Erratum to Student perceived and determined knowledge of biology concepts in an upper-level biology course (CBE Life Sci. Educ. (2014), 13, (322-330), 10.1187/cbe.13-09-0175);Student perceived and determined knowledge of biology concepts in an upper-level biology course

CBE Life Sciences Education

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 322-330

  Ziegler, Brittany ^a   Montplaisir, Lisa ^b  

^a MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY MANKATO   (United States)

^b NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; PERCEPTION; STUDENT;

BIOLOGY; CURRICULUM; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; PERCEPTION; STUDENTS;

EID: 84901837745     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19317913     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.13-09-0175     Document Type: Erratum

References (40)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (2011). Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action, Washington, DC.
2. Bell P, VolckmannD (2011). Knowledge surveys in general chemistry: confidence, overconfidence, and performance. JChem Educ 88, 1469-1476.
3. Bowers N, BrandonM, Hill CD (2005). The use of knowledge surveys as an indicator of student learning in an introductory biology course. Cell Biol Educ 4, 311-322.
4. Bowman NA (2010). Can 1st-year college students accurately report their learning and development? Am Educ Res J 47, 466-496.
5. Brewe E, Sawtell V, Kramer LH, O'Brien GE, Rodriquez I, Pamelá P (2010). Toward equity through participation in modeling instruction in introductory university physics. Phys Rev ST Phys Ed Res 6, 010106.
6. Cao L, Nietfeld JL (2005). Judgment of learning, monitoring accuracy, and student performance in the classroom context. Curr Issues Educ 8(4). http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume8/number4 (accessed August 2012).
7. Crowe A, Dirks C, Wenderoth MP (2008). Biology in Bloom: implementing Bloom's taxonomy to enhance student learning in biology. CBE Life Sci Educ 7, 368-381.
8. Donovan MS, Bransford JD (2005). Introduction. In: How Students Learn: History, Mathematics and Science in the Classroom, National Research Council, Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 1-28.
9. Ehrlinger J, DunningD (2003). Howchronic self-views influence (and potentially mislead) estimates of performance. J Pers Soc Psychol 84, 5-17.
10. Ehrlinger J, Johnson K, Banner M, Dunning D, Kruger J (2008). Why the unskilled are unaware: further explorations of (absent) selfinsight among the incompetent. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 105, 98-121.
11. Flavell JH (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. Am Psychol 34, 906-911.
12. Flavell JH, Miller PH, Miller SA (2002). Cognitive Development, 4th ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13. Glucksberg S, McCloskey M (1981). Decisions about ignorance: knowing that you don't know. J Exp Psychol [Hum Learn] 7, 311-325.
14. Gonyea RM (2005). Self-reported data in institutional research: review and recommendations. In: New Directions of Institutional Research, no. 127, ed. PD Umbach, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 73-89.
15. Grant DM, Malloy AD, MurphyMC (2009). A comparison of student perceptions of their computer skills to their actual abilities. J Inf Technol Educ 8, 141-160.
16. Hacker DJ, Bol L, Horgan DD, Rakow EA (2000). Test prediction and performance in a classroom context. J Educ Psychol 92, 160-170.
17. Hargittai E, Shafer S (2006). Differences in actual and perceived online skills: the role of gender. Soc Sci Q 87, 432-448.
18. Herman JL, Aschbacher PR, Winters L (1992). A Practical Guide to Alternative Assessment, Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
19. Herzog S, Bowman NA (eds.) (2011). Validity and Limitations of College Student Self-Report Data: New Directions for Institutional Research, no. 150, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20. Kohlmyer MA, Caballero MD, Catrambone R, Chabay RW, Ding L, Haugan MP, Marr MJ, Sherwood BA, Schaltz MF (2009). Tale of two curricula: the performance of 2000 students in introductory electromagnetism. Phys Rev ST Phys Educ Res 5, 020105.
21. Koriat A (1993). How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychol Rev 100, 609-639.
22. Kruger J, Dunning D (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated selfassessments. J Pers Soc Psychol 77, 1121-1134.
23. Lauer S, Momsen J, Offerdahl E, Kryjevskaia, Christensen W, Montplaisir L (2013). Stereotyped: investigating gender in introductory science courses. CBE Life Sci Educ 12, 30-38.
24. Lord T (1998). Cooperative learning that really works in biology teaching: using constructivist-based activities to challenge student teams. Am Biol Teach 60, 580-588.
25. Lundberg MA, Fox PW, Punćochaŕ J (1994). Highly confident but wrong: gender differences and similarities in confidence judgments. J Educ Psychol 86, 114-121.
26. Lynch B, Shaw P (2005). Portfolios, power, and ethics. TESOL Q 39, 263-297.
27. Miner AC, Reder LM (1994). A new look at feeling of knowing: its metacognitive role in regulating question answering. In: Metacognition: Knowing about Knowing, ed. J Metcalfe and AP Shimamura, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. National Research Council (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
29. Perkins D (1993). Teaching for understanding. Am Educ 17, 28-35.
30. Pintrich PR (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theor Pract 41, 219-225.
31. Schraw G (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instr Sci 26, 113-125.
32. Schraw G, Crippen KJ, Hartley K (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Res Sci Educ 36, 111-139.
33. Schraw G, Moshman D (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educ Psychol Rev 7, 351-371.
34. Tanner K, Allen D (2005). Approaches to biology teaching and learning: understanding the wrong answers-teaching toward conceptual change. Cell Biol Educ 4, 112-117.
35. Tanner KD (2012). Promoting student metacognition. CBE Life Sci Educ 11, 113-120.
36. Tobias S, Everson HT (1996). Assessing Metacognitive Knowledge Monitoring, College Board Report no. 96-01, New York: College Board.
37. Tobias S, Everson HT (2002). Knowing What You Know and What You Don't: Further Research on Metacognitive Knowledge Monitoring, College Board Report no. 2002-3, New York: College Board.
38. Willingham DT (2003/2004). Why students think they understand when they don't. Am Educ (Winter), 38-48.
39. Ziegler B, Montplaisir L (2012). Measuring student understanding in a portfolio-based course. J Coll Sci Teach 42, 16-25.
40. Zimmerman BJ (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: an overview. Educ Psychol 25, 3-17.