Oral perceptual discrimination of viscosity differences for non-newtonian liquids in the nectar- and honey-thick ranges

Dysphagia

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 355-364

  Steele, Catriona M ^a,b,c   James, David F ^d   Hori, Sarah ^a   Polacco, Rebecca C ^a   Yee, Clemence ^a  

^a TORONTO REHABILITATION INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c University of Toronto   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Deglutition; Deglutition disorders; Discrimination; Dysphagia; Oral; Perception; Sensation; Viscosity

Indexed keywords

XANTHAN; NECTAR;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; APPARENT VISCOSITY DISCRIMINATION ACUITY; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSPHAGIA; FEMALE; FUNCTION TEST; HONEY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LIQUID; MALE; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; NECTAR; NON NEWTONIAN LIQUID; NORMAL HUMAN; ORAL PERCEPTUAL DISCRIMINATION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAMPLE; SEX DIFFERENCE; STIMULUS; SWALLOWING; THICKNESS; TRIANGLE TEST PARADIGM; VISCOSITY; ADOLESCENT; MIDDLE AGED; MOUTH; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PHYSIOLOGY; TOUCH; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS; HONEY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOUTH; PLANT NECTAR; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; TOUCH PERCEPTION; VISCOSITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84904050823     PISSN: 0179051X     EISSN: 14320460     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00455-014-9518-9     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Robbins J, Nicosia MA, Hind JA, Gill GD, Blanco R, Logemann JA. Defining physical properties of fluids for dysphagia evaluation and treatment. Perspectives on swallowing and swallowing disorders (Dysphagia) American Speech-Language Hearing Association Special Interest Division 13 Newsletter. 2002; p. 16-9.
2. Garcia JM, Chambers E 4th, Molander M. Thickened liquids: practice patterns of speech-language pathologists. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2005;14:4-13.
3. Logemann JA, Gensler G, Robbins J, Lindblad AS, Brandt D, Hind JA, Kosek S, Dikeman K, Kazandjian M, Gramigna GD, Lundy D, McGarvey-Toler S, Miller Gardner PJ. A randomized study of three interventions for aspiration of thin liquids in patients with dementia or Parkinson's disease. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51:173-83.
4. Clave P, de Kraa M, Arreola V, Girvent M, Farre R, Palomera E, Serra-Prat M. The effect of bolus viscosity on swallowing function in neurogenic dysphagia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24:1385-94.
5. Felt P. The National Dysphagia Diet: the science and practice. Nutr Clin Pract. 1999;14:S60-3.
6. National Dysphagia Diet Task Force. National Dysphagia Diet: Standardization For Optimal Care. Chicago, IL: American Dietetic Association; 2002.
7. Cichero JA, Atherton M, Bellis-Smith N, Suter M. Texture-modified foods and thickened fluids as used for individuals with dysphagia: Australian standardised labels and definitions. Nutr Diet. 2007;64:S53-76.
8. National Patient Safety Agency, National Health Service. Dysphagia Diet Food Texture Descriptors. 2011.
9. Steele CM, Van Lieshout PH, Goff HD. The rheology of liquids: a comparison of clinicians' subjective impressions and objective measurement. Dysphagia. 2003;18:182-95.
10. Glassburn DL, Deem JF. Thickener viscosity in dysphagia management: variability among speech-language pathologists. Dysphagia. 1998;13:218-22.
11. Garcia JM, Chambers E, Clark M, Helverson J, Matta Z. Quality of care issues for dysphagia: modifications involving oral fluids. Dysphagia. 2011;26:205.
12. Garcia JM, Chambers E 4th, Matta Z, Clark M. Serving temperature viscosity measurements of nectar- and honey-thick liquids. Dysphagia. 2008;23(1):65-75.
13. Garcia JM, Chambers E 4th, Matta Z, Clark M. Viscosity measurements of nectar- and honey-thick liquids: product, liquid, and time comparisons. Dysphagia. 2005;20:325-35.
14. Payne C, Methven L, Fairfield C, Bell A. Consistently inconsistent: commercially available starch-based dysphagia products. Dysphagia. 2011;26:27-33.
15. Hanson B, Cox B, Kaliviotis E, Smith CH. Effects of saliva on starch-thickened drinks with acidic and neutral pH. Dysphagia. 2012;27:427-35.
16. Steele CM. Searching for meaningful differences in viscosity. Dysphagia. 2005;20:336-8.
17. Pangborn RM, Gibbs ZM, Tassan C. Effects of hydrocolloids on apparent viscosity and sensory properties of selected beverages. J Texture Stud. 1978;9:415-36.
18. Christensen CM. Oral perception of solution viscosity. J Texture Stud. 1979;10:164.
19. Christensen CM, Casper LM. Oral and nonoral perception of solution viscosity. J Food Sci. 1987;52:445-7.
20. Smith CH, Logemann JA, Burghardt WR, Carrell TD, Zecker SG. Oral sensory discrimination of fluid viscosity. Dysphagia. 1997;12:68-73.
21. Smith CH, Logemann JA, Burghardt WR, Zecker SG, Rademaker AW. Oral and oropharyngeal perception of fluid viscosity across the age span. Dysphagia. 2006;21:209-17.
22. Felt P. The National Dysphagia Diet: the science and practice. Nutr Clin Pract. 1999;14:S60-3.
23. Tedja S, Nonaka R, Ennis DM, O'Mahony M. Triadic discrimination testing: refinement of Thurstonian and sequential sensitivity analysis approaches. Chem Senses. 1994;19:279-301.
24. Gallagher DL. Statistical comparison of the triangle test and the two-of-five test for taste and odor evaluation. Water Sci Technol. 2004;49:107-14.
25. Lau S, O'Mahony M, Rousseau B, Lau S, O'Mahony M, Rousseau B. Are three-sample tasks less sensitive than two-sample tasks? Memory effects in the testing of taste discrimination. Percept Psychophys. 2004;66:464-74.
26. Zacarias I, Yanez CG, Araya M, Oraka C, Olivares M, Uauy R. Determination of the taste threshold of copper in water. Chem Senses. 2001;26:85-9.
27. O'Leary M, Hanson B, Smith C. Viscosity and non-Newtonian features of thickened fluids used for dysphagia therapy. J Food Sci. 2010;75(6):E330-8.