A hybrid fuzzy analytic network process approach to the new product development selection problem

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

Volumn 2014, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Chyu, Chiuh Cheng ^a   Fang, Ying Chieh ^a  

^a YUAN ZE UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION THEORY; FUZZY FILTERS; FUZZY LOGIC; INDUSTRY;

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; COMPETITIVE BUSINESS; DECISION MAKING PROCESS; DECISION SITUATION; FUZZY ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; GRAY RELATION ANALYSIS; NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; SELECTION PROBLEMS;

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84904102224     PISSN: 1024123X     EISSN: 15635147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1155/2014/485016     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Koen P., Ajamian G., Burkart R., Clamen A., Davidson J., D'Amore R., Elkins C., Herald K., Incorvia M., Johnson A., Karol R., Seibert R., Slavejkov A., Wagner K., Providing clarity and a common language to the 'fuzzy front end'. Research Technology Management 2001 44 2 46 55 2-s2.0-0035274573 (Pubitemid 32301821)
2. Keeney R. L., Raiffa H., Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs 1976 New York, NY, USA Wiley MR0449476
3. Herrera F., Herrera-Viedma E., Verdegay J. L., A sequential selection process in group decision making with a linguistic assessment approach. Information Sciences 1995 85 4 223 239 2-s2.0-0029345772
4. Rasmy M. H., Lee S. M., Abd El-Wahed W. F., Ragab A. M., El-Sherbiny M. M., An expert system for multiobjective decision making: application of fuzzy linguistic preferences and goal programming. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 2002 127 2 209 220 10.1016/S0165-0114(01)00201-9 MR1894678 ZBL0993.90062 (Pubitemid 34247812)
5. Pedrycz W., Song M., Analytic Hierarchy process (AHP) in group decision making and its optimization with an allocation of information granularity. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 2011 19 3 527 539 2-s2.0-79957974279 10.1109/TFUZZ.2011.2116029
6. Saaty T. L., Takizawa M., Dependence and independence: from linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks. European Journal of Operational Research 1986 26 2 229 237 10.1016/0377-2217(86)90184-0 MR852293 ZBL0599.90067 (Pubitemid 16610234)
7. Saaty T. L., Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process 1996 Pittsburgh, Pa, USA RWS publications
8. Saaty T. L., Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World 1999 Pittsburgh, Pa, USA RWS publications
9. Lee Y.-C., Huang S.-Y., A new fuzzy concept approach for Kano's model. Expert Systems with Applications 2009 36 3 4479 4484 2-s2.0-58349102737 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.05.034
10. Liou J. J., Chuang Y.-T., Developing a hybrid multi-criteria model for selection of outsourcing providers. Expert Systems with Applications 2010 37 5 3755 3761 2-s2.0-73249117632 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.11.048
11. Yang J. L., Tzeng G., An integrated MCDM technique combined with DEMATEL for a novel cluster-weighted with ANP method. Expert Systems with Applications 2011 38 3 1417 1424 2-s2.0-78049530944 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.048
12. Shen Y.-C., Lin G. T., Tzeng G.-H., Combined DEMATEL techniques with novel MCDM for the organic light emitting diode technology selection. Expert Systems with Applications 2011 38 3 1468 1481 2-s2.0-78049530327 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.056
13. Hsu H.-M., Chen C.-T., Aggregation of fuzzy opinions under group decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1996 79 3 279 285 10.1016/0165-0114(95)00185-9 MR1388402 (Pubitemid 126667411)
14. Shih H.-S., Shyur H.-J., Lee E. S., An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 2007 45 7-8 801 813 2-s2.0-33845571095 10.1016/j.mcm.2006.03.023 (Pubitemid 44937544)
15. Deng J.-L., Grey entropy and grey target decision making. Journal of Grey System 2010 22 1 1 4 MR1025897 ZBL0701.90057
16. Lee J. W., Kim S. H., Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection. Computers and Operations Research 2000 27 4 367 382 10.1016/S0305-0548(99)00057-X MR1737942 ZBL0973.90015 (Pubitemid 30144761)
17. Karsak E. E., Sozer S., Alptekin S. E., Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach. Computers and Industrial Engineering 2003 44 1 171 190 2-s2.0-0037209876 10.1016/S0360-8352(02)00191-2 (Pubitemid 35282243)
18. Mohanty R. P., Agarwal R., Choudhury A. K., Tiwari M. K., A fuzzy ANP-based approach to R&D project selection: a case study. International Journal of Production Research 2005 43 24 5199 5216 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.12.005 MR2228122 (Pubitemid 43000426)
19. Agarwal A., Shankar R., Tiwari M. K., Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: an ANP-based approach. European Journal of Operational Research 2006 173 1 211 225 2-s2.0-33748693686 10.1016/j.ejor.2004. 12.005 (Pubitemid 44389582)
20. Hu Y.-C., Wang J.-H., Wang R.-Y., Evaluating the performance of Taiwan Homestay using analytic network Process. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2012 2012 24 2-s2.0-84866104504 10.1155/2012/827193 827193
21. Shyur H.-J., COTS evaluation using modified TOPSIS and ANP. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2006 177 1 251 259 2-s2.0-33744533988 10.1016/j.amc.2005.11.006 (Pubitemid 43815530)
22. Dadeviren M., A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model for personnel selection in manufacturing systems. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 2010 21 4 451 460 2-s2.0-77955664339 10.1007/s10845-008-0200-7
23. Hsu P.-F., Selection model based on ANP and GRA for independent media agencies. Quality and Quantity 2012 46 1 1 17 2-s2.0-81255147986 10.1007/s11135-010-9323-y
24. Wu C.-M., Hsieh C.-L., Chang K.-L., A hybrid multiple criteria decision making model for supplier selection. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2013 2013 8 324283 10.1155/2013/324283
25. Azimi R., Yazdani-Chamzini A., Fouladgar M. M., Zavadskas E. K., Basiri M. H., Ranking the strategies of mining sector through ANP and TOPSIS in a SWOT framework. Journal of Business Economics and Management 2011 12 4 670 689 2-s2.0-84864005460 10.3846/16111699.2011.626552
26. Matzler K., Hinterhuber H. H., How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano's model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment. Technovation 1998 18 1 25 38 2-s2.0-0031599079 (Pubitemid 128432150)
27. Kahraman C., Ruan D., Doan I., Fuzzy group decision-making for facility location selection. Information Sciences 2003 157 1-4 135 153 2-s2.0-0242365693 10.1016/S0020-0255(03)00183-X
28. Chou T.-Y., Hsu C.-L., Chen M.-C., A fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for international tourist hotels location selection. International Journal of Hospitality Management 2008 27 2 293 301 2-s2.0-38949134545 10.1016/j.ijhm.2007. 07.029
29. Kahraman C., Cebeci U., Ruan D., Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: the case of Turkey. International Journal of Production Economics 2004 87 2 171 184 2-s2.0-0348039960 10.1016/S0925-5273(03) 00099-9
30. Kaboli A., Aryanezhad M. B., Shahanaghi K., Niroomand I., A new method for plant location selection problem: a fuzzy-AHP approach. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC '07) October 2007 582 586 2-s2.0-40949146570 10.1109/ICSMC.2007.4413890 (Pubitemid 351409619)
31. Kahraman C., Kaya I., Cebi S., A comparative analysis for multiattribute selection among renewable energy alternatives using fuzzy axiomatic design and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Energy 2009 34 10 1603 1616 2-s2.0-69349099688 10.1016/j.energy.2009.07.008
32. Kang H.-Y., Lee A. H., Chang C.-C., Kang M.-S., A model for selecting technologies in new product development. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2012 2012 17 358129 10.1155/2012/358129
33. Hwang C.-L., Yoon K., Multiple Attribute Decision Making 1981 New York, NY, USA Springer MR610245
34. Yoon K., Hwang C.-L., Manufacturing plant location analysis by multiple attribute decision making: part I-single-plant strategy. International Journal of Production Research 1985 23 2 345 359 2-s2.0-0022028706 (Pubitemid 15512004)
35. Choudhary D., Shankar R., An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: a case study from India. Energy 2012 42 1 510 521 2-s2.0-84860837971 10.1016/j.energy.2012.03.010
36. Kwong C. K., Tam S. M., Case-based reasoning approach to concurrent design of low power transformers. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 2002 128 1-3 136 141 2-s2.0-0037032148 10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00440-5
37. Chen M.-F., Tzeng G.-H., Combining grey relation and TOPSIS concepts for selecting an expatriate host country. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 2004 40 13 1473 1490 2-s2.0-18144418619 10.1016/j.mcm.2005.01.006 (Pubitemid 40607891)
38. Milani A. S., Shanian A., Madoliat R., Nemes J. A., The effect of normalization norms in multiple attribute decision making models: a case study in gear material selection. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 2005 29 4 312 318 2-s2.0-17444373066 10.1007/s00158-004-0473-1 (Pubitemid 40537598)
39. Hui-Ru Z., Na-Na L., A novel hybrid evaluation model for the performance of ERP project based on ANP and improved matter-element extension model. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2013 2013 9 2-s2.0-84876520750 10.1155/2013/913212 913212
40. Kano N., Seraku N., Takahashi F., Tsuji S., Attractive quality and must-be quality. The Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control 1984 14 2 39 48
41. Bhattacharyya S., Rahman Z., Capturing the customer's voice, the centerpiece of strategy making: a case study in banking. European Business Review 2004 16 2 128 138 10.1108/09555340410524238 (Pubitemid 38334701)
42. Florez-Lopez R., Ramon-Jeronimo J. M., Managing logistics customer service under uncertainty: an integrative fuzzy Kano framework. Information Sciences 2012 202 41 57 2-s2.0-84860841148 10.1016/j.ins.2012.03.004
43. Fontela E., Gabus A., The DEMATEL Observer 1976 Geneva, Switzerland Battelle Institute, Geneva Research Center
44. Warfield J. N., Societal Systems: Planning, Policy, and Complexity 1976 River Edge, NJ, USA World Scientific
45. Tzeng G.-H., Chiang C.-H., Li C.-W., Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: a novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications 2007 32 4 1028 1044 2-s2.0-33751418314 10.1016/j.eswa.2006.02.004 (Pubitemid 44821793)
46. Yang Y.-P., Shieh H.-M., Leu J.-D., Tzeng G.-H., A novel hybrid MCDM model combined with DEMATEL and ANP with applications. International Journal of Operations Research 2008 5 3 160 168
47. Shen Y.-C., Lin G. T., Tzeng G.-H., Combined DEMATEL techniques with novel MCDM for the organic light emitting diode technology selection. Expert Systems with Applications 2011 38 3 1468 1481 2-s2.0-78049530327 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.056
48. Tamura H., Akazawa K., Structural modeling and systems analysis of uneasy factors for realizing safe, secure and reliable society. Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology 2005 3 64 72
49. Meade L. M., Presley A., R&D project selection using the analytic network process. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2002 49 1 59 66 2-s2.0-0036475969 10.1109/17.985748 (Pubitemid 34295129)
50. Fahrni P., Spätig M., An application-oriented guide to R&D project selection and evaluation methods. R&D Management 1990 20 2 155 171