Recalibration of Phonetic Categories by Lipread Speech Versus Lexical Information

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1483-1494

  van Linden, Sabine ^a   Vroomen, Jean ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

lexical information; lipreading; perceptual learning; recalibration; speech perception

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LIP READING; MALE; PHONETICS; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LIPREADING; MALE; PHONETICS; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 38349103731     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1483     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Baayen R.H., Piepenbrock R., and van Rijn H. The CELEX Lexical Database (Release 1) [CD-ROM] (1993), Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
2. Bertelson P., Vroomen J., and de Gelder B. Visual recalibration of auditory speech identification: A McGurk aftereffect. Psychological Science 14 (2003) 592-597
3. Brancazio L. Lexical influences in audiovisual speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30 (2004) 445-463
4. Cutler A., Mehler J., Norris D., and Segui J. Phoneme identification and the lexicon. Cognitive Psychology 19 (1987) 141-177
5. Eimas P.D., and Corbit J.D. Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors. Cognitive Psychology 4 (1973) 99-109
6. Eisner F., and McQueen J.M. Perceptual learning in speech: Stability over time. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119 (2006) 1950-1953
7. Fox R.A. Effects of lexical status on phonetic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10 (1984) 526-540
8. Ganong W.F. Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 6 (1980) 110-125
9. Green K.P. The use of auditory and visual information during phonetic processing: Implications for theories on speech perception. In: Campbell R., Dodd B., and Burnham D. (Eds). Hearing by eye: II. Advances in the psychology of speechreading and auditory-visual speech (1998), Psychology Press, Hove, England
10. Kraljic T., and Samuel A.G. Perceptual learning for speech: Is there a return to normal?. Cognitive Psychology 51 (2005) 141-178
11. Kraljic T., and Samuel A.G. Generalization in perceptual learning for speech. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13 (2006) 262-268
12. Kuhl P.K., and Meltzoff A.N. Infant vocalizations in response to speech: Vocal imitation and developmental chance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100 (1996) 425-438
13. Massaro D.W. Speech perception by ear and eye: A paradigm for psychological inquiry (1987), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
14. McClelland J.L., and Elman J.L. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology 18 (1986) 1-86
15. McGurk H., and MacDonald J. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 264 (1976, December 23-30) 746-748
16. Montgomery A.A., Walden B.E., and Prosek R.A. Effects of consonatal context on vowel lipreading. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 30 (1987) 50-59
17. Munhall K.G., and Tohkura Y. Audiovisual gating and the time course of speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 104 (1998) 530-539
18. Norris D., McQueen J.M., and Cutler A. Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2000) 299-370
19. Norris D., McQueen J.M., and Cutler A. Perceptual learning in speech. Cognitive Psychology 47 (2003) 204-238
20. Pitt M.A. The locus of the lexical shift in phoneme identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21 (1995) 1037-1052
21. Samuel A.G. The role of bottom-up confirmation in the phonemic restoration illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 7 (1981) 1123-1131
22. Samuel A.G. Red herring detectors and speech perception: In defense of selective adaptation. Cognitive Psychology 18 (1986) 452-499
23. Schwartz J.L., Robert-Ribes J., and Escudier P. 10 years after Summerfield: A taxonomy of models for audio-visual fusion in speech perception. In: Campbell R., Dodd B., and Burnham D. (Eds). Hearing by eye: II. Advances in the psychology of speechreading and auditory-visual speech (1998), Psychology Press, Hove, England 85-108
24. Sumby W.H., and Pollack I. Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 26 (1954) 212-215
25. Summerfield Q. Some preliminaries to a comprehensive account of audio-visual speech perception. In: Dodd B., and Campbell R. (Eds). Hearing by eye: The psychology of lip reading (1987), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 3-51
26. Vroomen, J. (1992). Hearing voices and seeing lips: Investigations in the psychology of lipreading. Unpublished manuscript, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
27. Vroomen J., van Linden S., de Gelder B., and Bertelson P. Visual recalibration and selective adaptation in auditory-visual speech perception: Contrasting build-up courses. Neuropsychologia 45 (2007) 572-577
28. Vroomen J., van Linden S., Keetels M., de Gelder B., and Bertelson P. Selective adaptation and recalibration of auditory speech by lipread information: Dissipation. Speech Communication 44 (2004) 55-61
29. Warren D.H. Intermodality interactions in spatial localization. Cognitive Psychology 1 (1970) 114-133