An empirical evaluation of two-stage species tree inference strategies using a multilocus dataset from North American pines

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Degiorgio, Michael ^a   Syring, John ^b   Eckert, Andrew J ^c,d   Liston, Aaron ^e   Cronn, Richard ^f   Neale, David B ^c   Rosenberg, Noah A ^g  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LINFIELD COLLEGE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^g STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS; COALESCENCE; CONIFEROUS TREE; DATA SET; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION METHOD; GENE FLOW; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; TAXONOMY;

NORTH AMERICA;

PLANT DNA;

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; GENETICS; MULTILOCUS SEQUENCE TYPING; PHYLOGENY; PINE; UNITED STATES;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DNA, PLANT; MULTILOCUS SEQUENCE TYPING; PHYLOGENY; PINUS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84899669558     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-14-67     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Species trees from highly incongruent gene trees in rice. Cranston KA, Hurwitz B, Ware D, Stein L, Wing RA, Syst Biol 2009 58 489 500 10.1093/sysbio/syp054 20525603
2. Resolving conflict in eutherian mammal phylogeny using phylogenomics and the multispecies coalescent model. Song S, Liu L, Edwards SV, Wu S, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012 109 14942 14947 10.1073/pnas.1211733109 22930817
3. A phylogeny of birds based on over 1,500 loci collected by target enrichment and high-throughput sequencing. McCormack JE, Harvey MG, Faircloth BC, Crawford NG, Glenn TC, Brumfield RT, PLoS One 2013 8 54848 10.1371/journal.pone.0054848 23382987
4. Inferring ancient divergences requires genes with strong phylogenetic signals. Salichos L, Rokas A, Nature 2013 497 327 331 10.1038/nature12130 23657258
5. Phylogenetic inference using whole genomes. Rannala B, Yang Z, Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2008 9 217 231 10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164407 18767964
6. Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference and the multispecies coalescent. Degnan JH, Rosenberg NA, Trends Ecol Evol 2009 24 332 340 10.1016/j.tree.2009.01.009 19307040
7. Inconsistency of phylogenetic estimates from concatenated data under coalescence. Kubatko LS, Degnan JH, Syst Biol 2007 56 17 24 10.1080/ 10635150601146041 17366134
8. Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees. Degnan JH, Rosenberg NA, PLoS Genet 2006 2 68 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020068 16733550 (Pubitemid 43794324)
9. Properties of consensus methods for estimating species trees from gene trees. Degnan JH, DeGiorgio M, Bryant D, Rosenberg NA, Syst Biol 2009 58 35 54 10.1093/sysbio/syp008 20525567
10. The performance of matrix representation with parsimony for inferring species from gene trees. Wang Y, Degnan JH, Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2011 10 21
11. Consistency properties of species tree inference by minimizing deep coalescences. Than CV, Rosenberg NA, J Comput Biol 2011 18 1 15 10.1089/cmb.2010.0102 21210728
12. A classification of consensus methods for phylogenies. Bryant D, BioConsensus Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society Press, Janowitz M, Lapointe FJ, McMorris FR, Mirkin B, Roberts FS, 2003 163 183 DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science
13. Inferring species phylogenies from multiple genes: Concatenated sequence tree versus consensus gene tree. Gadagkar SR, Rosenberg MS, Kumar S, J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 2005 304 64 74 15593277 (Pubitemid 40346325)
14. What is the danger of the anomaly zone for empirical phylogenetics? Huang H, Knowles LL, Syst Biol 2009 58 527 536 10.1093/sysbio/syp047 20525606
15. Robustness to divergence time underestimation when inferring species trees from estimated gene trees. DeGiorgio M, Degnan JH, Syst Biol 2014 63 66 82 10.1093/sysbio/syt059 23988674
16. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Rokas A, Williams BL, King N, Carroll SB, Nature 2003 425 798 804 10.1038/nature02053 14574403 (Pubitemid 37355944)
17. Bayesian estimation of concordance factors. Ané C, Larget B, Baum DA, Smith SD, Rokas A, Mol Biol Evol 2007 24 412 426 17095535
18. Species trees from gene trees: reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions. Liu L, Pearl DK, Syst Biol 2007 56 504 514 10.1080/10635150701429982 17562474
19. BEST: Bayesian estimation of species trees under the coalescent model. Liu L, Bioinformatics 2008 24 2542 2543 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn484 18799483
20. Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Heled J, Drummond AJ, Mol Biol Evol 2010 27 570 580 10.1093/molbev/msp274 19906793
21. Estimating species phylogenies using coalescence times among sequences. Liu L, Yu L, Pearl DK, Edwards SV, Syst Biol 2009 58 468 477 10.1093/sysbio/syp031 20525601
22. Fast and consistent estimation of species trees using supermatrix rooted triples. DeGiorgio M, Degnan JH, Mol Biol Evol 2010 27 552 569 10.1093/molbev/msp250 19833741
23. Maximum tree: a consistent estimator of the species tree. Liu L, Yu L, Pearl DK, J Math Biol 2010 60 95 106 10.1007/s00285-009-0260-0 19283383
24. A maximum pseudo-likelihood approach for estimating species trees under the coalescent. Liu L, Yu L, Edwards SV, BMC Evo Biol 2010 10 302
25. Incomplete lineage sorting: consistent phylogeny estimation from multiple loci. Mossel E, Roch S, IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 2010 7 166 171
26. Improvements to a class of distance matrix methods for inferring species trees from gene trees. Helmkamp LJ, Jewett EM, Rosenberg NA, J Comput Biol 2012 19 632 649 10.1089/cmb.2012.0042 22697239
27. iGLASS: an improvement to the GLASS method for estimating species trees from gene trees. Jewett EM, Rosenberg NA, J Comput Biol 2012 19 293 315 10.1089/cmb.2011.0231 22216756
28. Sources of error inherent in species-tree estimation: impact of mutational and coalescent effects on accuracy and implications for choosing among different methods. Huang H, He Q, Kubatko LS, Knowles LL, Syst Biol 2010 59 573 583 10.1093/sysbio/syq047 20833951
29. Comparing two Bayesian methods for gene tree/species tree reconstruction: simulations with incomplete lineage sorting and horizontal gene transfer. Chung Y, Ané C, Syst Biol 2011 60 261 275 10.1093/sysbio/syr003 21368324
30. The accuracy of species tree estimation under simulation: a comparison of methods. Leaché AD, Rannala B, Syst Biol 2011 60 126 137 10.1093/sysbio/syq073 21088009
31. An experimental study of Quartets MaxCut and other supertree methods. Swenson MS, Suri R, Linder CR, Warnow T, Algorithms Mol Biol 2011 6 7 10.1186/1748-7188-6-7 21504600
32. Fast and accurate methods for phylogenomic analyses. Yang J, Warnow T, BMC Bioinformatics 2011 12 Suppl9 4
33. Speciational history of Australian grass finches (Poephila) inferred from thirty gene trees. Jennings WB, Edwards SV, Evolution 2005 59 2033 2047 16261740 (Pubitemid 41384386)
34. Comparison of species tree methods for reconstructing the phylogeny of bearded manakins (Aves: Pipridae, Manacus) from multilocus sequence data. Brumfield RT, Liu L, Lum DE, Edwards SV, Syst Biol 2008 57 719 731 10.1080/10635150802422290 18853359
35. Integrating phylogenetic and population genetic analyses of multiple loci to test species divergence hypotheses in Passerina buntings. Carling MD, Brumfield RT, Genetics 2008 178 363 377 10.1534/genetics.107.076422 18202379 (Pubitemid 351398753)
36. Estimating species trees using multiple-allele DNA sequence data. Liu L, Pearl DK, Brumfield RT, Edwards SV, Evolution 2008 62 2080 2091 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00414.x 18462214 (Pubitemid 352033253)
37. Estimating species phylogeny from gene-tree probabilities despite incomplete lineage sorting: an example from Melanoplus grasshoppers. Carstens BC, Knowles LL, Syst Biol 2007 56 400 411 10.1080/10635150701405560 17520504 (Pubitemid 46826903)
38. Comparison of methods for species-tree inference in the sawfly genus Neodiprion (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae). Linnen CR, Farrell BD, Syst Biol 2008 57 876 890 10.1080/10635150802580949 19085330
39. Multiple nuclear and mitochondrial genes resolve the branching order of a rapid radiation of crested newts (Triturus, Salamandridae). Espregueira Themudo G, Wielstra B, Arntzen JW, Mol Phylogenet Evol 2009 52 321 328 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.03.024 19348957
40. Comparative performance of supertree algorithms in large data sets using the soapberry family (Sapindaceae) as a case study. Buerki S, Forest F, Salamin N, Alvarez N, Syst Biol 2011 60 32 44 10.1093/sysbio/syq057 21068445
41. Empirical tests of the reliability of phylogenetic trees constructed with microsatellite DNA. Takezaki N, Nei M, Genetics 2008 178 385 392 10.1534/genetics.107.081505 18202381 (Pubitemid 351398755)
42. Rapid and accurate species tree estimation for phylogenetic investigations using replicated subsampling. Hird S, Kubatko L, Carstens B, Mol Phylogenet Evol 2010 57 888 898 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.08.006 20727977
43. Multilocus phylogenetics of a rapid radiation in the genus Thomomys (Rodentia: Geomyidae). Belfiore NM, Liu L, Moritz C, Syst Biol 2008 57 294 310 10.1080/10635150802044011 18432550
44. Inferring species-level phylogenies and taxonomic distinctiveness using multilocus data in Sistrus rattlesnakes. Kubatko LS, Gibbs HL, Bloomquist EW, Syst Biol 2011 60 393 409 10.1093/sysbio/syr011 21389297
45. Hidden likelihood support in genomic data: can forty-five wrongs make a right? Gatesy J, Baker RH, Syst Biol 2005 54 483 492 10.1080/10635150590945368 16012113 (Pubitemid 41040446)
46. High-resolution species trees without concatenation. Edwards SV, Liu L, Pearl DK, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007 104 5936 5941 10.1073/pnas.0607004104 17392434 (Pubitemid 47175637)
47. Widespread genealogical nonmonophyly in species of Pinus subgenus Strobus. Syring J, Farrell K, Businský R, Cronn R, Liston A, Syst Biol 2007 56 163 181 10.1080/10635150701258787 17454973 (Pubitemid 46474674)
48. Trans-species shared polymorphisms at orthologous nuclear gene loci among distant species in the conifer Picea (Pinaceae): implications for the long-term maintenance of genetic diversity in trees. Bouillé M, Bousquet J, Am J Bot 2005 92 63 73 10.3732/ajb.92.1.63 21652385 (Pubitemid 40113108)
49. Genetic structure and evolutionary history of a diploid hybrid pine Pinus densata inferred from the nucleotide variation at seven gene loci. Ma XF, Szmidt AE, Wang XR, Mol Biol Evol 2006 23 807 816 10.1093/molbev/msj100 16446291
50. Reticulate evolution and incomplete lineage sorting among the ponderosa pines. Willyard A, Cronn R, Liston A, Mol Phylogenet Evol 2009 52 498 511 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.02.011 19249377
51. Genomic diversity in forest trees. Savolainen O, Pyhäjärvi T, Curr Opin Plant Biol 2007 10 162 167 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.01.011 17292660 (Pubitemid 46330113)
52. Pinus. Kral R, Flora of North America (North of Mexico) New York: Oxford University Press, Flora of North America editorial committee F, Flora of North America editorial committee F, 1993 373 398
53. Perry JP, The Pines of Mexico and Central America Portland: Timber Press 1991
54. Evolutionary relationships among Pinus (Pinaceae) subsections inferred from multiple low-copy nuclear loci. Syring J, Willyard A, Cronn R, Liston A, Am J Bot 2005 92 2086 2100 10.3732/ajb.92.12.2086 21646125 (Pubitemid 43203935)
55. Patterns of population structure and environmental associations to aridity across the range of Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L., Pinaceae). Eckert AJ, van Heerwaarden J, Wegrzyn JL, Nelson CD, Ross-Ibarra J, González- Martínez SC, Neale DB, Genetics 2010 185 969 982 10.1534/genetics.110. 115543 20439779
56. PineSAP-sequence alignment and SNP identification pipeline. Wegrzyn JL, Lee JM, Liechty J, Neale DB, Bioinformatics 2009 25 2609 2610 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp477 19667082
57. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P, Genome Res 1998 8 175 185 10.1101/gr.8.3.175 9521921 (Pubitemid 28177229)
58. Heterogeneity detector: finding heterogeneous positions in Phred/Phrap assemblies. Lee WH, Vega VB, Bioinformatics 2004 20 2863 2864 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth301 15130927 (Pubitemid 39530182)
59. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. Edgar RC, BMC Bioinformatics 2004 5 113 10.1186/1471-2105-5-113 15318951 (Pubitemid 40195393)
60. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Edgar RC, Nucleic Acids Res 2004 32 1792 1797 10.1093/nar/gkh340 15034147 (Pubitemid 38832724)
61. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Ewing B, Green P, Genome Res 1998 8 186 194 9521922 (Pubitemid 28177230)
62. Increasing phylogenetic resolution at low taxonomic levels using massively parallel sequencing of chloroplast genomes. Parks M, Cronn R, Liston A, BMC Biol 2009 7 84 10.1186/1741-7007-7-84 19954512
63. Felsenstein J, Inferring Phylogenies Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates 2004
64. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Felsenstein J, Evolution 1985 39 783 791 10.2307/2408678
65. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ, An Introduction to the Bootstrap New York: Chapman and Hall 1993
66. Swofford DL, PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis Using Parsimony (* and Other Methods). Version 4 Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates 2003
67. The supermatrix approach to systematics. de Queiroz A, Gatesy J, Trends Ecol Evol 2007 22 34 41 10.1016/j.tree.2006.10.002 17046100 (Pubitemid 44959174)
68. Rooted triple consensus and anomalous gene trees. Ewing GB, Ebersberger I, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, BMC Evol Biol 2008 8 118 18439266
69. Gene trees in species trees. Maddison WP, Syst Biol 1997 46 523 536 10.1093/sysbio/46.3.523
70. Species tree inference by minimizing deep coalescences. Than C, Nakhleh L, PLoS Comput Biol 2009 5 1000501 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000501 19749978
71. Modified mincut supertrees. Page RDM, Algorithms in Bioinformatics, Second International Workshop, WABI, 2002, Rome, Italy, September 17-21, 2002, Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 2452) Berlin: Springer, Guigó R, Gusfield D, 2002 537 552
72. Quartet puzzling: a quartet maximum-likelihood method for reconstructing tree topologies. Strimmer K, von Haeseler A, Mol Biol Evol 1996 13 964 969 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025664 (Pubitemid 26284912)
73. Comparison of phylogenetic trees. Robinson DR, Foulds LR, Math Biosci 1981 53 131 147 10.1016/0025-5564(81)90043-2 (Pubitemid 11129084)
74. Dryden IL, Mardia KV, Statistical Shape Analysis Chichester: Wiley 1998
75. Cox TF, Cox MAA, Multidimensional Scaling, 2nd edition Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall 2001
76. Gower JC, Dijksterhuis GB, Procrustes Problems New York: Oxford University Press 2004
77. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Ward JH, J Am Stat Assoc 1963 58 236 244 10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845
78. "Good" and "bad" phenograms. Sackin MJ, Syst Zool 1972 21 225 226 10.2307/2412292
79. Phylogenetics, the theory and practice of phylogenetic systematics (book review). Colless DH, Syst Zool 1982 31 100 104 10.2307/2413420
80. Tree balance. Shao KT, Sokal RR, Syst Zool 1990 39 266 276 10.2307/2992186
81. Searching for evolutionary patterns in the shape of a phylogenetic tree. Kirkpatrick M, Slatkin M, Evolution 1993 47 1171 1181 10.2307/2409983
82. A worldwide survey of haplotype variation and linkage disequilibrium in the human genome. Conrad DF, Jakobsson M, Coop G, Wen X, Wall JD, Rosenberg NA, Pritchard JK, Nat Genet 2006 38 1251 1260 10.1038/ng1911 17057719 (Pubitemid 44646287)
83. Mathematical properties of the deep coalescence cost. Than CV, Rosenberg NA, IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Biosci 2013 10 61 72
84. Critchfield WB, Little EL Jr, Geographic Distribution of the Pines of the World Washington, DC: USDA Forest Service Miscellaneous Publication 991 1966
85. Coalescent methods for estimating phylogenetic trees. Liu L, Yu L, Kubatko L, Pearl DK, Edwards SV, Mol Phylogenet Evol 2009 53 320 328 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.05.033 19501178
86. Knowles LL, Kubatko LS, Estimating Species Trees: Practical and Theoretical Aspects Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell 2010
87. Multiple nuclear loci reveal the distinctiveness of the threatened neotropical pine Pinus chiapensis. Syring J, del Castillo RF, Cronn R, Liston A, Syst Bot 2007 32 703 717 10.1600/036364407783390836
88. STEM: species tree estimation using maximum likelihood for gene trees under coalescence. Kubatko LS, Carstens BC, Knowles LL, Bioinformatics 2009 25 971 973 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp079 19211573
89. Estimating species trees from unrooted gene trees. Liu L, Yu L, Syst Biol 2012 60 661 667
90. Coalescent-based species tree inference from gene tree topologies under incomplete lineage sorting by maximum likelihood. Wu Y, Evolution 2012 66 763 775 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01476.x 22380439
91. Maximum likelihood estimates of species trees: how accuracy of phylogenetic inference depends upon the divergence history and sampling design. McCormack JE, Huang H, Knowles LL, Syst Biol 2009 58 501 508 10.1093/sysbio/syp045 20525604
92. Accuracy and precision of species trees: effects of locus, individual, and base pair sampling on inference of species trees in lizards of the Liolaemus darwinii group (Squamata, Liolaemidae). Camargo A, Avila LJ, Morando M, Sites JW Jr, Syst Biol 2012 61 272 288 10.1093/sysbio/syr105 22076301
93. State-of the art methodologies dictate new standards for phylogenetic analysis. Anisimova M, Liberles DA, Philippe H, Provan J, Pupko T, von Haeseler A, BMC Evol Biol 2013 13 161 23914788