Implementation of breast tomosynthesis in a routine screening practice: An observational study

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 200, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1401-1408

  Rose, Stephen L ^a   Tidwell, Andra L ^a   Bujnoch, Louis J ^a   Kushwaha, Anne C ^a   Nordmann, Amy S ^a   Sexton Jr , Russell ^a  

^a TOPS Comprehensive Breast Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Cancer detection; Mammography; Recall rate; Tomosynthesis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST DISEASE; BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER GRADING; CANCER SIZE; CANCER STAGING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENSITY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RECALL; TUMOR BIOPSY; TUMOR CALCINOSIS; BIOPSY; BREAST TUMOR; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84879697513     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.9672     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Tabár L, Vitak B, Chen HH, Yen MF, Duffy SW, Smith RA. Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer 2001; 91:1724-1731
2. Tabár L, Vitak B, Chen TH, et al. Swedish twocounty trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. Radiology 2011; 260:658-663
3. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Rubin SM, Sandrock C, Ernster VL. Efficacy of screening mammography: a meta-analysis. JAMA 1995; 273:149-154
4. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Ernster V. Benefit of mammography screening in women ages 40-49 years: current evidence from randomized controlled trials. Cancer 1995; 76:1679-1681
5. Lehtimäki T, Lundin M, Linder N, et al. Long-term prognosis of breast cancer detected by mammography screening or other methods. Breast Cancer Res 2011; 13:R134
6. Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002; 137:347-360
7. Duffy SW, Tabár L, Chen HH, et al. The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties. Cancer 2002; 95:458-469
8. Youlden DR, Cramb SM, Dunn NA, Muller JM, Pyke CM, Baade PD. The descriptive epidemiology of female breast cancer: an international comparison of screening, incidence, survival and mortality. Cancer Epidemiol 2012; 36:237-248
9. Ng EH, Ng FC, Tan PH, et al. Results of intermediate measures from a population-based, randomized trial of mammographic screening prevalence and detection of breast carcinoma among Asian women: the Singapore Breast Screening Project. Cancer 1998; 82:1521-1528
10. Sickles EA, Wolverton DE, Dee KE. Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists. Radiology 2002; 224:861-869
11. Jiang Y, Miglioretti DL, Metz CE, Schmidt RA. Breast cancer detection rate: designing imaging trials to demonstrate improvements. Radiology 2007; 243:360-367
12. Elmore JG, Wells CK, Lee CH, Howard DH, Feinstein AR. Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms. N Engl J Med 1994; 331:1493-1499
13. Beam CA, Conant EF, Sickles EA, Weinstein SP. Evaluation of proscriptive health care policy implementation in screening mammography. Radiology 2003; 229:534-540
14. Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC. Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 1992; 184:613-617
15. Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, et al. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138:168-175
16. Niklason LT, Christian BT, Niklason LE, et al. Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 1997; 205:399-406
17. Rafferty EA. Digital mammography: novel applications. Radiol Clin North Am 2007; 45:831-843
18. Baker JA, Lo JY. Breast tomosynthesis: state-ofthe-art and review of the literature. Acad Radiol 2011; 18:1298-1310
19. U.S. Food and Drug Administration website. Summary of safety and effectiveness data. www.fda. gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/Committees- MeetingMaterials/MedicalDevices/MedicalDevicesAdvisoryCommittee/ RadiologicalDevicesPanel/ UCM324866.pdf. Published 20 Accessed February 7, 2013
20. U.S. Food and Drug Administration website. Radiation-emitting products: Mammography Quality Standards Act Regulations. www.fda.gov/Radiation- EmittingProducts/MammographyQualityStandards-ActandProgram/Regulations/default. htm. Updated December 4, 20 Accessed February 7, 2013
21. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system atlas. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003
22. Gur D, Abrams GS, Chough DM, et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study. AJR 2009; 193:586-591
23. Poplack SP, Tosteson TD, Kogel CA, Nagy HM. Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. AJR 2007; 189:616-623
24. Gur D, Sumkin JH, Hardesty LA, et al. Recall and detection rates in screening mammography. Cancer 2004; 100:1590-1594
25. Beam CA, Layde PM, Sullivan DC. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156:209-213
26. Skaane P, Diekmann F, Balleyguier C, et al. Observer variability in screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with softcopy reading. Eur Radiol 2008; 18:1134-1143
27. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151:716-726
28. Gur D, Zuley ML, Anello MI, et al. Dose reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening using synthetically reconstructed projection images: an observer performance study. Acad Radiol 2012; 19:166-171