Sociopsychological tailoring to address colorectal cancer screening disparities: A randomized controlled trial

Annals of Family Medicine

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 204-214

  Jerant, Anthony ^a   Kravitz, Richard L ^a   Sohler, Nancy ^b   Fiscella, Kevin ^c   Romero, Raquel L ^d   Parnes, Bennett ^e   Tancredi, Daniel J ^a,f   Aguilar Gaxiola, Sergio ^a,f   Slee, Christina ^g   Dvorak, Simon ^a   Turner, Charles ^a   Hudnut, Andrew ^h   Prieto, Francisco ^h   Franks, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^h Sutter Medical Foundation   (United States)

Author keywords

Colorectal neoplasms; Computer assisted instruction; Early detection of cancer; Expanded health belief model; Health behavior; Health care disparities; Health education; Health promotion; Hispanic Americans; Outcome and process assessment (health care); Patient acceptance of health care; Randomized controlled trial; Software

Indexed keywords

AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DISPARITY; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PROMOTION; HISPANIC; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; OCCULT BLOOD; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SELF CONCEPT; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

AGED; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTHCARE DISPARITIES; HISPANIC AMERICANS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCCULT BLOOD; PSYCHOLOGY; SELF EFFICACY; SIGMOIDOSCOPY;

EID: 84900435222     PISSN: 15441709     EISSN: 15441717     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1370/afm.1623     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Klabunde CN, Cronin KA, Breen N, Waldron WR, Ambs AH, Nadel MR. Trends in colorectal cancer test use among vulnerable populations in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011; 20(8):1611-1621.
2. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):627-637.
3. Jerant AF, Arellanes RE, Franks P. Factors associated with Hispanic/ non-Hispanic white colorectal cancer screening disparities. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(8):1241-1245.
4. Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH. Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Educ Q. 1988;15(2):175-183.
5. Sabatino SA, Lawrence B, Elder R, et al; Community Preventive Services Task Force. Effectiveness of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers: nine updated systematic reviews for the guide to community preventive services. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(1):97-118.
6. Chua RY, Iyengar SS. Empowerment through choice? A critical analysis of the effects of choice in organizations. Res Organ Behav. 2006;27:41-79.
7. Hawkins RP, Kreuter M, Resnicow K, Fishbein M, Dijkstra A. Understanding tailoring in communicating about health. Health Educ Res. 2008;23(3):454-466.
8. Jerant A, Sohler N, Fiscella K, Franks B, Franks P. Tailored interactive multimedia computer programs to reduce health disparities: opportunities and challenges. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;85(2):323-330.
9. Petty RE, Cacioppo JT. Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1986.
10. Jerant A, Kravitz RL, Rooney M, Amerson S, Kreuter M, Franks P. Effects of a tailored interactive multimedia computer program on determinants of colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled pilot study in physician offices. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;66 (1):67-74.
11. Rawl SM, Skinner CS, Perkins SM, et al. Computer-delivered tailored intervention improves colon cancer screening knowledge and health beliefs of African-Americans. Health Educ Res. 2012;27(5):868-885.
12. Mosher CE, Fuemmeler BF, Sloane R, et al. Change in self-efficacy partially mediates the effects of the FRESH START intervention on cancer survivors' dietary outcomes. Psychooncology. 2008;17(10): 1014-1023.
13. Napolitano MA, Papandonatos GD, Lewis BA, et al. Mediators of physical activity behavior change: a multivariate approach. Health Psychol. 2008;27(4):409-418.
14. Emmons KM, Wong M, Puleo E, Weinstein N, Fletcher R, Colditz G. Tailored computer-based cancer risk communication: correcting colorectal cancer risk perception. J Health Commun. 2004;9(2): 127-141.
15. Costanza ME, Luckmann R, Stoddard AM, et al. Using tailored telephone counseling to accelerate the adoption of colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Detect Prev. 2007;31(3):191-198.
16. Myers RE, Hyslop T, Sifri R, et al. Tailored navigation in colorectal cancer screening. Med Care. 2008;46(9)(Suppl 1):S123-S131.
17. Christy SM, Perkins SM, Tong Y, et al. Promoting colorectal cancer screening discussion: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2013;44(4):325-329.
18. Glenn BA, Herrmann AK, Crespi CM, et al. Changes in risk perceptions in relation to self-reported colorectal cancer screening among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer cases enrolled in a randomized trial. Health Psychol. 2011;30(4):481-491.
19. Ruffin MT IV, Fetters MD, Jimbo M. Preference-based electronic decision aid to promote colorectal cancer screening: results of a randomized controlled trial. Prev Med. 2007;45(4):267-273.
20. Miller DP Jr, Spangler JG, Case LD, Goff DC Jr, Singh S, Pignone MP. Effectiveness of a web-based colorectal cancer screening patient decision aid: a randomized controlled trial in a mixedliteracy population. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(6):608-615.
21. Kukafka R, Lussier YA, Eng P, Patel VL, Cimino JJ. Web-based tailoring and its effect on self-efficacy: results from the MI-HEART randomized controlled trial. Proc AMIA Symp. 2002;410-414.
22. Rawl SM, Champion VL, Scott LL, et al. A randomized trial of two print interventions to increase colon cancer screening among firstdegree relatives. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;71(2):215-227.
23. Krebs P, Prochaska JO, Rossi JS. A meta-analysis of computertailored interventions for health behavior change. Prev Med. 2010; 51(3-4):214-221.
24. Noar SM, Benac CN, Harris MS. Does tailoring matter? Metaanalytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychol Bull. 2007;133(4):673-693.
25. Walsh JM, Salazar R, Nguyen TT, et al. Healthy colon, healthy life: a novel colorectal cancer screening intervention. Am J Prev Med. 2010;39(1):1-14.
26. Vernon SW, Bartholomew LK, McQueen A, et al. A randomized controlled trial of a tailored interactive computer-delivered intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening: sometimes more is just the same. Ann Behav Med. 2011;41(3):284-299.
27. Myers RE, Sifri R, Hyslop T, et al. A randomized controlled trial of the impact of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening. Cancer. 2007;110(9):2083-2091.
28. Manne SL, Coups EJ, Markowitz A, et al. A randomized trial of generic versus tailored interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening among intermediate risk siblings. Ann Behav Med. 2009; 37(2):207-217.
29. Marcus AC, Mason M, Wolfe P, et al. The efficacy of tailored print materials in promoting colorectal cancer screening: results from a randomized trial involving callers to the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service. J Health Commun. 2005;10(Suppl 1):83-104.
30. Weinberg DS, Keenan E, Ruth K, Devarajan K, Rodoletz M, Bieber EJ. A randomized comparison of print and web communication on colorectal cancer screening. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(2):122-129.
31. Neville LM, O'Hara B, Milat AJ. Computer-tailored dietary behaviour change interventions: a systematic review. Health Educ Res. 2009;24(4):699-720.
32. Rimer BK, Conaway M, Lyna P, et al. The impact of tailored interventions on a community health center population. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;37(2):125-140.
33. Myers RE, Bittner-Fagan H, Daskalakis C, et al. A randomized controlled trial of a tailored navigation and a standard intervention in colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013; 22(1):109-117.
34. Menon U, Belue R, Wahab S, et al. A randomized trial comparing the effect of two phone-based interventions on colorectal cancer screening adherence. Ann Behav Med. 2011;42(3):294-303.
35. Fenton JJ, Jerant AF, von Friederichs-Fitzwater MM, Tancredi DJ, Franks P. Physician counseling for colorectal cancer screening: impact on patient attitudes, beliefs, and behavior. J Am Board Fam Med. 2011;24(6):673-681.
36. Cameron KA, Francis L, Wolf MS, Baker DW, Makoul G. Investigating Hispanic/Latino perceptions about colorectal cancer screening: a community-based approach to effective message design. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;68(2):145-152.
37. American Cancer Society. Guidelines for the early detection of cancer. 2013. http://www.cancer.org/Healthy/FindCancerEarly/ CancerScreeningGuidelines/american-cancer-society-guidelinesfor-the-early-detection-of-cancer.
38. Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Generation of allocation sequences in randomised trials: chance, not choice. Lancet. 2002;359(9305):515-519.
39. Pressman RS. Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach. 6th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2005.
40. Jerant A, Kravitz RL, Fiscella K, et al. Effects of tailored knowledge enhancement on colorectal cancer screening preference across ethnic and language groups. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;90(1):103-110.
41. O'Connor AM, Fiset V, DeGrasse C, et al. Decision aids for patients considering options affecting cancer outcomes: evidence of efficacy and policy implications. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1999;25(25):67-80.
42. Kreuter M, Farrell D, Olevitch L, Brennan L. Tailoring Health Messages: Customizing Communication With Computer Technology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000.
43. Deci EL, Ryan RM. The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987;53(6):1024-1037.
44. Miller SM. Monitoring versus blunting styles of coping with cancer influence the information patients want and need about their disease. Implications for cancer screening and management. Cancer. 1995;76(2):167-177.
45. Peterson C, Stunkard AJ. Personal control and health promotion. Soc Sci Med. 1989;28(8):819-828.
46. Freed E, Long D, Rodriguez T, Franks P, Kravitz RL, Jerant A. The effects of two health information texts on patient recognition memory: a randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;92(2): 260-265.
47. National Cancer Institute. Tests to detect colorectal cancer and polyps. 2011. http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/detection/ colorectal-screening.
48. Instituto Nacional del Cáncer. Exámenes para detectar el cáncer colorrectal y los pólipos. 2011. http://www.cancer.gov/espanol/recursos/ hojas-informativas/deteccion-diagnostico/examenes-colorrectal.
49. O'Connor AM. User manual-knowledge. 2000. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. http://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/User_ Manuals/UM_Knowledge.pdf.
50. Vernon SW, Myers RE, Tilley BC. Development and validation of an instrument to measure factors related to colorectal cancer screening adherence. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997;6(10):825-832.
51. O'Connor AM. User manual-decision self-efficacy scale. 1995. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. http://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/ develop/User_Manuals/UM_Decision_SelfEfficacy.pdf.
52. Rawl S, Champion V, Menon U, Loehrer PJ, Vance GH, Skinner CS. Validation of scales to measure benefits of and barriers to colorectal cancer screening. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2001;19:47-63.
53. Prochaska JO, Goldstein MG. Process of smoking cessation. Implications for clinicians. Clin Chest Med. 1991;12(4):727-735.
54. Morris NS, MacLean CD, Chew LD, Littenberg B. The Single Item Literacy Screener: evaluation of a brief instrument to identify limited reading ability. BMC Fam Pract. 2006;7:21.
55. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220-233.
56. Lairson DR, DiCarlo M, Myers RE, et al. Cost-effectiveness of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening use. Cancer. 2008;112(4):779-788.
57. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis For the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988.
58. Resnicow K, Davis RE, Zhang G, et al. Tailoring a fruit and vegetable intervention on novel motivational constructs: results of a randomized study. Ann Behav Med. 2008;35(2):159-169.
59. Cesario J, Grant H, Higgins ET. Regulatory fit and persuasion: transfer from "Feeling Right". J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004;86(3):388-404.
60. Denberg TD, Melhado TV, Coombes JM, et al. Predictors of nonadherence to screening colonoscopy. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20 (11):989-995.
61. Jerant AF, Fenton JJ, Franks P. Determinants of racial/ethnic colorectal cancer screening disparities. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(12):1317-1324.
62. Kravitz RL, Franks P, Feldman MD, et al. Patient engagement programs for recognition and initial treatment of depression in primary care: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;310(17):1818-1828.
63. Dietrich AJ, Tobin JN, Cassells A, et al. Telephone care management to improve cancer screening among low-income women: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(8):563-571.
64. Ferreira MR, Dolan NC, Fitzgibbon ML, et al. Health care providerdirected intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among veterans: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(7):1548-1554.
65. Schneider F, de Vries H, Candel M, van de Kar A, van Osch L. Periodic email prompts to re-use an internet-delivered computertailored lifestyle program: influence of prompt content and timing. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(1):e23.