The effect of social interaction on learning engagement in a social networking environment

Interactive Learning Environments

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 401-417

  Lu, Jie ^a   Churchill, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

cognitive engagement; social engagement; social interaction; social networking environment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904210126     PISSN: 10494820     EISSN: 17445191     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2012.680966     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Anderson, L.W., & Krathwohl, D.R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 212-218. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
2. Barab, S., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Carteaux, R., & Tuzun, H. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. ETR&D, 53(1), 86-107.
3. Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D.Y.P. (2001). The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133-149. doi: 10.1348/000709901158433
4. boyd, d.m., & Ellison, N.B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
5. Carini, R., Kuh, G., & Klein, S. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1-32. doi: 10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9
6. Chapman, E. (2003). Assessing student engagement rates, ERIC Digest. ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation. Retrieved from http://www.ericdigests.org/2005-2/engagement.html
7. Churchill, D. (2009). Educational application of Web 2.0: Using blogs to support teaching and learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 179-183. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00865.x
8. Cole, M. (2009). Using Wiki technology to support student engagement: Lessons from the trenches. Computers & Education, 52(1), 141-146. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.003
9. Deng, L., & Yuen, A.H.K. (2007). Exploring the role of weblogs in supporting learning communities: An integrative approach. Paper presented at the ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings of Ascilite Singapore 2007, Singapore.
10. Dippold, D. (2009). Peer feedback through blogs: Student and teacher perceptions in an advanced German class. ReCALL, 21(1), 18-36. doi: 10.1017/S095834400900010X
11. Dole, J.A., & Sinatra, G.M. (1998). Reconceptalizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 33, 109-128. doi: 10.1080/00461520.1998.9653294
12. Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., & Paris, A.H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. doi: 10.3102/00346543074001059
13. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 87-105. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
14. Garton, A. (1992). Social interaction and the development of language and cognition, Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Gunawardena, C.N., Lowe, C.A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17, 397-431. doi: 10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NRAG
16. Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). Social network analysis: An approach and technique for the study of information exchange. Library & Information Science Research, 18, 323-342. doi: 10.1016/S0740-8188(96)90003-1
17. Hodkinson, P. (2007). Interactive online journals and individualization. New Media & Society, 9, 625-650. doi: 10.1177/1461444807076972
18. Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1999). Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning., Retrieved August 23, 2007, from http://home.sprynet.com/~gkearsley/engage.htm
19. Kirschner, P.A. (2002). Can we support CSCL? Educational, social and technological affordances for learning. In P. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL, 7-34. Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.
20. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P.A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 335-353. doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2
21. Linden Research Inc (2007). What is Second Life?, [Video file]. Retrieved October 7, 2007, from http://secondlife.com/whatis/
22. Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., Lallimo, J., & Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students' computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 13, 487-509. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00042-7
23. Manca, S., Delfino, M., & Mazzoni, E. (2009). Coding procedures to analyse interaction patterns in educational web forums. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 189-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00296.x
24. Martinez, A., Dimitriadis, Y., Gomez-Sanchez, E., Rubia-Avi, B., Jorrin-Abellan, I., & Marcos, J.A. (2006). Studying participation networks in collaboration using mixed methods. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 383-408. doi: 10.1007/s11412-006-8705-6
25. Monge, P.R., & Contractor, N. (2003). Theories of communication networks, New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Palincsar, A.S. (2003). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 345-375. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.345
27. Pintrich, P.R., & De Groot, E.V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
28. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D.R., & Archer, W. (2001). Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 8-22.
29. Rovai, A.P. (2002). Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 5, 319-332. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00130-6
30. Scardamalia, M. (2004). CSILE/Knowledge Forum®, Retrieved September 15, 2007, from http://ikit.org/fulltext/CSILE_KF.pdf
31. Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis: A handbook, London: Sage Publications.
32. Shen, D., Nuankhieo, P., Huang, X., Amelung, C., & Laffey, J. (2008). Using social network analysis to understand sense of community in an online learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39(1), 17-36. doi: 10.2190/EC.39.1.b
33. Skinner, E.A., & Belmont, M.J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571-581. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571
34. Tan, C. (2001). What is knowledge community?, Retrieved October 8, 2007, from http://www.globalkc.net/doc/kc.pdf
35. Waltonen-Moore, S., Stuart, D., Newton, E., Oswald, R., & Varonis, E. (2006). From virtual strangers to a cohesive learning community: The evolution of online group development in a professional development course. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14, 287-311.
36. Wang, M., & Kang, M. (2006). Cybergogy for engaged learning: A framework for creating learner engagement through information and communication technology. In D. Hung, & M.S. Khine (Eds.), Engaged learning with emerging technologies, 225-253. Dordrecht: Springer.
37. Wasserman, S. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. West, R., Wright, G., Gabbitas, B., & Graham, C. (2006). Reflections from the introduction of blogs and RSS feeds into a preservice instructional technology course. TechTrends, 50, 54-60. doi: 10.1007/s11528-006-0054-9
39. Zhu, E. (2006). Interaction and cognitive engagement: An analysis of four asynchronous online discussions. Instructional Science, 34, 451-480. doi: 10.1007/s11251-006-0004-0