Efficient purging of deleteriousmutations in plants with haploid selfing

Genome Biology and Evolution

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1238-1252

  Szövényi, Péter ^a,b,c   Devos, Nicolas ^d   Weston, David J ^e   Yang, Xiaohan ^e   Hock, Zsófia ^a   Shaw, Jonathan A ^d   Shimizu, Kentaro K ^a   McDaniel, Stuart F ^f   Wagner, Andreas ^a,b,g,h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b SWISS INSTITUTE OF BIOINFORMATICS   (Switzerland)

^c EÖTVÖS LORÁND UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^d DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^g BIOINFORMATICS INSTITUTE   (Singapore)

^h SANTA FE INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Deleterious mutations; Diploid; Haploid; Haploid dominant life cycle; High throughput sequencing; Intragametophytic selfing; Outcrossing

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTOME;

CONSERVED SEQUENCE; DIPLOIDY; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; HAPLOIDY; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; MOSS; MUTATION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; POLLINATION; SELF FERTILIZATION;

BASE SEQUENCE; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; BRYOPHYTA; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; DIPLOIDY; HAPLOIDY; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; MUTATION; POLLINATION; SELECTION, GENETIC; SELF-FERTILIZATION; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 84902995537     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17596653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evu099     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Altenhoff AM, Studer RA, Robinson-Rechavi M, Dessimoz C. 2012. Resolving the ortholog conjecture: orthologs tend to be weakly, but significantly, more similar in function than paralogs. PLoS Comput Biol. 8: e1002514.
2. Altschul SF, et al. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 3389-3402.
3. Anderson LE, Shaw AJ, Shaw B. 2009. Peatmosses (Sphagnum) of the southeastern United States. New York: New York Botanical Garden Press.
4. runkumar R, Josephs EB, Williamson RJ, Wright SI. 2013. Pollen-specific, but not sperm-specific, genes show stronger purifying selection and higher rates of positive selection than sporophytic genes in Capsella grandiflora. Mol Biol Evol. 30: 2475-2486.
5. Axelsson E, et al. 2008. Natural selection for avianprotein-coding genes expressed in brain. Mol Ecol. 17: 3008-3017.
6. Barner AK, Pfister CA, Wootton JT. 2011. The mixed mating system of the sea palm kelp Postelsia palmaeformis: few costs to selfing. Proc Biol Sci. 278: 1347-1355.
7. Bengtsson BO, Cronberg N. 2009. The effective size of bryophyte populations. J Theor Biol. 258: 121-126.
8. Billiard S, López-Villavicencio M, Hood ME, Giraud T. 2012. Sex, outcrossing and mating types: unsolved questions in fungi and beyond. J Evol Biol. 25: 1020-1038.
9. Birky CW, Walsh JB. 1988. Effects of linkage on rates of molecular evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 85: 6414-6418.
10. Birney E, Clamp M, Durbin R. 2004. GeneWise and Genomewise. Genome Res. 14: 988-995.
11. Bork P, et al. 1998. Predicting function: from genes to genomes and back. J Mol Biol. 283: 707-725.
12. Bustamante CD, et al. 2002. The cost of inbreeding in Arabidopsis. Nature 416: 531-534.
13. Charlesworth B. 2012. The effects of deleterious mutations on the evolution of linked sites. Genetics 190: 5-22.
14. Charlesworth D, Willis JH. 2009. The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat Rev Genet. 10: 783-796.
15. Charlesworth D, Wright SI. 2001. Breeding system and genome evolution. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 11: 685-690.
16. Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32: 1792-1797.
17. Eppley SM, Taylor PJ, Jesson LK. 2007. Self-fertilization in mosses: a comparison of heterozygote deficiency between species with combined versus separate sexes. Heredity 98: 38-44.
18. Eyre-Walker A, Keightley PD, Smith NG, Gaffney D. 2002. Quantifying the slightly deleterious mutation model of molecular evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 19: 2142-2149.
19. Felsenstein J. 1974. The evolutionary advantage of recombination. Genetics 78: 737-756.
20. Gerstein AC, Cleathero LA, MandegarMA, Otto SP. 2011. Haploids adapt faster than diploids across a range of environments. J Evol Biol. 24: 531-540.
21. Gerstein AC, Otto SP. 2011. Cryptic fitness advantage: diploids invade haploid populations despite lacking any apparent advantage as measured by standard fitness assays. PLoS One 6: e26599.
22. Glémin S. 2007. Mating systems and the efficacy of selection at the molecular level. Genetics 177: 905-916.
23. Glémin S, Galtier N. 2012. Genome evolution in outcrossing versus selfing versus asexual species. Methods Mol Biol. 855: 311-335.
24. Gossmann TI, et al. 2010. Genome wide analyses reveal little evidence for adaptive evolution in many plant species. Mol Biol Evol. 27: 1822-1832.
25. Grabherr MG, et al. 2011. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNAseq data without a reference genome. Nature Biotechnol. 29: 644-652.
26. Hanada K, Shiu SH, Li WH. 2007. The nonsynonymous/synonymous substitution rate ratio versus the radical/conservative replacement rate ratio in the evolution of mammalian genes. Mol Biol Evol. 24: 2235-2241.
27. Hazzouri KM, et al. 2013. Comparative population genomics in Collinsia sister species reveals evidence for reduced effective population size, relaxed selection, and evolution of biased gene conversion with an ongoing mating system shift. Evolution 67: 1263-1278.
28. Hedrick PW. 1987a. Genetic load and the mating system in homosporous ferns. Evolution 41: 1282-1289.
29. Hedrick PW. 1987b. Population genetics of intragametophytic selfing. Evolution 41: 137-144.
30. Holsinger KE. 1987. Gametophytic self-fertilization in homosporous plants: development, evaluation, and application of a statistical method for evaluating its importance. Am J Bot. 74: 1173-1183.
31. Hughes AL, Friedman R. 2009. More radical amino acid replacements in primates than in rodents: support for the evolutionary role of effective population size. Gene 440: 50-56.
32. Kimura M. 1983. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Klekowski EJ. 1973. Genetic load in Osmunda regalis populations. Am J Bot. 60: 146-154.
34. Klekowski EJ. 1982. Genetic load and soft selection in ferns. Heredity 49: 191-197.
35. Kryazhimskiy S, Plotkin JB. 2008. The population genetics of dN/dS. PLoS Genet. 4: e1000304.
36. Lassmann T, Hayashizaki Y, Daub CO. 2009. TagDust-a program to eliminate artifacts from next generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 25: 2839-2840.
37. Lechner M, et al. 2011. Proteinortho: detection of (co-) orthologs in largescale analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 12: 124.
38. Liu Y, Budke JM, Goffinet B. 2012. Phylogenetic inference rejects sporophyte based classification of the Funariaceae (Bryophyta): rapid radiation suggests rampant homoplasy in sporophyte evolution. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 62: 130-145.
39. Lloyd RM. 1974. Mating systems and genetic load in pioneer and nonpioneer Hawaiian Pteridophyta. Bot J Linn Soc. 69: 23-35.
40. Mank JE, Nam K, Brunström B, Ellegren H. 2010. Ontogenetic complexity of sexual dimorphism and sex-specific selection. Mol Biol Evol. 27: 1570-1578.
41. Marchler-Bauer A, Bryant SH. 2004. CD-Search: protein domain annotations on the fly. Nucleic Acids Res. 32(Web Server issue): W327-W331.
42. Marchler-Bauer A, et al. 2013. CDD: conserved domains and protein three-dimensional structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 41: 348-352.
43. Maynard Smith J, Szathmáry E. 1995. The major transitions in evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44. McCauley DE, Whittier DP, Reilly LM. 1985. Inbreeding and the rate of selffertilization in a grape-fern, Botrychium dissectum. Am J Bot. 72: 1978-1981.
45. McDaniel SF, et al. 2010. The speciation history of the Physcomitrella- Physcomitrium complex. Evolution 64: 217-231.
46. McDaniel SF, Atwood J, Burleigh JG. 2013. Recurrent evolution of dioecy in bryophytes. Evolution 67: 567-572.
47. McDaniel SF, van Baren MJ, Jones KS, Payton AC, Quatrano RS. 2013. Estimating the nucleotide diversity in Ceratodon purpureus (Hedw.) Brid. from 208 conserved intron-spanning nuclear loci. Appl Plant Sci. 1: 1200387.
48. Miyata T, Miyazawa S, Yasunaga T. 1979. Two types of amino acid substitutions in protein evolution. J Mol Evol. 12: 219-236.
49. Mugal CF, Wolf JBW, Kaj I. 2014. Why time matters: codon evolution and the temporal dynamics of dN/dS. Mol Biol Evol. 31: 212-231.
50. Ness RW, Siol M, Barrett SC. 2012. Genomic consequences of transitions from cross- to self-fertilization on the efficacy of selection in three independently derived selfing plants. BMC Genomics 13: 611.
51. Nielsen R, Yang Z. 2003. Estimating the distribution of selection coefficients from phylogenetic data with applications to mitochondrial and viral DNA. Mol Biol Evol. 20: 1231-1239.
52. Nordborg M. 2000. Linkage disequilibrium, gene tress and selfing: an ancestral recombination graph with partial self-fertilization. Genetics 154: 923-929.
53. O'Donoghue MT, et al. 2013. Genome-wide transcriptomic analysis of the sporophyte of the moss Physcomitrella patens. J Exp Bot. 64: 3567-3581.
54. Otto SP, Gerrsein AC. 2008. The evolution of haploidy and diploidy. Curr Biol. 18: 1112-1124.
55. Perroud PF, Cove DJ, Quatrano RS, McDaniel SF. 2011. An experimental method to facilitate the identification of hybrid sporophytes in the moss Physcomitrella patens using fluorescent tagged lines. New Phytol. 191: 301-306.
56. Qiu S, Zeng K, Slotte T, Wright SI, Charlesworth D. 2011. Reduced efficacy of natural selection on codon usage bias in selfing Arabidopsis and Capsella species. Gen Biol Evol. 3: 868-880.
57. R Development Core Team. 2011. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [cited 2014 May 16]. Available from: http://www.Rproject.org/.
58. Rensing SA, et al. 2007. An ancient genome duplication contributed to the abundance of metabolic genes in the moss Physcomitrella patens. BMC Evol Biol. 7: 130.
59. Rensing SA, et al. 2008. The genome of the moss Physcomitrella patens reveals evolutionary insights into the conquest of land by plants. Science 319: 64-69.
60. Rocha EPC, et al. 2006. Comparisons of dN/dS are time dependent for closely related bacterial genomes. J Theor Biol. 239: 226-235.
61. Shaw AJ. 1991. The genetic structure of sporophytic and gametophytic populations of the moss, Funaria hygrometrica Hedw. Evolution 45: 1260-1274.
62. Shaw AJ. 2000. Population ecology, ?population genetics, and microevolution. In: Goffinet B, Shaw AJ, editors. Bryophyte biology. 1st ed. New York: Cambridge University Press. p. 403-448.
63. Shaw AJ, et al. 2008. Genetic structure and genealogy in the Sphagnum subsecundum complex (Sphagnaceae: Bryophyta). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 49: 304-317.
64. Shaw AJ, et al. 2010. Peatmoss (Sphagnum) diversification associated with Miocene Northern Hemisphere climatic cooling? Mol Phylogenet Evol. 55: 1139-1145.
65. Slotte T, Foxe JP, Hazzouri KM, Wright SI. 2010. Genome-wide evidence for efficient positive and purifying selection in Capsella grandiflora, a plant species with a large effective population size. Mol Biol Evol. 27: 1813-1821.
66. Slotte T, et al. 2011. Genomic determinants of protein evolution and polymorphism in Arabidopsis. Gen Biol Evol. 3: 1210-1219.
67. Slotte T, et al. 2013. The Capsella rubella genome and the genomic consequences of rapid mating system evolution. Nature Genet. 45: 831-835.
68. Smith NGC. 2003. Are radical and conservative substitution rates useful statistics in molecular evolution? J Mol Evol. 57: 467-478.
69. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 2012. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 4th ed. New York: W. H. Freeman and Co.
70. Stenøien HK, Sastad S. 2001. Genetic variability in bryophytes: does mating system really matter? J Bryol. 4: 313-318.
71. Subramanian S. 2013. Significance of population size on the fixation of nonsynonymous mutations in genes under varying levels of selection pressure. Genetics 193: 995-1002.
72. Suyama M, Torrents D, Bork P. 2006. PAL2NAL: robust conversion of protein sequence alignments into the corresponding codon alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 34: 609-612.
73. Szövényi P, Rensing SA, Lang D, Shaw AJ, Wray G. 2011. Generationbiased gene expression in a bryophyte model system. Mol Biol Evol. 28: 803-812.
74. Szövényi P, Ricca M, Shaw AJ. 2009. Multiple paternity and sporophytic inbreeding depression in a dioicous moss species. Heredity 103: 394-403.
75. Szövényi P, Terracciano S, Ricca M, Giordano S, Shaw AJ. 2008. Recent divergence, intercontinental dispersal and shared polymorphism are shaping the genetic structure of amphi-Atlantic peatmoss populations. Mol Ecol. 17: 5364-5377.
76. Szövényi P, et al. 2013. Selection is no more efficient in haploid than in diploid life stages of an angiosperm and a moss. Mol Biol Evol. 30: 1929-1939.
77. Taylor PJ, Eppley SM, Jesson LK. 2007. Sporophytic inbreeding depression in mosses occurs in a species with separate sexes but not in a species with combined sexes. Am J Bot. 94: 1853-1859.
78. Vijay N, Poelstra JW, Künstner A, Wolf JBW. 2013. Challenges and strategies in transcriptome assembly and differential gene expression quantification. A comprehensive in silico assessment of RNA-seq experiments. Mol Ecol. 22: 620-634.
79. Wang J, Hill WG, Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. 1999. Dynamics of inbreeding depression due to deleterious mutations in small populations: mutation parameters and inbreeding rate. Genet Res (Camb). 74: 165-178.
80. Wernegreen JJ. 2011. Reduced selective constraint in endosymbionts: elevation in radical amino acid replacements occurs genome-wide. PLoS One 6: e28905.
81. Wolf JBW, Künstner A, Nam K, Jakobsson M, Ellegren H. 2009. Nonlinear dynamics of nonsynonymous (dN) and synonymous (dS) substitution rates affects inference of selection. Genome Biol Evol. 1: 308-319.
82. Wright SI, Andolfatto P. 2008. The impact of natural selection on the genome: emerging patterns in Drosophila and Arabidopsis. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 39: 193-213.
83. Wright SI, Kalisz S, Slotte T. 2013. Evolutionary consequences of selffertilization in plants. Proc R Soc B. 280: 20130133.
84. Wright SI, Ness RW, Foxe JP, Barrett SCH. 2008. Genomic consequences of selfing and outcrossing in plants. Int J Plant Sci. 169: 105-118.
85. Yang L, Gaut BS. 2011. Factors that contribute to variation in evolutionary rate among Arabidopsis genes. Mol Biol Evol. 28: 2359-2369.
86. Yang Z, Nielsen R. 2000. Estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates under realistic evolutionary models. Mol Biol Evol. 17: 32-43.
87. Zhang J. 2000. Rates of conservative and radical nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions in mammalian nuclear genes. J Mol Evol. 50: 56-68.
88. Zhang Z, et al. 2006. KaKs Calculator: calculating Ka and Ks through model selection and model averaging. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 4: 259-263.
89. Zörgö E, et al. 2013. Ancient evolutionary trade-offs between yeast ploidy states. PLoS Genet. 9: e1003388.