Accurate prediction of interfacial residues in two-domain proteins using evolutionary information: Implications for three-dimensional modeling

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 82, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 1219-1234

  Bhaskara, Ramachandra M ^a   Padhi, Amrita ^a   Srinivasan, Narayanaswamy ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

Author keywords

Difference domain architecture; Differential residue conservation; Interface evolution; Knowledge based docking; Na ve Bayesian classifier

Indexed keywords

PHORBOL DIBUTYRATE; PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING;

ARTICLE; BAYESIAN LEARNING; CLASSIFIER; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHM; INTERFACE PRESSURE; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR MODEL; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC;

EUKARYOTA;

BAYES THEOREM; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR DOCKING SIMULATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; ROC CURVE;

EID: 84902175948     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24486     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Wollacott AM, Zanghellini A, Murphy P, Baker D. Prediction of structures of multidomain proteins from structures of the individual domains. Protein Sci 2007;16(2):165-175.
2. Cheng TM, Blundell TL, Fernandez-Recio J. Structural assembly of two-domain proteins by rigid-body docking. BMC Bioinformatics 2008;9:441.
3. Edwards AM, Arrowsmith CH, Christendat D, Dharamsi A, Friesen JD, Greenblatt JF, Vedadi M. Protein production: feeding the crystallographers and NMR spectroscopists. Nat Struct Biol 2000;7 Suppl:970-972.
4. Montelione GT, Zheng D, Huang YJ, Gunsalus KC, Szyperski T. Protein NMR spectroscopy in structural genomics. Nat Struct Biol 2000;7 Suppl:982-985.
5. Ekman D, Bjorklund AK, Frey-Skott J, Elofsson A. Multi-domain proteins in the three kingdoms of life: orphan domains and other unassigned regions. J Mol Biol 2005;348(1):231-243.
6. Punta M, Coggill PC, Eberhardt RY, Mistry J, Tate J, Boursnell C, Pang N, Forslund K, Ceric G, Clements J, Heger A, Holm L, Sonnhammer EL, Eddy SR, Bateman A, Finn RD. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40(Database issue):D290-301.
7. Pandit SB, Bhadra R, Gowri VS, Balaji S, Anand B, Srinivasan N. SUPFAM: a database of sequence superfamilies of protein domains. BMC Bioinformatics 2004;5:28.
8. Wright PE, Dyson HJ. Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. J Mol Biol 1999;293(2):321-331.
9. Tompa P. Intrinsically unstructured proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 2002;27(10):527-533.
10. Ventura S, Villaverde A. Protein quality in bacterial inclusion bodies. Trends Biotechnol 2006;24(4):179-185.
11. Sanchez R, Pieper U, Melo F, Eswar N, Marti-Renom MA, Madhusudhan MS, Mirkovic N, Sali A. Protein structure modeling for structural genomics. Nat Struct Biol 2000;7 Suppl:986-990.
12. Rose PW, Bi C, Bluhm WF, Christie CH, Dimitropoulos D, Dutta S, Green RK, Goodsell DS, Prlic A, Quesada M, Quinn GB, Ramos AG, Westbrook JD, Young J, Zardecki C, Berman HM, Bourne PE. The RCSB Protein Data Bank: new resources for research and education. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41(D1):D475-D482.
13. Ofran Y, Rost B. ISIS: interaction sites identified from sequence. Bioinformatics 2007;23(2):e13-16.
14. Konc J, Janezic D. Protein-protein binding-sites prediction by protein surface structure conservation. J Chem Inf Model 2007;47(3):940-944.
15. Zhang QC, Petrey D, Norel R, Honig BH. Protein interface conservation across structure space. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107(24):10896-10901.
16. Ma B, Elkayam T, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Protein-protein interactions: structurally conserved residues distinguish between binding sites and exposed protein surfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100(10):5772-5777.
17. Yan C, Dobbs D, Honavar V. A two-stage classifier for identification of protein-protein interface residues. Bioinformatics 2004;20 Suppl 1:i371-378.
18. Bradford JR, Westhead DR. Improved prediction of protein-protein binding sites using a support vector machines approach. Bioinformatics 2005;21(8):1487-1494.
19. Murakami Y, Mizuguchi K. Applying the Naive Bayes classifier with kernel density estimation to the prediction of protein-protein interaction sites. Bioinformatics 2010;26(15):1841-1848.
20. Franke V, Sikic M, Vlahovicek K. Prediction of interacting protein residues using sequence and structure data. Methods Mol Biol 2012;819:233-251.
21. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 1995;247(4):536-540.
22. Update on activities at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41(D1):D43-D47.
23. Altschul SF, Koonin EV. Iterated profile searches with PSI-BLAST-a tool for discovery in protein databases. Trends Biochem Sci 1998;23(11):444-447.
24. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25(17):3389-3402.
25. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994;22(22):4673-4680.
26. Higgins DG, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ. Using CLUSTAL for multiple sequence alignments. Methods Enzymol 1996;266:383-402.
27. Hwang H, Vreven T, Janin J, Weng Z. Protein-protein docking benchmark version 4.0. Proteins 2010;78(15):3111-3114.
28. Hubbard SJ, Thornton JM. 'NACCESS', computer program. London: University College; 1993.
29. Chothia C. The nature of the accessible and buried surfaces in proteins. J Mol Biol 1976;105(1):1-12.
30. Chothia C, Janin J. Principles of protein-protein recognition. Nature 1975;256(5520):705-708.
31. Lichtarge O, Bourne HR, Cohen FE. An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. J Mol Biol 1996;257(2):342-358.
32. Capra JA, Singh M. Predicting functionally important residues from sequence conservation. Bioinformatics 2007;23(15):1875-1882.
33. Mayrose I, Graur D, Ben-Tal N, Pupko T. Comparison of site-specific rate-inference methods for protein sequences: empirical Bayesian methods are superior. Mol Biol Evol 2004;21(9):1781-1791.
34. Vlahovicek K, Pintar A, Parthasarathi L, Carugo O, Pongor S. CX, DPX and PRIDE: WWW servers for the analysis and comparison of protein 3D structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33(Web Server issue):W252-254.
35. Bhaskara RM, Srinivasan N. Stability of domain structures in multi-domain proteins. Sci Rep 2011;1:40.
36. Wu G, Chang EY.Class-boundary alignment for imbalanced dataset learning. In: ICML 2003 workshop on learning from imbalanced data sets II, Washington, DC; 2003.
37. Remmert M, Biegert A, Hauser A, Soding J. HHblits: lightning-fast iterative protein sequence searching by HMM-HMM alignment. Nat Methods 2012;9(2):173-175.
38. Sali A, Blundell TL. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol 1993;234(3):779-815.
39. Eswar N, Webb B, Marti-Renom MA, Madhusudhan MS, Eramian D, Shen MY, Pieper U, Sali A. Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER. Curr Protoc Protein Sci 2007;Chapter 2:Unit 2.9.
40. Zemla A. LGA: a method for finding 3D similarities in protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31(13):3370-3374.
41. Betancourt MR, Skolnick J. Universal similarity measure for comparing protein structures. Biopolymers 2001;59(5):305-309.
42. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33(7):2302-2309.
43. Schneidman-Duhovny D, Inbar Y, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. PatchDock and SymmDock: servers for rigid and symmetric docking. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33(Web Server issue):W363-367.
44. R-devel C. R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. 2.13.0. Vienna, Australia: R foundation for Statistical Computing; 2011.
45. De S, Krishnadev O, Srinivasan N, Rekha N. Interaction preferences across protein-protein interfaces of obligatory and non-obligatory components are different. BMC Struct Biol 2005;5:15.
46. Kim WK, Henschel A, Winter C, Schroeder M. The many faces of protein-protein interactions: a compendium of interface geometry. PLoS Comput Biol 2006;2(9):e124.
47. Pupko T, Bell RE, Mayrose I, Glaser F, Ben-Tal N. Rate4Site: an algorithmic tool for the identification of functional regions in proteins by surface mapping of evolutionary determinants within their homologues. Bioinformatics 2002;18 Suppl 1:S71-77.
48. Qin S, Zhou HX. meta-PPISP: a meta web server for protein-protein interaction site prediction. Bioinformatics 2007;23(24):3386-3387.
49. Gao M, Skolnick J. iAlign: a method for the structural comparison of protein-protein interfaces. Bioinformatics 2010;26(18):2259-2265.
50. Xu W, Doshi A, Lei M, Eck MJ, Harrison SC. Crystal structures of c-Src reveal features of its autoinhibitory mechanism. Mol Cell 1999;3(5):629-638.
51. Lemmon MA, Schlessinger J. Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell 2010;141(7):1117-1134.
52. Gan W, Yang S, Roux B. Atomistic view of the conformational activation of Src kinase using the string method with swarms-of-trajectories. Biophys J 2009;97(4):L8-L10.
53. Yang S, Roux B. Src kinase conformational activation: thermodynamics, pathways, and mechanisms. PLoS Comput Biol 2008;4(3):e1000047.
54. Bu Z, Callaway DJ. Proteins move! Protein dynamics and long-range allostery in cell signaling. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol 2011;83:163-221.
55. Wriggers W, Chakravarty S, Jennings PA. Control of protein functional dynamics by peptide linkers. Biopolymers 2005;80(6):736-746.
56. Vogel C, Bashton M, Kerrison ND, Chothia C, Teichmann SA. Structure, function and evolution of multidomain proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2004;14(2):208-216.
57. Cho JH, Muralidharan V, Vila-Perello M, Raleigh DP, Muir TW, Palmer AG, 3rd. Tuning protein autoinhibition by domain destabilization. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2011;18(5):550-555.
58. Apic G, Gough J, Teichmann SA. An insight into domain combinations. Bioinformatics 2001;17 Suppl 1:S83-89.
59. Apic G, Gough J, Teichmann SA. Domain combinations in archaeal, eubacterial and eukaryotic proteomes. J Mol Biol 2001;310(2):311-325.
60. Pang E, Tan T, Lin K. Promiscuous domains: facilitating stability of the yeast protein-protein interaction network. Mol Biosyst 2012;8(3):766-771.
61. Basu MK, Carmel L, Rogozin IB, Koonin EV. Evolution of protein domain promiscuity in eukaryotes. Genome Res 2008;18(3):449-461.
62. Brown SD, Gerlt JA, Seffernick JL, Babbitt PC. A gold standard set of mechanistically diverse enzyme superfamilies. Genome Biol 2006;7(1):R8.
63. Gerlt JA, Babbitt PC. Divergent evolution of enzymatic function: mechanistically diverse superfamilies and functionally distinct suprafamilies. Annu Rev Biochem 2001;70:209-246.
64. Duarte JM, Srebniak A, Scharer MA, Capitani G. Protein interface classification by evolutionary analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 2012;13(1):334.
65. Toth-Petroczy A, Tawfik DS. Slow protein evolutionary rates are dictated by surface-core association. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108(27):11151-11156.
66. Bloom JD, Drummond DA, Arnold FH, Wilke CO. Structural determinants of the rate of protein evolution in yeast. Mol Biol Evol 2006;23(9):1751-1761.
67. Franzosa EA, Xia Y. Structural determinants of protein evolution are context-sensitive at the residue level. Mol Biol Evol 2009;26(10):2387-2395.
68. Levy ED. A simple definition of structural regions in proteins and its use in analyzing interface evolution. J Mol Biol 2010;403(4):660-670.
69. Ofran Y, Rost B. Analysing six types of protein-protein interfaces. J Mol Biol 2003;325(2):377-387.
70. Reichmann D, Rahat O, Albeck S, Meged R, Dym O, Schreiber G. The modular architecture of protein-protein binding interfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102(1):57-62.
71. Moreira IS, Fernandes PA, Ramos MJ. Hot spots--a review of the protein-protein interface determinant amino-acid residues. Proteins 2007;68(4):803-812.
72. Pollock DD, Thiltgen G, Goldstein RA. Amino acid coevolution induces an evolutionary stokes shift. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109(21):E1352-1359.
73. Veitia RA. Rosetta Stone proteins: "chance and necessity"? Genome Biol 2002;3(2):INTERACTIONS1001.
74. Wallner B, Elofsson A. All are not equal: a benchmark of different homology modeling programs. Protein Sci 2005;14(5):1315-1327.
75. Vyas VK, Ukawala RD, Ghate M, Chintha C. Homology modeling a fast tool for drug discovery: current perspectives. Indian J Pharm Sci 2012;74(1):1-17.
76. Tuncbag N, Gursoy A, Nussinov R, Keskin O. Predicting protein-protein interactions on a proteome scale by matching evolutionary and structural similarities at interfaces using PRISM. Nat Protoc 2011;6(9):1341-1354.
77. Wang L, Liu ZP, Zhang XS, Chen L. Prediction of hot spots in protein interfaces using a random forest model with hybrid features. Protein Eng Des Sel 2012;25(3):119-126.
78. Zellner H, Staudigel M, Trenner T, Bittkowski M, Wolowski V, Icking C, Merkl R. PresCont: predicting protein-protein interfaces utilizing four residue properties. Proteins 2012;80(1):154-168.
79. Zhou HX, Qin S. Interaction-site prediction for protein complexes: a critical assessment. Bioinformatics 2007;23(17):2203-2209.
80. Bhaskara RM, de Brevern AG, Srinivasan N. Understanding the role of domain-domain linkers in the spatial orientation of domains in multi-domain proteins. J Biomol Struct Dyn 2013;31(12):1467-1480.