Wall shear stress distribution at the carotid bifurcation: Influence of eversion carotid endarterectomy

European Radiology

Volumn 23, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 3361-3369

  Harloff, A ^a   Berg, S ^a   Barker, A J ^b   Schollhorn J ^a   Schumacher, M ^a   Weiller, C ^a   Markl, M ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Northwestern University   (United States)

Author keywords

4D flow MRI; Atherosclerosis; Carotid; Endarterectomy; Wall shear stress

Indexed keywords

GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE;

AGED; ARTERY WALL; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CAROTID ARTERY BIFURCATION; CAROTID ARTERY FLOW; CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMMON CAROTID ARTERY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; EXTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FOUR DIMENSIONAL FLOW NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY OCCLUSION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SHEAR STRESS;

AGED; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CAROTID ARTERY, INTERNAL; CAROTID STENOSIS; ENDARTERECTOMY, CAROTID; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SYSTOLE;

EID: 84890562364     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-2953-4     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Brott TG, Hobson RW 2nd, Howard G et al (2010) Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 363:11-23
2. Harloff A, Zech T, Wegent F, Strecker C, Weiller C, Markl M (2013) Comparison of blood flow velocity quantification by 4D flow MR imaging with ultrasound at the carotid bifurcation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3419
3. Sachar R, Yadav JS, Roffi M et al (2004) Severe bilateral carotid stenosis: the impact of ipsilateral stenting on Doppler-defined contralateral stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:1358-1362
4. Aleksic M, Matoussevitch V, Heckenkamp J, Brunkwall J (2006) Changes in internal carotid blood flow after CEA evaluated by transit-time flowmeter. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 31:14-17
5. Malek AM, Alper SL, Izumo S (1999) Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. JAMA 282:2035-2042
6. Cheng C, Tempel D, van Haperen R et al (2006) Atherosclerotic lesion size and vulnerability are determined by patterns of fluid shear stress. Circulation 113:2744-2753
7. Tomita H, Hagaman J, Friedman MH, Maeda N (2012) Relationship between hemodynamics and atherosclerosis in aortic arches of apolipoprotein E-null mice on 129S6/SvEvTac and C57BL/6J genetic backgrounds. Atherosclerosis 220:78-85
8. Lee SW, Antiga L, Spence JD, Steinman DA (2008) Geometry of the carotid bifurcation predicts its exposure to disturbed flow. Stroke 39:2341-2347
9. Markl M, Wegent F, Zech T et al (2010) In vivo wall shear stress distribution in the carotid artery: effect of bifurcation geometry, internal carotid artery stenosis, and recanalization therapy. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 3:647-655
10. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group (1991) MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet 337:1235-1243
11. Harloff A, Albrecht F, Spreer J et al (2009) 3D blood flow characteristics in the carotid artery bifurcation assessed by flow-sensitive 4D MRI at 3T. Magn Reson Med 61:65-74
12. Bock J, Kreher BW, Hennig J, Markl M (2007) Optimized pre-processing of time-resolved 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI data. Abstract. ISMRM May; Berlin, Germany. p 3138
13. Bock J, Frydrychowicz A, Stalder AF et al (2010) 3D phase contrast MRA and flow visualization in the thoracic aorta at 3T: feasibility and effect of standard and blood-pool contrast agents. Magn Reson Med 63:330-338
14. Stalder AF, Russe MF, Frydrychowicz A, Bock J, Hennig J, Markl M (2008) Quantitative 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI: optimized analysis of blood flow and vessel wall parameters. Magn Reson Med 60:1218-1231
15. Barker AJ, Markl M, Burk J et al (2012) Bicuspid aortic valve is associated with altered wall shear stress in the ascending aorta. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 5:457-466
16. Lal BK, Beach KW, Roubin GS et al (2012) Restenosis after carotid artery stenting and endarterectomy: a secondary analysis of CREST, a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 11:755-763
17. Markl M, Wallis W, Harloff A (2011) Reproducibility of flow and wall shear stress analysis using flow-sensitive four-dimensional MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 33:988-994
18. LaDisa JF Jr, Bowers M, Harmann L et al (2010) Time-efficient patient-specific quantification of regional carotid artery fluid dynamics and spatial correlation with plaque burden. Med Phys 37:784-792
19. Hayase H, Tokunaga K, Nakayama T et al (2011) Computational fluid dynamics of carotid arteries after carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting based on postoperative patient-specific computed tomography angiography and ultrasound flow data. Neurosurgery 68:1096-1101
20. Harloff A, Markl M, Frydrychowicz A, Hennig J, Weiller C (2009) Diagnosing stroke aetiologies. Morphologic and functional analysis of the aorta and carotid arteries by MRI. Nervenarzt 80:929-940
21. Gallo D, Steinman DA, Bijari PB, Morbiducci U (2012) Helical flow in carotid bifurcation as surrogate marker of exposure to disturbed shear. J Biomech 45:2398-2404
22. Tate Q, Kim SE, Treiman G, Parker DL, Hadley JR (2012) Increased vessel depiction of the carotid bifurcation with a specialized 16-channel phased array coil at 3T. Magn Reson Med 69:1486-1493
23. Barker AJ, Lanning C, Shandas R (2010) Quantification of hemodynamic wall shear stress in patients with bicuspid aortic valve using phase-contrast MRI. Ann Biomed Eng 38:788-800