Concentrating on affective feedforward in online tutoring

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 694-706

  Chen, Ya Ting ^a   Chou, Yung Hsin ^a   Cowan, John ^b  

^a WENZAO URSULINE UNIVERSITY OF LANGUAGES   (Taiwan)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY;

CONFUCIANS; CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS; FEED-FORWARD; LEARNING EXPERIENCES; ONLINE DISCUSSIONS; ONLINE TUTORING; PRO ACTIVITIES; TECHNOLOGICAL LINKS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84902485362     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12077     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Adair, J., (1984). The Hawthorne effect: a reconsideration of the methodological artifact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 2, 334-345.
2. Anon (2011). CCTST. Retrieved August 28, 2012, from CCTST: http://www.insightassessment.com/Products/Critical-Thinking-Skills-Tests/ California-Critical-Thinking-Skills-Test-CCTST
3. Arroyo, I., Muldner, K., Burleson, W., Woolf, B., &, Cooper, D., (2009). Designing affective support to foster learning, motivation and attribution. 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED.
4. Astleitner, H., (2002). Teaching critical thinking online. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 29, 2, 53-76.
5. Aviv, R., Erlich, Z., Ravid, G., &, Geva, A., (2003). Network analysis of knowledge construction in asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7, 3, 1-20.
6. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., William, D., (2003). Assessment for learning; putting it into practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
7. Bonk, C., &, King, K., (1998). Electronic collaborators: learner-centred technologies for literacy, apprenticeship and discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Brem, S., &, Rips, L., (2000). Explanation and evidence in informed argument. Cognitive Science, 24, 4, 573-604.
9. Brookfield, S. D., (1990). The skilful teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Brookfield, S. D., (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
11. Bruner, J., (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Chang, J., (2001). Chinese speakers. In, M. Swan, &, B. Smith, (Eds), Learner English (2nd ed.) (pp. 310-324). London: Cambridge University Press.
13. Chang, W., (2000). In search of the Chinese in all the wrong places? Journal of Psychology in Chinese Society, 1, 1, 125-142.
14. Cheng, Y. Y., &, Yeh, Y. C., (2000). The effects of critical thinking instruction for college students. Social Science Quarterly, 2, 1, 127-142.
15. Chiu, Y. C., (2009). Facilitating Asian students' critical thinking in online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 1, 42-57.
16. Chiu, Y. C., &, Cowan, J., (2009). Dealing with affective needs in e-learning: contrasting two cases in two cultures. In, B. Olinaran, (Ed.), Cases on successful E-learning practices in the developed and developing world: methods for the global information methods for the global information economy (pp. 42-57). Hershey, NY: IGI Global Publications.
17. Chiu, Y. C., &, Cowan, J., (2012). Helping Eastern students to master Western critical thinking. Asia Pacific Education Review, 13, 1, 103-111.
18. Chu, L., Li, H., Lin, W., &, Lee, K., (2002). Effect of students' background on e-learning performance. Mingchi Academic Journal, 34, 1, 57-63.
19. Cohen, L., Manion, L., &, Morrison, K., (2011). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
20. Cowan, J., (2005). The atrophy of the affect. In, S. Robinson, &, C. Katalushu, (Eds), Values in higher education (pp. 159-177). Aureus: Vale of Glamorgan.
21. Cowan, J., (2006). On becoming an innovative university teacher (2nd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
22. Cowan, J., (2010). Virtual relationships-behind a veil? In, J. Smith, (Ed.), Academic identities for the 21st century (pp. 53-59). Glasgow: University of Strathclyde.
23. Cowan, J., (2013). Facilitating reflective journalling-personal reflections on three decades of practice. Journal of Learning Development In Higher Education, 5, 1-17.
24. de Andres, V., (2002-3). The influence of affective variables on EFL/ESL learning and teaching. Journal of the Imagination in Language Learning and Teaching, 7. Retrieved May 30, 2013, from: http://www.njcu.edu/cill/vol7/andres. html
25. Eyers, G., &, Hill, M., (2004). Improving student learning? Research evidence about teacher feedback for improvement in New Zealand schools. Waikato Journal of Education, 10, 251-261.
26. Garrison, D. R., &, Anderson, T., (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: a framework for research and practice. New York: Routledge Falmer.
27. George, J., Cowan, J., Hewitt, L., &, Cannell, P., (2004). Failure dances to the tune of insecurity: affective issues in the assessment and evaluation of access learning. Journal of Access Policy and Practice, 1, 2, 119-135.
28. Gerber, S., Scott, L., Clements, D. H., &, Sarama, J., (2005). Instructor influence on reasoned argument in discussion boards. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 2, 25-39.
29. Hounsell, D., McCune, V., Hounsell, J., &, Litjens, J., (2008). The quality of guidance and feedback to students. Higher Education Research and Development, 27, 1, 55-67.
30. Huang, W., (2001). The impact of online small group facilitators' scaffolding on students' critical thinking development. (unpublished Masters Thesis) Hualien: National Tunghua University.
31. Jonassen, D., (2002). Learning to solve problems online. In, C. Vrasidas, &, G. Glass, (Eds), Distance education and distributed learning (pp. 75-98). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
32. Juwah, C., Macfarlane-Dick, D., Matthew, B., Nicol, D., Ross, D., &, Smith, B., (2004). Enhancing student learning through effective formative feedback. York: Higher Education Academy.
33. Kao, T. C., &, Chen, Y. E., (2003). Group dynamics interactive skills in asynchronous small group discussion online. ICDE Conference. Taipei: ICDE.
34. Kraft, K., Srogi, L., Husman, J., Semken, S., &, Fuhman, M., (2011). Engaging students to learn through the affective domain. Journal of Geoscience Education, 59, 2, 71-84.
35. Lehman, B., Matthews, M., D'Mello, S., &, Person, N., (2008). What are you feeling? Investigating student affective states during expert human tutoring sessions. 9th Internatinal Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 50-59). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin.
36. Markle, S. M., (1978). Teaching conceptual networks. NSPI Journal, 17, 1, 4-7.
37. McCormick, B., Davenport, D., &, Geh, Y., (2004). Shepherd leadership: wisdom for leaders from Psalm 23. Taipei: Apocalypse Press.
38. Merryfield, M., (2003). Like a veil: cross-cultural experiential learning online. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 3, 2, 146-171.
39. Murtagh, L., &, Baker, N., (2009). Feedback to feed forward: student response to tugors' written comments on assignments. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 3, 1, 20-28.
40. Nicol, D. J., &, Milligan, C., (2006). Rethinking technology-supported assessment in terms of the seven principles of good feedback practice. In, C. Bryan, &, K. Clegg, (Eds), Innovative assessment in higher education (pp. 64-78). London: Temple & Francis.
41. Oliver, M., &, Shaw, G., (2003). Asynchronous discussion in support of medical education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7, 1, 56-67.
42. Parlett, M., &, Hamilton, D., (1972). Evaluation as illumination: a new approach to the study of innovatory programs. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
43. Parra, Y., (2008). Action research on affective factors and language learning strategies. Profile, 10, 195-210.
44. Parry, S., &, Bamber, M., (2010). Feedforward: the responses of students in accountancy. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 4, 1, 62-72.
45. Paul, R., Elder, L., &, Bartell, T., (2002). Study of 38 public universities and 28 private universities to determine faculty emphasis on critical thinking in instruction. Retrieved September 3, 2003, from Critical Thinking: http://www.criticalthinking.org/schoolstudy.htm
46. Pawan, F., Paulus, T. M., Yalcin, S., &, Chang, C., (2003). Online learning: patterns of engagement and interaction among in-service teachers. Language Learning and Technology, 7, 3, 119-140.
47. Perry, W. G., (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
48. Rheingold, H., (1998). The art of hosting good conversations online. Retrieved November 28, 2012, from Rheingold's brainstorms: http://www.rheingold. com/texts/artonlinehost.html
49. Rogers, C. R., (1961). On becoming a person. London: Constable.
50. Sadler, D. R., (2009). Beyond feedback: developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 5, 535-550.
51. Salmon, G., (2000). E-moderating: the key to teaching and learning online. London: Kogan Page.
52. Salmon, G., (2002). E-tivities:the key to active online learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing Inc.
53. Scardamalia, M., &, Bereiter, C., (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 3, 265-283.
54. Schellens, T., &, Valcke, M., (2006). Fostering knowledge construction in university students through asynchronous discussion groups. Computer and Education, 46, 349-370.
55. Schön, D. A., (1983). The reflective practitioner-how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
56. Shute, V., (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 1, 153-189.
57. Siemens, G., &, Yurkiw, S., (2003). The roles of the learner and the instructor in e-learning. In, G. Piskurich, (Ed.), Preparing learners for e-learning (pp. 123-138). San Francisco: Wiley.
58. Stein, N., &, Bernas, R., (1999). The early emergence of argumentative knowledge and skillJ. In, J. Andriessen, &, P. Corrier, (Eds), Foundations of argumentative text processing (pp. 97-116). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
59. The Foundation for Critical Thinking (2011). Thinkers guides. Retrieved November 28, 2012, from The Critical Thinking Community: http://www. criticalthinking.org
60. Vlachopoulos, P., &, Cowan, J., (2010). Reconceptualising moderation in asynchronous online discussions using grounded theory. Distance Education, 31, 1, 23-36.
61. Vygotsky, L., (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62. Walker, S. A., (2004). Socratic strateges and devil's advocacy in synchronous CMC debate. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 172-182.
63. Watkins, D. A., &, Biggs, J. B., (2001). Insights into teaching the Chinese learner. In, D. Watkins, &, J. Biggs, (Eds), Teaching the Chinese learner: psychological and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 277-300). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre.
64. Wilbur, S., (1997). An archaeology of cyberspace: virtuality identity. In, D. Porter, (Ed.), Internet cuylture (pp. 5-22). New York: Routledge.
65. Williams, S., Watkins, K., Daly, B., &, Courtney, B., (2001). Facilitating cross-cultural discussion groups: implications for practice. ETAL Distance Education, 22, 1, 151-168.
66. Wu, M., &, Lee, C., (2002). A preliminary enquiry for rationality theories and critical thinking education in Taiwan. Journal of Science and Technology, 11, 1, 63-74.
67. Yu, Y., &, Chou, S., (2004). Integrating writing with reading in EFL writing classroom with metacognitive approach. Selected Papers from Thirteenth International Symposium and Book Fair on English Teaching, 1, 708-719.