Wall shear stress calculations based on 3D cine phase contrast MRI and computational fluid dynamics: A comparison study in healthy carotid arteries

NMR in Biomedicine

Volumn 27, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 826-834

  Cibis, Merih ^a   Potters, Wouter V ^b   Gijsen, Frank J H ^a   Marquering, Henk ^b   vanBavel, Ed ^b   van der Steen, Antonius F W ^a,c   Nederveen, Aart J ^b   Wentzel, Jolanda J ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Carotid arteries; CFD; Phase contrast MRI; Shear stress

Indexed keywords

SHEAR STRESS; VELOCITY;

CARDIO-VASCULAR DISEASE; CAROTID ARTERY; DISEASE PROGRESSION; HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS; HUMAN CAROTID ARTERY; PHASE CONTRAST MRI; TEMPORAL VARIATION; VELOCITY GRADIENTS;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD FLOWMETRY; BLOOD VISCOSITY; CAROTID ARTERY; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMMON CAROTID ARTERY; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIASTOLE; EXTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY; HEART CYCLE; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEAR STRESS; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SYSTOLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; HEALTH; HYDRODYNAMICS; MECHANICAL STRESS; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

ADULT; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CAROTID ARTERIES; CORONARY CIRCULATION; DIASTOLE; HEALTH; HUMANS; HYDRODYNAMICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 84902345633     PISSN: 09523480     EISSN: 10991492     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3126     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Malek AM, Alper SL, Izumo S. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1999; 282(21): 2035-2042.
2. VanderLaan PA, Reardon CA, Getz GS. Site specificity of atherosclerosis: site-selective responses to atherosclerotic modulators. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2004; 24(1): 12-22.
3. Shaaban AM, Duerinckx AJ. Wall shear stress and early atherosclerosis: a review. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2000; 174(6): 1657-1665.
4. Slager CJ, Wentzel JJ, Gijsen FJH, Thury A, van der Wal AC, Schaar JA, Serruys PW. The role of shear stress in the destabilization of vulnerable plaques and related therapeutic implications. Nat. Clin. Pract. Cardiovasc. Med. 2005; 2(9): 456-464.
5. Cecchi E, Giglioli C, Valente S, Lazzeri C, Gensini GF, Abbate R, Mannini L. Role of hemodynamic shear stress in cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis 2011; 214(2): 249-256.
6. Wentzel JJ, Corti R, Fayad ZA, Wisdom P, Macaluso F, Winkelman MO, Fuster V, Badimon JJ. Does shear stress modulate both plaque progression and regression in the thoracic aorta? Human study using serial magnetic resonance imaging. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2005; 45(6): 846-854.
7. Pfeiffer V, Sherwin SJ, Weinberg PD. Does low and oscillatory wall shear stress correlate spatially with early atherosclerosis? A systematic review. Cardiovasc. Res. 2013; 99(2): 242-250.
8. Shojima M, Oshima M, Takagi K, Torii R, Hayakawa M, Katada K, Morita A, Kirino T. Magnitude and role of wall shear stress on cerebral aneurysm: computational fluid dynamic study of 20 middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Stroke 2004; 35(11): 2500-2505.
9. Oshinski JN, Ku DN, Mukundan S, Loth F, Pettigrew RI. Determination of wall shear stress in the aorta with the use of MR phase velocity mapping. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1995; 5(6): 640-647.
10. Oyre S, Ringgaard S, Kozerke S, Paaske WP, Erlandsen M, Boesiger P, Pedersen EM. Accurate noninvasive quantitation of blood flow, cross-sectional lumen vessel area and wall shear stress by three-dimensional paraboloid modeling of magnetic resonance imaging velocity data. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1998; 32(1): 128-134.
11. Sui B, Gao P, Lin Y, Qin H, Liu L, Liu G. Noninvasive determination of spatial distribution and temporal gradient of wall shear stress at common carotid artery. J. Biomech. 2008; 41(14): 3024-3030.
12. Sui B, Gao P, Lin Y, Gao B, Liu L, An J. Blood flow pattern and wall shear stress in the internal carotid arteries of healthy subjects. Acta Radiol. 2008; 49(7): 806-14.
13. van Es AC, van der Flier WM, Box FM, Middelkoop HA, Westendorp RG, van Buchem MA, van der Grond J. Carotid and basilar artery wall shear stress in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Dementia Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 2009; 28(3): 220-224.
14. Masaryk AM, Frayne R, Unal O, Krupinski E, Strother CM. In vitro and in vivo comparison of three MR measurement methods for calculating vascular shear stress in the internal carotid artery. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 1999; 20(2): 237-245.
15. Stokholm R, Oyre S, Ringgaard S, Flaagoy H, Paaske WP, Pedersen EM. Determination of wall shear rate in the human carotid artery by magnetic resonance techniques. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2000; 20(5): 427-433.
16. Papathanasopoulou P, Zhao S, Köhler U, Robertson MB, Long Q, Hoskins P, Xu XY, Marshall I. MRI measurement of time-resolved wall shear stress vectors in a carotid bifurcation model, and comparison with CFD predictions. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2003; 17(2): 153-162.
17. Stalder AF, Russe MF, Frydrychowicz A, Bock J, Hennig J, Markl M. Quantitative 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI: optimized analysis of blood flow and vessel wall parameters. Magn. Reson. Med. 2008; 60(5): 1218-1231.
18. Frydrychowicz A, Stalder AF, Russe MF, Bock J, Bauer S, Harloff A, Berger A, Langer M, Hennig J, Markl M. Three-dimensional analysis of segmental wall shear stress in the aorta by flow-sensitive four-dimensional-MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2009; 30(1): 77-84.
19. Van Ooij P, Potters WV, Guédon A, Schneiders JJ, Marquering HA, Majoie CB, vanBavel E, Nederveen AJ. Wall shear stress estimated with phase contrast MRI in an in vitro and in vivo intracranial aneurysm. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2013; 38(4): 876-884.
20. Harloff A, Berg S, Barker AJ, Schöllhorn J, Schumacher M, Weiller C, Markl M. Wall shear stress distribution at the carotid bifurcation: influence of eversion carotid endarterectomy. Eur. Radiol. 2013; 23(12): 3361-3369.
21. Potters W, Van Ooij P, Marquering H, vanBavel E, Nederveen AJ. Volumetric arterial wall shear stress calculation based on cine phase contrast MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014: 1-12. doi:10.1002/jmri.24560
22. Yushkevich PA, Piven J, Hazlett HC, Smith RG, Ho S, Gee JC, Gerig G. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 2006; 31(3): 1116-1128.
23. Antiga L, Piccinelli M, Botti L, Ene-Iordache B, Remuzzi A, Steinman DA. An image-based modeling framework for patient-specific computational hemodynamics. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2008; 46(11): 1097-1112.
24. Lee SW, Antiga L, Spence JD, Steinman DA. Geometry of the carotid bifurcation predicts its exposure to disturbed flow. Stroke 2008; 39(8): 2341-2347.
25. Seo T, Schachter LG, Barakat AI. Computational study of fluid mechanical disturbance induced by endovascular stents. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2005; 33(4): 444-456.
26. Petersson S, Dyverfeldt P, Ebbers T. Assessment of the accuracy of MRI wall shear stress estimation using numerical simulations. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012; 36(1): 128-138.
27. Kohler U, Marshall I, Robertson MB, Long Q, Xu YX, Hoskins PR. MRI measurement of wall shear stress vectors in bifurcation models and comparison with CFD predictions. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001; 14: 563-573.
28. Boussel L, Rayz V, Martin A, Acevedo-Bolton G, Lawton MT, Higashida R, Smith WS, Young WL, Saloner D. Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging measurements in intracranial aneurysms in vivo of flow patterns, velocity fields, and wall shear stress: comparison with computational fluid dynamics. Magn. Reson. Med. 2009; 61(2): 409-417.
29. Isoda H, Ohkura Y, Kosugi T, Hirano M, Alley MT, Bammer R, Pelc NJ, Namba H, Sakahara H. Comparison of hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms between MR fluid dynamics using 3D cine phase-contrast MRI and MR-based computational fluid dynamics. Neuroradiology 2010; 52(10): 913-920.
30. Naito T, Miyachi S, Matsubara N, Isoda H, Izumi T, Haraguchi K, Takahashi I, Ishii K, Wakabayashi T. Magnetic resonance fluid dynamics for intracranial aneurysms - comparison with computed fluid dynamics. Acta Neurochir. 2012; 154(6): 993-1001.
31. Schubert T, Santini AF, Stalder AF, Bock J, Meckel S, Bonati L, Markl M, Wetzel S. Dampening of blood-flow pulsatility along the carotid siphon: does form follow function? Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2011; 32(6): 1107-1112.
32. Conway DE, Williams MR, Eskin SG, McIntire LV. Endothelial cell responses to atheroprone flow are driven by two separate flow components: low time-average shear stress and fluid flow reversal. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2010; 298: H367-H374.
33. Nilsson A, Bloch KM, Carlsson M, Heiberg E, Stahlberg F. Variable velocity encoding in a three-dimensional, three-directional phase contrast sequence: evaluation in phantom and volunteers. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012; 36(6): 1450-1459.
34. Giese D, Kabbasch C, Hedderich D, Maintz D, Liebig T, Bunck A. The use of k-t PCA accelerated dual-venc 3D flow MRI to assess hemodynamics before and after flow diverting stent implantation in cerebral aneurysm models. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 2014; 16(Suppl. 1): W29.