Quantification of amylose, amylopectin, and β-glucan in search for genes controlling the three major quality traits in barley by genome-wide association studies

Frontiers in Plant Science

Volumn 5, Issue MAY, 2014, Pages

  Shu, Xiaoli ^a,b   Rasmussen, Søren K ^b  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Amylopectin; Amylose; Co regulation; GWAS; Hordeum vulgare; glucan

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901061038     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1664462X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00197     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Ahmad, A., Anjum, F. M., Zahoor, T., Nawaz, H., and Dilshad, S. M. (2012). Beta glucan: a valuable functional ingredient in foods. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 52, 201-212. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2010.499806
2. Aldughpassi, A., Abdel-Aal, E.-S. M., and Wolever, T. M. S. (2012). Barley cultivar, kernel composition, and processing affect the glycemic index. J. Nutr. 142, 1666-1671. doi: 10.3945/jn.112.161372
3. Andersson, A. A. M., Andersson, R., Autio, K., and Åman, P. (1999). Chemical composition and microstructure of two naked waxy barleys. J. Cereal Sci. 30, 183-191. doi: 10.1006/jcrs.1999.0267
4. Asare, E. K., Jaiswal, S., Maley, J., Baga, M., Sammynaiken, R., Rossnagel, B. G., et al. (2011). Barley grain constituents, starch composition, and structure affect starch in vitro enzymatic hydrolysis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 59, 4743-4754. doi: 10.1021/jf200054e
5. Bahatty, R. S., and Rossangel, B. G. (1997). Zero amylose lines of hull-less barley. Cereal Chem. 74, 190-191. doi: 10.1094/CCHEM.1997.74.2.190
6. Baik, B.-K., and Ullrich, S. E. (2008). Barley for food: characteristics, improvement, and renewed interest. J. Cereal Sci. 48, 233-242. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2008.02.002
7. Brennan, C. S., and Cleary, L. J. (2005). The potential use of cereal (1→3,1→4)-β-d-glucans as functional food ingredients. J. Cereal Sci. 42, 1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2005.01.002
8. Burton, R. A., Collins, H. M., Kibble, N. A., Smith, J. A., Shirley, N. J., Jobling, S. A., et al. (2011). Over-expression of specific hvcslf cellulose synthase-like genes in transgenic barley increases the levels of cell wall (1,3;1,4)-beta-d-glucans and alters their fine structure. Plant Biotechnol. J. 9, 117-135. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00532.x
9. Burton, R. A., and Fincher, G. B. (2012). Current challenges in cell wall biology in the cereals and grasses. Front. Plant Sci. 3:130. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2012.00130
10. Burton, R. A., Jobling, S. A., Harvey, A. J., Shirley, N. J., Mather, D. E., Bacic, A., et al. (2008). The genetics and transcriptional profiles of the cellulose synthase-like hvcslf gene family in barley. Plant Physiol. 146, 1821-1833. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.114694
11. Burton, R. A., Wilson, S. M., Hrmova, M., Harvey, A. J., Shirley, N. J., Medhurst, A., et al. (2006). Cellulose synthase-like cslf genes mediate the synthesis of cell wall (1,3;1,4)-beta-d-glucans. Science 311, 1940-1942. doi: 10.1126/science.1122975
12. Chan, E. K., Rowe, H. C., and Kliebenstein, D. J. (2010). Understanding the evolution of defense metabolites in arabidopsis thaliana using genome-wide association mapping. Genetics 185, 991-1007. doi: 10.1534/genetics.109.108522
13. Comadran, J., Kilian, B., Russell, J., Ramsay, L., Stein, N., Ganal, M., et al. (2012). Natural variation in a homolog of antirrhinum centroradialis contributed to spring growth habit and environmental adaptation in cultivated barley. Nat. Genet. 44, 1388-1392. doi: 10.1038/ng.2447
14. Cory, A. T., Båga, M., Anyia, A., Rossnagel, B. G., and Chibbar, R. N. (2012). Genetic markers for cslf6 gene associated with (1,3;1,4)-β-glucan concentration in barley grain. J. Cereal Sci. 56, 332-339. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2012.02.003
15. Denyer, K., Clarke, B., Hylton, C., Tatge, H., and Smith, A. M. (1996). The elongation of amylose and amylopectin chains in isolated starch garnules. Plant J. 10, 1135-1143. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1996.10061135.x
16. Dhugga, K. S. (2012). Biosynthesis of non-cellulosic polysaccharides of plant cell walls. Phytochemistry 74, 8-19. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.10.003
17. Farrokhi, N., Burton, R. A., Brownfield, L., Hrmova, M., Wilson, S. M., Bacic, A., et al. (2006). Plant cell wall biosynthesis: genetic, biochemical and functional genomics approaches to the identification of key genes. Plant Biotechnol. J. 4, 145-167. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2005.00169.x
18. Finocchiaro, F., Ferrari, B., Gianinetti, A., Scazzina, F., Pellegrini, N., Caramanico, R., et al. (2012). Effects of barley beta-glucan-enriched flour fractions on the glycaemic index of bread. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 63, 23-29. doi: 10.3109/09637486.2011.593504
19. Gao, W., Clancy, J. A., Han, F., Jones, B. L., Budde, A., Wesenberg, D. M., et al. (2004). Fine mapping of a malting-quality qtl complex near the chromosome 4h s telomere in barley. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109, 750-760. doi: 10.1007/s00122-004-1688-7
20. Han, F., Ullrich, S. E., Chirat, S., Menteur, S., Jestin, L., Sarrafi, A., et al. (1995). Mapping of β-glucan content and β-glucanase activity loci in barley grain and malt. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91, 921-927. doi: 10.1007/BF00223901
21. Hang, A., Obert, D., Gironella, A. I. N., and Burton, C. S. (2007). Barley amylose and beta-glucan: their relationships to protein, agronomic traits, and environmental factors. Crop Sci. 47, 1754-1760. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2006.06.0429
22. Held, M. A., Penning, B., Brandt, A. S., Kessans, S. A., Yong, W., Scofield, S. R., et al. (2008). Small-interfering rnas from natural antisense transcripts derived from a cellulose synthase gene modulate cell wall biosynthesis in barley. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 20534-20539. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809408105
23. Hylton, C. M., Denyer, K., Keeling, P. L., Chang, M.-T., and Smith, A. M. (1996). The effect of waxy mutations on the granule-bound starch synthase of barley and maize endosperms. Planta 198, 230-237. doi: 10.1007/BF00206248
24. Islamovic, E., Obert, D. E., Oliver, R. E., Harrison, S. A., Ibrahim, A., Marshall, J. M., et al. (2012). Genetic dissection of grain beta-glucan and amylose content in barley (hordeum vulgare l.). Mol. Breed. 31, 15-25. doi: 10.1007/s11032-012-9764-1
25. Kirpitch, A. R., and Maryniuk, M. D. (2011). The 3 R's of glycemic index: recommendations, research, and the real world. Clin. Diabetes 29, 155-159. doi: 10.2337/diaclin.29.4.155
26. Kotting, O. (2005). Identification of a novel enzyme required for starch metabolism in arabidopsis leaves. The phosphoglucan, water dikinase. Plant Physiol. 137, 242-252. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.055954
27. Kotting, O., Santelia, D., Edner, C., Eicke, S., Marthaler, T., Gentry, M. S., et al. (2009). Starch-excess4 is a laforin-like phosphoglucan phosphatase required for starch degradation in arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 21, 334-346. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.064360
28. Lee, M. J., Lee, N. Y., Kim, Y. K., Park, J. C., Choi, I. D., Cho, S. G., et al. (2011). Physicochemical properties of pearled hull-less barley cultivars with normal and low amylose content. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 20, 55-62. doi: 10.1007/s10068-011-0008-7
29. Li, J., Båga, M., Rossnagel, B. G., Legge, W. G., and Chibbar, R. N. (2008). Identification of quantitative trait loci for β-glucan concentration in barley grain. J. Cereal Sci. 48, 647-655. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2008.02.004
30. Li, Z., Li, D., Du, X., Wang, H., Larroque, O., Jenkins, C. L., et al. (2011). The barley amo1 locus is tightly linked to the starch synthase iiia gene and negatively regulates expression of granule-bound starch synthetic genes. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 5217-5231. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err239
31. Mayer, K. F., Martis, M., Hedley, P. E., Simkova, H., Liu, H., Morris, J. A., et al. (2011). Unlocking the barley genome by chromosomal and comparative genomics. Plant Cell 23, 1249-1263. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.082537
32. Mezaka, L., Beleidere, M., Legzdina, L., and Rostoks, N. (2011). Whole genome association mapping identifies naked grain locus nud as determinant of b-glucan content in barley. Agriculture 98, 283-292.
33. Milne, I., Shaw, P., Stephen, G., Bayer, M., Cardle, L., Thomas, W. T., et al. (2010). Flapjack-graphical genotype visualization. Bioinformatics 26, 3133-3134. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq580
34. Morell, M. K., Kosar-Hashemi, B., Cmiel, M., Samuel, M. S., Chandler, P., Rahman, S., et al. (2003). Barley sex6 mutants lack starch synthase iia activity and contain a starch with novel properties. Plant J. 34, 173-185. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01712.x
35. Newell, M. A., Asoro, F. G., Scott, M. P., White, P. J., Beavis, W. D., and Jannink, J.-L. (2012). Genome-wide association study for oat (avena sativa l.) beta-glucan concentration using germplasm of worldwide origin. Theor. Appl. Genet. 125, 1687-1696. doi: 10.1007/s00122-012-1945-0
36. Newton, A. C., Flavell, A. J., George, T. S., Leat, P., Mullholland, B., Ramsay, L., et al. (2011). Crops that feed the world 4. Barley: a resilient crop? Strengths and weaknesses in the context of food secuity. Food Sci. 3, 141-178. doi: 10.1007/s12571-011-0126-3
37. Pasam, R. K., Sharma, R., Malosetti, M., van Eeuwijk, F. A., Haseneyer, G., Kilian, B., et al. (2012). Genome-wide association studies for agronomical traits in a world wide spring barley collection. BMC Plant Biol. 12:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-12-16
38. Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M., and Donnelly, P. (2000). Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155, 945-959.
39. Schober, M. S., Burton, R. A., Shirley, N. J., Jacobs, A. K., and Fincher, G. B. (2009). Analysis of the (1,3)-beta-d-glucan synthase gene family of barley. Phytochemistry 70, 713-720. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2009.04.002
40. Shu, X., Backes, G., and Rasmussen, S. K. (2012). Genome-wide association study of resistant starch (RS) phenotypes in a barley variety collection. J. Agric. Food Chem. 60, 10302-10311. doi: 10.1021/jf3031875
41. Stearns, F. W. (2010). One hundred years of pleiotrpy: a retrospective. Genetics 186, 767-773. doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.122549
42. Taketa, S., Yuo, T., Tonooka, T., Tsumuraya, Y., Inagaki, Y., Haruyama, N., et al. (2012). Functional characterization of barley betaglucanless mutants demonstrates a unique role for cslf6 in (1,3;1,4)-beta-d-glucan biosynthesis. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 381-392. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err285
43. Tetlow, I. J., Wait, R., Lu, Z., Akkasaeng, R., Bowsher, C. G., Esposito, S., et al. (2004). Protein phosphorylation in amyloplasts regulates starch branching enzyme activity and protein-protein interactions. Plant Cell 16, 694-708. doi: 10.1105/tpc.017400
44. Thondre, P. S., and Henry, C. J. (2009). High-molecular-weight barley beta-glucan in chapatis (unleavened indian flatbread) lowers glycemic index. Nutr. Res. 29, 480-486. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2009.07.003
45. Tondelli, A., Xu, X., Moragues, M., Schnaithmann, F., Sharma, R., Ingvardsen, C., et al. (2013). Structural and temporal variation in the genetic diversity of a european collection of spring 2-row barley cultivars and utility for association mapping of quantitative traits. Plant Genome 6, 1-14. doi: 10.3835/plantgenome2013.3803.0007
46. Tonooka, T., Aoki, E., Yoshioka, T., and Taketa, S. (2009)., A nove mutant gene for (1-3, 1-4)-β-D-glucanless grain on barley (hordeum vulgare l.) chromosome 7H. Breed. Sci. 59, 47-54. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.59.47
47. Wang, J., Li, Y., Tian, Y., Xu, X., Ji, X., Cao, X., et al. (2010). A novel triple-wavelength colorimetric method for measuring amylose and amylopectin contents. Starch Stärke 62, 508-516. doi: 10.1002/star.200900242
48. Wei, K., Xue, D. W., Huang, Y. Z., Jin, X. L., Wu, F. B., and Zhang, G. P. (2009). Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci associated with beta-amylase and limit dextrinase activities and beta-glucan and protein fraction contents in barley. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 10, 839-846. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B0920135
49. Zeeman, S. C., Kossmann, J., and Smith, A. M. (2010). Starch: its metabolism, evolution, and biotechnological modification in plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 61, 209-234. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112301
50. Zhu, C., and Yu, J. (2009). Nonmetic multidimensional scaling corrects for population structure in whole genome association studies. Genetics 182, 875-888. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.098863