Physicochemical properties of pearled hull-less barley cultivars with normal and low amylose content

Food Science and Biotechnology

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 55-62

  Lee, Mi Ja ^a   Lee, Na Young ^a   Kim, Yang Kil ^a   Park, Jong Chul ^a   Choi, In Duck ^a   Cho, Sang Gun ^a   Kim, Jung Gon ^a   Park, Hong Kyu ^a   Kim, Kee Jong ^a   Park, Ki Hun ^b   Kim, Hyung Soon ^c  

^a National Institute of Crop Science   (South Korea)

^b National Institute of Animal Science   (South Korea)

^c Seonam University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Amylose; Hull less barley; Physicochemical property; glucan; Starch

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVES; CYCLODEXTRINS; FOOD PRODUCTS; HARDNESS; PLANTS (BOTANY); STARCH; VISCOSITY; WATER ABSORPTION;

AMYLOSE; CHEMICAL COMPONENT; CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS; HIGHLY-CORRELATED; HULL-LESS BARLEY; PASTING TEMPERATURE; PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS; SETBACK VISCOSITY;

PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES;

HORDEUM;

EID: 79959696675     PISSN: 12267708     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10068-011-0008-7     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Li JH, Vasanthan T, Rossnagel B, Hoover R. Starch from hull-less barley: I. Granule morphology, composition, and amylopectin structure. Food Chem. 74: 395-405 (2001)
2. Oscarsson M, Andersson R, Aman P, Olofesson S, Jonsson A. Effect of cultivar, nitrogen fertilization rate, and environment on yield and grain quality of barley. J. Sci. Food Agr. 78: 359-366 (1998)
3. Baik BK, Steven EU. Barley for food: Characteristics, improvement, and renewed interest. J. Cereal Sci. 48: 233-242 (2008)
4. Seog HM, Seo MS, Choi HD, Kim IH, Lee YT. Changes in physicochemical properties of barley germ during roasting. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 11: 618-622 (2002)
5. Newma CW, Newman RK. A brief history of barley food. Cereal Food World 51: 4-7 (2006)
6. Fredriksson H, Silverio J, Andersson R, Eliasson AC, Aman P. The influence of amylose and amylopectin characteristics on gelatization and retrogradation properties of different starches. Carbohyd. Polym. 35: 119-134 (1998)
7. Annica AA, Cajsa E, Roger A, Sigurol R, Per Å. Chemical and physical characteristics of different barley samples. J. Sci. Food Agr. 79: 979-986 (1999)
8. Faraj A, Vasanthan T, Hoover R. The influence of α-amylasehydrolysed barley starch fractions on the viscosity of low and hifh purity barley β-glucan concentrates. Food Chem. 96: 56-65 (2006)
9. Klamczynski A, Baik BK, Czuchajowska Z. Composition, microstructure, water imbibition, and thermal properties of abraded barley. Cereal Chem. 72: 677-685 (1998)
10. AACC. Approved Methods of the AACC. 8th ed. Method 08-01. American Association of Cereal Chemistry, St. Paul, MN, USA (1983)
11. Juliano BO. Criteria and test for rice grain qualities. pp. 443-524. In: Rice Chemistry and Technology. Juliano BO (ed). American Association of Cereal Chemistry, St. Paul, MN, USA (1985)
12. McCleary BV, Codd R. Measurement of (1-3)(1-4)-β-D-glucan in barley and oats: A streamlined enzymic procedure. J. Sci. Food Agr. 55: 303-312 (1991)
13. Mccleary BV, Solah V, Gibson TS. Quantitative measurement of total starch in cereal flours and products. J. Cereal Sci. 20: 51-58 (1994)
14. Song J, Kim SL. Element analysis and evaluation of usefulness of crop: Analysis the texture and color of the cooked rice. Korean J. Crop Sci. 49(S1): 277-284 (2004)
15. Edney MJ, Rossnagel BG, Endo Y, Ozawa S, Brophy M. Pearling quality of Canadian barley varieties and their potential uses as rice extenders. J. Cereal Sci. 36: 295-305 (2002)
16. Quinde Z, Ullrich SE, Baik BK. Genotypic variation in colour and discoloration potential of barley-based food products. Cereal Chem. 81: 752-758 (2004)
17. You SG, Kim SM. Molecular characteristics and functional properties of barley starches with varying amylose content. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 10: 207-213 (2008)
18. Bhatty RS. Potential of hull-less barley. Cereal Chem. 76: 589-599 (1999)
19. Izydorczyk MS, Lagassé LL, Hatcher DW, Dexter JE, Rossnagel BG. The enrichment of asian noodles with fiber-rich fractions derived from roller milling of hull-less barley. J. Sci. Food Agr. 85: 2094-2104 (2005)
20. Newman RK, Newman CW, Graham H. The hypocholesterolemic function of barley β-glucans. Cereal Foods World 34: 883-885 (1989)
21. Choi HC, Chi JH, Cho SY. Varietal difference in water absorption characteristics of milled rice, and its relation to the other grain quality components. Korean J. Crop Sci. 44: 288-295 (1999)
22. Schoch TJ, Elder AL. Starchs in the food industry. Vol 12, pp. 21-34. In: Uses of Sugar and Other Carbohydrates in the Food Industry. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry (ed). American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, USA (1955)
23. Tirawanichakul Y, Prachayawarakorn S, Varanyanond W, Soponronnarit S. Simulation and grain quality for instore drying of paddy. J. Food Eng. 64: 405-415 (2004)
24. Mazurs EG, Schoch TJ, Kite FE. Graphic analysis of the brabender viscosity curves of various starches. Cereal Chem. 34: 141-152 (1957)
25. Chung WK, Meullenet JF. Prediction of cooked rice texture in longgrain rice using rapid visco analyser data. pp. 371-379. In: B.R. Wells Rice Research Studies. Chung WK, Meullenet JF (eds). Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series 550. University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AK, USA (2006)
26. Yoshmotoa Y, Takeda Y. Molecular structure and some physicochemical properties of waxy and low amylase barley starches. Carbohyd. Polym. 47: 159-167 (2002)
27. Champagne ET, Bett KL, Vinyard BT, McClung AM, Barton FE, Moldenhauer K, Linscombe S, McKenzie K. Correlation between cooked rice texture and rapid visco analyser measurements. Cereal Chem. 76: 764-771 (1999)
28. Adebawele KO, Lawal OS. Foaming, gelation, and electrophoretic characteristics of mucuna bean (Mucuna pruriens) protein concentrates. Food Chem. 83: 237-246 (2003)
29. Zheng GH, Sosulski FW. Determination of water separation from cooked starch and flour pastes after refrigeration and freeze-thaw. J. Food Sci. 63: 134-139 (1998)
30. Paul S, John O, Nigel B, Vivian LG, Elke A, Eimear G. Chemical composition and microstructure of milled barley fractions. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 230: 579-595 (2010)