Phonetic category recalibration: What are the categories?

Journal of Phonetics

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 91-105

  Reinisch, Eva ^a,b   Wozny, David R ^b   Mitterer, Holger ^c   Holt, Lori L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MALTA   (Malta)

Author keywords

Audiovisual processing; Perceptual learning; Prelexical processing; Speech perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 84900792122     PISSN: 00954470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2014.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Barr D.J., Levy R., Scheepers C., Tily H. Random-effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 2013, 68:255-278.
2. Benoit C., Mohamadi T., Kandel S. Effects of phonetic context on audio-visual intelligibility of French. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1994, 37(5):1195-1203.
3. Bernstein L.E., Demorest M.E., Tucker P.E. Speech perception without hearing. Perception & Psychophysics 2000, 62:233-252.
4. Bertelson P., Vroomen J., de Gelder B. Visual recalibration of auditory speech identification: A McGurk aftereffect. Psychological Science 2003, 14:592-597.
5. Boersma P. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 2001, 5:341-345.
6. Chomsky N., Halle M. The sound pattern of English 1968, Harper & Row, New York, NJ.
7. Clarke-Davidson C.M., Luce P.A., Sawusch J.R. Does perceptual learning in speech reflect changes in phonetic category representation or decision bias?. Perception & Psychophysics 2008, 70(4):604-618. 10.3758/pp.70.4.604.
8. Cohen J A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 1992, 112:155-159. 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.
9. Dahan D., Mead R.L. Context-conditioned generalization in adaptation to distorted speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2010, 36:704-728. 10.1037/a0017449.
10. D'Ausilio A., Pulvermüller F., Salmas P., Bufalari I., Begliomini C., Fadiga L. The motor somatotopy of speech perception. Current Biology 2009, 19(5):381-385.
11. Eisner F., McQueen J.M. The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing. Perception & Psychophysics 2005, 67(2):224-238. 10.3758/BF03206487.
12. Fowler C.A. Listeners do hear sounds, not tongues. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1996, 99:1730-1741. 10.1121/1.415237.
13. Galantucci B., Fowler C.A., Turvey M.T. The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2006, 13(3):361-377. 10.3758/BF03193857.
14. Ganong W.F. Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1980, 6:110-125.
15. Harding S., Meyer G. Changes in the perception of synthetic nasal consonants as a result of vowel formant manipulations. Speech Communication 2003, 39(3):173-189.
16. Hervais-Adelman A.G., Davis M.H., Johnsrude I.S., Taylor K.J., Carlyon R.P. Generalization of perceptual learning of vocoded speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2011, 37:283-295.
17. Hyman L.M. Phonology 1975, Holt, Reinhart, and Winston, New York.
18. Jesse A., McQueen J.M. Positional effects in the lexical retuning of speech perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2011, 18:943-950. 10.3758/s13423-011-0129-2.
19. Kraljic T., Samuel A.G. Perceptual learning for speech: Is there a return to normal?. Cognitive Psychology 2005, 51:141-178. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.05.001.
20. Kraljic T., Samuel A.G. Generalization in perceptual learning for speech. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2006, 13:262-268. 10.3758/BF03193841.
21. Kraljic T., Samuel A.G. Perceptual adjustments to multiple speakers. Journal of Memory and Language 2007, 56:1-15. 10.1016/j.jml.2006.07.010.
22. Kraljic T., Samuel A.G., Brennan S. First impressions and last resorts: How listeners adjust to speaker variability. Psychological Science 2008, 19:332-338. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02090.x.
23. Kurowski K., Blumstein S.E. Perceptual integration of the murmur and formant transitions for place of articulation in nasal consonants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1984, 76:383.
24. Lahiri A., Reetz H. Underspecified recognition. Laboratory phonology 2002, 7:637-676. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
25. Liberman A.M. Speech: A special code 1996, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
26. Logan J.S., Lively S.E., Pisoni D.B. Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: a first report. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1991, 89(2):874-886.
27. Marslen-Wilson W.D., Warren P. Levels of perceptual representations and processes in lexical access: Words, phonemes, and features. Psychological Review 1994, 101:653-675.
28. Massaro D.W. Perceiving talking faces: From speech perception to a behavioral principle 1998, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
29. McClelland J.L., Elman J.L. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology 1986, 18:1-86. 10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015-0.
30. McGurk H., MacDonald J. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 1976, 264:746-748.
31. McQueen J.M., Cutler A., Norris D. Phonological abstraction in the mental lexicon. Cognitive Science 2006, 30:1113-1126. 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_79.
32. Mitterer H., Chen Y., Zhou X. Phonological abstraction in processing lexical-tone variation: Evidence from a learning paradigm. Cognitive Science 2011, 35:184-197. 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01140.x.
33. Mitterer H., de Ruiter J.P. Recalibrating color categories using world knowledge. Psychological Science 2008, 19(7):629-634. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02133.x.
34. Mitterer H., McQueen J.M. Foreign subtitles help but native-language subtitles harm foreign speech perception. Plos One 2009, 4(e7785). 10.1371/journal.pone.0007785.
35. Mitterer H., Scharenborg O., McQueen J.M. Phonological abstraction without phonemes in speech perception. Cognition 2013, 129(2):356-361. 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.011.
36. Norris D., McQueen J.M. Shortlist B: A Bayesian Model of Continuous Speech Recognition. Psychological Review 2008, 115:357-395. 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.357.
37. Norris D., McQueen J.M., Cutler A. Perceptual learning in speech. Cognitive Psychology 2003, 47:204-238. 10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00006-9.
38. Owens E., Blazek B. Visemes observed by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing adult viewers. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 1985, 28(3):381.
39. Poellmann K., McQueen J.M., Mitterer H. The time course of perceptual learning. Proceedings of the 17th international congress of phonetic sciences 2011 [ICPhS XVII] 2011, 1618-1621. Department of Chinese, Translation and Linguistics, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. W.-S. Lee, E. Zee (Eds.).
40. Reinisch E., Holt L.L. Lexically-guided phonetic retuning of foreign-accented speech and its generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2014, 40:539-555. 10.1037/a0034409.
41. Remez R.E., Rubin P.E., Berns S.M., Pardo J.S., Lang J.M. On the perceptual organization of speech. Psychological Review 1994, 101:129-156.
42. Repp B.H., Svastikula K. The perception of the [m]-[n] distinction in VC syllables. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1988, 83:237-247.
43. Samuel A.G., Kraljic T. Perceptual learning for speech. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2009, 71:1207-1218. 10.3758/APP.71.6.1207.
44. Sjerps M.J., McQueen J.M. The bounds on flexibility in speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2010, 36:195-211. 10.1037/a0016803.
45. Smits R., Bosch L.ten, Collier R. Evaluation of various sets of acoustic cues for the perception of prevocalic stop consonants. I. Perception experiment. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1996, 100(6):3852-3864. 10.1121/1.417241.
46. Van Linden S., Vroomen J. Recalibration of phonetic categories by lipread speech versus lexical information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:1483-1494.
47. Van Wassenhove V., Grant K.W., Poeppel D. Temporal window of integration in auditory-visual speech perception. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45(3):598-607.
48. Vatakis A., Spence C. Crossmodal binding: Evaluating the "unity assumption" using audiovisual speech stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics 2007, 69:744-756.
49. Vroomen J., van Linden S., de Gelder B., Bertelson P. Visual recalibration and selective adaptation in auditory-visual speech perception: Contrasting build-up courses. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:572-577.
50. Wagner A., Ernestus M., Cutler A. Fricative inventory and the relevance of formant transitions for fricative identification. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 2006, 120:2267-2277.
51. Wickelgren W.A. Context-sensitive coding, associative memory, and serial order in (speech) behavior. Psychological Review 1969, 76:1-15.