Digital breast tomosynthesis: Lessons learned from early clinical implementation

Radiographics

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2014, Pages

  Gartner Roth, Robyn ^a   Maidment, Andrew D A ^a   Weinstein, Susan P ^a   Orel Roth, Susan ^a   Conant, Emily F ^a  

^a HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BREAST TUMOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;

EID: 84904337802     PISSN: 02715333     EISSN: 15271323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/rg.344130087     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Tabár L, Vitak B, Chen TH, et al. Swedish Two-County Trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. Radiology 2011;260(3):658-663.
2. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2005;353(17):1773-1783.
3. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151(10):716-726, W236.
4. ACR Practice Guideline for the Performance of Screening and Diagnostic Mammography. American College of Radiology Web site. http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/PGTS/guidelines/Screening_Mammography.pdf. Updated 2008. Accessed May 20,2013.
5. American College of Obstetricians-Gynecologists. Practice Bulletin No. 122: Breast cancer screening. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118(2 Pt 1):372-382.
6. American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer. American Cancer Society Web site. http://www.cancer.org/cancer/breastcancer/moreinformation/breastcancerearlydetection/breast-cancer-early-detection-acs-recs. Updated May 3, 2013. Accessed May 20, 2013.
7. Hubbard RA, Kerlikowske K, Flowers CI, Yankaskas BC, Zhu W, Miglioretti DL. Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2011;155(8):481-492.
8. Brewer NT, Salz T, Lillie SE. Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms. Ann Intern Med 2007;146(7):502-510.
9. Brodersen J, Siersma VD. Long-term psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening mammography. Ann Fam Med 2013;11(2):106-115.
10. Skaane P, Gullien R, Bjørndal H, et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting. Acta Radiol 2012;53(5):524-529.
11. Michell MJ, Iqbal A, Wasan RK, et al. A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis. Clin Radiol 2012;67(10):976-981.
12. Rafferty EA, Park JM, Philpotts LE, et al. Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial. Radiology 2013; 266(1):104-113.
13. Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R, et al. Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. Radiology 2013;267(1):47-56.
14. Acciavatti RJ, Maidment AD. Observation of super-resolution in digital breast tomosynthesis. Med Phys 2012;39(12):7518-7539.
15. Poplack SP, Tosteson TD, Kogel CA, Nagy HM. Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189(3): 616-623.
16. Gur D, Abrams GS, Chough DM, et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193(2):586-591.
17. Svahn T, Andersson I, Chakraborty D, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of dual-view digital mammography, single-view breast tomosynthesis and a dual-view combination of breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography in a free-response observer performance study. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2010; 139(1-3):113-117.
18. Gur D, Bandos AI, Rockette HE, et al. Localized detection and classification of abnormalities on FFDM and tomosynthesis examinations rated under an FROC paradigm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196(3):737-741.
19. Wallis MG, Moa E, Zanca F, Leifland K, Danielsson M. Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: highresolution x-ray imaging observer study. Radiology 2012;262(3):788-796.
20. Noroozian M, Hadjiiski L, Rahnama-Moghadam S, et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis is comparableto mammographic spot views for mass characterization. Radiology 2012;262(1):61-68.
21. Bernardi D, Ciatto S, Pellegrini M, et al. Prospective study of breast tomosynthesis as a triage to assessment in screening. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012;133(1):267-271.
22. Rose SL, Tidwell AL, Bujnoch LJ, Kushwaha AC, Nordmann AS, Sexton RS Jr. Implementation of breast tomosynthesis in a routine screening practice: an observational study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200(6):1401-1408.
23. Haas B, Kalra VB, Raghu M, Philpotts LE. Performance of digital breast tomosynthesis compared to conventional digital mammography for breast cancer screening [abstr]. In: Radiological Society of North America Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting Program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2012; 158.
24. Conant EF, Gavenonis SC, Weinstein SP, Schnall MD, Kontos D. Early implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of call-back and cancer detection rates in a clinical screening practice [abstr]. In: Radiological Society of North America Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting Program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2012; 239.
25. Tagliafico A, Astengo D, Cavagnetto F, et al. Oneto-one comparison between digital spot compression view and digital breast tomosynthesis. Eur Radiol 2012;22(3):539-544.
26. Förnvik D, Zackrisson S, Ljungberg O, et al. Breast tomosynthesis: accuracy of tumor measurement compared with digital mammography and ultrasonography. Acta Radiol 2010;51(3):240-247.
27. Meacock LM, Mombelloni S, Iqbal A, Akbar A, Wang Y, Michell MJ. The accuracy of breast cancer size measurement: digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) vs. 2D digital mammography (DM). Presented at the 22nd annual meeting of the European Congress of Radiology, Vienna, Austria, March 4-8, 2010.
28. Zuley ML, Bandos AI, Ganott MA, et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus supplemental diagnostic mammographic views for evaluation of noncalcified breast lesions. Radiology 2013;266(1):89-95.
29. Brandt KR, Craig DA, Hoskins TL, et al. Can digital breast tomosynthesis replace conventional diagnostic mammography views for screening recalls without calcifications? A comparison study in a simulated clinical setting. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200(2):291-298.
30. Waldherr C, Cerny P, Altermatt HJ, et al. Value of one-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in diagnostic workup of women with clinical signs and symptoms and in women recalled from screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200(1):226-231.
31. Hakim CM, Chough DM, Ganott MA, Sumkin JH, Zuley ML, Gur D. Digital breast tomosynthesis in the diagnostic environment: a subjective side-by-side review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 195(2):W172-W176.
32. Feng SS, Sechopoulos I. Clinical digital breast tomosynthesis system: dosimetric characterization. Radiology 2012;263(1):35-42.
33. Gur D, Zuley ML, Anello MI, et al. Dose reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening using synthetically reconstructed projection images: an observer performance study. Acad Radiol 2012;19(2):166-171.
34. Houssami N, Skaane P. Overview of the evidence on digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detection. Breast 2013;22(2):101-108.
35. Proceedings of the Radiologic Devices Panel. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Web site. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/MedicalDevices/ MedicalDevicesAdvisoryCommittee/RadiologicalDevicesPanel/UCM328613.pdf.Published October
36. Skaane P, Gullien R, Eben EB, et al. Implementation of synthesized 2D plus tomosynthesis images in breast cancer screening: comparison of performance levels with full field digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program [abstr]. In: Radiological Society of North America Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting Program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2013; 62
37. Kopans D, Gavenonis S, Halpern E, Moore R. Calcifications in the breast and digital breast tomosynthesis. Breast J 2011;17(6):638-644.
38. Spangler ML, Zuley ML, Sumkin JH, et al. Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196(2):320-324.
39. Chan HP, Wei J, Zhang Y, et al. Computer-aided detection of masses in digital tomosynthesis mammography: comparison of three approaches. Med Phys 2008;35(9):4087-4095.
40. Chan HP, Wei J, Sahiner B, et al. Computer-aided detection system for breast masses on digital tomosynthesis mammograms: preliminary experience. Radiology 2005;237(3):1075-1080.
41. Singh S, Tourassi GD, Baker JA, Samei E, Lo JY. Automated breast mass detection in 3D reconstructed tomosynthesis volumes: a featureless approach. Med Phys 2008;35(8):3626-3636.
42. Reiser I, Nishikawa RM, Giger ML, et al. Computerized mass detection for digital breast tomosynthesis directly from the projection images. Med Phys 2006;33(2):482-491.
43. Reiser I, Nishikawa RM, Edwards AV, et al. Automated detection of microcalcification clusters for digital breast tomosynthesis using projection data only: a preliminary study. Med Phys 2008;35 (4):1486-1493.
44. Breast tomosynthesis: training requirements and site readiness. Hologic Web site. http://www.hologic.com/data/Medical%20Professionals/pdf/SS-00099_TrainingRequirementsSheet.pdf. Updated 2011. Accessed February 2, 2014.
45. Bernardi D, Ciatto S, Pellegrini M, et al. Application of breast tomosynthesis in screening: incremental effect on mammography acquisition and reading time. Br J Radiol 2012;85(1020):e1174-e1178. doi:10.1259/bjr/19385909. Published January 28, 2014. Accessed February 2, 2014.
46. Baker JA, Lo JY. Breast tomosynthesis: state-ofthe-art and review of the literature. Acad Radiol 2011;18(10):1298-1310.