Improvements to a class of distance matrix methods for inferring species trees from gene trees

Journal of Computational Biology

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 632-649

  Helmkamp, Laura J ^a   Jewett, Ethan M ^b   Rosenberg, Noah A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

algorithms; coalescence; phylogenetic trees

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; GENE LOCUS; PHYLOGENY; SAMPLE SIZE; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ALGORITHMS; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETIC LOCI; GENETIC SPECIATION; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; SAMPLE SIZE;

EID: 84862556870     PISSN: 10665277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0042     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Degnan, J.H., and Rosenberg, N.A. 2009. Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference and the multispecies coalescent. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 332-340.
2. Degnan, J.H., and Rosenberg, N.A. 2006. Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees. PLoS Genet. 2, 762-768.
3. Ewing, G.B., Ebersberger, I., von Haeseler, A., et al. 2008. Rooted triple consensus and anomalous gene trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 8, 118.
4. Felsenstein, J. 2004. Inferring Phylogenies. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
5. Gordon, A.D. 1996. Hierarchical clustering, 65-121. In Arabie, P., Hubert, L.J., and De Soete, G. eds. Clustering and Classification. World Scientific, River Edge, NJ.
6. Jewett, E.M., and Rosenberg, N.A. 2012. iGLASS: An improvement to the GLASS method for estimating species trees from gene trees. J. Comput. Biol. 19, 293-315.
7. Kubatko, L.S., Carstens, B.C., and Knowles, L.L. 2009. STEM: species tree estimation using maximum likelihood for gene trees under coalescence. Bioinformatics 25, 971-973.
8. Kulkarni, V.G. 2010. Modeling and Analysis of Stochastic Systems, 2nd ed. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
9. Liu, L., Yu, L., and Pearl, D.K. 2010. Maximum tree: a consistent estimator of the species tree. J. Math. Biol. 60, 95-106.
10. Liu, L., Yu, L., Pearl, D.K., et al. 2009. Estimating species phylogenies using coalescence times among sequences. Syst. Biol. 58, 468-477.
11. Maddison, W.P. 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 46, 523-536.
12. Maddison, W.P., and Knowles, L.L. 2006. Inferring phylogeny despite incomplete lineage sorting. Syst. Biol. 55, 21-30.
13. Meng, C., and Kubatko, L.S. 2009. Detecting hybrid speciation in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting using gene tree incongruence: a model. Theor. Popul. Biol. 75, 35-45.
14. Mossel, E., and Roch, S. 2010. Incomplete lineage sorting: consistent phylogeny estimation from multiple loci. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 7, 166-171.
15. Ross, S.M. 2007. Introduction to Probability Models, 9th ed. Academic Press, New York.
16. Sokal, R.R., and Michener, C.D. 1958. A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. 38, 1409-1438.
17. Takahata, N. 1989. Gene genealogy in three related populations: consistent probability between gene and population trees. Genetics 122, 957-966.
18. Than, C., and Nakhleh, L. 2009. Species tree inference by minimizing deep coalescences. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000501.
19. Yang, J., and Warnow, T. 2011. Fast and accurate methods for phylogenomic analyses. BMC Bioinform. 12, S4.