Recurrent evolution of dioecy in bryophytes

Evolution

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 567-572

  Mcdaniel, Stuart F ^a   Atwood, John ^b   Burleigh, J Gordon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN   (United States)

Author keywords

Diversification; Haploid dioecy; Hermaphroditism; Inbreeding depression; Mating system; Sexual dimorphism

Indexed keywords

BRYOPHYTE; CLADISTICS; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENOMICS; HERMAPHRODITISM; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; MOSS; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY;

ARTICLE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HERMAPHRODITIC SPECIES; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOSS; PHYLOGENY; REPRODUCTION;

BRYOPHYTA; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC VARIATION; HERMAPHRODITIC ORGANISMS; PHYLOGENY; REPRODUCTION;

BRYOPHYTA; BRYOPHYTES;

EID: 84873056867     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01808.x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Abbott, J. K. 2011. Intra-locus sexual conflict and sexually antagonistic genetic variation in hermaphroditic animals. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 278:161-169.
2. Allen, C. 1945. Genetics of bryophytes II. Bot. Rev. (Lancaster) 11:260-287.
3. Ashman, T.-L. 2002. The role of herbivores in the evolution of separate sexes from hermaphroditism. Ecology 83:1175-1184.
4. Bachtrog, D., M. Kirkpatrick, J. E. Mank, S. F. McDaniel, J. C. Pires, W. R. Rice, and N. Valenzuela . 2011. Are all sex chromosomes created equal Trends Genet. 27:350-357.
5. Baker, H. G. 1955. Self-compatibility and establishment after 'long-distance' dispersal. Evolution 9:347-349.
6. Barraclough, T. G., P. H. Harvey, and S. Nee . 1995. Sexual selection and taxonomic diversity in passerine birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 259:211-215.
7. Bawa, K. S. 1980. Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11:15-39.
8. Bisang, I., J. Ehrlen, and L. Hedenas . 2004. Mate limited reproductive success in two dioicous mosses. Oikos 104:291-298.
9. Busch, J. W., and L. F. Delph . 2012. The relative importance of reproductive assurance and automatic selection as hypotheses for the evolution of self-fertilization. Annals Bot. 109:553-562.
10. Butler, M. A., S. A. Sawyer, and J. B. Losos . 2007. Sexual dimorphism and adaptive radiation in Anolis lizards. Nature 447:202-205.
11. Case, A., and S. Barrett . 2004. Environmental stress and the evolution of dioecy: Wurmbea dioica (Colchicaceae) in Western Australia. Evol. Ecol. 18:145-164.
12. Charlesworth, B., and D. Charlesworth . 1978. A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. Am. Nat. 112:975-997.
13. Charnov, E. L., J. J. Bull, and J. Maynard Smith . 1976. Why be an hermaphrodite Nature 263:125-126.
14. Cox, R. M., and R. Calsbeek . 2009. Sexually antagonistic selection, sexual dimorphism, and the resolution of intralocus sexual conflict. Am. Nat. 173:176-187.
15. Crawford, M., L. K. Jesson, and P. J. Garnock-Jones . 2009. Correlated evolution of sexual system and life-history traits in mosses. Evolution 63:1129-1142.
16. Crosby, M., R. Magill, B. Allen, and S. He . 2000. A checklist of mosses. Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis, MO .
17. Darwin, C. 1878. The effects of cross and self-fertilization in the vegetable kingdom. John Murray, London .
18. Devos, N., M. A. M. Renner, R. Gradstein, A. J. Shaw, B. Laenen, and A. Vanderpoorten . 2011. Evolution of sexual systems, dispersal strategies and habitat selection in the liverwort genus Radula. New Phytol. 192:225-236.
19. Eppley, S. M., and L. K. Jesson . 2008. Moving to mate: the evolution of separate and combined sexes in multicellular organisms. J. Evol. Biol. 21:727-736.
20. Eppley, S. M., P. J. Taylor, and L. K. Jesson . 2006. Self-fertilization in mosses: a comparison of heterozygote deficiency between species with combined versus separate sexesM. Heredity 98:38-44.
21. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
22. FitzJohn, R. G., W. P. Maddison, and S. P. Otto . 2009. Estimating trait-dependent speciation and extinction rates from incompletely resolved phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 58:595-611.
23. Freeman, D. C., J. L. Doust, A. El-Keblawy, K. J. Miglia, and E. D. McArthur . 1997. Sexual specialization and inbreeding avoidance in the evolution of dioecy. Bot. Rev. 63:65-92.
24. Ghiselin, M. T. 1969. The evolution of hermaphroditism among animals. Q. Rev. Biol. 44:189-208.
25. Heilbuth, J. C. 2000. Lower species richness in dioecious clades. Am. Nat. 156:221-241.
26. Heilbuth, J. C., K. L. Ilves, and S. P. Otto . 2001. The consequences of dioecy for seed dispersal: modeling the seed-shadow handicap. Evolution 55:880-888.
27. Horsley, K., L. R. Stark, and D. N. McLetchie . 2011. Does the silver moss Bryum argenteum exhibit sex-specific patterns in vegetative growth rate, asexual fitness or prezygotic reproductive investment Annals Bot. 107:897-907.
28. Jarne, P., and J. R. Auld . 2006. Animals mix it up too: the distribution of self-fertilization among hermaphroditic animals. Evolution 60:1816-1824.
29. Jesson, L. K., A. P. Cavanagh, and D. S. Perley . 2011. Polyploidy influences sexual system and mating patterns in the moss Atrichum undulatum sensu lato. Annals Bot. 107:135-143.
30. Klekowski, E. J. J. 1969. Reproductive biology of the pteridophyta II. Theoretical considerations. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 62:347-359.
31. Maddison, W. 2006. Confounding asymmetries in evolutionary diversification and character change. Evolution 60:1743-1746.
32. Maddison, W. P., and D. R. Maddison . 2010. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.73 Available at http://mesquiteproject.org.
33. Maddison, W. P., P. E. Midford, and S. P. Otto . 2007. Estimating a binary character's effect on speciation and extinction. Syst. Biol. 56:701-710.
34. Maynard Smith, J. 1971. The origin and maintenance of sex. In G. C. Williams, ed. Group selection. Aldine, Chicago .
35. McDaniel, S. F. 2005. Genetic correlations do not constrain the evolution of sexual dimorphism in the moss Ceratodon purpureus. Evolution 59:2353-2361.
36. McDaniel, S. F., J. H. Willis, and A. J. Shaw . 2007. A linkage map reveals a complex basis for segregation distortion in an interpopulation cross in the moss Ceratodon purpureus. Genetics 176:2489-2500.
37. Miller, J. S., and D. L. Venable . 2000. Polyploidy and the evolution of gender dimorphism in plants. Science 289:2335-2338.
38. Mitter, C., B. Farrell, and B. J. Wiegmann . 1988. The phylogenetic study of adaptive zones: has phytophagy promoted insect diversification Am. Nat. 132:107-128.
39. Natcheva, R., and N. Cronberg . 2004. What do we know about hybridization among bryophytes in nature. Can. J. Bot. 82:1687-1704.
40. Otto, S. P., and T. Lenormand . 2002. Resolving the paradox of sex and recombination. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3:252-261.
41. Pagel, M. 1999. The maximum likelihood approach to reconstructing ancestral character states of discrete characters on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 48:612-622.
42. Perroud, P. F., D. J. Cove, R. S. Quatrano, and S. F. McDaniel . 2011. An experimental method to facilitate the identification of hybrid sporophytes in the moss Physcomitrella patens using fluorescent tagged lines. New Phytol. 191:301-306.
43. Platt, T. R., and D. R. Brooks . 1997. Evolution of the schistosomes (Digenea: Schistosomatoidea): the origin of dioecy and colonization of the venous system. J. Parasitol. 83:1035-1044.
44. Renner, S. S., and R. E. Ricklefs . 1995. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. Am. J. Bot. 82:596-606.
45. Robertson, K., E. E. Goldberg, and B. Igić . 2011. Comparative evidence for the correlated evolution of polylploidy and self-compatibility in Solanaceae. Evolution 65:139-155.
46. Sanderson, M. J. 2002. Estimating absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times: a penalized likelihood approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:101-109.
47. Sanderson, M. J. 2003. R8s: inferring absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times in the absence of a molecular clock. Bioinformatics 19:301-302.
48. Shaw, A. J., C. J. Cox, and B. Goffinet . 2005. Global patterns of moss diversity: taxonomic and molecular inferences. Taxon 54:337-352.
49. Stamatakis, A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22:2688-2690.
50. Stark, L., N. McLetchie, and B. Mishler . 2001. Sex expression and sex dimorphism in sporophytic populations of the desert moss Syntrichia caninervis. Plant Ecol. 157:181-194.
51. Taylor, P. J., S. M. Eppley, and L. K. Jesson . 2007. Sporophytic inbreeding depression in mosses occurs in a species with separate sexes but not in a species with combined sexes. Am. J. Bot. 94:1853-1859.
52. Vamosi, S. M., and J. C. Vamosi . 2005. Endless tests: guidelines for analyzing non-nested sister-group comparisons. Evol. Ecol. Res. 7:567-579.
53. Wiegmann, B. M., C. Mitter, and B. Farrell . 1993. Diversification of carnivorous parasitic insects: extraordinary radiation or specialized dead end Am. Nat. 142:737-754.
54. Wyatt, R., and L. E. Anderson . 1984. Breeding systems in bryophytes. Pp. 39-64 in A. F. Dyer and J. G. Duckett, eds. The experimental biology of bryophytes. Academic Press, London, U.K .