graham C. Discourse of widening participation in the prospectus documents and websites of six English higher education institutions. British Journal of Sociology Education 2013, 34(1):76-93.
24. Gries S.T. Acorpus-linguistic analysis of English -ic vs. -ical adjectives. ICAME Journal 2001, 25:65-107.
25. Groom N. Phraseology and epistemology in academic book reviews: A corpus-driven analysis of two humanities disciplines. Academic evaluation: Review genres in university settings 2009, 122-139. Palgrave Macmillan, London. K. Hyland, G. Diani (Eds.).
26. Haggan M. Research paper titles in literature, linguistics and science: Dimensions of attraction. Journal of Pragmatics 2004, 36(2):293-317.
27. Hasan R. The structure of a text. Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective 1989, 52-59. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. M.A.K. Halliday, R. Hasan (Eds.).
28. Hinkel E. Tense, aspect and the passive voice in L1 and L2 academic texts. Language Teaching Research 2004, 8(1):5-29.
29. Holmes R. Genre analysis and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes 1997, 16(4):321-337.
30. Hunston S., Thompson G. Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse 2000, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
31. Hyland K. Genre: Language, context, and literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 2002, 22:113-135.
32. Hyland K. Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies 2005, 7(2):173-192.
33. Hyland K. Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing 2007, 16(3):148-164.
34. Hyland K. Disciplinary identities: Individuality and community in academic discourse 2012, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
35. Hyland K., Diani G. Introduction: Academic evaluation and review genres. Academic evaluation: Review genres in university settings 2009, 1-14. Palgrave, Basingstoke, England. K. Hyland, G. Dianin (Eds.).
36. Hyland K., Tse P. 'The leading journal in its field': Evaluation in journal descriptions. Discourse Studies 2009, 11(6):703-720.
37. Hyland K., Tse P. Claiming a territory: Relative clauses in journal description. Journal of Pragmatics 2010, 42(7):1880-1889.
38. Kirk J.M. Word frequency: Use or misuse?. What's in a word-list? Investigating word frequency and keyword extraction 2009, 17-34. Ashgate, Surrey, England. D. Archer (Ed.).
39. Lorés R. On RA abstracts: From rhetorical structure to thematic organization. English for Specific Purposes 2004, 23(3):280-302.
40. Martin J.P., White P.P.R. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English 2005, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, England.
41. Molle D., Prior P. Multimodal genre systems in EAP writing pedagogy: Reflecting on a needs analysis. TESOL Quarterly 2008, 42(4):541-566.
42. Osman H. Re-branding academic institutions with corporate advertising: A genre perspective. Discourse & Communication 2008, 2(1):57-77.
43. Rowley-Jolivet E. Genre awareness and rhetorical appropriacy: Manipulation of information structure by NS and NNS scientists in the international conference setting. English for Specific Purposes 2005, 24(1):41-64.
44. Samraj B. Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes 2002, 21(1):1-17.
45. Samraj B. An exploration of genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes 2005, 24(2):141-156.
46. Scott M. WordSmith tools (version 5) [computer software] 2008, Lexical Analysis Software, Liverpool, England.
47. Scott M., Tribble C. Textual patterns: Keywords and corpus analysis in language education 2006, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
48. Swales J.M. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
49. Swales J.M. Research genres: Exploration and applications 2004, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
50. Swales J.M., Feak C.B. Navigating academic: Writing supporting genres 2011, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbour, MI.
51. Williams I.A. Results sections of medical research articles: Analysis of rhetorical categories for pedagogical. English for Specific Purposes 1999, 18(4):347-366.
52. Yang R., Allison D. RAs in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes 2003, 22(4):365-385.
53. Yang W.H. 'Why choose us?' texts in university websites: A genre analysis. Taiwan International ESP Journal 2013, 5(1):45-80.
54. Yang W.H. Two folded messages behind CFP: A cross disciplinary study. International Journal of Language Studies 2013, 7(2):83-108.
55. Zapletalová G. Social and cognitive contexts of prepared speeches: The impact of individual and collective aspects on the social dynamics of conference presentations and their discussions 2011, Paper presented in the 42nd Poznań Linguistic Meeting, Poznań, Poland.