Visual Recalibration of Auditory Speech Identification: A McGurk Aftereffect

Psychological Science

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 592-597

  Bertelson, Paul ^a,b   Vroomen, Jean ^b   De Gelder, Béatrice ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

^b TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEARING; HUMAN; PHONETICS; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VISION;

AUDITORY PERCEPTION; HUMANS; PHONETICS; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION TESTS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0346361710     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1470.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Anstis, S. (1986). Motion perception in the frontal plane: Sensory aspects. In K.R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J.P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. I, chap. 16). New York: Wiley.
2. Bedford, F. (1995). Constraints on perceptual learning: Objects and dimensions. Cognition, 54, 253-297.
3. Bermant, R.I., & Welch, R.B. (1976). The effect of degree of visual-auditory stimulus separation and eye position upon the spatial interaction of vision and audition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 43, 487-493.
4. Bertelson, P. (1999). Ventriloquism: A case of cross-modal perceptual grouping. In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann, & J. Müsseler (Eds.), Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events (pp. 347-362). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
5. Bertelson, P., & Aschersleben, G. (1998). Automatic visual bias of perceived auditory location. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 482-489.
6. Bertelson, P., & de Gelder, B. (in press). The psychology of multimodal perception. In C. Spence & J. Driver (Eds.), Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention. London: Oxford University Press.
7. Bertelson, P., & Radeau, M. (1975). Cognitive and perceptual factors in adaptation to auditory-visual conflict. In F. Vital-Durant & M. Jeannerod (Eds.), Aspects of neural plasticity (pp. 153-160). Paris: Editions INSERM.
8. Bertelson, P., & Radeau, M. (1976). Ventriloquism, sensory interaction and response bias: Remarks on the paper by Choe, Welch, Gilford and Juola. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 531-535.
9. Bertelson, P., & Radeau, M. (1981). Cross-modal bias and perceptual fusion with auditory-visual spatial discordance. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 578-587.
10. Bertelson, P., Vroomen, J., Wiegeraad, G., & de Gelder, B. (1994). Exploring the relation between McGurk interference and ventriloquism. In ICSLP 94 (Vol. 2, pp. 559-562). Yokohama: Acoustical Society of Japan.
11. Blakemore, C., & Sutton, P. (1969). Size adaptation: A new after-effect. Science, 166, 245-257.
12. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (1999). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Retrieved from http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/
13. Choe, C.S., Welch, R.B., Gilford, R.M., & Juola, J.F. (1975). The "ventriloquist effect": Visual dominance or response bias? Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 55-60.
14. de Gelder, B., & Vroomen, J. (1994). A new place for modality in a modular mind. Current Psychology of Cognition, 13, 84-91.
15. de Gelder, B., & Vroomen, J. (2000). Perceiving emotions by ear and by eye. Cognition & Emotion, 14, 289-311.
16. Eimas, P.D., & Corbit, J.D. (1973). Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 99-109.
17. Epstein, W. (1975). Recalibration by pairing: A process of perceptual learning. Perception, 4, 59-72.
18. Gibson, J.J. (1933). Adaptation, after-effects and contrast in the perception of curved lines. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 1-31.
19. Held, R. (1965). Plasticity in sensory-motor systems. Scientific American, 213, 84-94.
20. Jusczyk, P. (1986). Speech perception. In K.R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J.P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. II, chap. 27). New York: Wiley.
21. Klemm, O. (1909). Localisation von Sinneneindrücken bei disparaten Nebenreizen [Localization of sensory impressions with disparate distractors]. Psychologische Studien (Wundt), 5, 73-161.
22. McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748.
23. Radeau, M. (1994a). Auditory-visual interaction and modularity. Current Psychology of Cognition, 13, 3-51.
24. Radeau, M. (1994b). Ventriloquism against audio-visual speech: Or where Japanese-speaking barn owls might help? Current Psychology of Cognition, 13, 124-140.
25. Radeau, M., & Bertelson, P. (1974). The after-effects of ventriloquism. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26, 63-71.
26. Radeau, M., & Bertelson, P. (1976). The effect of a textured visual field on modality dominance in a ventriloquism situation. Perception & Psychophysics, 20, 227-235.
27. Recanzone, G. (1998). Rapidly induced auditory plasticity: The ventriloquism aftereffect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 95, 869-875.
28. Roberts, M., & Summerfield, Q. (1981). Audiovisual presentation demonstrates that selective adaptation in speech perception is purely auditory. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 309-314.
29. Rosenblum, L D. (1994). How special is audiovisual speech integration? Current Psychology of Cognition, 13, 110-116.
30. Saldaña, H.M., & Rosenblum, L.D. (1994). Visual influences on auditory pluck and bow judgements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 3658-3661.
31. Samuel, A.G. (1986). Red herring detectors and speech perception: In defense of selective adaptation. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 452-499.
32. Sawusch, J.R., & Pisoni, D.B. (1976). Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds. Perception & Psychophysics, 20, 413-418.
33. Shigeno, S. (2002). Anchoring effects in audiovisual speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111, 2853-2861.
34. Vroomen, J. (1999). Ventriloquism and the nature of the unity decision (commentary on Welch). In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann, & J. Müsseler (Eds.), Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events (pp. 389-394). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
35. Wallach, H. (1968). Informational discrepancy as a basis of perceptual adaptation. In S.J. Freeman (Ed.), The neuropsychology of spatially oriented behaviour (pp. 209-230). Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
36. Welch, R.B. (1986). Adaptation of space perception. In K.R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J.P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. I, chap. 24). New York: Wiley.
37. Welch, R.B. (1999). Meaning, attention, and the unity assumption in the intersensory bias of spatial and temporal perceptions. In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann, & J. Müsseler (Eds.), Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events (pp. 371-387). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
38. Welch, R.B., & Warren, D.H. (1980). Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 638-667.