Multimodal genre systems in EAP writing pedagogy: Reflecting on a needs analysis

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 541-566

  Daniella, Molle ^a   Paul, Prior ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350125204     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/40264488     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Agha, A. (2007). Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (V. W. McGee, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
3. Bazerman, C. (1994). Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 79-101). London: Taylor & Francis.
4. Bazerman, C. (1998). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
5. Bazerman, C. (1999). The languages of Edison's light. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Bazerman, C. (2004). Speech acts, genres, and activity systems: How texts organize activity and people. In C. Bazerman & P. Prior (Eds.), What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices (pp. 83-96). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Bazerman, C., & Prior, P. (2005). Participating in emergent socio-literate worlds: Genre, disciplinarity, interdisciplinarity. In R. Beach, J. Green, M. Kamil, & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Multidisciplinary perspectives on literacy research (2nd ed.; pp. 133-178). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
8. Belcher, D. (1995). Writing critically across the curriculum. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 135-154). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
9. Belcher, D. (2006). English for specific purposes: Teaching to perceived needs and imagined futures in worlds of work, study, and everyday life. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 133-156.
10. Belluzzi, O. (1958). Scienza della costruzioni (Vol. 3, Part 2). Bologna, Italy: Zanichelli. Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes: Theory, politics, and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Berkenkotter, C. (2001). Genre systems at work: DSM-IV and rhetorical recontextualization in psychotherapy paperwork. Written Communication, 18, 326-349.
12. Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Bhatia, V. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. New York: Longman.
14. Bhatia, V. J. (2002). Applied genre analysis: Analytical advances and pedagogical procedures. In A. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 279-284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Braine, G. (1995). Writing in the natural sciences and engineering. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 113-134). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
17. Canagarajah, S. (2006). TESOL at forty: What are the issues? TESOL Quarterly, 40, 9-34.
18. Casanave, C. P. (2002). Writing games: Multicultural case studies of academic literacy practices in higher education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Coe, R. (2002). The new rhetoric of genre: Writing political briefs. In A. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 197-207). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Devitt, A. (1991). Intertextuality in tax accounting: Generic, referential, and functional. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities (pp. 336-357). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
21. Devitt, A. (2004). Writing genres. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
22. Dias, P., Freedman, A., Medway, P., & Paré, A. (1999). Worlds apart: Acting and writing in academic and workplace contexts. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Dudley-Evans, T. (2001). Team-teaching in EAP: Changes and adaptations in the Birmingham approach. In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (Eds.), Research perspectives on English for academic purposes (pp. 225-238). New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
25. Fairclough, N. (2004). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
26. Flowerdew, J., & Peacock, M. (2001). The EAP curriculum: Issues, methods, and challenges. In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (Eds.), Research perspectives on English for academic purposes (pp. 177-194). New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Hanks, W. (1996). Language and communicative practices. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
28. Hyon, S. (1996). Genre in three traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 693-722.
29. Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
30. Johns, A. (1997). Text, role, and context: Developing academic literacies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31. Johns, A. (1998). The visual and the verbal: A case study in macroeconomics. English for Specific Purposes, 17, 183-197.
32. Johns, A. (Ed.). (2002). Genre and pedagogy: Multiple perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Johns, A. (2003). Genre and ESL/EFL composition instruction. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 195-217). New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.
35. Leki, I., & Carson, J. (1997). "Completely different worlds": EAP and the writing experiences of ESL students in university courses. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 39-69.
36. Lea, M., & Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23, 157-172.
37. Lea, M., & Street, B. (2006). The academic literacies model: Theory and applications. Theory Into Practice, 45, 368-377.
38. Lemke, J. L. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science (pp. 87-113). London: Routledge.
39. Lillis, T. (2003). Student writing as 'academic literacies': drawing on Bakhtin to move from critique to design. Language and Education, 17, 192-207.
40. Orlikowski, W., & Yates, J. (1994). Genre repertoire: The structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 541-574.
41. Paltridge, B. (2001). Genre and the language learning classroom. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
42. Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43. Prior, P. (1995). Redefining the task: An ethnographic examination of writing and response in graduate seminars. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 47-82). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
44. Prior, P. (1998). Writing/disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Prior, P., & Shipka, J. (2003). Chronotopic lamination: Tracing the contours of literate activity. In C. Bazerman & D. Russell (Eds.), Writing selves, writing societies (pp. 180-238). Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse. Available from (http://wac.colostate.edu/books/selves_societies/).
46. Räisänen, C. (1999). The conference forum as a system of genre. Gothenberg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
47. Reynolds, R. (1988). Islands from archipelago. I. Summer island: Oboe and computer-generated tape [Musical Score]. New York: C. F. Peters.
48. Russell, D. R. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14, 504-554.
49. Silva, T., & Leki, I. (2004). Family matters: The influence of applied linguistics and composition studies on second language writing studies-Past, present, and future. Modern Language Journal, 88, 1-13.
50. Spack, R. (2004). The acquisition of academic literacy in a second language: A longitudinal case study. In V. Zamel & R. Spack (Eds.), Crossing the curriculum: Multilingual learners in college classrooms (pp. 19-45). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Spinuzzi, C. (2004). Four ways to investigate assemblages of texts: Genre sets, systems, repertoires, and ecologies. In S. Tilley & S. Huang (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Design of Information: The engineering of quality documentation (pp. 110-116). New York: ACM.
52. Starfield, S. (2001). I'll go with the group: Rethinking discourse community in EAP. In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (Eds.), Research perspectives on English for academic purposes (pp. 132-147). New York: Cambridge University Press.
53. Swales, J. (1984). Research into the structure of introductions to journal articles and its application to the teaching of academic writing. In R. Williams, J. Swales, & J. Kirkman (Eds.), Common ground: Shared interests in ESP and communication studies (pp. 77-86). Oxford: Pergamon.
54. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. New York: Cambridge University Press.
55. Swales, J. (1996). Occluded genres in the academy. In E. Ventola & A. Mauranen (Eds.), Academic writing (pp. 45-58). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
56. Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: Exploration and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. Swales, J., Barks, D., Ostermann, A., & Simpson, R. (2001). Between accommodation and critique: Reflections on an EAP course for masters of architecture students. English for Specific Purposes, 20, 439-458.
58. Swales, J., & Feak, C. (2000). English in today's research world: A writing guide. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
59. Swales, J., & Feak, C. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
60. Tucker, P. (2003). Evaluation in the art-historical research article. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2, 291-312.
61. Voloshinov, V. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language (L. Matejka & I. Titunik, Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.