Transmembrane recognition of the semaphorin co-receptors neuropilin 1 and plexin A1: Coarse-grained simulations

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2014, Pages

  Aci Sèche, Samia ^a   Sawma, Paul ^b   Hubert, Pierre ^b   Sturgis, James N ^b   Bagnard, Dominique ^c   Jacob, Laurent ^c   Genest, Monique ^a   Garnier, Norbert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ D'ORLÉANS   (France)

^b AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

1,2 DI OLEOYL SN GLYCERO 3 PHOSPHOCHOLINE; HETERODIMER; HOMODIMER; MONOMER; NEUROPILIN 1; PALMITOYL 2 OLEOYL SN GLYCERO 3 PHOSPHOCHOLINE; PHOSPHORYLCHOLINE; PLEXIN; PLEXIN A1; SEMAPHORIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; 1,2-OLEOYLPHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINE; 1-PALMITOYL-2-OLEOYLPHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINE; CELL SURFACE RECEPTOR; LIPID BILAYER; NERVE PROTEIN; PHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINE; PLXNA1 PROTEIN, HUMAN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIMERIZATION; FORCE; HETERODIMERIZATION; HOMODIMERIZATION; HYBRID; LIPID BILAYER; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN MOTIF; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; CELL MEMBRANE; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; METABOLISM; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; PROTEIN QUATERNARY STRUCTURE; THERMODYNAMICS;

CELL MEMBRANE; HUMANS; LIPID BILAYERS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; NERVE TISSUE PROTEINS; NEUROPILIN-1; PHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINES; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, QUATERNARY; RECEPTORS, CELL SURFACE; SEMAPHORINS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 84901438347     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097779     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Cebecauer M, Spitaler M, Serge A, Magee AI (2010) Signalling complexes and clusters: functional advantages and methodological hurdles. Journal of Cell Science 123: 309-320.
2. Lemmon MA, Schlessinger J (2010) Cell Signaling by Receptor Tyrosine Kinases. Cell 141: 1117-1134.
3. Call ME, Wucherpfennig KW (2007) Common themes in the assembly and architecture of activating immune receptors. Nature Reviews Immunology 7: 841-850. (Pubitemid 350006236)
4. Campbell ID, Humphries MJ (2011) Integrin Structure, Activation, and Interactions. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 3.
5. Audet M, Bouvier M (2012) Restructuring G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Activation. Cell 151: 14-23.
6. Beevers AJ, Dixon AM (2010) Helical membrane peptides to modulate cell function. Chem Soc Rev 39: 2146-2157.
7. Bordag N, Keller S (2010) Alpha-helical transmembrane peptides: a "divide and conquer" approach to membrane proteins. Chem Phys Lipids 163: 1-26.
8. Cymer F, Veerappan A, Schneider D (2011) Transmembrane helix-helix interactions are modulated by the sequence context and by lipid bilayer properties. Biochim Biophys Acta 1818: 963-973.
9. Fink A, Sal-Man N, Gerber D, Shai Y (2011) Transmembrane domains interactions within the membrane milieu: Principles, advances and challenges. Biochim Biophys Acta 1818: 974-983.
10. Hubert P, Sawma P, Duneau JP, Khao J, Henin J, et al. (2010) Single-spanning transmembrane domains in cell growth and cell-cell interactions: More than meets the eye? Cell Adh Migr 4: 313-324.
11. Li E, Wimley WC, Hristova K (2012) Transmembrane helix dimerization: beyond the search for sequence motifs. Biochim Biophys Acta 1818: 183-193.
12. Matthews EE, Zoonens M, Engelman DM (2006) Dynamic helix interactions in transmembrane signaling. Cell 127: 447-450. (Pubitemid 44647431)
13. Lemmon MA, Flanagan JM, Hunt JF, Adair BD, Bormann BJ, et al. (1992) Glycophorin A dimerization is driven by specific interactions between transmembrane alpha-helices. J Biol Chem 267: 7683-7689.
14. Mackenzie KR (2006) Folding and stability of alpha-helical integral membrane proteins. Chem Rev 106: 1931-1977.
15. MacKenzie KR, Engelman DM (1998) Structure-based prediction of the stability of transmembrane helix-helix interactions: the sequence dependence of glycophorin A dimerization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 3583-3590. (Pubitemid 128616229)
16. MacKenzie KR, Prestegard JH, Engelman DM (1997) A transmembrane helix dimer: structure and implications. Science 276: 131-133. (Pubitemid 27161261)
17. Moore DT, Berger BW, DeGrado WF (2008) Protein-protein interactions in the membrane: sequence, structural, and biological motifs. Structure 16: 991-1001. (Pubitemid 351899292)
18. Russ WP, Engelman DM (2000) The GxxxG motif: a framework for transmembrane helix-helix association. J Mol Biol 296: 911-919.
19. Arkhipov A, Shan YB, Das R, Endres NF, Eastwood MP, et al. (2013) Architecture and Membrane Interactions of the EGF Receptor. Cell 152: 557-569.
20. Endres NF, Das R, Smith AW, Arkhipov A, Kovacs E, et al. (2013) Conformational Coupling across the Plasma Membrane in Activation of the EGF Receptor. Cell 152: 543-556.
21. Roth L, Koncina E, Satkauskas S, Cremel G, Aunis D, et al. (2009) The many faces of semaphorins: from development to pathology. Cell Mol Life Sci 66: 649-666.
22. Neufeld G, Kessler O (2008) The semaphorins: versatile regulators of tumour progression and tumour angiogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer 8: 632-645.
23. Neufeld G, Sabag AD, Rabinovicz N, Kessler O (2012) Semaphorins in angiogenesis and tumor progression. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2: a006718.
24. Soker S, Takashima S, Miao HQ, Neufeld G, Klagsbrun M (1998) Neuropilin-1 is expressed by endothelial and tumor cells as an isoform-specific receptor for vascular endothelial growth factor. Cell 92: 735-745. (Pubitemid 28155313)
25. Chen H, Chedotal A, He Z, Goodman CS, Tessier-Lavigne M (1997) Neuropilin-2, a novel member of the neuropilin family, is a high affinity receptor for the semaphorins Sema E and Sema IV but not Sema III. Neuron 19: 547-559. (Pubitemid 27430744)
26. Takahashi T, Nakamura F, Jin Z, Kalb RG, Strittmatter SM (1998) Semaphorins A and E act as antagonists of neuropilin-1 and agonists of neuropilin-2 receptors. Nat Neurosci 1: 487-493.
27. Feiner L, Koppel AM, Kobayashi H, Raper JA (1997) Secreted chick semaphorins bind recombinant neuropilin with similar affinities but bind different subsets of neurons in situ. Neuron 19: 539-545. (Pubitemid 27430743)
28. Kolodkin AL, Levengood DV, Rowe EG, Tai YT, Giger RJ, et al. (1997) Neuropilin is a semaphorin III receptor. Cell 90: 753-762. (Pubitemid 27357966)
29. Nakamura F, Tanaka M, Takahashi T, Kalb RG, Strittmatter SM (1998) Neuropilin-1 extracellular domains mediate semaphorin D/III-induced growth cone collapse. Neuron 21: 1093-1100. (Pubitemid 29018078)
30. Sharma A, Verhaagen J, Harvey AR (2012) Receptor complexes for each of the Class 3 Semaphorins. Front Cell Neurosci 6: 28.
31. Rohm B, Ottemeyer A, Lohrum M, Puschel AW (2000) Plexin/neuropilin complexes mediate repulsion by the axonal guidance signal semaphorin 3A. Mech Dev 93: 95-104. (Pubitemid 30216499)
32. Takahashi T, Fournier A, Nakamura F, Wang LH, Murakami Y, et al. (1999) Plexin-neuropilin-1 complexes form functional semaphorin-3A receptors. Cell 99: 59-69. (Pubitemid 29468630)
33. Tamagnone L, Artigiani S, Chen H, He Z, Ming GI, et al. (1999) Plexins are a large family of receptors for transmembrane, secreted, and GPI-anchored semaphorins in vertebrates. Cell 99: 71-80. (Pubitemid 29468631)
34. Antipenko A, Himanen JP, van Leyen K, Nardi-Dei V, Lesniak J, et al. (2003) Structure of the semaphorin-3A receptor binding module. Neuron 39: 589-598. (Pubitemid 36993577)
35. Love CA, Harlos K, Mavaddat N, Davis SJ, Stuart DI, et al. (2003) The ligand-binding face of the semaphorins revealed by the high-resolution crystal structure of SEMA4D. Nat Struct Biol 10: 843-848. (Pubitemid 37187657)
36. Janssen BJ, Robinson RA, Perez-Branguli F, Bell CH, Mitchell KJ, et al. (2010) Structural basis of semaphorin-plexin signalling. Nature 467: 1118-1122.
37. Klostermann A, Lohrum M, Adams RH, Puschel AW (1998) The chemorepulsive activity of the axonal guidance signal semaphorin D requires dimerization. J Biol Chem 273: 7326-7331. (Pubitemid 28152751)
38. Liu H, Juo ZS, Shim AH, Focia PJ, Chen X, et al. (2010) Structural basis of semaphorin-plexin recognition and viral mimicry from Sema7A and A39R complexes with PlexinC1. Cell 142: 749-761.
39. Nogi T, Yasui N, Mihara E, Matsunaga Y, Noda M, et al. (2010) Structural basis for semaphorin signalling through the plexin receptor. Nature 467: 1123-1127.
40. Tong Y, Chugha P, Hota PK, Alviani RS, Li M, et al. (2007) Binding of Rac1, Rnd1, and RhoD to a novel Rho GTPase interaction motif destabilizes dimerization of the plexin-B1 effector domain. J Biol Chem 282: 37215-37224.
41. Oinuma I, Katoh H, Negishi M (2004) Molecular dissection of the semaphorin 4D receptor plexin-B1-stimulated R-Ras GTPase-activating protein activity and neurite remodeling in hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci 24: 11473-11480. (Pubitemid 39658283)
42. Takahashi T, Strittmatter SM (2001) Plexina1 autoinhibition by the plexin sema domain. Neuron 29: 429-439. (Pubitemid 32206481)
43. Janssen BJ, Malinauskas T, Weir GA, Cader MZ, Siebold C, et al. (2012) Neuropilins lock secreted semaphorins onto plexins in a ternary signaling complex. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19: 1293-1299.
44. Tamagnone L, Comoglio PM (2000) Signalling by semaphorin receptors: cell guidance and beyond. Trends Cell Biol 10: 377-383. (Pubitemid 30612470)
45. Roth L, Nasarre C, Dirrig-Grosch S, Aunis D, Cremel G, et al. (2008) Transmembrane domain interactions control biological functions of neuropilin-1. Mol Biol Cell 19: 646-654. (Pubitemid 351272152)
46. Nasarre C, Roth M, Jacob L, Roth L, Koncina E, et al. (2010) Peptide-based interference of the transmembrane domain of neuropilin-1 inhibits glioma growth in vivo. Oncogene 29: 2381-2392.
47. Chaudhary B, Khaled YS, Ammori BJ, Elkord E (2013) Neuropilin 1: function and therapeutic potential in cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother.
48. Marrink SJ, de Vries AH, Mark AE (2004) Coarse grained model for semiquantitative lipid simulations.. 108: 750-760.
49. Marrink SJ, Risselada HJ, Yefimov S, Tieleman DP, de Vries AH (2007) The MARTINI force field: coarse grained model for biomolecular simulations. J Phys Chem B 111: 7812-7824. (Pubitemid 47169693)
50. Monticelli L, Kandasamy SK, Periole X, Larson RG, Tieleman DP, et al. (2008) The MARTINI coarse grained forcefield: extension to proteins. J Chem Theory and Comput 4: 819-834.
51. Hall BA, Chetwynd AP, Sansom MS (2011) Exploring peptide-membrane interactions with coarse-grained MD simulations. Biophys J 100: 1940-1948.
52. Henin J, Pohorille A, Chipot C (2005) Insights into the recognition and association of transmembrane alpha-helices. The free energy of alpha-helix dimerization in glycophorin A. J Am Chem Soc 127: 8478-8484. (Pubitemid 40828164)
53. Janosi L, Prakash A, Doxastakis M (2010) Lipid-modulated sequence-specific association of glycophorin A in membranes. Biophys J 99: 284-292.
54. Sengupta D, Marrink SJ (2010) Lipid-mediated interactions tune the association of glycophorin A helix and its disruptive mutants in membranes. Phys Chem Chem Phys 12: 12987-12996.
55. Psachoulia E, Fowler PW, Bond PJ, Sansom MS (2008) Helix-helix interactions in membrane proteins: coarse-grained simulations of glycophorin a helix dimerization. Biochemistry 47: 10503-10512.
56. Bond PJ, Sansom MS (2006) Insertion and assembly of membrane proteins via simulation. J Am Chem Soc 128: 2697-2704. (Pubitemid 43327948)
57. Domanski J, Marrink SJ, Schafer LV (2012) Transmembrane helices can induce domain formation in crowded model membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1818: 984-994.
58. Psachoulia E, Marshall DP, Sansom MS (2010) Molecular dynamics simulations of the dimerization of transmembrane alpha-helices. Acc Chem Res 43: 388-396.
59. Schafer LV, de Jong DH, Holt A, Rzepiela AJ, de Vries AH, et al. (2011) Lipid packing drives the segregation of transmembrane helices into disordered lipid domains in model membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 1343-1348.
60. Periole X, Knepp AM, Sakmar TP, Marrink SJ, Huber T (2012) Structural Determinants of the Supramolecular Organization of G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Bilayers. Journal of the American Chemical Society 134: 10959- 10965.
61. Doura AK, Kobus FJ, Dubrovsky L, Hibbard E, Fleming KG (2004) Sequence context modulates the stability of a GxxxG-mediated transmembrane helix-helix dimer. J Mol Biol 341: 991-998. (Pubitemid 39037359)
62. Cymer F, Schneider D (2010) Transmembrane helix-helix interactions involved in ErbB receptor signaling. Cell Adh Migr 4: 299-312.
63. Escher C, Cymer F, Schneider D (2009) Two GxxxG-like motifs facilitate promiscuous interactions of the human ErbB transmembrane domains. J Mol Biol 389: 10-16.
64. Fleishman SJ, Schlessinger J, Ben-Tal N (2002) A putative molecular-activation switch in the transmembrane domain of erbB2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 15937-15940. (Pubitemid 35462727)
65. Mendrola JM, Berger MB, King MC, Lemmon MA (2002) The single transmembrane domains of ErbB receptors self-associate in cell membranes. J Biol Chem 277: 4704-4712. (Pubitemid 34968501)
66. Mineev KS, Bocharov EV, Pustovalova YE, Bocharova OV, Chupin VV, et al. (2010) Spatial structure of the transmembrane domain heterodimer of ErbB1 and ErbB2 receptor tyrosine kinases. J Mol Biol 400: 231-243.
67. Periole X, Marrink SJ (2013) The Martini coarse-grained force field. Methods Mol Biol 924: 533-565.
68. Zachary IC (2011) How neuropilin-1 regulates receptor tyrosine kinase signalling: the knowns and known unknowns. Biochemical Society Transactions 39: 1583-1591.
69. Yin H, Slusky JS, Berger BW, Walters RS, Vilaire G, et al. (2007) Computational design of peptides that target transmembrane helices. Science 315: 1817-1822. (Pubitemid 46580135)
70. Battesti A, Bouveret E (2012) The bacterial two-hybrid system based on adenylate cyclase reconstitution in Escherichia coli. Methods 58: 325-334.
71. Hess B, Kutzner C, van der Spoel D, Lindahl E (2008) GROMACS 4: Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation. J Chem Theory Comp 4: 435-447.
72. Van der Spoel D, Lindahl B, Hess G, Groenhof G, Mark AE, et al. (2005) GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free. J Comput Chem 26: 1701-1718. (Pubitemid 43076182)
73. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD - Visual Molecular Dynamics. J Molec Graphics 14: 33-38.
74. Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, van Gunsteren WF, DiNola A, Haak JR (1984) Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys 81: 3684- 3690.
75. Case DA, Cheatham TE 3rd, Darden T, Gohlke H, Luo R, et al. (2005) The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J Comput Chem 26: 1668-1688. (Pubitemid 43076180)
76. Ponder JW, Case DA (2003) Force fields for protein simulations. Adv Protein Chem 66: 27-85. (Pubitemid 37392314)
77. Kumar S, Rosenberg JM, Bouzida D, Swendsen RH, Kollman PA (1992) THE weighted histogram analysis method for free-energy calculations on biomolecules. I. The method. J Comput Chem 13: 1011-1021.