Generation and characterization of induced pluripotent stem cells from aid-deficient mice

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2014, Pages

  Shimamoto, Ren ^a   Amano, Naoki ^a   Ichisaka, Tomoko ^a   Watanabe, Akira ^a   Yamanaka, Shinya ^a,b   Okita, Keisuke ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b GLADSTONE INSTITUTE OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATION INDUCED CYTIDINE DEAMINASE; CELL DNA; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; KRUPPEL LIKE FACTOR 4; MYC PROTEIN; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 4; ORGANIC CATION TRANSPORTER 3; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR NANOG; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SOX2; AICDA (ACTIVATION-INDUCED CYTIDINE DEAMINASE); CYTIDINE DEAMINASE;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; B LYMPHOCYTE; CELL ACTIVITY; CELL MATURATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL RENEWAL; CHIMERA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA METHYLATION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME DEFICIENCY; FEMALE; FIBROBLAST; KNOCKOUT MOUSE; MALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PROTEIN DNA INTERACTION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; ANIMAL; ANIMAL EMBRYO; C57BL MOUSE; CYTOLOGY; DEFICIENCY; GENETICS; METABOLISM;

ANIMALS; CYTIDINE DEAMINASE; DNA METHYLATION; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; FIBROBLASTS; INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; MICE, INBRED C57BL;

EID: 84899546318     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094735     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S (2006) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126: 663-676. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024. (Pubitemid 44233629)
2. Okita K, Ichisaka T, Yamanaka S (2007) Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 448: 313-318. doi:10.1038/nature05934.
3. Wernig M, Meissner A, Foreman R, Brambrink T, Ku M, et al. (2007) In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. Nature 448: 318-324. doi:10.1038/nature05944. (Pubitemid 47080337)
4. Koche RP, Smith ZD, Adli M, Gu H, Ku M, et al. (2011) Reprogramming factor expression initiates widespread targeted chromatin remodeling. Cell Stem Cell 8: 96-105. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2010.12.001.
5. Maherali N, Sridharan R, Xie W, Utikal J, Eminli S, et al. (2007) Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. Cell Stem Cell 1: 55-70. doi:10.1016/j.stem. 2007.05.014.
6. Mikkelsen TS, Hanna J, Zhang X, Ku M, Wernig M, et al. (2008) Dissecting direct reprogramming through integrative genomic analysis. Nature 454: 49-55. doi:10.1038/nature07056. (Pubitemid 351931978)
7. Polo JM, Anderssen E, Walsh RM, Schwarz BA, Nefzger CM, et al. (2012) A molecular roadmap of reprogramming somatic cells into iPS cells. Cell 151: 1617-1632. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.11.039.
8. Pawlak M, Jaenisch R (2011) De novo DNA methylation by Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b is dispensable for nuclear reprogramming of somatic cells to a pluripotent state. Genes Dev 25: 1035-1040. doi:10.1101/gad.2039011.
9. Bhutani N, Burns DM, Blau HM (2011) DNA demethylation dynamics. Cell 146: 866-872. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.042.
10. Rai K, Huggins IJ, James SR, Karpf AR, Jones DA, et al. (2008) DNA demethylation in zebrafish involves the coupling of a deaminase, a glycosylase, and gadd45. Cell 135: 1201-1212. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.11.042.
11. Petersen-Mahrt SK, Harris RS, Neuberger MS (2002) AID mutates E. coli suggesting a DNA deamination mechanism for antibody diversification: 99-103. doi:10.1038/nature00849.1.
12. Muramatsu M, Kinoshita K, Fagarasan S, Yamada S, Shinkai Y, et al. (2000) Class switch recombination and hypermutation require activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), a potential RNA editing enzyme. Cell 102: 553-563.
13. Revy P, Muto T, Levy Y, Geissmann F, Plebani A, et al. (2000) Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) deficiency causes the autosomal recessive form of the Hyper-IgM syndrome (HIGM2). Cell 102: 565-575.
14. Popp C, Dean W, Feng S, Cokus SJ, Andrews S, et al. (2010) Genome-wide erasure of DNA methylation in mouse primordial germ cells is affected by AID deficiency. Nature 463: 1101-1105. doi:10.1038/nature08829.
15. Bhutani N, Brady JJ, Damian M, Sacco A, Corbel SY, et al. (2010) Reprogramming towards pluripotency requires AID-dependent DNA demethylation. Nature 463: 1042-1047. doi:10.1038/nature08752.
16. Guo JU, Su Y, Zhong C, Ming G, Song H (2011) Hydroxylation of 5-Methylcytosine by TET1 Promotes Active DNA Demethylation in the Adult Brain. Cell 145: 423-434. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.022.
17. Stadtfeld M, Maherali N, Breault DT, Hochedlinger K (2008) Defining molecular cornerstones during fibroblast to iPS cell reprogramming in mouse. Cell Stem Cell 2: 230-240. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2008.02.001.
18. Brambrink T, Foreman R, Welstead GG, Lengner CJ, Wernig M, et al. (2008) Sequential expression of pluripotency markers during direct reprogramming of mouse somatic cells. Cell Stem Cell 2: 151-159. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2008.01.004. (Pubitemid 351168714)
19. Bhutani N, Decker MN, Brady JJ, Bussat RT, Burns DM, et al. (2013) A critical role for AID in the initiation of reprogramming to induced pluripotent stem cells. FASEB J 27: 1107-1113. doi:10.1096/fj.12-222125.
20. Oka K, Kobayashi K, Sullivan M, Martinez J, Teng BB, et al. (1997) Tissue-specific inhibition of apolipoprotein B mRNA editing in the liver by adenovirus-mediated transfer of a dominant negative mutant APOBEC-1 leads to increased low density lipoprotein in mice. J Biol Chem 272: 1456-1460. (Pubitemid 27043221)
21. Nakagawa M, Koyanagi M, Tanabe K, Takahashi K, Ichisaka T, et al. (2008) Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells without Myc from mouse and human fibroblasts. Nat Biotechnol 26: 101-106. doi:10.1038/nbt1374.
22. Yamaguchi S, Kimura H, Tada M, Nakatsuji N, Tada T (2005) Nanog expression in mouse germ cell development. Gene Expr Patterns 5: 639-646. doi:10.1016/j.modgep.2005.03.001. (Pubitemid 40796609)
23. Jeong K-S, Lee S (2005) Estimating the total mouse DNA methylation according to the B1 repetitive elements. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 335: 1211-1216. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.08.015. (Pubitemid 41215546)
24. Hollenbach PW, Nguyen AN, Brady H, Williams M, Ning Y, et al. (2010) A comparison of azacitidine and decitabine activities in acute myeloid leukemia cell lines. PLoS One 5: e9001. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009001.
25. Mandal PK, Kazazian HH (2008) SnapShot: Vertebrate transposons. Cell 135: 192-192.e1. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.028.
26. Serre D, Lee BH, Ting AH (2010) MBD-isolated Genome Sequencing provides a high-throughput and comprehensive survey of DNA methylation in the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 391-399. doi:10.1093/nar/gkp992.
27. Zhang Y, Liu T,Meyer CA, Eeckhoute J, Johnson DS, et al. (2008) Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol 9: R137. doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137.
28. Nair SS, Coolen MW, Stirzaker C, Song JZ, Statham AL, et al. (2011) Comparison of methyl-DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) and methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) protein capture for genome-wide DNA methylation analysis reveal CpG sequence coverage bias. Epigenetics 6: 34-44. doi:10.4161/epi.6.1.13313.
29. Habib O, Habib G, Moon S-H, Do JT, Chung H-M (2013) AID-coupled DNA Demethylation is Not Crucial for the Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Stem Cells Dev: 1-43. doi:10.1089/scd.2013.0337.
30. Kumar R, DiMenna L, Schrode N, Liu T-C, Franck P, et al. (2013) AID stabilizes stem-cell phenotype by removing epigenetic memory of pluripotency genes. Nature 500: 89-92. doi:10.1038/nature12299.
31. Fritz EL, Rosenberg BR, Lay K, Mihailović A, Tuschl T, et al. (2013) A comprehensive analysis of the effects of the deaminase AID on the transcriptome and methylome of activated B cells. Nat Immunol 14: 749-755. doi:10.1038/ni.2616.
32. Hogenbirk MA, Heideman MR, Velds A, van den Berk PCM, Kerkhoven RM, et al. (2013) Differential programming of B cells in AID deficient mice. PLoS One 8: e69815. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0069815.
33. Okazaki I, Hiai H, Kakazu N, Yamada S, Muramatsu M, et al. (2003) Constitutive expression of AID leads to tumorigenesis. J Exp Med 197: 1173-1181. doi:10.1084/jem.20030275. (Pubitemid 36570072)
34. Basu U, Chaudhuri J, Alpert C, Dutt S, Ranganath S, et al. (2005) The AID antibody diversification enzyme is regulated by protein kinase A phosphorylation. Nature 438: 508-511. doi:10.1038/nature04255. (Pubitemid 41742023)
35. Pasqualucci L, Kitaura Y, Gu H, Dalla-Favera R (2006) PKA-mediated phosphorylation regulates the function of activation-induced deaminase (AID) in B cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 395-400. doi:10.1073/pnas.0509969103. (Pubitemid 43122412)
36. Ito S, Nagaoka H, Shinkura R, Begum N, Muramatsu M, et al. (2004) Activation-induced cytidine deaminase shuttles between nucleus and cytoplasm like apolipoprotein B mRNA editing catalytic polypeptide 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 1975-1980. doi:10.1073/pnas.0307335101. (Pubitemid 38229000)
37. Rada C, Jarvis JM, Milstein C (2002) AID-GFP chimeric protein increases hypermutation of Ig genes with no evidence of nuclear localization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 7003-7008. doi:10.1073/pnas.092160999. (Pubitemid 34526247)
38. Meissner A, Mikkelsen TS, Gu H, Wernig M, Hanna J, et al. (2008) Genome-scale DNA methylation maps of pluripotent and differentiated cells. Nature 454: 766-770. doi:10.1038/nature07107.
39. Cedar H, Bergman Y (2009) Linking DNA methylation and histone modification: patterns and paradigms. Nat Rev Genet 10: 295-304. doi:10.1038/nrg2540.
40. Onder TT, Kara N, Cherry A, Sinha AU, Zhu N, et al. (2012) Chromatin-modifying enzymes as modulators of reprogramming. Nature 483: 598-602. doi:10.1038/nature10953.
41. Luo M, Ling T, Xie W, Sun H, Zhou Y, et al. (2013) NuRD blocks reprogramming of mouse somatic cells into pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells 31: 1278-1286. doi:10.1002/stem.1374.
42. Mansour AA, Gafni O, Weinberger L, Zviran A, Ayyash M, et al. (2012) The H3K27 demethylase Utx regulates somatic and germ cell epigenetic reprogramming. Nature 488: 409-413. doi:10.1038/nature11272.
43. Doege CA, Inoue K, Yamashita T, Rhee DB, Travis S, et al. (2012) Early-stage epigenetic modification during somatic cell reprogramming by Parp1 and Tet2. Nature 488: 652-655. doi:10.1038/nature11333.
44. Pasqualucci L, Neumeister P, Goossens T, Nanjangud G, Chaganti RS, et al. (2001) Hypermutation of multiple proto-oncogenes in B-cell diffuse large-cell lymphomas. Nature 412: 341-346. doi:10.1038/35085588. (Pubitemid 32691848)
45. Robbiani DF, Bothmer A, Callen E, Reina-San-Martin B, Dorsett Y, et al. (2008) AID is required for the chromosomal breaks in c-myc that lead to c-myc/IgH translocations. Cell 135: 1028-1038. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.062.
46. Liu M, Duke JL, Richter DJ, Vinuesa CG, Goodnow CC, et al. (2008) Two levels of protection for the B cell genome during somatic hypermutation. Nature 451: 841-845. doi:10.1038/nature06547. (Pubitemid 351253166)
47. Gore A, Li Z, Fung H-L, Young JE, Agarwal S, et al. (2011) Somatic coding mutations in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 471: 63-67. doi:10.1038/nature09805.
48. Hussein SM, Batada NN, Vuoristo S, Ching RW, Autio R, et al. (2011) Copy number variation and selection during reprogramming to pluripotency. Nature 471: 58-62. doi:10.1038/nature09871.
49. Young MA, Larson DE, Sun C-W, George DR, Ding L, et al. (2012) Background mutations in parental cells account for most of the genetic heterogeneity of induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 10: 570-582. doi:10.1016/j.stem. 2012.03.002.
50. Takahashi K, Okita K, Nakagawa M, Yamanaka S (2007) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from fibroblast cultures. Nat Protoc 2: 3081-3089. doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.418.
51. Meiner VL, Cases S, Myers HM, Sande ER, Bellosta S, et al. (1996) Disruption of the acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase gene in mice: evidence suggesting multiple cholesterol esterification enzymes in mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci US A 93: 14041-14046. (Pubitemid 26424243)
52. Nakanishi T, Kuroiwa A, Yamada S, Isotani A, Yamashita A, et al. (2002) FISH Analysis of 142 EGFP Transgene Integration Sites into the Mouse Genome. Genomics 80: 564-574. doi:10.1006/geno.2002.7008. (Pubitemid 36062644)
53. Gassmann M, Donoho G, Berg P (1995) Maintenance of an extrachromosomal plasmid vector in mouse embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92: 1292-1296.
54. Morita S, Kojima T, Kitamura T (2000) Plat-E: an efficient and stable system for transient packaging of retroviruses. Gene Ther 7: 1063-1066. doi:10.1038/sj.gt.3301206. (Pubitemid 30398356)
55. Nakamura M, Kondo S, Sugai M, Nazarea M, Imamura S, et al. (1996) High frequency class switching of an IgM+ B lymphoma clone CH12F3 to IgA+ cells. Int Immunol 8: 193-201. (Pubitemid 26049771)
56. Eminli S, Foudi A, Stadtfeld M, Maherali N, Ahfeldt T (n.d.) Differentiation stage determines reprogramming potential of hematopoietic cells into iPS cells. doi:10.1038/ng.428.
57. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, et al. (2007) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131: 861-872. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019. (Pubitemid 350138099)
58. Hogart A, Lichtenberg J, Ajay SS, Anderson S, Margulies EH, et al. (2012) Genome-wide DNA methylation profiles in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells reveal overrepresentation of ETS transcription factor binding sites. Genome Res 22: 1407-1418. doi:10.1101/gr.132878.111.
59. Quinlan AR, Hall IM (2010) BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26: 841-842. doi:10.1093/ bioinformatics/btq033.