Erratum to BioCore guide: A tool for interpreting the core concepts of vision and change for biology majors (CBE Life Sci. Educ. (2014), 13, (200-211), 10.1187/cbe.13-12-0233);BioCore Guide: A tool for interpreting the core concepts of vision and change for biology majors

CBE Life Sciences Education

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 200-211

  Brownell, Sara E ^a   Freeman, Scott ^b   Wenderoth, Mary Pat ^b   Crowe, Alison J ^b  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY;

BIOLOGY; CURRICULUM; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 84901824970     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19317913     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.13-12-0233     Document Type: Erratum

References (34)

1. Alles DL (2001). Using evolution as the framework for teaching biology. Am Biol Teach 63, 20-23.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science (2011). Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action, Washington, DC.
3. American Society of Plant Biologists (2012). Core Concepts and Learning Objectives. http://my.aspb.org/blogpost/722549/ 152613/Core-Concepts-and-Learning-Objectives-in-Undergraduate-Plant-Biology (accessed 20 December 2013).
4. Cheesman K, French D, Cheesman I, Swails N, Thomas J (2007). Is there any common curriculum for undergraduate biology majors in the 21st century? BioScience 57, 516-522.
5. Duncan RG, Rivet AE (2013). Science learning progressions. Science 339, 396-397.
6. Gregory E, Ellis JP, Orenstein AN (2011). A proposal for a common minimal topic set in introductory biology courses for majors. AmBiol Teach 73, 16-21.
7. Hartley LM, Wilke BJ, Schramm JW, D'Avanzo C, Anderson CW (2011). College students' understanding of the carbon cycle: contrasting principle-based and informal reasoning. BioScience 61, 65-75.
8. Henderson C, Beach A, Finkelstein N (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: an analytic review of the literature. J Res Sci Teach 48, 952-984.
9. Henderson C, Finkelstein N, Beach A (2010). Beyond dissemination in college science teaching: an introduction to four core change strategies. J Coll Sci Teach 39(5), 18-25.
10. Heppner F, Hammen C, Kass-Simon G, Krueger W (1990). A de facto standardized curriculum for US college biology and zoology. BioScience 40, 130-134.
11. Khodor J, Halme DG, Walker GC (2004). A hierarchical biology concept framework: a tool for course design. Cell Biol Educ 3, 111-121.
12. KlymkowskyMW (2010). Thinking about the conceptual foundations of the biological sciences. CBE Life Sci Educ 9, 405-407.
13. Labov JB, Reid AH, Yamamoto KR (2010). Integrated biology and undergraduate science education: a new biology education for the twenty-first century? CBE Life Sci Educ 9, 10-16.
14. LedbetterML, Campbell AM (2005). A survey of survey courses: are they effective? Argument favoring a survey as the first course for majors. Cell Biol Educ 4, 133-137.
15. Marbach-Ad G et al. (2007). A faculty team works to create content linkages among various courses to increase meaningful learning of targeted concepts of microbiology. CBE Life Sci Educ 6, 155-162.
16. MaroccoDA (2000). Biology for the 21st century: the search for a core. Am Biol Teach 62, 565-569.
17. Merkel S (2012). The development of curricular guidelines for introductory microbiology that focus on understanding. J Microbiol Biol Educ 13, 32.
18. Michael J, McFarland J (2011). The core principles ("big ideas") of physiology: results of faculty surveys. Adv Physiol Educ 35, 336-341.
19. Michael J, Modell H, McFarland J, Cliff W (2009). The "core principles" of physiology: what should students understand? Adv Physiol Educ 33, 10-16.
20. National Research Council (2003). BIO2010, Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
21. Nehm R, Schonfeld IS (2008). Measuring knowledge of natural selection: a comparison of the CINS, an open-response instrument, and an oral interview. J Res Sci Teach 45, 1131-1160.
22. PULSE Community (2014). Home page. www.pulsecommunity.org (accessed 4 February 2014).
23. Quinn H, Schweingruber H, Keller T (eds.) (2011). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
24. Rowland DL, Smith CA, Gillam EM, Wright T (2011). The concept lens diagram: a new mechanism for presenting biochemistry content in terms of "big ideas. " Biochem Mol Biol Educ 39, 267-279.
25. Russell AP (2009). Situating and teaching 21st century zoology: revealing pattern in the form and function of animals. Integr Zool 4, 309-315.
26. Scheiner SM (2010). Toward a conceptual framework for biology. Q Rev Biol 85, 293-318.
27. Shi J, Wood WB, Martin JM, Guild NA, Vicens Q, Knight JK (2010). Diagnostic assessment for introductory molecular and cell biology. CBE Life Sci Educ 9, 453-461.
28. Silverthorn DU (2003). Restoring physiology to the undergraduate biology curriculum: a call for action. Adv Physiol Educ 27, 91-96.
29. Smith JI et al. (2013). Development of the biology card sorting task to measure conceptual expertise in biology. CBE Life Sci Educ 12, 628-644.
30. Tansey JT, Baird T, Cox MM, Fox KM, Knight J, Sears D, Bell E (2013). Foundational concepts and underlying theories for majors in "biochemistry and molecular biology. " Biochem Mol Biol Educ 41, 289-296.
31. Timmerman BE, Strickland DC, Carstensen SM (2008). Curricular reform and inquiry teaching in biology: where are our efforts most fruitfully invested? Integr Comp Biol 48, 226-240.
32. Voet JG, Bell E, Boyer R, Boyle J, O'Leary M, Zimmerman JK (2003). Recommended curriculum for a program in biochemistry and molecular biology. Biochem Mol Biol Educ 31, 161-162.
33. Wiertelak EP, Ramirez JJ (2008). Undergraduate neuroscience education: blueprints for the 21st century. J Undergrad Neurosci Educ 6, A34-A39.
34. Wood WB (2009). Revising the AP biology curriculum. Science 325, 1627-1628.