On the human control of vehicles: An experimental study of acceleration

European Transport Research Review

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 157-170

  Bosetti, Paolo ^a   Da Lio, Mauro ^a   Saroldi, Andrea ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

^b CENTRO RICERCHE FIAT   (Italy)

Author keywords

Advanced driver assistance systems; Driver modeling; Human machine interaction; Intelligent vehicles; Man machine systems

Indexed keywords

ADVANCED DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS; INTELLIGENT VEHICLE HIGHWAY SYSTEMS; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; VEHICLES;

CONTINUOUS SUPPORT; DRIVER MODELING; EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS; HUMAN MACHINE INTERACTION; LATERAL ACCELERATION; OPTIMALITY PRINCIPLE; STATISTICAL SUMMARY; TWO-THIRDS POWER LAWS;

ACCELERATION;

EID: 84901296148     PISSN: 18670717     EISSN: 18668887     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12544-013-0120-2     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Hesslow G (2012) The current status of the simulation theory of cognition. Brain Res 1428: 71-79.
2. Jeannerod M (2001) Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage 14(1 Pt 2): S103-S109.
3. Hurley S (2008) The shared circuits model (SCM): how control, mirroring, and simulation can enable imitation, deliberation, and mindreading. Behav Brain Sci 31(1): 1-22, discussion 22-58.
4. Demiris Y (2007) Prediction of intent in robotics and multi-agent systems. Cogn Process 8(3): 151-158.
5. Wolpert DM, Doya K, Kawato M (2003) A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 358(1431): 593-602.
6. Demiris Y, Khadhouri B (2006) Hierarchical attentive multiple models for execution and recognition of actions. Robot Auton Syst 54(5): 361-369.
7. interactive - Accident avoidance by intervention for Intelligent Vehicles. [Online]. Available: http://www. interactive-ip. eu/. [Accessed: 30-May-2013].
8. Saroldi A, Tango F, Da Lio M, Biral F, Galvani M (2012) Implementation of a Co-driver for continuous support. In: 19th ITS World Congress, no. October, p. EU-00748.
9. Da Lio M, Biral F, Galvani M, and Saroldi A (2012) Will intelligent vehicles evolve into human-peer robots? In: IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Proceedings, pp. 304-309.
10. Da Lio M, Bosetti P, Saroldi A (To be submitted) Artificial co-drivers as a universal enabling technology for future intelligent vehicles and transportation systems. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst.
11. Todorov E (2004) Optimality principles in sensorimotor control. Nat Neurosci 7(9): 907-915.
12. Liu D, Todorov E (2007) Evidence for the flexible sensorimotor strategies predicted by optimal feedback control. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 27(35): 9354-9368.
13. Mitrovic D, Klanke S, Vijayakumar S (2010) Adaptive optimal feedback control with learned internal dynamics models. Robotics 264: 65-84.
14. Nagengast J, Braun DA, Wolpert DM (2009) Optimal control predicts human performance on objects with internal degrees of freedom. PLoS Comput Biol 5(6): e1000419.
15. Bays PM, Wolpert DM (2007) Computational principles of sensorimotor control that minimize uncertainty and variability. J Physiol 578(Pt 2): 387-396.
16. Flash T, Hochner B (2005) Motor primitives in vertebrates and invertebrates. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15(6): 660-666.
17. Mussa-Ivaldi F, Solla S (2004) Neural primitives for motion control. IEEE J Ocean Eng 29(3): 640-650.
18. Harris CM (2009) Biomimetics of human movement: functional or aesthetic? Bioinspiration Biomimetics 4(3): 033001.
19. Viviani P, Flash T (1995) Minimum-jerk, two-thirds power law, and isochrony: converging approaches to movement planning. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21(1): 32-53.
20. Flash T, Meirovitch Y, Barliya A (2013) Models of human movement: trajectory planning and inverse kinematics studies. Robot Auton Syst 61(4): 330-339.
21. Harris C (1998) Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 394: 780-784.
22. Grush R (2004) The emulation theory of representation: motor control, imagery, and perception. Behav Brain Sci 27(3): 377-396, discussion 396-442.
23. Wolpert DM, Miall RC, Kawato M (1998) Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends Cogn Sci 2(9): 338-347.
24. Macadam CC (2003) Understanding and modeling the human driver. Veh Syst Dyn 40(1-3): 101-134.
25. Plochl M, Edelmann J (2007) Driver models in automobile dynamics application. 45:(7-8): 699-741.
26. Bertolazzi E, Biral F, Da Lio M, Saroldi A, Tango F (2010) Supporting drivers in keeping safe speed and safe distance: the SASPENCE subproject within the European framework programme 6 integrating project PReVENT. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 11(3): 525-538.
27. Cossalter V, Da Lio M, Biral F, Fabbri L (1998) SAE TECHNICAL evaluation of motorcycle maneuverability with the optimal maneuver method. Eng Conf 724.
28. Biral F, Da Lio M, Bertolazzi E (2005) Combining safety margins and user preferences into a driving criterion for optimal control-based computation of reference maneuvers for an ADAS of the next generation. In: IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Proceedings, vol. 2005, pp. 36-41.
29. Biral F, da Lio M, Lot R, Sartori R (2010) An intelligent curve warning system for powered two wheel vehicles. Eur Transp Res Rev 2(3): 147-156.
30. Cossalter V, Da Lio M, Lot R, Fabbri L (1999) A general method for the evaluation of vehicle manoeuvrability with special emphasis on motorcycles. Veh Syst Dyn 31(2): 113-135.
31. Ritchie ML, McCoy WK, Welde WL (1968) A study of the relation between forward velocity and lateral acceleration in curves during normal driving. Hum Factors 10(3): 255-258.
32. van Winsum W, Godthelp H (1996) Speed choice and steering behaviour in curve driving. Hum Factors 38(3): 434-441.
33. Emmanuel F, Navin F (1998) Automobiles on horizontal curves. Transp Res Rec 98: 50-56.
34. Levison WH (1998) Interactive highway safety design model: issues related to driver modeling. Transp Res Rec 1631: 20-27.
35. Savkoor AR, Ausejo S (2000) Analysis of driver's steering and speed control strategies in curve negotiation. Veh Syst Dyn 33(SUPPL): 94-109.
36. Reymond G, Kemeny A, Droulez J, Berthoz A (2001) Role of lateral acceleration in curve driving: driver model and experiments on a real vehicle and a driving simulator. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 43(3): 483-495.
37. Levinson W (2007) Development of a driver vehicle module for the interactive highway safety design model,[Online]. Available: http://www. fhwa. dot. gov/publications/research/safety/08019/08019. pdf. [Accessed: 31-May-2013].
38. Cafiso S, Cerni G (2012) New approach to defining continuous speed profile models for two-lane rural roads. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2309(1): 157-167.
39. Fancher P, Bareket Z, Ervin R (2001) Human-centered design of an ACC-with-braking and forward-crash-warning system. Veh Syst Dyn 36(2-3): 203-223.
40. Moon S, Yi K (2008) Human driving data-based design of a vehicle adaptive cruise control algorithm. Veh Syst Dyn 46(8): 661-690.
41. Rice RS (1973) Measuring car-driver interaction with the g-g diagram. SAE Technical Papers.
42. Hisaoka Y, Yamamoto M, Okada A (1999) Closed-loop analysis of vehicle behavior during braking in a turn. JSAE Rev 20: 537-542.
43. Bartlett W, Masory O, Wright B (2000) Driver abilities in closed course testing. SAE Technical Papers.
44. Hollnagel E (2002) Cognition as control: a pragmatic approach to the modelling of joint cognitive systems. Control 9: 1-23.
45. Hollnagel E, Woods DD (2005) Joint cognitive systems. Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, pp. 113-133.
46. Michon JA (1985) A critical view of driver behavior models: what do we know, what should we do? Hum Behav Traffic Saf 485-520.
47. Test Track (Google Maps). [Online]. Available: http://goo. gl/maps/mzfBs.
48. Levison WH, Bittner AC Jr, Campbell JL, Schreiner C (2002) Modification and partial validation of the driver/vehicle module. Transp Res Rec 1803: 52-58.
49. Hicheur H, Vieilledent S, Richardson MJE, Flash T, Berthoz A (2005) Velocity and curvature in human locomotion along complex curved paths: a comparison with hand movements. Exp Brain Res Experimentelle Hirnforschung Expérimentation Cérébrale 162(2): 145-154.