The effects of professional development on the attitudes, knowledge and skills for data-driven decision making

Studies in Educational Evaluation

Volumn 42, Issue , 2014, Pages 79-90

  Staman, L ^a   Visscher, A J ^a   Luyten, H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Data use; Data driven decision making; Data driven teaching; Professionalization; Student monitoring system

Indexed keywords

EID: 84903708409     PISSN: 0191491X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Black P., Wiliam D. Inside the Black Box: Raising standards through classroom assessment: Formative assessment is an essential component of classroom work and can raise student achievement. Phi Delta Kappan 2010, 92(1):81-90.
2. Bosker R.J., Branderhorst E.M., Visscher A.J. Improving the utilization of management information systems in secondary schools. Schools Effectiveness and School Improvement 2007, 18(4):451-467.
3. Branderhorst, E. M. (2005). Wat is er mis met MIS? Ontwerp en evaluatie van een training in het gebruik van managementinformatie binnen het voorgezet onderwijs (Dissertation). University of Twente, Enschede.
4. Coe R. Evidence on the role and impact of performance feedback in schools. School improvement through performance feedback 2002, 3-26. Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse. A.J. Visscher, R. Coe (Eds.).
5. Earl L., Fullan M. Using data in leadership for learning. Cambridge Journal of Education 2003, 33(3):383-394.
6. Hattie J.A.C. Visible learning; a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement 2009, Routledge, Abingdon.
7. Hattie J.A.C., Timperley H. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 2007, 77(1):81-112.
8. Heritage M., Kim J., Vendlinski T., Herman J. From evidence to action: A seamless process in formative assessment?. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 2009, 28:24-31.
9. Inspectie van het Onderwijs De staat van het onderwijs: Onderwijsverslag 2007/2008 2009, Inspectie van het Onderwijs, Utrecht.
10. Inspectie van het Onderwijs Opbrengstgericht werken in het basisonderwijs; een onderzoek naar opbrengstgericht werken bij rekenen-wiskunde in het basisonderwijs 2010, Inspectie van het Onderwijs, Utrecht.
11. Inspectie van het Onderwijs De staat van het onderwijs: Onderwijsverslag 2010/2011 2012, Inspectie van het Onderwijs, Utrecht.
12. Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2005). Using imperfect information to identify effective teachers (Unpublished paper). Los Angeles: School of Public Affairs, University of California - Los Angeles.
13. Keuning, T., & Van Geel, M. J. M. (2012). Focus projects II and III. The effects of a training in 'achievement oriented work' for primary school teams. Poster presented at the International ICO fall school, Girona, Spain.
14. Kluger A.N., DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin 1996, 119(2):254.
15. Ledoux G., Blok H., Boogaard M., Krüger M. Opbrengstgericht werken; over de waarde van meetgestuurd onderwijs 2009, SCO-Kohnstamm Institute, Amsterdam.
16. Locke E.A., Latham G. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. The American Psychologist 2002, 57(9):705-717.
17. Marsh J.A., McCombs J.S., Martorell F. How instructional coaches support data-driven decision making: Policy implementation and effects in Florida middle schools. Educational Policy 2010, 24(6):872-907.
18. Mintzberg H. The structuring of organizations 1997, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
19. Nye B., Konstantopoulos S., Hedges L. How large are teacher effects?. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 2004, 26(3):237-257.
20. Schildkamp K., Kuiper W. Data-informed curriculum reform: Which data, what purposes, and promoting and hindering factors. Teaching and Teacher Education 2010, 26:482-496.
21. Scheerens J., Bosker R. The foundations of educational effectiveness 1997, Pergamon, New York.
22. Schuyler Ikemoto G., Marsh J.E. Cutting through the data-driven mantra: Different conceptions of data-driven decision making. Evidence and Decision Making: Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education 2008, 106(1):105-131.
23. Verhaeghe, G. (2011). School performance feedback systems: Design and implementation issues (PhD thesis). University of Gent, Gent.
24. Managing schools towards high performance 1999, Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse. A.J. Visscher (Ed.).
25. Visscher A.J. A framework for studying school performance feedback systems. School improvement through performance feedback 2002, 41-72. Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse/Abingdon/Exton/Tokyo. A.J. Visscher, R. Coe (Eds.).
26. Visscher A.J., Coe R. School performance feedback systems: Conceptualisation, analysis and reflection. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 2003, 14(3):321-349.
27. Visscher A., Ehren M. De eenvoud en complexiteit van opbrengstgericht werken [The complexity and simplicity of data-driven teaching] 2011, Rijksoverheid, http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten-en-publicaties/rapporten/2011/07/13/de-eenvoud-en-complexiteit-van-opbrengstgericht-werken.html [accessed 23.01.12].
28. Wayman J.C. Involving teachers in data-driven decision making: Using computer data systems to support teacher inquiry and reflection. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk 2005, 10(3):295-308.