Evolutionary relationships among Pinus (Pinaceae) subsections inferred from multiple low-copy nuclear loci

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 92, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 2086-2100

  Syring, John ^a   Willyard, Ann ^a   Cronn, Richard ^b   Liston, Aaron ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Incongruence; Nuclear genes; Phylogeny; Pinaceae; Pinus

Indexed keywords

CONIFEROUS TREE; EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY;

CONIFEROPHYTA; PARRYA; PINACEAE; PINUS CONTORTA; PINUS KREMPFII; PINUS NELSONII;

EID: 32144438168     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: 00029122     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.92.12.2086     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. ÁLVAREZ, I., R. C. CRONN, AND J. F. WENDEL. 2005. Phylogeny of the New World diploid cottons (Gossypium L., Malvaceae) based on sequences of three low-copy nuclear genes. Plant Systematics and Evolution 252: 199-214.
2. ÁLVAREZ, I., AND J. F. WENDEL. 2003. Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29: 417-34.
3. BOUILLÉ, M., AND J. BOUSQUET. 2005. Trans-species shared polymorphisms at orthologous nuclear gene loci among distant species in the conifer Picea (Pinaceae): implications for the long-term maintenance of genetic diversity in trees. American Journal of Botany 92: 63-73.
4. BROWN, G. R., E. E. KADEL III, D. L. BASSONI, K. L. KIEHNE, B. TEMESGEN, J. P. VAN BUIJTENEN, M. M. SEWELL, K. A. MARSHALL, AND D. B. NEALE. 2001. Anchored reference loci in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) for integrating pine genomics. Genetics 159: 799-809.
5. BROWN, G. R., G. P. GILL, R. J. KUNTZ, C. H. LANGLEY, AND D. B. NEALE. 2004. Nucleotide diversity and linkage disequilibrium in loblolly pine. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101: 15255-15260.
6. BULL, J. J., J. P. HUELSENBECK, C. W. CUNNINGHAM, D. L. SWOFFORD, AND P. J. WADDELL. 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42: 384-397.
7. CAMPBELL, C. S., W. A. WRIGHT, M. COX, T. F. VINING, C. S. MAJOR, AND M. P. ARSENAULT. 2005. Nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) in Picea (Pinaceae): sequence divergence and structure. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 35: 165-185.
8. CHAW, S. M., A. ZHARKIKH, H. M. SUNG, T. C. LAU, AND W. H. LI. 1997. Molecular phylogeny of extant gymnosperms and seed plant evolution: analysis of nuclear 18S rRNA sequences. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 56-68.
9. CHEE, P. W., M. LAVIN, AND L. E. TALBERT. 1995. Molecular analysis of evolutionary patterns in U genome wild wheats. Genome 38: 290-297.
10. CHEN, J., C. G. TAUER, AND Y. HUANG. 2002. Nucleotide sequences of the internal transcribed spacers and 5.8S region of nuclear ribosomal DNA in Pinus taeda L. and Pinus echinata Mill. DNA Sequence 13: 129-131.
11. CLEGG, M. T., B. S. GAUT, G. H. LEARN JR., AND B. R. MORTON. 1994. Rates and patterns of chloroplast DNA evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 91: 6795-6801.
12. CRITCHFIELD, W. B. 1986. Hybridization and classification of the white pines (Pinus section Strobus). Taxon 35: 647-656.
13. CRONN, R. C., R. L. SMALL, T. HASELKORN, AND J. F. WENDEL. 2002. Rapid diversification of the cotton genus (Gossypium: Malvaceae) revealed by analysis of sixteen nuclear and chloroplast genes. American Journal of Botany 89: 707-725.
14. CRONN, R. C., R. L. SMALL, T. HASELKORN, AND J. F. WENDEL. 2003. Cryptic repeated genomic recombination during speciation in Gossypium gossypioides. Evolution 57: 2475-2489.
15. CUNNINGHAM, C. W. 1997. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 733-740.
16. DEVEY, M. E., S. D. CARSON, M. F. NOLAN, A. C. MATHESON, C. TERIINI, AND J. HOHEPA. 2004. QTL associations for density and diameter in Pinus radiata and the potential for marker-aided selection. Theoretical Applied Genetics 108: 516-524.
17. DON, R. H., P. T. COX, B. J. WAINWRIGHT, K. BAKER, AND J. S. MATTICK. 1991. 'Touchdown' PCR to circumvent spurious priming during gene amplification. Nucleic Acids Research 19: 4008.
18. DVORAK, W. S., A. P. JORDAN, G. P. HODGE, AND J. L. ROMERO. 2000. Assessing evolutionary relationships of pines in the Oocarpae and Australes subsections using RAPD markers. New Forests 20: 163-192.
19. EISEN, J. A., AND C. M. FRASER. 2003. Phylogenomics: intersection of evolution and genomics. Science 300: 1706-1707.
20. FARJON, A. 1990. A bibliography of conifers. Regnum Vegetabile 122. Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein, Germany.
21. FARJON, A. 1998. World checklist and bibliography of conifers. Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.
22. FARRIS, J. S., M. KÄLLERSJÖ, A. G. KLUGE, AND C. BULT. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
23. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
24. FRIESEN, N., A. BRANDES, AND J. S. HESLOP-HARRISON. 2001. Diversity, origin, and distribution of retrotransposons (gypsy and copia) in conifers. Molecular Biology and Evolution 18: 1176-1188.
25. FULTON, T. M., R. VAN DER HOEVEN, N. T. EANNETTA, AND S. D. TANKSLEY. 2002. Identification, analysis, and utilization of conserved ortholog set markers for comparative genomics in higher plants. Plant Cell 14: 1457-1467.
26. GARRETT, P. W. 1979. Species hybridization in the genus Pinus. USDA Forest Service Research Paper NE-436. USDA. Forest Service Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Broomall, Pennsylvania, USA.
27. GEADA LÓPEZ, G., K. KAMIYA, AND K. HARADA. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of diploxylon pines (subgenus Pinus) based on plastid sequence data. International Journal of Plant Sciences 163: 737-747.
28. GERMANO, J., AND A. S. KLEIN. 1999. Using species-specific nuclear and chloroplast single nucleotide polymorphisms to distinguish between Picea glauca, P. mariana, and P. rubens from single needle samples. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 99: 37-49.
29. GERNANDT, D. S., A. LISTON, AND D. PIÑERO. 2001. Variation in the nrDNA ITS of Pinus subsection Cembroides: implications for molecular systematic studies of pine species complexes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 21: 449-467.
30. GERNANDT, D. S., A. LISTON, AND D. PIÑERO. 2003. Phylogenetics of Pinus subsections Cembroides and Nelsoniae inferred from cpDNA sequences. Systematic Botany 4: 657-673.
31. GERNANDT, D. S., G. GEADA LÓPEZ, S. O. GARCÍA, AND A. LISTON. 2005. Phylogeny and classification of Pinus. Taxon 54: 29-42.
32. GROTKOPP, E., M. REJMANEK, M. J. SANDERSON, AND T. L. ROST. 2004. Evolution of genome size in pines (Pinus) and its life-history correlates: supertree analyses. Evolution 58: 1705-1729.
33. HALL, T. A. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95-98.
34. HARRIS, E. E., AND T. R. DISOTELL. 1998. Nuclear gene trees and the phylogenetic relationships of the mangabeys (Primates: Papionini). Molecular Biology and Evolution 15: 892-900.
35. HART, J. A. 1987. A cladistic analysis of conifers: preliminary results. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 68: 269-307.
36. HIPP, A. L., J. C. HALL, AND K. SYTSMA. 2004. Congruence versus phylogenetic accuracy: revisiting the incongruence length difference test. Systematic Biology 53: 81-89.
37. HUELSENBECK, J. P., J. J. BULL, AND C. W. CUNNINGHAM. 1996. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 152-158.
38. IGLESIAS, R. G., AND M. J. BABIANO. 1999. Isolation and characterization of a cDNA encoding a late-embryogenesis-abundant protein (Accession No. AJ012483) from Pseudotsuga menziesii seeds. Plant Physiology 119: 806.
39. JANSSON, S., AND P. GUSTAFSSON. 1990. Type I and Type II genes for the chlorophyll a/b-binding protein in the gymnosperm Pinus sylvestris (Scots pine): cDNA cloning and sequence analysis. Plant Molecular Biology 14: 287-296.
40. JOHNSON, L. A., AND D. E. SOLTIS. 1998. Assessing congruence: empirical examples from molecular data. In D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle [eds.], Molecular systematics of plants II: DNA sequencing, 297-348. Kluwer, Norwell, Massachusetts, USA.
41. KARALAMANGALA, R. R., AND D. L. NICKRENT. 1989. An electrophoretic study of representatives of subgenus Diploxylon of Pinus. Canadian Journal of Botany 67: 1750-1759.
42. KINLAW, C. S., AND D. B. NEALE. 1997. Complex gene families in pine genomes. Trends in Plant Science 2: 356-359.
43. KRUPKIN, A. B., A. LISTON, AND S. H. STRAUSS. 1996. Phylogenetic analysis of the hard pines (Pinus subgenus Pinus, Pinaceae) from chloroplast DNA restriction site analysis. American Journal of Botany 83: 489-498.
44. KRUTOVSKY, K. V., M. TROGGIO, G. R. BROWN, K. D. JERMSTAD, AND D. B. NEALE. 2004. Comparative mapping in the Pinaceae. Genetics 168: 447-461.
45. KUMAR, S., K. TAMURA, I. B. JAKOBSEN, AND M. NEI. 2001. MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software. Bioinformatics 17: 1244-1245.
46. KUSUMI, J., Y. TSUMURA, H. YOSHIMARU, AND H. TACHIDA. 2002. Molecular evolution of nuclear genes in Cupressaceae, a group of conifer trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19: 736-747.
47. LE MAITRE, D. C. 1998. Pines in cultivation: a global view. In D. M. Richardson [ed.], Ecology and biogeography of Pinus, 407-431. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA.
48. LISTON, A., W. A. ROBINSON, D. PIÑERO, AND E. R. ALVAREZ-BUYLLA. 1999. Phylogenetics of Pinus (Pinaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer region sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 11: 95-109.
49. LISTON, A., D. S. GERNANDT, T. F. VINING, C. S. CAMPBELL, AND D. PIÑERO. 2003. Molecular phylogeny of Pinaceae and Pinus. Acta Horticulturae 615: 107-114.
50. LITTLE, E. L. JR., AND F. I. RIGHTER. 1965. Botanical descriptions of forty artificial pine hybrids. USDA Forest Service Technical Bulletin 1345. USDA Forest Service, Washington, D.C., USA.
51. MALCOMBER, S. T. 2002. Phylogeny of Gaertnera Lam. (Rubiaceae) based on multiple DNA markers: evidence of rapid radiation in a widespread, morphologically diverse genus. Evolution 56: 42-57.
52. MIYAMOTO, M. M. 1996. A congruence study of molecular and morphological data for Eutherian mammals. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 6: 373-390.
53. NKONGOLO, K. K., P. MICHAEL, AND W. S. GRATTON. 2002. Identification and characterization of RAPD markers inferring genetic relationships among pine species. Genome 45: 51-58.
54. POLLOCK, D. D., D. J. ZWICKL, J. S. MCGUIRE, AND D. M. HILLIS. 2002. Increased taxon sampling is advantageous for phylogenetic inference. Systematic Biology 51: 664-671.
55. POSADA, D., AND K. A. CRANDALL. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
56. PRICE, R. A., A. LISTON, AND S. H. STRAUSS. 1998. Phylogeny and systematics of Pinus. In D. M. Richardson [ed.], Ecology and biogeography of Pinus, 49-68. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA.
57. RICE, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223-225.
58. RICHARDSON, D. M., AND P. W. RUNDEL. 1998. Ecology and biogeography of Pinus: an introduction. In D. M. Richardson [ed.], Ecology and biogeography of Pinus, 3-46. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA.
59. ROKAS, A., B. L. WILLIAMS, N. KING, AND S. B. CARROLL. 2003. Genome scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425: 798-804.
60. ROSENBERG, M. S., AND S. KUMAR. 2001. Incomplete taxon sampling is not a problem for phylogenetic inference. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98: 10751-10756.
61. SANDERSON, M. J., AND H. B. SHAFFER. 2002. Troubleshooting molecular phylogenetic analyses. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 49-72.
62. SHAW, J., E. B. LICKEY, J. T. BECK, S. B. FARMER, W. LIU, J. MILLER, K. C. SIRIPUN, C. T. WINDER, E. E. SCHILLING, AND R. L. SMALL. 2005. The tortoise and the hare II: relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. Americn Journal of Botany 92: 142-166.
63. SHOWALTER, A. M. 2001. Arabinogalactan-proteins: structure, expression, and function. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 58: 1399-1417.
64. SMALL, R. L., R. C. CRONN, AND J. F. WENDEL. 2004. Use of nuclear genes for phylogeny reconstruction in plants. Australian Systematic Botany 17: 145-170.
65. SPRINGER, M. S., R. W. DEBRY, C. DOUADY, H. M. AMRINE, O. MADSEN, W. W. DE JONG, AND M. J. STANHOPE. 2001. Mitochondrial versus nuclear gene sequences in deep-level mammalian phylogeny reconstruction. Molecular Biology and Evolution 18: 132-143.
66. STRAUSS, S. H., AND A. H. DOERKSEN. 1990. Restriction fragment analysis of pine phylogeny. Evolution 44: 1081-1096.
67. SUCHARD, M. A., C. M. R. KITCHEN, J. S. SINSHEIMER, AND R. E. WEISS. 2003. Hierarchical phylogenetic models for analyzing multipartite sequence data. Systematic Biology 52: 649-664.
68. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods, version 4.0b10). Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
69. TAKEZAKI, N., F. FIGUEROA, Z. ZALESKA-RUTCZYNSKA, N. TAKAHATA, AND J. KLEIN. 2004. The phylogenetic relationship of tetrapod, coelacanth, and lungfish revealed by the sequences of forty-four nuclear genes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21: 1512-1524.
70. TEMESGEN, B., G. R. BROWN, D. E. HARRY, C. S. KINLAW, M. M. SEWELL, AND D. B. NEALE. 2001. Genetic mapping of expressed sequence tag polymorphism (ESTP) markers in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda). Theoretical Applied Genetics 102: 664-675.
71. TEMPLETON, A. R. 1983. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and the apes. Evolution 37: 221-244.
72. WANG, X. R., Y. TSUMURA, H. YOSHIMARU, K. NAGASAKA, AND A. E. SZMIDT. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships of Eurasian pines (Pinus, Pinaceae) based on chloroplast rbcL, matK, rpl20-rps18 spacer, and trnV intron sequences. American Journal of Botany 86: 1742-1753.
73. WANG, X. R., A. E. SZMIDT, AND H. N. NGUYEN. 2000a. The phylogenetic position of the endemic flat-needle pine Pinus krempfii (Pinaceae) from Vietnam, based on PCR-RFLP analysis of chloroplast DNA. Plant Systematics and Evolution 220: 21-36.
74. WANG, X. Q., D. C. TANK, AND T. SANG. 2000b. Phylogeny and divergence times in Pinaceae: evidence from three genomes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17: 773-781.
75. WENDEL, J. F., AND J. J. DOYLE. 1998. Phylogenetic incongruence: window into genome history and molecular evolution. In D. Soltis, P. Soltis, and J. Doyle [eds.], Molecular systematics of plants II, 265-296. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
76. WU, J., K. V. KRUTOVSKII, AND S. H. STRAUSS. 1999. Nuclear DNA diversity, population differentiation, and phylogenetic relationships in the California closed-cone pines based on RAPD and allozyme markers. Genome 42: 893-908.
77. YANG, Z. 1998. On the best evolutionary rate for phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 47: 125-133.
78. YODER, A. D., J. A. IRWIN, AND B. A. PAYSEUR. 2001. Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for slow loris phylogeny. Systematic Biology 50: 408-424.
79. ZHANG, X. H., AND V. L. CHIANG. 1997. Molecular cloning of 4-coumarate: coenzyme A ligase in loblolly pine and the roles of this enzyme in the biosynthesis of lignin in compression wood. Plant Physiology 113: 65-74.
80. ZHANG, Y., G. BROWN, R. WHETTEN, C. A. LOOPSTRA, D. B. NEALE, M. J. KIELISZEWSKI, AND R. R. SEDEROFF. 2003. An arabinogalactan protein associated with secondary cell wall formation in differentiating xylem of loblolly pine. Plant Molecular Biology 52: 91-102.
81. ZHANG, Z. Y., AND D. Z. LI. 2004. Molecular phylogeny of section Parrya of Pinus (Pinaceae) based on chloroplast matK gene sequence data. Acta Botanica Sinica 46: 171-179.