Portfolios, power, and ethics

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 263-297

  Lynch, Brian ^a   Shaw, Peter ^b  

^a PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MONTEREY INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645466599     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3588311     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
2. Birenbaum, M. (1996). Assessment 2000: Towards a pluralistic approach to assessment. In M. Birenbaum & F. J. R. C. Dochy (Eds.), Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning processes, and prior knowledge (pp. 3-29). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
3. Brown, J. D., & Hudson, T. D. (1998). The alternatives in language assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 653-675.
4. Chapelle, C. A. (1998). Construct definition and validity inquiry in SLA research. In L. F. Bachman & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Interfaces between SLA and language testing research (pp. 32-70). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
5. Darling-Hammond, L. (1994). Performance-based assessment and educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 64, 5-30.
6. Dreyfus, H. L., & Rabinow, P. (1982). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Brighton, England: The Harvester.
7. Elbow, P. (1991). Preface. In P. Belanoff & M. Dickson (Eds.), Portfolios: Process and product (pp. i-iv). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann/Boynton- Cook.
8. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage.
9. Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. In H. L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow, Michel Foucault: beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208-226). Brighton, England: The Harvester Press.
10. Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality: Volumes 1, 2, and 3 (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Vintage.
11. Foucault, M. (1997a). Michel Foucault: an interview by Stephen Riggins. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The essential works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984, Vol. 1: Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 121-133). London: Allen Lane.
12. Foucault, M. (1997b). Self writing. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The essential works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984, Vol. 1: Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 207-222). London: Allen Lane.
13. Foucault, M. (1997c). Technologies of the self. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The essential works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984, Vol. 1: Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 223-251). London: Allen Lane.
14. Foucault, M. (1997d). On the genealogy of ethics: An overview of a work in progress. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The essential works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984, Vol. 1: Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 253-280). London: Allen Lane.
15. Foucault, M. (1997e). The ethics of the concern of the self as the practice of freedom. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The essential works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984, Vol. 1: Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 281-301). London: Allen Lane.
16. Foucault, M. (1998). Structuralism and poststructuralism. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), The essential works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984, Vol. 2: Aesthetics, method, and epistemology (pp. 443-458). New York: The New Press.
17. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18. Hamayan, E. V. (1995). Approaches to alternative assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 15, 212-226.
19. Hamp-Lyons, L. (1989). Language testing and ethics. Prospect, 5(1), 7-15.
20. Hamp-Lyons, L., & Condon, W. (2000). Assessing the portfolio: Principles for practice, theory, and research. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
21. Hamp-Lyons, L., & Lynch, B. K. (1998). Perspectives on validity: A historical analysis of language testing conference abstracts. In A. J. Kunnan (Ed.), Validation in language assessment (pp. 253-276). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Kincheloe, J. L., & McLaren, P. (2000). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 279-313). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
23. Linn, R. L., Baker, E. L., & Dunbar, S. B. (1991). Complex, performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher, 20(8), 15-21.
24. Lynch, B. K. (2001). Rethinking assessment from a critical perspective. Language Testing, 18(4), 351-372.
25. Lynch, D. A., & Jukuri, S. D. (1998). Beyond master and slave: Reconciling our fears of power in the writing classroom. Rhetoric Review, 16(2), 270-288.
26. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-103). Washington, DC: The American Council on Education and the National Council on Measurement in Education.
27. MIIS Graduate School of Language and Educational Linguistics. (2002). Program level assessment in the MATESOL/MATEFL curriculum: The portfolio. [Departmental document]. Monterey, CA: Monterey Institute of International Studies.
28. Moss, P. A. (1994). Can there be validity without reliability? Educational Researcher, 23(2), 5-12.
29. Moss, P. A. (1996). Enlarging the dialogue in educational measurement: Voices from interpretive research traditions. Educational Researcher, 25(1), 20-28.
30. Norris, J. M., Brown, J. D., Hudson, T., & Yoshioka, J. (1998). Designing second language performance assessments. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i Press, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
31. Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32. Phillips, D. C. (1990). Postpositivistic science: Myths and realities. In E. G. Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialog (pp. 31-45). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33. Schwandt, T. D. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructionism. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 189-213). Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.
34. Shohamy, E. (1996). Language testing: Matching assessment procedures with language knowledge. In M. Birenbaum & F. J. R. C. Dochy (Eds.), Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning processes, and prior knowledge (pp. 143-160). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
35. Wile, J. M., & Tierney, R. J. (1996). Tensions in assessment: The battle over portfolios, curriculum, and control. In R. C. Calfee & P. Perfumo (Eds.), Writing portfolios in the classroom, (pp. 203-215). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36. Wolf, D., Bixby, J., Glenn, J., & Gardener, H. (1991). To use their minds well: Investigating new forms of student assessment. Review of Research in Education, 17, 31-74.