Computer-delivered tailored intervention improves colon cancer screening knowledge and health beliefs of African-Americans

Health Education Research

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 868-885

  Rawl, Susan M ^a   Skinner, Celette Sugg ^b   Perkins, Susan M ^a   Springston, Jeffrey ^c   Wang, Hsiao Lan ^d   Russell, Kathleen M ^a   Tong, Yan ^a   Gebregziabher, Netsanet ^a   Krier, Connie ^a   Smith Howell, Esther ^a   Brady Watts, Tawana ^a   Myers, Laura J ^a,e   Ballard, Deborah ^f   Rhyant, Broderick ^a   Willis, Deanna R ^a   Imperiale, Thomas F ^a   Champion, Victoria L ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^e Roudebush VAMC   (United States)

^f Norton Cancer Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFRICAN AMERICAN; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COLON TUMOR; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; UNITED STATES;

AFRICAN AMERICANS; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; UNITED STATES; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84866358206     PISSN: 02681153     EISSN: 14653648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/her/cys094     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Edwards BK, Ward E, Kohler BA et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates. Cancer 2010; 116: 544-73.
2. American Cancer Society. Colorectal Cancer Facts & Figures 2008-2010. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2008.
3. American Cancer Society. Cancer Prevention & Early Detection. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2010.
4. Center for Disease Control. CDC surveillance summaries; Surveillance of screening-detected cancers (colon and rectum, breast, and cervix). Morbidity Mortality Weekly Rep 2010; 59: 1-26.
5. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer, and the american college of radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 2008; 58: 130-60.
6. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures for African Americans 2009-2010. Atlanta GA: American Cancer Society, 2009.
7. Rex DK, Rawl S, Rabeneck L et al. Colorectal cancer in African Americans. Rev Gastroenterol Disord 2004; 4: 60-5.
8. Greiner KA, Born W, Nollen N et al. Knowledge and perceptions of colorectal cancer screening among urban African Americans. J Gen Intern Med 2005; 20: 977-83.
9. Myers RE, Trock BJ, Lerman C et al. Adherence to colorectal cancer screening in an HMO population. Prevent Med 1990; 19: 502-14.
10. Holt WS Jr. Factors affecting compliance with screening sigmoidoscopy. J Fam Pract 1991; 32: 585-9.
11. Kelly R, Shank J. Adherence to screening flexible sigmoidoscopy in asymptomatic patients. Med Care 1992; 30: 1029-42.
12. Lewis SF, Jensen NM. Screening sigmoidoscopy. Factors associated with utilization. J Gen Int Med 1996; 11: 542-4.
13. Mandelson MT, Curry SJ, Anderson LA et al. Colorectal cancer screening participation by older women. Am J Prev Med 2000; 19: 149-54.
14. Weitzman ER, Zapka J, Estabrook B et al. Risk and reluctance: understanding impediments to colorectal cancer screening. Prev Med 2001; 32: 502-13.
15. Zapka JG, Puleo E, Vickers-LahtiMet al. Healthcare system factors and colorectal cancer screening. Am J Prev Med 2002; 23: 28-35.
16. O'Malley AS, Forrest CB, Mandelblatt J. adherence of lowincome women to cancer screening recommendations.J Gen Int Med 2002; 17: 144-54.
17. Krebs P, Prochaska JO, Rossi JS. A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. Prev Med 2010; 51: 214-21.
18. Albada A, Ausems MG, Bensing JM et al. Tailored information about cancer risk and screening: a systematic review. Patient Edu Counsel 2009; 77: 155-71.
19. Kroeze W, Werkman A, Brug J. A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors. Ann Behav Med 2006; 31: 205-23.
20. Noar SM, Benac CN, Harris MS. Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychol Bull 2007; 133: 673-93.
21. Velicer WF, Prochaska JO, Redding CA. Tailored communications for smoking cessation: past successes and future directions. Drug Alcohol Rev 2006; 25: 49-57.
22. Revere D, Dunbar PJ. Review of computer-generated outpatient health behavior interventions: clinical encounters 'in absentia'. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001; 8: 62-79.
23. Kreuter MW, Farrell D, Olevitch L et al. Tailoring Health Messages: Customizing Communication with Computer Technology. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000.
24. Strecher VJ, Greenwood T,Wang C et al. Interactive multimedia and risk communiction. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1999; 25: 134-9.
25. Brug J, Campbell M, van Assema P. The application and impact of computer-generated personalized nutrition education: a review of the literature. Patient Edu Counsel 1999; 36: 145-56.
26. Skinner CS, Campbell MK, Rimer BK et al. How effective is tailored print communication? Ann Behav Med 1999; 21: 290-8.
27. Edwards AGK, Evans R, Hood K, Elwyn GJ. Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 4. No. CD001865. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001865. pub2.
28. Petty RE, Cacioppo JT. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 1986; 19: 123-205.
29. Petty R, Barden J, Wheeler S. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion: developing health promotions for sustained behavioral change. In: DiClemente R, Crosby R,KegelerM(eds). Emerging Theories in Health Promotion Practice and Research. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2009, 185-214.
30. Lipkus IM, Rimer BK, Halabi S et al. Can tailored interventions increase mammography use among HMO women? Am J PrevMed 2000; 18: 1-10.
31. Rakowski W, Ehrich B, Goldstein MG et al. Increasing mammography among women aged 40-74 by use of a stage-matched, tailored intervention. Prev Med 1998; 27: 748-56.
32. Clark MA, Rakowski W, Ehrich B et al. The effect of a stage-matched and tailored intervention on repeat mammography (1). Am J Prev Med 2002; 22: 1-7.
33. Steinwachs D, Allen JD, BarlowWE, Duncan RP et al. NIH Consens State Sci Statements. National Institutes of Health, 2010, 1-31.
34. Vernon SW, Bartholomew LK, McQueen A et al. A randomized controlled trial of a tailored interactive computer-delivered intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening: sometimes more is just the same. Ann Behav Med 2011; 41: 284-99.
35. Cooper CP, Gelb CA, Jameson H et al. Developing English and Spanish television public service announcements to promote colorectal cancer screening. Health Prom Pract 2005; 6: 385.
36. American Cancer Society. If You're 50 orOlder, You Need to Get Tested for Colon Cancer. No Matter How Good Your Excuse Is, 2005, American Cancer Society, Inc. Publ. No. 2432.00.
37. Champion VL. Instrument refinement for breast cancer screening behaviors. Nurs Res 1993; 42: 139-43.
38. Champion VL, Scott CR. Reliability and validity of breast cancer screening belief scales in African American women. Nurs Res 1997; 46: 331-7.
39. Kreuter MW, Strecher VJ. Changing inaccurate perceptions of health risk: results from a randomized trial. Health Psychol 1995; 14: 56-63.
40. Rawl S, Champion VL, Menon U et al. Validation of scales to measure benefits and barriers to colorectal cancer screening. J Psychosoc Oncol 2001; 19: 47-63.
41. MenonU, ChampionVL, LarkinGNet al. Beliefs associated with fecal occult blood test and colonoscopy use at aworksite colon cancer screening program. J Occupat Environ Med 2003; 45: 891-8.
42. Hochberg Y. A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 1988; 75: 800.
43. Weinstein ND. Testing four competing theories of health-protective behavior. Health Psychol 1993; 12: 324-33.
44. Janz NK, Becker MH. The health belief model: a decade later. Health Edu Quart 1984; 11: 1-47.
45. Champion VL, Skinner CS. The health belief model. Health Behav Health Edu Theor Res Pract 2008; 3: 45-62.
46. Janz NK, Wren PA, Schottenfeld D et al. Colorectal cancer screening attitudes and behavior: a population-based study. Prev Med 2003; 37: 627-34.
47. Manne S, Markowitz A,Winawer S et al. Correlates of colorectal cancer screening compliance and stage of adoption among siblings of individuals with early onset colorectal cancer. Health Psychol 2002; 21: 3-15.
48. Codori AM, Petersen GM, Miglioretti DL et al. Health beliefs and endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer: potential for cancer prevention. PrevMed 2001; 33: 128-36.
49. Gwede CK, William CM, Thomas KB et al. Exploring disparities and variability in perceptions and self-reported colorectal cancer screening among three ethnic subgroups of US. blacks. Oncol Nurs Forum 2010; 37: 581-91.
50. Cronan TA, Devos-Comby L, Villalta I et al. Ethnic differences in colorectal cancer screening. J Psychosoc Oncol 2008; 26: 63-86.
51. Lipkus IM, Lyna PR, Rimer BK. Colorectal cancer risk perceptions and screening intentions in a minority population. JAMA 2000; 92: 492-500.
52. Gerrard M, Gibbons FX, Reis-Bergan M. The effect of risk communication on risk perceptions: the significance of individual differences. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1999; 25: 94-100.
53. Rawl SM, Menon U, Champion VL et al. Do benefits and barriers differ by stage of adoption for colorectal cancer screening? Health Edu Res 2005.
54. Vernon SW. Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997; 89: 1406-22.
55. Greiner KA, Born W, Nollen N et al. Knowledge and perceptions of colorectal cancer screening among urban African Americans. J Gen Int Med 2005; 20: 977-83.
56. Green PM, Kelly BA. Colorectal cancer knowledge, perceptions, and behaviors in African Americans. Cancer Nurs 2004; 27: 206-15; quiz 216-7.
57. McAlearney AS, Reeves KW, Dickinson SL et al. Racial differences in colorectal cancer screening practices and knowledge within a low-income population. Cancer 2008; 112: 391-8.
58. Maxwell AE, Bastani R, Crespi CM et al. Behavioralmediators of colorectal cancer screening in a randomized controlled intervention trial. Prev Med 2011; 52: 167-73.
59. Jerant A, Sohler N, Fiscella K et al. Tailored interactive multimedia computer programs to reduce health disparities: opportunities and challenges. Patient Edu Counsel 2011; 85: 323-30.