Structural basis of semaphoring-plexin signalling

Nature

Volumn 467, Issue 7319, 2010, Pages 1118-1122

  Janssen, Bert J C ^a   Robinson, Ross A ^a   Pérez Brangulý́, Francesc ^b   Bell, Christian H ^a   Mitchell, Kevin J ^b   Siebold, Christian ^a   Jones, E Yvonne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIMER; MUTANT PROTEIN; PLEXIN; PLEXIN A2; PLEXIN B1; SEMAPHORIN; SEMAPHORIN 4D; SEMAPHORIN 6A; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CD100 ANTIGEN; CELL ADHESION MOLECULE; CELL SURFACE RECEPTOR; LEUKOCYTE ANTIGEN; LIGAND; NERVE PROTEIN; PLXNA2 PROTEIN, MOUSE; PLXNB1 PROTEIN, HUMAN; SEMA6A PROTEIN, MOUSE;

BIOASSAY; BIOPHYSICS; CANCER; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATA SET; HOMEOSTASIS; IMMUNE RESPONSE; LIGAND; MORPHOGENESIS; MUTATION; NEUROLOGY; PROTEIN; SIGNALING; VERTEBRATE;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; BIOPHYSICS; CELL ASSAY; CELL COMMUNICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DIMERIZATION; EMBRYO; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; WILD TYPE; ANIMAL; C57BL MOUSE; CELL STRAIN 3T3; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MOUSE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

MURINAE; VERTEBRATA;

ANIMALS; ANTIGENS, CD; BINDING SITES; CELL ADHESION MOLECULES; CELL COMMUNICATION; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; HUMANS; LIGANDS; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NERVE TISSUE PROTEINS; NIH 3T3 CELLS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; RECEPTORS, CELL SURFACE; SEMAPHORINS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 78049406651     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature09468     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Kruger, R.P., Aurandt, J.&Guan, K.L.Semaphorinscommandcellstomove. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 789-800 (2005).
2. Tamagnone, L. et al. Plexins are a large family of receptors for transmembrane, secreted, and GPI-anchored semaphorins in vertebrates. Cell 99, 71-80 (1999).
3. Suto, F. et al. Interactions between plexin-A2, plexin-A4, and semaphorin 6A control lamina-restricted projection of hippocampal mossy fibers. Neuron 53, 535-547 (2007).
4. Kolodkin, A. L., Matthes, D. J. & Goodman, C. S. The semaphorin genes encode a family oftransmembrane and secreted growth cone guidance molecules. Cell 75, 1389-1399 (1993).
5. Love, C. A. et al. The ligand-binding face of the semaphorins revealed by the high-resolution crystal structure of SEMA4D. Nature Struct. Biol. 10, 843-848 (2003).
6. Antipenko, A. et al. Structure of the semaphorin-3A receptor binding module. Neuron 39, 589-598 (2003).
7. Winberg, M. L. et al. Plexin A is a neuronal semaphorin receptor that controls axon guidance. Cell 95, 903-916 (1998).
8. Capparuccia, L.&Tamagnone, L.Semaphorinsignalingincancer cells andincells of the tumor microenvironment-two sides of a coin. J. Cell Sci. 122, 1723-1736 (2009).
9. Korostylev, A. et al. A functional role for semaphorin 4D/plexin B1 interactions in epithelial branching morphogenesis during organogenesis. Development 135, 3333-3343 (2008).
10. Kerjan, G. et al. The transmembrane semaphorin Sema6A controls cerebellar granule cell migration. Nature Neurosci. 8, 1516-1524 (2005).
11. Renaud, J. et al. Plexin-A2 and its ligand, Sema6A, control nucleus-centrosome coupling in migrating granule cells. Nature Neurosci. 11, 440-449 (2008).
12. He, H., Yang, T., Terman, J. R. & Zhang, X. Crystal structure of the plexin A3 intracellular region reveals an autoinhibited conformation through active site sequestration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 15610-15615 (2009).
13. Tong, Y. et al. Structure and function of the intracellular region of the plexin-B1 transmembrane receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 35962-35972 (2009).
14. Takahashi, T. & Strittmatter, S. M. Plexina1 autoinhibition by the plexin sema domain. Neuron 29, 429-439 (2001).
15. Takahashi, T. et al. Plexin-neuropilin-1 complexes form functional semaphorin-3A receptors. Cell 99, 59-69 (1999).
16. Oinuma, I., Katoh, H. & Negishi, M. Molecular dissection of the semaphorin 4D receptor plexin-B1-stimulated R-Ras GTPase-activating protein activity and neurite remodeling in hippocampal neurons. J. Neurosci. 24, 11473-11480 (2004).
17. Tong, Y. et al. Binding of Rac1, Rnd1, and RhoD toa novel Rho GTPase interaction motif destabilizes dimerization of the plexin-B1 effector domain. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 37215-37224 (2007).
18. Gherardi, E., Love, C. A., Esnouf, R. M. & Jones, E. Y. The sema domain. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 14, 669-678 (2004).
19. Stamos, J., Lazarus, R.A., Yao, X., Kirchhofer, D. & Wiesmann, C.Crystal structure of the HGF b-chain in complex with the Sema domain of the Met receptor. EMBO J. 23, 2325-2335 (2004).
20. Niemann, H. H. et al. Structure of the human receptor tyrosine kinase met in complex with the Listeria invasion protein InlB. Cell 130, 235-246 (2007).
21. Koppel, A. M., Feiner, L., Kobayashi, H. & Raper, J. A. A 70 amino acid region within the semaphorin domain activates specific cellular responseof semaphorin family members. Neuron 19, 531-537 (1997).
22. Klostermann, A., Lohrum, M., Adams, R. H. & Puschel, A. W. The chemorepulsive activity of the axonal guidance signal semaphorin D requires dimerization. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 7326-7331 (1998).
23. Koppel, A. M. & Raper, J. A. Collapsin-1 covalently dimerizes, and dimerization is necessary for collapsing activity. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 15708-15713 (1998).
24. Turner, L.J.& Hall, A. Plexin-induced collapse assay inCOS cells. Methods Enzymol. 406, 665-676 (2006).
25. Merte, J. et al. A forward genetic screen in mice identifies Sema3A(K108N), which binds to neuropilin-1 but cannot signal. J. Neurosci. 30, 5767-5775 (2010).
26. Liu, H. et al. Structural basis of Semaphorin-Plexin recognition and viral mimicry from Sema7A and A39R complexes with PlexinC1. Cell 142, 749-761 (2010).
27. Toyofuku, T. et al. FARP2 triggers signals for Sema3A-mediated axonal repulsion. Nature Neurosci. 8, 1712-1719 (2005).
28. Gherardi, E. et al. Structural basis of hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor and MET signalling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 4046-4051 (2006).
29. Aricescu, A. R., Lu, W. & Jones, E. Y. A time-and cost-efficient system for high-level protein production inmammalian cells. Acta Crystallogr.D62, 1243-1250 (2006).
30. Chang, V. T. et al. Glycoprotein structural genomics: solving the glycosylation problem. Structure 15, 267-273 (2007).
31. Reeves, P.J., Callewaert, N., Contreras, R.& Khorana, H.G. Structure and function in rhodopsin: high-level expression of rhodopsin with restricted and homogeneous N-glycosylation by a tetracycline-inducible N- acetylglucosaminyltransferase I-negative HEK293S stable mammalian cell line. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 13419-13424 (2002).
32. Walter, T. S. et al. A procedure for setting up high-throughput nanolitre crystallization experiments.Crystallization workflowfor initial screening, automated storage, imaging and optimization. Acta Crystallogr. D 61, 651-657 (2005).
33. Mayo, C. J. et al. Benefits of automated crystallization plate tracking, imaging, and analysis. Structure 13, 175-182 (2005).
34. Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W.Processing X-ray diffraction data collectedin oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276, 307-326 (1997).
35. Leslie, A. G. Recent changes to the MOSFLM package for processing film and image plate data. Joint CCP4 1 ESF-EAMCB Newsletter on Protein Crystallography 26 (1992).
36. Evans, P. Scaling and assessment of data quality. Acta Crystallogr. D 62, 72-82 (2006).
37. CCP4. The CCP4 suite: programs for proteincrystallography. Acta Crystallogr.D 50, 760-763 (1994).
38. McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Cryst. 40, 658-674 (2007).
39. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: building new software for automated crystallographic structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D 58, 1948-1954 (2002).
40. Perrakis, A., Morris, R.&Lamzin, V.S. Automatedproteinmodelbuildingcombined with iterative structure refinement. Nature Struct. Biol. 6, 458-463 (1999).
41. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2126-2132 (2004).
42. Cowtan, K. The Buccaneer software for automated model building. 1. Tracing protein chains. Acta Crystallogr. D 62, 1002-1011 (2006).
43. Blanc, E. et al. Refinement of severely incomplete structures with maximum likelihood in BUSTER-TNT. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2210-2221 (2004).
44. Davis, I. W. et al. MolProbity: all-atom contacts and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W375-W383 (2007).
45. Stuart, D. I., Levine, M., Muirhead, H. & Stammers, D. K. Crystal structure of cat ? muscle pyruvate kinase at a resolution of 2.6A. J. Mol. Biol. 134, 109-142 (1979).
46. Baker, N. A., Sept, D., Joseph, S., Holst, M. J. & McCammon, J. A. Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 10037-10041 (2001).
47. Larkin, M. A. et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23, 2947-2948 (2007).
48. Krissinel, E.& Henrick, K. Inference ofmacromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J. Mol. Biol. 372, 774-797 (2007).
49. Gouet, P., Courcelle, E., Stuart, D. I. & Metoz, F. ESPript: analysis of multiple sequence alignments in PostScript. Bioinformatics 15, 305-308 (1999).
50. Landau, M. et al. ConSurf 2005: the projection of evolutionary conservation scores of residues on protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W299-W302 (2005).
51. Trombetta, E. S. & Parodi, A. J. Quality control and protein folding in the secretory pathway. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 19, 649-676 (2003).
52. Schuck, P. Size-distribution analysisof macromolecules bysedimentation velocity ultracentrifugation and Lamm equation modeling. Biophys. J. 78, 1606-1619 (2000).