Effects of tailored knowledge enhancement on colorectal cancer screening preference across ethnic and language groups

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 90, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 103-110

  Jerant, Anthony ^a   Kravitz, Richard L ^a   Fiscella, Kevin ^b   Sohler, Nancy ^c   Romero, Raquel Lozano ^d   Parnes, Bennett ^e   Aguilar Gaxiola, Sergio ^a   Turner, Charles ^f   Dvorak, Simon ^f   Franks, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY   (United States)

^c CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Attitudes, and practices; Colonoscopy; Colorectal neoplasms diagnosis; Computer assisted instruction methods; Health behavior; Health knowledge; Healthcare disparities; Hispanic Americans; Language; Mass screening; Multicenter study; Multimedia; Occult blood; Patient acceptance of health care; Patient education as topic methods; Patient preference

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; HISPANIC; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); OCCULT BLOOD TEST; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; ETHNIC GROUPS; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERVENTION STUDIES; LANGUAGE; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OCCULT BLOOD; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84870789076     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: 18735134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.08.017     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Screening for colorectal cancer: U. S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2008, 149:627-637.
2. Klabunde C.N., Cronin K.A., Breen N., Waldron W.R., Ambs A.H., Nadel M.R. Trends in colorectal cancer test use among vulnerable populations in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011, 20:1611-1621.
3. Jerant A.F., Fenton J.J., Franks P. Determinants of racial/ethnic colorectal cancer screening disparities. Arch Intern Med 2008, 168:1317-1324.
4. Jerant A. Increasing uptake of colorectal cancer screening. Brit Med J 2009, 338:a2658.
5. Hawley S.T., McQueen A., Bartholomew L.K., Greisinger A.J., Coan S.P., Myers R., et al. Preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests and screening test use in a large multispecialty primary care practice. Cancer 2012, 118:2726-2734.
6. McQueen A., Vernon S.W., Myers R.E., Watts B.G., Lee E.S., Tilley B.C. Correlates and predictors of colorectal cancer screening among male automotive workers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007, 16:500-509.
7. Wiggers L.C., Stalmeier P.F., Oort F.J., Smets E.M., Legemate D.A., de Haes J.C. Do patients' preferences predict smoking cessation?. Prev Med 2005, 41:667-675.
8. Clark N.M., Janz N.K., Dodge J.A., Mosca L., Lin X., Long Q., et al. The effect of patient choice of intervention on health outcomes. Contemp Clin Trials 2008, 29:679-686.
9. Swift J.K., Callahan J.L. The impact of client treatment preferences on outcome: a meta-analysis. J Clin Psychol 2009, 65:368-381.
10. Basch C.E., Wolf R.L., Brouse C.H., Shmukler C., Neugut A., DeCarlo L.T., et al. Telephone outreach to increase colorectal cancer screening in an urban minority population. Am J Public Health 2006, 96:2246-2253.
11. Fjeldsoe B.S., Marshall A.L., Miller Y.D. Behavior change interventions delivered by mobile telephone short-message service. Am J Prev Med 2009, 36:165-173.
12. Krebs P., Prochaska J.O., Rossi J.S. A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. Prev Med 2010, 51:214-221.
13. Noar S.M., Benac C.N., Harris M.S. Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychol Bull 2007, 133:673-693.
14. Wanyonyi K.L., Themessl-Huber M., Humphris G., Freeman R. A systematic review and meta-analysis of face-to-face communication of tailored health messages: implications for practice. Patient Educ Couns 2011, 85:348-355.
15. Dietrich A.J., Tobin J.N., Cassells A., Robinson C.M., Greene M.A., Sox C.H., et al. Telephone care management to improve cancer screening among low-income women: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2006, 144:563-571.
16. Fiscella K., Humiston S., Hendren S., Winters P., Idris A., Li S.X., et al. A multimodal intervention to promote mammography and colorectal cancer screening in a safety-net practice. J Natl Med Assoc 2011, 103:762-768.
17. Manne S.L., Coups E.J., Markowitz A., Meropol N.J., Haller D., Jacobsen P.B., et al. A randomized trial of generic versus tailored interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening among intermediate risk siblings. Ann Behav Med 2009, 37:207-217.
18. Marcus A.C., Mason M., Wolfe P., Rimer B.K., Lipkus I., Strecher V., et al. The efficacy of tailored print materials in promoting colorectal cancer screening: results from a randomized trial involving callers to the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service. J Health Commun 2005, 10:83-104.
19. Siddiqui A.A., Sifri R., Hyslop T., Andrel J., Rosenthal M., Vernon S.W., et al. Race and response to colon cancer screening interventions. Prev Med 2011, 52:262-264.
20. Walsh J.M., Salazar R., Nguyen T.T., Kaplan C., Nguyen L.K., Hwang J., et al. Healthy colon, healthy life: a novel colorectal cancer screening intervention. Am J Prev Med 2010, 39:1-14.
21. Jerant A., Kravitz R.L., Rooney M., Amerson S., Kreuter M., Franks P. Effects of a tailored interactive multimedia computer program on determinants of colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled pilot study in physician offices. Patient Educ Couns 2007, 66:67-74.
22. Part two: models of health behavior. Health behavior and health education. Theory, research, and practice 2002, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. 3rd ed. K. Glanz, B.K. Rimer, F.M. Lewis (Eds.).
23. Schumann A., John U., Ulbricht S., Ruge J., Bischof G., Meyer C. Computer-generated tailored feedback letters for smoking cessation: theoretical and empirical variability of tailoring. Int J Med Inform 2008, 77:715-722.
24. Jerant A., Sohler N., Fiscella K., Franks B., Franks P. Tailored interactive multimedia computer programs to reduce health disparities: opportunities and challenges. Patient Educ Couns 2011, 85:323-330.
25. CDC health disparities and inequalities report - United States. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2011, 60:1-113.
26. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer. Available at: [accessed 03.03.12]. http://www.cancer.org/Healthy/FindCancerEarly/CancerScreeningGuidelines/american-cancer-society-guidelines-for-the-early-detection-of-cancer.
27. Pressman R.S. Software engineering: a practitioner's approach 2005, McGraw-Hill, New York. 6th ed.
28. Kincaid JP, Fishburne RP, Rogers RL, Chissom BS. Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy-enlisted personnel. Research Branch Report 8-75. Memphis, TN: U.S. Naval Air Station; 1975.
29. Kreuter M., Farrell D., Olevitch L., Brennan L. Tailoring health messages: customizing communication with computer technology 2000, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
30. Miller S.M., Mangan C.E. Interacting effects of information and coping style in adapting to gynecologic stress: should the doctor tell all?. J Pers Soc Psychol 1983, 45:223-236.
31. Miller S.M. Monitoring versus blunting styles of coping with cancer influence the information patients want and need about their disease. Implications for cancer screening and management. Cancer 1995, 76:167-177.
32. Ware J., Kosinski M., Keller S.D. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996, 34:220-233.
33. Morris N.S., MacLean C.D., Chew L.D., Littenberg B. The single item literacy screener: evaluation of a brief instrument to identify limited reading ability. BMC Fam Pract 2006, 7:21.
34. Hibbard J.H., Mahoney E.R., Stockard J., Tusler M. Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Serv Res 2005, 40:1918-1930.
35. Alegria M., Sribney W., Perez D., Laderman M., Keefe K. The role of patient activation on patient-provider communication and quality of care for US and foreign born Latino patients. J Gen Intern Med 2009, 24:534-541.
36. Benet-Martinez V., John O.P. Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: multitrait multimethod analyses of the big five in Spanish and English. J Pers Soc Psychol 1998, 75:729-750.
37. John O.P., Donahue E.M., Kentle L.K. The Big Five inventory - version 4a and 54. Technical Report 1991, Institute of Personality and Social Research, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
38. Soto C.J., John O.P. Ten facet scales for the Big Five Inventory: convergence with NEO PI-R facets, self-peer agreement, and discriminant validity. J Res Pers 2009, 43:84-90.
39. Graubard B.I., Korn E.L. Predictive margins with survey data. Biometrics 2004, 55:652-659.
40. Cloutier J., Neil Macrae C. The feeling of choosing: Self-involvement and the cognitive status of things past. Conscious Cogn 2008, 17:125-135.
41. Costanza M.E., Luckmann R., Stoddard A.M., White M.J., Stark J.R., Avrunin J.S., et al. Using tailored telephone counseling to accelerate the adoption of colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Detect Prev 2007, 31:191-198.
42. Simon S.R., Zhang F., Soumerai S.B., Ensroth A., Bernstein L., Fletcher R.H., et al. Failure of automated telephone outreach with speech recognition to improve colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 2010, 170:264-270.
43. Rawl S.M., Champion V.L., Scott L.L., Zhou H., Monahan P., Ding Y., et al. A randomized trial of two print interventions to increase colon cancer screening among first-degree relatives. Patient Educ Couns 2008, 71:215-227.
44. Myers R.E., Sifri R., Hyslop T., Rosenthal M., Vernon S.W., Cocroft J., et al. A randomized controlled trial of the impact of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening. Cancer 2007, 110:2083-2091.
45. Vernon S.W., Bartholomew L.K., McQueen A., Bettencourt J.L., Greisinger A., Coan S.P., et al. A randomized controlled trial of a tailored interactive computer-delivered intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening: sometimes more is just the same. Ann Behav Med 2011, 41:284-299.
46. Lairson D.R., DiCarlo M., Myers R.E., Wolf T., Cocroft J., Sifri R., et al. Cost-effectiveness of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening use. Cancer 2008, 112:779-788.
47. Baranowski T., Cullen K.W., Nicklas T., Thompson D., Baranowski J. Are current health behavioral change models helpful in guiding prevention of weight gain efforts?. Obes Res 2003, 11:23S-43S.
48. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control 1997, Freeman, New York, NY.
49. Lairson D.R., Chang Y.C., Bettencourt J.L., Vernon S.W., Greisinger A. Estimating development cost for a tailored interactive computer program to enhance colorectal cancer screening compliance. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006, 13:476-484.
50. Hill L.H. Adult education for health and wellness: new directions for adult and continuing education 2011, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
51. John OP. The Big Five Inventory: frequently asked questions. Available at: [accessed 03.11.12]. http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~johnlab/bfi.htm.
52. Arai S., Nakaya N., Kakizaki M., Ohmori-Matsuda K., Shimazu T., Kuriyama S., et al. Personality and gastric cancer screening attendance: a cross-sectional analysis from the Miyagi Cohort Study. J Epidemiol 2009, 19:34-40.
53. Axelsson M., Brink E., Lundgren J., Lotvall J. The influence of personality traits on reported adherence to medication in individuals with chronic disease: an epidemiological study in West Sweden. PloS ONE 2011, 6:e18241.
54. Emilsson M., Berndtsson I., Lotvall J., Millqvist E., Lundgren J., Johansson A., et al. The influence of personality traits and beliefs about medicines on adherence to asthma treatment. Primary Care Resp J 2011, 20:141-147.
55. Jerant A., Chapman B., Duberstein P., Robbins J., Franks P. Personality and medication non-adherence among older adults enrolled in a six-year trial. Brit J Health Psychol 2011, 16:151-169.
56. Skolasky R.L., Green A.F., Scharfstein D., Boult C., Reider L., Wegener S.T. Psychometric properties of the patient activation measure among multimorbid older adults. Health Serv Res 2011, 46:457-478.
57. Skolasky R.L., Mackenzie E.J., Wegener S.T., Riley L.H. Patient activation and adherence to physical therapy in persons undergoing spine surgery. Spine 2008, 33:E784-E791.
58. Hibbard JH, Cunningham PJ. How engaged are consumers in their health and health care, and why does it matter. HSC Research Brief No. 8. 2008. Available at: [accessed 02.17.12]. http://hschange.org/CONTENT/1019/%23ib8.