Staffing for Success: Linking Teacher Evaluation and School Personnel Management in Practice

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 207-227

  Master, Benjamin ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

educational policy; leadership; principals; school teacher effectiveness; teacher assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899649553     PISSN: 01623737     EISSN: 19351062     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0162373713506552     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Angrist J.,Pathak P.,Walters C.Explaining charter school effectiveness. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2011:.
2. Ballou D.Teacher contracts in Massachusetts. Boston, MA: Pioneer Institute for Public Policy; 2000:.
3. Balu R.,Beteille T.,Loeb S.Examining teacher turnover: The role of school leadership.Politique Americaine. 2010;3:55-79.
4. Boyd D.,Lankford H.,Loeb S.,Wyckoff J.Teacher layoffs: An empirical illustration of seniority v. measures of effectiveness.Education. 2011;6:439-454.
5. Chingos M.,West M. R.Promotion and reassignment in public school districts: How do schools respond to differences in teacher effectiveness?.Economics of Education Review. 2011;30:419-433.
6. Danielson C.Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development; 2007:.
7. Dobbie W.,Fryer R.Getting beneath the veil of effective schools: Evidence from New York City. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2011:.
8. Fryer R.Creating "no excuses" (traditional) public schools: Preliminary evidence from an experiment in Houston. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2011:.
9. Gallagher H. A.Vaughn elementary's innovative teacher evaluation system: Are teacher evaluation scores related to growth in student achievement?.Peabody Journal of Education. 2004;79:79-107.
10. Hamre B. K.,Pianta R. C.Can instructional and emotional support in the first grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure?.Child Development. 2005;76:949-967.
11. HarrisD. N.SassT. R. (2009). What makes for a good teacher and who can tell? (CALDER Working Paper). Washington, DC: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research. Retrieved from http://www.caldercenter.org/upload/CALDER-Working-Paper-30_FINAL.pdf.
12. Hausman C.,Nebeker A.,McCreary J.,Donaldson G.The work life of the assistant principal.Journal of Educational Administration. 2002;40:136-157.
13. Heneman H. G.,Milanowski A.,Kimball S. M.,Odden A.Standards-based teacher evaluation as a foundation for knowledge- and skill-based pay. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Consortium for Policy Research in Education; 2006:.
14. Hess F. M.,Loup C.The leadership limbo: Teacher labor agreements in America's fifty largest school districts. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute; 2008:.
15. Holtzapple E.Criterion-related validity evidence for a standards-based teacher evaluation system.Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education. 2003;17:207-219.
16. Jackson C. K.,Bruegmann E.Teaching students and teaching each other: The importance of peer learning for teachers.American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. 2009;1:85-108.
17. Jacob B. A.Do principals fire the worst teachers?. Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2010:.
18. Jacob B. A.,Lefgren L.Can principals identify effective teachers? Evidence on subjective performance evaluation in education.Journal of Labor Economics. 2008;26:101-136.
19. Jacob B. A.,Walsh E.What's in a rating?.Economics of Education Review. 2011;30:434-448.
20. Kane T. J.,Staiger D. O.Gathering feedback for teaching: Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains. Seattle, WA: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; 2012:.
21. Kane T. J.,Taylor E. S.,Tyler J. H.,Wooten A. L.Identifying effective classroom practices using student achievement data.Journal of Human Resources. 2011;46:587-613.
22. Milanowski A. T.The relationship between teacher performance evaluation scores and student achievement: Evidence from Cincinnati.Peabody Journal of Education. 2004;79:33-53.
23. Price M.Teacher union contracts and high school reform. Center on Reinventing Public Education, University of Washington; 2009:.
24. Rockoff J. E.,Speroni C.Subjective and objective evaluations of teacher effectiveness: Evidence from New York City.Labour Economics. 2011;18:687-696.
25. Rockoff J. E.,Staiger D. O.,Kane T. K.,Taylor E. S.Information and employee evaluation: Evidence from a randomized intervention in public schools.American Economic Review. 2012;102:3184-3213.
26. Ronfeldt M.,Lankford H.,Loeb S.,Wyckoff J.How teacher turnover harms student achievement.American Educational Research Journal. 2013;50:4-36.
27. Stoughton E. H.How will I get them to behave? Preservice teachers reflect on classroom management.Teaching and Teacher Education. 2007;23:1024-1137.
28. Taylor E. S.,Tyler J. H.The effect of evaluation on performance: Evidence from longitudinal student achievement data of mid-career teachers. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2011:.
29. Weisberg D.,Sexton S.,Mulhern J.,Keeling D.The widget effect.Education Digest. 2009;75:31-35.