Positional effects in the lexical retuning of speech perception

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 943-950

  Jesse, Alexandra ^a   McQueen, James M ^a,b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Perceptual learning; Speech perception; Talker variability

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053123336     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0129-2     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Allen, J. S., & Miller, J. L. (2004). Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115, 3171-3183.
2. Allen, J. S., Miller, J. L., & deSteno, D. (2003). Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 13, 544-552.
3. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
4. Bertelson, P., Vroomen, J., & de Gelder, B. (2003). Visual recalibration of auditory speech identification: A McGurk aftereffect. Psychological Science, 14, 592-597.
5. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2005). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 4. 3. 14). Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/.
6. Craik, F. I. M., & Kirsner, K. (1974). The effect of speaker's voice on word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26, 274-284.
7. Creelman, C. D. (1957). Case of the unknown talker. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 655.
8. Cutler, A., McQueen, J. M., Butterfield, S., & Norris, D. (2008). Prelexically-driven perceptual retuning of phoneme boundaries. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2008 (p. 2056). Brisbane, Australia.
9. Eisner, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2005). The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 224-238.
10. Eisner, F., & McQueen, J. (2006). Perceptual learning in speech: Stability over time (L). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 1950-1953.
11. Fant, G. (1973). Speech sounds and features (Vol. XI). MIT Press: Cambridge.
12. Foulkes, P., & Docherty, G. (2006). The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 406-438.
13. Hervais-Adelman, A., Davis, M. H., Johnsrude, I. S., & Carlyon, R. P. (2008). Perceptual learning of noise vocoded words: Effects of feedback and lexicality. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 34, 460-474.
14. Jesse, A., & McQueen, J. M. (2007). Prelexical adjustments to speaker idiosyncracies: Are they position-specific? In H. van Hamme & R. van Son (Eds.), Proceedings of Interspeech 2007 (pp. 1597-1600). Adelaide: Causal Productions.
15. Johnson, K., & Mullennix, J. W. (Eds.). (1997). Talker variability in speech processing. San Diego: Academic Press.
16. Keating, P. A., Wright, R., & Zhang, J. (1999). Word-level asymmetries in consonant articulation. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 97, 157-173.
17. Kraljic, T., & Samuel, A. G. (2005). Perceptual learning for speech: Is there a return to normal? Cognitive Psychology, 51, 141-178.
18. Kraljic, T., & Samuel, A. G. (2006). Generalization in perceptual learning for speech. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 262-268.
19. Ladefoged, P., & Broadbent, D. E. (1957). Information conveyed by vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 98-104.
20. Maye, J., Aslin, R. N., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). The weckud wetch of the wast: Lexical adaptation to a novel accent. Cognitive Science, 32, 543-562.
21. McQueen, J. M., & Jesse, A. (2008). Positional specificity in lexical retuning of speech perception. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 13, 7.
22. McQueen, J. M., Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (2006). Phonological abstraction in the mental lexicon. Cognitive Science, 30, 1113-1126.
23. McQueen, J. M., Jesse, A., & Norris, D. (2009). No lexical-prelexical feedback during speech perception. Or: Is it time to stop playing those Christmas tapes? Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 1-18.
24. Miller, J. L., & Liberman, A. M. (1979). Some effects of later-occurring information on the perception of stop consonant and semivowel. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 457-465.
25. Mirman, D., McClelland, J. L., & Holt, L. L. (2006). An interactive Hebbian account of lexically guided tuning of speech perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 958-965.
26. Newman, R. S., Clouse, S. A., & Burnham, J. L. (2001). The perceptual consequences of within-talker variability in fricative production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 1181-1196.
27. Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 299-370.
28. Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2003). Perceptual learning in speech. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 204-238.
29. Nygaard, L. C., Sommers, M. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1994). Speech perception as a talker-contingent process. Psychological Science, 5, 42-46.
30. Peterson, G. E., & Barney, H. L. (1952). Control methods used in a study of the vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24, 175-184.
31. Quené, H. (1992). Durational cues for word segmentation in Dutch. Journal of Phonetics, 20, 331-350.
32. Redford, M. A., & Diehl, R. L. (1999). The relative perceptual distinctiveness of initial and final consonants in CVC syllables. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 1555-1565.
33. Stevens, M. (2007). Perceptual adaptation to phonological differences between language varieties. Unpublished dissertation. Ghent: University Ghent.
34. Theodore, R. M., Miller, J. L., & DeSteno, D. (2009). Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time: Contextual influences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 3974-3982.