Perceptual learning for speech

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 71, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1207-1218

  Samuel, Arthur G ^a   Kraljic, Tanya ^b  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LONG TERM MEMORY; PHONETICS; READING; REVIEW; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ADULT; HUMANS; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; MULTILINGUALISM; PHONETICS; READING; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 70349509463     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.6.1207     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Allen, J. S., & Miller, J. L. (2004). Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115, 3171-3183.
2. Aoyama, K., Flege, J. E., Guion, S. G., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Yamada, T. (2004). Perceived phonetic dissimilarity and L2 speech learning: The case of Japanese /r/ and English /l/ and /r/. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 233-250.
3. Bertelson, P., Vroomen, J., & de Gelder, B. (2003). Visual recalibration of auditory speech identification: A McGurk after effect. Psychological Science, 14, 592-597.
4. Best, C. T. (1994). The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: A perceptual assimilation hypothesis. In J. C. Goodman & H. C. Nusbaum (Eds.), The development of speech perception (pp. 167-224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Goodell, E. (2001). Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 775-794.
6. Bradlow, A. R., Akahane-Yamada, R., Pisoni, D. B., & Tohkura, Y. (1999). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: Long-term retention of learning in perception and production. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 977-985.
7. Bradlow, A. R., & Bent, T. (2008). Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition, 106, 707-729.
8. Bradlow, A. R., Pisoni, D. B., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Tohkura, Y. (1997). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 2299-2310.
9. Clarke, C. M., & Garrett, M. F. (2004). Rapid adaptation to foreign- accented English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 3647-3658.
10. Clarke-Davidson, C. M., Luce, P. A., & Sawusch, J. R. (2008). Does perceptual learning in speech reflect changes in phonetic category representation or decision bias? Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 604-618.
11. Cutler, A., McQueen, J. M., Butterfield, S., & Norris, D. (2008). Prelexically-driven perceptual retuning of phoneme boundaries. Proceedings of Interspeech 2008, Brisbane, Australia.
12. Cutler, A., Weber, A., & Otake, T. (2006). Asymmetric mapping from phonetic to lexical representations in second-language listening. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 269-284.
13. Dahan, D., Drucker, S. J., & Scarborough, R. A. (2008). Talker adaptation in speech perception: Adjusting the signal or the representations? Cognition, 108, 710-718.
14. Davis, M. H., Johnsrude, I. S., Hervais-Adelman, A., Taylor, K., & McGettigan, C. (2005). Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: Evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 222-241.
15. Dupoux, E., & Green, K. (1997). Perceptual adjustment to highly compressed speech: Effects of talker and rate changes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 914-927.
16. Eimas, P. D., & Corbit, J. D. (1973). Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 99-109.
17. Eisner, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2005). The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 224-238.
18. Eisner, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2006). Perceptual learning in speech: Stability over time. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 1950-1953.
19. Fenn, K. M., Nusbaum, H. C., & Margoliash, D. (2003). Consolidation during sleep of perceptual learning of spoken language. Nature, 425, 614-616.
20. Flege, J. E. (1991). Perception and production: The relevance of phonetic input to L2 phonological learning. In C. Ferguson and T. Huebner (Eds.), Crosscurrents in second language acquisition and linguistic theories. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
21. Flege, J. E. (1995). Two procedures for training a novel second language phonetic contrast. Applied Psycholinguistics, 16, 425-442.
22. Fu, Q.-J., & Galvin, J. J., III (2003). The effects of short-term training for spectrally mismatched noise-band speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 1065-1072.
23. Gibson, J. J., & Gibson, E. J. (1955). Perceptual learning: Differentiation or enrichment? Psychological Review, 62, 32-41.
24. Goldinger, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105, 251-279.
25. Goldstone, R. L. (1998). Perceptual learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 585-612.
26. Greenspan, S. L., Nusbaum, H. C., & Pisoni, D. B. (1988). Perceptual learning of synthetic speech produced by rule. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 421-433.
27. Hervais-Adelman, A., Davis, M. H., Johnsrude, I. S., & Carlyon, R. P. (2008). Perceptual learning of noise vocoded words: Effects of feedback and lexicality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 34, 460-474.
28. Kingston, J. (2003). Learning foreign vowels. Language & Speech, 46, 295-349.
29. Klatt, D. H. (1976). The linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59, 1208-1221.
30. Kraljic, T., Brennan, S. E., & Samuel, A. G. (2008). Accommodating variation: Dialects, idiolects, and speech processing. Cognition, 107, 54-81.
31. Kraljic, T., & Samuel, A. G. (2005). Perceptual learning for speech: Is there a return to normal? Cognitive Psychology, 51, 141-178.
32. Kraljic, T., & Samuel, A. G. (2006). Generalization in perceptual learning for speech. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 262-268.
33. Kraljic, T., & Samuel, A. G. (2007). Perceptual adjustments to multiple speakers. Journal of Memory & Language, 56, 1-15.
34. Kraljic, T., Samuel, A. G., & Brennan, S. E. (2008). First impressions and last resorts: How listeners adjust to speaker variability. Psychological Science, 19, 332-338.
35. Leach, L., & Samuel, A. G. (2007). Lexical configuration and lexical engagement: When adults learn new words. Cognitive Psychology, 55, 306-353.
36. Lively, S. E., Logan, J. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/ II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94, 1242-1255.
37. Lively, S. E., Pisoni, D. B., Yamada, R. A., Tohkura, Y., & Yamada, T. (1994). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. III. Long-term retention of new phonetic categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96, 2076-2087.
38. Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B. (1991). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: A first report. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 874-886.
39. Maye, J., Aslin, R. N., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). The weckud wetch of the wast: Lexical adaptation to a novel accent. Cognitive Science, 32, 543-562.
40. McGarr, N. S. (1983). The intelligibility of deaf speech to experienced and inexperienced listeners. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 26, 451-458.
41. McQueen, J. M., Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (2006). Phonological abstraction in the mental lexicon. Cognitive Science, 30, 1113-1126.
42. McQueen, J. M., Norris, D., & Cutler, A. (2006). The dynamic nature of speech perception. Language & Speech, 49, 101-112.
43. Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2003). Perceptual learning in speech. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 204-238.
44. Nygaard, L. C., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Talker-specific learning in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 355-376.
45. Nygaard, L. C., Sommers, M. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1994). Speech perception as a talker-contingent process. Psychological Science, 5, 42-46.
46. Pallier, C., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Dupoux, E., Christophe, A., & Mehler, J. (1998). Perceptual adjustment to time-compressed speech: A cross-linguistic study. Memory & Cognition, 26, 844-851.
47. Peterson, G. E., & Lehiste, I. (1960). Duration of syllabic nuclei in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32, 693-703.
48. Remez, R. E., Rubin, P. E., Pisoni, D. B., & Carrell, T. D. (1981). Speech perception without traditional speech cues. Science, 212, 947-950.
49. Rosen, S., Faulkner, A., & Wilkinson, L. (1999). Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: Implications for cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 3629-3636.
50. Samuel, A. G. (1986). Red herring detectors and speech perception: In defense of selective adaptation. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 452-499.
51. Sebastián-Gallés, N., Dupoux, E., Costa, A., & Mehler, J. (2000). Adaptation to time-compressed speech: Phonological determinants. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 834-842.
52. Stacey, P. C., & Summerfield, A. Q. (2007). Effectiveness of computer- based auditory training in improving the perception of noise-vocoded speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121, 2923- 2935.
53. Strange, W., Jenkins, J. J., & Johnson, T. L. (1983). Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 74, 695-705.
54. Teinonen, T., Aslin, R. N., Alku, P., & Csibra, G. (2008). Visual speech contributes to phonetic learning in 6-month-old infants. Cognition, 108, 850-855.
55. van Linden, S., & Vroomen, J. (2007). Recalibration of phonetic categories by lipread speech versus lexical information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 1483-1494.
56. van Linden, S., & Vroomen, J. (2008). Audiovisual speech recalibration in children. Journal of Child Language, 35, 809-822.
57. Volkmann, A. (1858). Ueber den Einfluss der Uebung auf das Erkennen räumlicher Distanzen. Berichte über die Verhandlungen der Königlich Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Mathematisch-Physische Classe, 10, 38-69.
58. Vroomen, J., & Baart, M. (2009a). Phonetic recalibration only occurs in speech mode. Cognition, 110, 254-259.
59. Vroomen, J., & Baart, M. (2009b). Recalibration of phonetic categories by lipread speech: Measuring aftereffects after a 24-hour delay. Language & Speech, 52, 341-350.
60. Vroomen, J., van Linden, S., de Gelder, B., & Bertelson, P. (2007). Visual recalibration and selective adaptation in auditory-visual speech perception: Contrasting build-up courses. Neuropsychologia, 45, 572-577.
61. Vroomen, J., van Linden, S., Keetels, M., de Gelder, B., & Bertelson, P. (2004). Selective adaptation and recalibration of auditory speech by lipread information: Dissipation. Speech Communication, 44, 55-61.
62. Wang, Y., Spence, M. M., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. A. (1999). Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 3649-3658.